2006-11-28
Madam Speaker Aagaard took the Chair at 10 am.
Madam SPEAKER: Honourable members, I have received from His Honour the Administrator message No 14 notifying assent to bills passed in the October 2006 sittings of the Assembly.
Madam SPEAKER: Honourable members, I advise of the presence in the gallery of students from Years 3 to 6 from Wugularr School, accompanied by Rosemary Murray, and Years 5 to 8 students from Maningrida CSC, accompanied by Shannon Alexander and Pamela Hepburn. On behalf of honourable members, I extend to you a very warm welcome.
Members: Hear, hear!
The CLERK: Madam Speaker, pursuant to Standing Order 100A, I advise honourable members a response to petition No 47 has been received and circulated to honourable members.
Response
Dr BURNS (Police, Fire and Emergency Services): Madam Speaker, I report to the House on progress made by this government on rebuilding the Northern Territory Police Force. This government is proud of its commitment to the Northern Territory Police Force. We have provided our police with record funding through our $75m plan to rebuild the Northern Territory Police Force.
Since 2001, this has resulted in the NT Police, Fire and Emergency Services budget increasing by 55%. We have also seen record rates of police recruitment which is set to deliver an extra 200 police on the beat by the end of the year. For those who somehow perceive that this is not enough, I remind them of the shameful fact revealed …
Members interjecting.
Madam SPEAKER: Order!
Dr BURNS: I remind them of the shameful fact revealed in the O’Sullivan Report, particularly in the early 1990s. Under the CLP administration, the Territory Police Force went three years without a single constable recruit.
In an ideal world, the rate of recruitment should equal the rate of officers leaving the force. In the last three financial years, the rate of recruitment into the Northern Territory police has been double the rate of officers leaving. I pay tribute to my predecessor as Police minister, the member for Wanguri, whose determination to upgrade both the police force and the number of our police is now paying rich dividends.
Earlier this month, I had great pleasure in attending the graduation of police Recruit Squad 86 - my first as Police minister - and welcoming another 24 constables into the Northern Territory Police Force. Members of Recruit Squad 86 survived a tough recruitment selection process and an even more demanding and challenging training course.
I particularly acknowledge Constable Mark Berry, who was awarded the Rod Evans Memorial Trophy for the highest academic achievement; Constable Boyd McMahon, who won the Commissioner’s Trophy for overall performance; Constable Clinton Richardson from Darwin, who won the Physical Training Trophy; and Constable Peter Brown from Alice Springs, who was awarded the Glen Huitson Trophy for most consistent application in all areas of training throughout the recruit training course. They and their fellow graduates are a credit to themselves, their families and the staff of the police training college.
I was particularly pleased to see the member for Araluen at the graduation ceremony. She would have noticed that 50 trainees from Recruit Squad 87 and Recruit Squad 88 took part in the graduation ceremony. Recruit Squad 88 commenced two weeks ago. In all, there are currently 77 recruits at various stages of their training.
The Northern Territory government’s commitment to building and supporting its police force is absolutely clear and unwavering. As growth in police strength continues this year, so too does the growth in facilities such as the police post at Mutitjulu commissioned last month as part of a joint federal/Territory agreement. As well as the two ACPOs at Mutitjulu, we have also stationed an extra constable at Yulara to provide additional support to the community. Meanwhile, we are rolling out mobile police stations in Darwin, Alice Springs, and soon in Katherine. There are also new vehicles for Aboriginal Community Police Officers, and new policing equipment such as the rigid hull inflatable boat which I helped to launch last week.
The dedicated Police Traffic Branch, which was scrapped by the CLP in 1991, will be reformed next month in Alice Springs and Darwin, in time for the Christmas road safety campaign. We are also creating highway patrols to operate out of Katherine and Alice Springs, and forming the remote area traffic patrols to provide coverage throughout the Territory – all this building on other initiatives which followed the 2003 O’Sullivan Report into police resources.
Madam Speaker, we have a fantastic police force whose professionalism and dedication has resulted in significant reduction in crime over the past few years, particularly property crime. I am very proud to be the Police minister in this exciting time in our force’s history.
Ms CARNEY (Opposition Leader): Madam Speaker, how nice it is to be back in parliament, hearing the dulcet tones of the minister. The dulcet tones of the minister do not get him away from the truth. The truth is that the member for Wanguri lost the job as Police minister because he was so bad at it. I note with interest that there has been so much written about the leadership – or the Chief Minister’s lack of it - in recent times. I thought the article on crikey.com was best. I note with great interest that the author has described the minister for Police as a Chief Ministerial supporter. I note the irony then, that he paid tribute to the former Police minister. One wonders what is going on behind the scenes of the Labor caucus and within Labor caucus ...
Mr Henderson: Get on with the report!
Ms CARNEY The aspiring Chief Minister on the other side wants to have a go – and how Territorians are missing hearing from him!
Back to police. Has the Chief Minister read the Police Association’s media release of 10 November in which it is stated:
In comments made prior to this release, the minister failed to mention – and he still fails to mention – the fact that more than 209 police officers have left the force since July 2003. Mr Vince Kelly went on and said that the government’s position is now apparently that there would be an extra 200 police personnel by 2007, and not necessarily police on the beat.
We now know, of course, that so many of them will be dedicated to traffic duties, sitting somewhere between Darwin and Alice Springs on the highway, pinging people for exceeding 130 km/h. Police minister …
Mr Henderson: They will not be breathalysed …
Ms CARNEY: … if you want to do better than the last fellow in the job you now have, you had better start telling the truth, for which he is not well known.
Mrs BRAHAM (Braitling): Madam Speaker, we all know the demands made on our police are enormous. As we pass legislation in this House, more and more are made, so less and less police are seen doing the things that we would like to see them doing; that is, be on the beat on the street.
Too many police, in my opinion, are caught up on non-operational duties. I mention something like Neighbourhood Watch. I realise these Neighbourhood Watch people are at the end of their career, but why should this particular job be taken up by the police? There is a lot of time police have to spend reporting these days. Sometimes, with domestic or family violence, police sent out spend hours writing reports. That needs to be streamlined. We need to have a system where we do not tie up police on doing administrative matters rather than doing things that we want to do. Minister, I ask you to, perhaps, address that.
Regarding the vacancies in remote communities at senior levels; we are all aware that it is not an attractive job. Forced transfers are, obviously, not acceptable to the police union. I suggest that you need to put in some type of incentive to cover the remote centres where we have them. I also suggest that you need to have more Aboriginal Community Police Officers trained. They do a remarkable job; they should get that.
I wondered why you did not, when you had the graduation ceremony, invite the members to the barracks – and I am talking, of course, of the member for Nelson. Why are people on this side not being invited to functions that are in their electorate? Too often, this particular government has said: ‘No, you are not getting invited’. We find that the member whose electorate the barracks are in has lost that opportunity to meet with the people he is representing. I ask the government to put this right. Do not be petty. If something is happening in an electorate, the local member, no matter who they are, should be invited.
Madam SPEAKER: Member for Braitling, your time has expired.
Dr BURNS (Police, Fire and Emergency Services): Madam Speaker, I thank the member for Braitling for her comments. I did not organise the graduation, but I will feed that information on. I believe that all members should be invited to such functions. Regarding streamlining processes, I am always interested in streamlining processes, and I will pass your comments on to the Police Commissioner.
The member for Araluen, she did everything; she threw the dust in the air - everything to avoid the real issue which was the freeze on police recruiting during the 1990s, and this government’s successful efforts in rebuilding our police force.
Regarding Mr Vince Kelly’s comments about 209 police officers leaving the police force - wrong, wrong, wrong! I believe Mr Kelly got his figures from the Government Gazette. How he can string together 209 police from …
Ms Carney: Stop talking down the police.
Dr BURNS: … the Government Gazette, I do not know. The fact is that our recruitment is double our attrition. We are on target to make that extra 200 police officers. The community knows …
Ms Carney: No, you are not, you slippery …
Madam SPEAKER: Order, Leader of the Opposition!
Dr BURNS: … they see those police out on the beat …
Madam SPEAKER: Please pause, minister. Leader of the Opposition, I ask you to withdraw that comment.
Ms CARNEY: Slippery, Madam Speaker?
Madam SPEAKER: Indeed.
Ms CARNEY: I withdraw the comment, Madam Speaker.
Madam SPEAKER: Thank you, Leader of the Opposition. Have you finished, minister?
Dr BURNS: Yes, Madam Speaker.
Ms Carney interjecting.
Madam SPEAKER: Leader of the Opposition, I would appreciate you not making comments like that when I have asked you to withdraw.
Ms SCRYMGOUR (Natural Resources, Environment and Heritage): Madam Speaker, one month ago, on 28 October, I listed five new sites across the Territory as heritage places. These sites represent the enormous diversity of our history and heritage here in the Territory - history that tells the story of the Northern Territory and makes it what it is today.
One is the declaration of a Milkwood tree not more than 0.5 km from where we are now, on the corner of Foelsche and Wood Streets. Astonishingly - especially for such an urbanised area as Darwin - this tree is a remnant of the original vegetation of the Darwin Peninsula, and has been standing there since before European arrival in 1869, an entirely unlikely possibility for any other jurisdiction in the nation. It is a wonderful example, along with the redevelopment of Old Admiralty House as a restaurant that I reported on last month, of the history of old Darwin being represented in a meaningful way in our modern development, and contributing to today’s lifestyle.
Two of the sites declared last month represent aspects of our colonial past: the church site at Warruwi and the town markers from the site of a town - Virginia - that has never been built.
The church at Warruwi on South Goulburn Island was built by the Methodist Mission between 1925 and 1928. It is the oldest existing church in Arnhem Land, and remains a significant building in the community.
Telling another part of our colonial past are the stone survey trenches and ironwood survey pegs located in the Virginia town site, which are the only remaining physical evidence of George Woodroffe Goyder’s 1869 survey of Port Darwin and its surrounds. Goyder’s story is a remarkable one. He and his team surveyed 270 000 ha in eight months from Port Darwin to south of Adelaide River and west beyond the Finniss River. The survey also included the town sites of Palmerston - now called Darwin, of course - Southport, Virginia and Daly. The survey defined the capital of South Australia’s new northern province of the Northern Territory and laid the foundation of modern Darwin. To be able to preserve some of the original survey trenches and markers helps tell the story of Darwin’s beginnings.
Another of the sites I declared last month is the crash site of the B24 Bomber, Nothing Sacred, and is another piece in the jigsaw of World War II history. The remains of the bomber, and its crash site near Hayes Creek, are tangible reminders of the air war conducted against the Japanese during World War II from Australian soil.
Finally, I also declared as heritage places sites associated with the Wave Hill walk-off and strike of 40 years ago, which represent an important episode in the nation’s history of the land rights struggle.
Earlier this year, I launched on behalf of the Chief Minister The Value and Nature of Heritage Tourism in Alice Springs: A Summary Report and Action Plan. That publication marks an important step in recognising the value of our heritage to our tourism industry and, indeed, our modern lives as Territorians.
People, both locals and tourists, are interested in our history and our heritage and want to experience it. For example, the very building we are sitting in now, Parliament House, was close to the site of the old Post Office where a number of civilians were killed on the first raids on 19 February 1942. As a modern building, it is a very long way from being a heritage site, yet, it contains the remnants of a wall of the old Post Office, as well as other memorabilia from that fateful day. It is a modern building that, nevertheless, holds memories far older than the fabric of the building itself. History and heritage can be accommodated in modern development, and development need not be compromised by the presence of historically significant sites. We have proved that time and time again here in the Territory. It is a balance which works for us here.
Madam Speaker, while we often call the Territory a ‘young’ place, of course, we know that Territorians are custodians of ancient stories that are embedded; for example, in the rock art of our region. However, the story of the Northern Territory is a continuing one, which is why we celebrate events and movements in our more recent past. Our heritage is part of our environment and I am delighted that we are able to combine our history with our development in the Northern Territory.
Mrs MILLER (Katherine): Madam Speaker, I thank the minister for her report this morning. Heritage and conserving our history is extremely important. While the Territory is not terribly old, it is important that we ensure that we do conserve as much heritage as we possibly can.
I suggest to the minister that she have a look at an area in my electorate which I believe would be quite significant for our heritage tourism; that is, Manbulloo Homestead, which has some wonderful historical old sheds and buildings on it. It also has one of the last remaining solid timber stockyards in the Northern Territory. I had a look at it last week and was impressed by the solidness of this wonderful area. It is not in huge disrepair; it is being utilised at present. It is a wonderful stockyard area, with fabulous tamarind trees that have been there for a long time and have a great amount of history. The homestead is designed in Territory style - it is a unique style with a space between the roof and the ceilings to allow air flow. It does not have any airconditioning. It is a wonderful place. It is used as a tourist park at the moment.
I have not spoken to the minister about this before, but I suggest that it is a unique area. If we are looking after the history of the Northern Territory, this does need to be looked at.
Mr WOOD (Nelson): Madam Speaker, I have to slightly disagree with the member for Katherine, I believe we actually have some very old heritage in the Northern Territory. It depends on what perspective you are coming from.
I congratulate the government on naming these five sites. I would like to make a couple of quick comments. I mentioned last time that I had a look at Old Admiralty House. I must admit that I do not think the gardens have done anything for Old Admiralty House. It is a very modern garden, almost like an architecturally designed garden by a landscaper. That old-fashioned garden was part of what Admiralty House was about. That is what made it unique, of that era. It had plants that we remember from old Darwin, and now it has manicured fig trees in pots. It might look nice but I believe we have lost something with that change.
The Virginia town site – I noticed in the Gazette that you have taken a portion of that and declared it a heritage site. I am interested to know what you are going to do with it. For the average person going to the Virginia town site, it is a piece of bush. There would need to be protection and some interpretative signage to tell people what that bit of bush is being preserved for. Whether there is a possibility of some development there, as in Southport - in other words, it is used as a housing area with the streets maintained as they were originally surveyed - that might be an option.
Making the B24 crash site a heritage site would be a great thing. I know Steve Barnes has been on to me many times, as he has you, minister. Bob Alford was working hard on that as well. It is important that it is now a heritage site. We should start looking at all our World War II airstrips. The Chief Minister, in her report about her Vision of Darwin, talked about an opportunity to maintain our unique military history. We have to be going forward now and saying that our airstrips should be heritage sites. I would hope the Strauss Airstrip is expanded to be one as well.
Ms SCRYMGOUR (Natural Resources, Environment and Heritage): Madam Speaker, I thank both members for their responses. Firstly, member for Katherine, the Heritage Advisory Council, you will be happy to know, has already started assessing with the Jawoyn the history of Manbulloo and their ties with that. That work is already currently under way. Hopefully, once they complete that work, that recommendation will come to me for heritage listing. It is certainly an important part of our history. I remember talking to people like old Lofty Bardayal who lives on the escarpment in west Arnhem, who has vast knowledge and history of that, along with the Chinese and many different players.
Member for Nelson, regarding the garden at Old Admiralty House, yes, I agree plants were removed. The whole architectural process with the garden was done with the Heritage Advisory Council, which had worked with …
Madam SPEAKER: Minister, your time has expired. Minister!
Ms SCRYMGOUR: … those people, but I would be happy to give you a briefing.
Ms LAWRIE (Planning and Lands): Madam Speaker, today I report on the Martin Labor government’s continued commitment to balance development and growing our strong Territory economy. This government has a vision for the future of Darwin, a vision we set out in creating Darwin’s future which was launched by the Chief Minister in October of this year. Our vision is one of protecting our unique Territory lifestyle with more recreation facilities for Territorians and more green, open spaces. It is about honouring our heritage, and drawing on this heritage to create unique tourism opportunities for the Territory. Our experience of World War II, totally different from the rest of Australia, is a prime example. Our vision is also about continued residential and industrial development that grows our already strong economy while protecting our environment.
One of the key initiatives of creating Darwin’s future is a forum in early 2007 to engage the community and industry on the planning issues affecting the future development of Darwin. The forum will be about exchanging ideas, discussing our way forward, and developing key themes for the future planning of our tropical city. We already conduct extensive consultation under statutory provisions of the Planning Act. This forum will be an opportunity to go beyond this, and to really pick the brains of those committed to the growth, development and future shape of Darwin. Key stakeholders in the future planning, growth and development of Darwin will be invited to the forum including representatives from local government, the urban planning and design community, property developers and representatives from community, environmental and resident action groups.
To kick-start the debate and make sure stakeholders are thinking about the key forum issues, a series of discussion papers will be developed, including papers on what is happening in planning globally, population and housing, employment, transport, the Darwin CBD, and a sustainable environment. These are important issues for our future. I am sure that there are many within the industries and the community who will seize the opportunity to engage with government on progressing them.
The forum will be a single-day event with keynote speakers on each of the key themes, followed by workshops with expert panels. Keynote speakers and panel members will be selected for their expertise and experience in urban renewal projects Australia-wide and locally. The intention is to compile results from the forum and disseminate the information to participants and the broader community. Outcomes may result in amendments to the Northern Territory Planning Scheme. Other feedback might influence existing projects being undertaken by government including, but not limited to, Myilly Point and the Stuart Park tank farm.
Planning is not a straightforward portfolio. There are probably as many views on a future Darwin town plan as there are people in Darwin. Whilst this diversity exists and is welcomed, there is one matter on which we would all agree: that Darwin will continue to develop and grow as the lifestyle capital of Australia. I look forward to hosting the planning forum in early 2007 and encourage all members of the Assembly to participate in that. I will make sure that the discussion papers are available to them and look forward to their input.
Ms CARNEY (Opposition Leader): Madam Speaker, the minister is clearly ill; I hope the minister recovers. Thank you for the report. I am sure you will be well aware that there is a view in Darwin that the glossy brochures put out by the Chief Minister a month or so ago did not go down terribly well because most people in Darwin knew of the Darwin City Council’s proposal and its vision for Darwin. Everyone knows that the Chief Minister tried desperately to gazump the Darwin City Council’s plan ...
Mr Bonson: Stop pulling Darwin down.
Ms CARNEY: Everybody knows, and if they do not, they should. Everybody knows that the relevant department and the back room people up on the fifth floor were working day and night to pump out those brochures. Everybody knows so it is a little disingenuous for the minister to now say: ‘We are going to consult and we are just caring, sharing people’. You must consult. It did not also go down well that, in the Chief Minister’s vision for Darwin - which she wants very much to look like Singapore, which is a mystery to many people, but she wants it to look like Singapore - the pictures in the glossies have to some extent, or are at risk of, being seen to pre-empt any consultation.
We note with interest that there were no costings from government. Some of these things would not be possible in the next decade or 20 years partly because there just would not be the money available for them. Some of the things are just pie-in-the-sky plans and the Chief Minister’s Darwin dreaming adventure.
In any case, we encourage people to contribute. Now that you have backed them into something of a corner, they should contribute. Clearly, this is not something the government can do by itself; it must work with the Darwin City Council. Interestingly, between the two, they cannot even do a skate park, but we wish you well with delivering those pictures on the glossies. We ask: what about Alice Springs, Tennant Creek, Katherine and everywhere else in between? What are you going to do about those spots?
Madam SPEAKER: Leader of the Opposition, your time has expired.
Mr WOOD (Nelson): Madam Speaker, I thank the minister for the report. The statement for the vision for Darwin has to be the whole of Darwin. We already have what they call the Regional Land Use Structure Plan for the Darwin area. We cannot just focus on Darwin city; we must focus on the entire harbour. That is what is missing. The government has been in for over six years now and has now brought in a vision. In that time, unfortunately, we have 33-storey buildings built boundary to boundary with no open space except for the balconies and a little space at the swimming pool.
The Chief Minister wants streetscapes with trees. We have not allowed any room for that to happen in our city. We have not allowed setbacks on public buildings. There has been an opportunity for this government to do something through the Planning Act and it has not acted. To some extent, it is too late. There is Hong Kong, as I call it, near the NT News building. You cannot tell me that that is a pretty site - all those blocks and blocks of flats there? It is ugly. I have not heard anyone say anything nice about it. That is destroying our tropical lifestyle. We should have been able to do better. In those Defence buildings on the other side of Carey Street; at least there is space and room, and it gives you a feeling you are in a tropical city. You, as the government, have allowed this overdevelopment of Darwin, and that is to our shame.
Anyone who goes through Palmerston will see the new suburb of Farrar. The roads can only take two cars. That means people then park on nature strips. Is that good planning? It is lousy planning. It is developers getting away with just using the minimum requirements instead of the government setting out maximum requirements for three cars on little roads. You might not think it is important, but it will make the streetscapes for those suburbs terrible because cars will park there. Mitchell Creek: how much effort have we tried to do to save that creek? Yet, we still see straight drains going into it; no modern concepts of environmental engineering design. There are many things. The last thing I point out is that we have ruined the centre of the harbour by allowing it to be a gravel scrape. That is where the vision was missing. It is too late now. The minister says it will cost too much money to fix it. It is sad to see that is where it has gone ...
Madam SPEAKER: Member for Nelson, your time has expired.
Ms LAWRIE (Planning and Lands): Madam Speaker, I thank the members opposite for their contribution. The shadow minister is clearly out of touch with the community of Darwin. I stood in shopping centres with the display of creating Darwin’s future, and I have to say people were overwhelmingly delighted to see it. They said it was good to see government paying attention to the future planning of Darwin and prompting public debate about what it will look like, and what components there will be. The shadow minister is clearly out of touch with the people of Darwin.
Regarding the role of the Darwin City Council, the Capital City Committee, which comprises the Northern Territory government and the Darwin City Council, has been fully briefed on the idea of this planning forum, and they will be participating partners in it. I look forward to their contribution.
In respect of the member for Nelson, all of the issues you raised will be the focus of discussion and debate at the planning forum: Darwin Harbour and the sustainable environment, how we, as a city, develop around our harbour, and what that looks like. What we allow to occur will be an important part of debate, as will be issues of CBD heights, building setbacks and streetscapes ...
Madam SPEAKER: Minister, your time has expired.
Sabah Meat Technology Centre
Mr NATT (Primary Industry and Fisheries): Madam Speaker, I report on my recent trip to Sabah for the opening of the Sabah Meat Technology Centre, and the continuing development of our relationship with the government of Sabah. It is a key priority that we diversify our markets for livestock exports to safeguard Northern Territory producers in the event of a downturn; for instance, in demand from Indonesia. Our work in Sabah is part of that diversification.
The memorandum of cooperation in place between my department and the Sabah Department of Veterinary Services and Animal Industries is the foundation stone on which the formal relationship is constructed. This memorandum defines the role of my department in relation to advice on training services, food hygiene and meat processing, and was integral to the establishment of the Sabah Meat Technology Centre.
Officers from my department have played a key role in the centre’s development by providing technical input and on-ground assistance through the memorandum of cooperation. The centre will be a model in Sabah for whole-of-supply-chain meat processing, from first-class livestock holding yards to state-of-the-art abattoir facilities and, finally, a modern retail outlet providing a selection of processed meats. Importantly, the government of Sabah is determined to develop export markets within the region for processed Halal product, and it will look to the Northern Territory for the supply of feeder and breeder stock.
I particularly acknowledge the work done by Mr Robert McFarlane from my department in assisting with the establishment of the centre. He has done a wonderful job with the establishment of the abattoir, and I know that his efforts have been appreciated by the government of Sabah.
My visit also included a tour of government livestock facilities and a private sector feed lot where many Northern Territory cattle are placed, and an inspection of the Sabah government’s Agricultural Training Centre. The work of Dr David Ffoulkes from my department, who manages our activities in Sabah, and Mr Alister Trier, Director of Pastoral Production, both of whom accompanied me to Sabah, also needs to be acknowledged.
Following my return to Darwin, Dr Ffoulkes and Mr Trier visited palm oil plantations to assess the management of imported Northern Territory cattle, and the Tawau Government Veterinary Laboratory where they were able to provide advice on the construction of a temporary holding facility for imported Territory cattle. Mr Trier also gave presentations at technical workshops held in Sarawak and Sabah with the overall aim of identifying key concepts and principles of breeder cattle management to ensure that Australian cattle imported for breeder purposes in palm oil plantations are properly cared for.
It is worth noting that the Livestock Manager from the Sawit Kinabalu Oil Palm Company attended my department’s training course on beef cattle management, and now runs breeding herds of over 5000 head of cattle in six palm oil estates for the primary purpose of reducing weed management costs. The Brahman breeders were sourced from the Northern Territory, and further imports to the company are expected over the next year to increase total cattle numbers to 10 000, which is good news for exporters.
All predictions are that Malaysia will always be a nett importer of beef and, so, by assisting in their current development, we place ourselves in a prime position to supply breeder cattle under the palm program, as well as in the long term. Through the successful training provided by my department’s Livestock Export Development program, it is expected that live cattle exports of Northern Territory cattle will continue to grow to meet these expanding markets.
With this in mind, I raised the issue of extending the current memorandum of cooperation beyond the 2008 expiry date with Hon Datuk Abdul Rahim Ismail, Minister of Agriculture and Food Industry. I am pleased to say that there is goodwill from both jurisdictions for this agreement to be extended, and I look forward to developing this and entrenching our working relationships in the area.
I acknowledge the work done by my predecessor, Hon Kon Vatskalis MLA, who helped to establish a solid working relationship with the Sabah government and put in place industry development arrangements for the two jurisdictions to share information and skills. Minister Vatskalis and the staff of my Department of Primary Industry, Fisheries and Mines laid the groundwork for what is becoming an important emerging export avenue for the Territory’s cattle industry.
Madam SPEAKER: The time for ministerial reports has expired.
Reports noted pursuant to standing orders.
LEGAL PROFESSION BILL
(Serial 75)
Continued from 19 October 2006.
Ms CARNEY (Opposition Leader): Madam Speaker, I can indicate to the Attorney-General - and should have done so earlier, my apologies - that we will be supporting the bill. No surprises there, I guess. I note again that people from the Law Society have graced us with their presence - welcome. This is, indeed, a significant day and, as we all know, this the biggest act in the Northern Territory’s history.
It is big for a number of reasons. It is not as though the issues contained in this legislation affect just the Northern Territory’s legal profession. They are issues that affect, and have affected, the profession around this country for many years. This bill does not have its genesis in the Northern Territory. Its genesis comes from, I believe it was SCAG in around 2001, although suggestions for a model or uniform bill have been kicking around for probably close to a decade or so. So, no surprise, Madam Speaker, that the bill has been introduced. We welcome it.
For my part, I would like to see a model Criminal Code come before us with similar speed. I note that the previous Attorney-General and I had discussions, both formal and informal, about the model Criminal Code, and I wish that that would pick up pace.
In relation to this very large bill, which a lawyer friend of mine in Alice Springs described as the best doorstop he has ever seen, I make a number of comments. I would like the Attorney-General to respond to these points in his reply. I am closely watching him move seats, and I am hoping that he will take some notes, because they are important questions. Some of them have been put to me by solicitors around the Northern Territory. That lawyers around the Northern Territory have not been falling over themselves to talk about this bill would not come as a surprise.
My take on it is that very few lawyers have actually read it from cover to cover. No surprises there as well. However, the relatively small group of legal practitioners who have - and some of them have had a long-standing interest in this area - have raised several issues with me. I should say, for the sake of the Parliamentary Record, a few weeks ago I spoke with Barbara Bradshaw about some of those matters, and I thank her for her assistance. I should also say that, on balance, the Law Society of the Northern Territory is supportive of this bill.
I am yet to find perfect legislation and, no doubt, a bill of this size will have difficulties in years from now, I am sure. That should not surprise any of us, given not only the length of this bill - I believe it has nearly 700 clauses - but also because of some of the issues that are involved.
My first question - and I hope the Attorney-General will answer this: what sort of education has been provided to the legal profession about this bill? Has it been simply a letter enclosing the bill and asking for comments, or has there been - and if there has not, will there be - after this bill passes, everything from information sheets to seminars commenced by the Department of Justice to assist the legal profession gets its collective head around this bill? I know that some lawyers are concerned. They have told me that they are not fussed about it because they figure that all will become clear in due course. I ask the Attorney-General whether he, as the Territory’s first law officer, will undertake to assist our very busy legal profession with understanding and getting their collective heads around the bill? That is important.
One other issue that came to me was the concern expressed as a result of clause 290 of the act; that is, the restriction on advertising in relation to personal injuries claims. The Attorney-General should know - his predecessor did - that there remains widespread dissatisfaction with tort law reform in this jurisdiction and, indeed, around the country. I note that all state and territory governments joined with the Commonwealth some time after the 11 September attacks. I believe I am on record at the time as saying that it amounted to something of a knee-jerk response to embark on a comprehensive tort law reform package which saw, inter alia, the capping of damages in a number of respects ...
Mr Stirling: Enabling small business to get insurance cover. What a dreadful thing to do.
Ms CARNEY: Madam Speaker, the Attorney-General has, for reasons unknown, not only got out of his seat, which is fine, but he is having a chat on the way around. If the Attorney-General does not know that there is dissatisfaction with tort law reform in this jurisdiction and elsewhere, then he should get a briefing. Insurance premiums have not gone down, they have gone up, and the rights of potential litigants remain compromised and diminished as a result of governments in this country having what can only be described as a knee-jerk response to the insurance industry …
Ms Martin: Your federal mates had a knee-jerk response too, did they?
Ms CARNEY: I find it extraordinary that the Chief Minister is also having a go. She does not know anything about this. She does not know much about anything, but she certainly does not know much about this. It is …
A member: She knows more than you do.
Mr Stirling: Helen Coonan got it all wrong. Helen Coonan was wrong.
Madam SPEAKER: Order!
Ms CARNEY: It just beggars belief that they are - I cannot hear exactly what they are saying but their muttering is clearly along the lines of this is nonsense. It is not nonsense. I do not know how many practising lawyers you know, but you should get out more. You should go to the firms in Darwin and Alice Springs and ask them about their personal injuries claims. You should ask them whether they are making the same amount of money now as they were making in 2000-01 in relation to personal injuries …
Ms Martin: Oh that is what it is about: lawyers making money!
Members interjecting.
Madam SPEAKER: Order, order!
Ms CARNEY: You should also ask them how many clients they have had to turn away because the legal system has been attacked by you and your colleagues around this country, because those potential litigants do not have claims anymore - or if they do have claims, they cannot claim very much. If you think that is satisfactory, bully for you. It is not satisfactory. How can you say the Australian Labor Party is a friend of the worker …
Mr Stirling: Filling lawyers’ pockets; that is what you are on about.
Ms CARNEY: … the friend of the worker when they fall over and hurt themselves and you do not believe they should receive more than $2.50. This is an outrage, Attorney-General …
Mr Stirling: Filling lawyers’ pockets; that is the aim of the opposition.
Ms CARNEY: I am staggered beyond description!
Members interjecting.
Madam SPEAKER: Order, order!
Ms CARNEY: You just do not get it, you idiot. I will withdraw ‘idiot’, Madam Speaker.
Madam SPEAKER: Withdraw.
Ms CARNEY: Madam Speaker, this is …
Madam SPEAKER: Leader of the Opposition, will you please resume your seat.
Honourable members, I would like to make a general comment. I have been out of the Territory for six weeks amongst people who are not politicians. One of the things that people said to me while I was away was about the rude behaviour of politicians. I have to say that I do not want this to happen in this parliament today. I am in no mood; I have had a lot of treatment over a long time. I think people need to get their act together and remember that we are all elected here to represent people in our electorates. I would appreciate you behaving like adults today.
Ms CARNEY: Thank you, Madam Speaker. It beggars belief …
Mr Kiely: No hysterics.
Madam SPEAKER: Member for Sanderson, please!
Ms CARNEY: … that the Territory’s first law officer does not have his head around tort law reforms undertaken thus far - and I understand there are more in the pipeline. It is just extraordinary. In fact, as a result of his comments and those of his colleagues, divided though they are, I hope that they have been picked up on Hansard because they should be. I will send them to the Territory’s legal profession.
I know there has been concern for some recent years and that concern is growing. What sort of first law officer does the Territory now have who does not even show any understanding of the difficulties facing the profession? That is a damning indictment of the Territory’s first law officer who ought know much better …
Mr STIRLING: A point of order, Madam Speaker! I appreciate the Leader of the Opposition’s fulsome backing of lawyers who want to fill their pockets - the same lawyers who drove insurance costs through the roof so that small businesses - even small community groups - could not get insurance for their activities whether they were weavers or basket makers, or whatever they were. That was the reality that all jurisdictions were facing. I am happy to have that debated at any time. It has nothing whatsoever to do with the Legal Profession Bill before us today.
Madam SPEAKER: Deputy Chief Minister, there is no point of order. I ask you, Leader of the Opposition, to direct your comments to the bill as closely as possible.
Ms CARNEY: I will, Madam Speaker. It again shows and demonstrates to anyone listening and anyone who will, subsequently, read this Parliamentary Record, that the Attorney-General of the Northern Territory does not even know what is in this bill. The Attorney-General says references to personal injury has nothing to do with this bill. Have a look at the bill, Attorney-General; there are clauses about personal injury claims, responsibilities and obligations. My comments, in fact, have everything to do with this bill.
Again, I say that the Attorney-General should give himself a briefing on this bill and personal injuries law in the Northern Territory. If he is going to introduce, as I understand, further law reform, then the least he can do is show some level of understanding to the Territory’s legal profession. This argument or debate that is occurring generally within - and only within - the profession, is not as the Australian Labor Party would have us believe: all about lawyers costs. It is about potential claimants being deprived of claiming in response to someone else’s negligence …
Mr Stirling: That is not what you said before.
Ms CARNEY: I will not suggest to the Attorney-General that he pick up a law book, but I can say to him that the judgment of Donoghue versus Stevenson the old snail in the bottle case, is a ripper yarn. It is a good read and you should at least indulge in that one so that you can have some semblance of understanding of the law of negligence. Am I concerned as a lawyer and a politician that my fellow Territorians claims are being diminished as a result of tort law reform? Absolutely, I am. I am stunned that others in this Chamber do not share my concern. I am stunned that you, seemingly, ignore the concerns of constituents who must surely be coming into your office to talk about this. I am stunned that some of your lawyer friends and you are particularly close to some of them …
Mr Stirling: They came in when they could not get insurance. They flooded in the door when they could not get insurance.
Ms CARNEY: There he goes again, Madam Speaker. He does not care about Territorians who are injured and who might have a claim for personal injury. It is going to be a very interesting sittings. I did not think the Attorney-General was so lacking in his understanding. However, we can have that debate another day.
What started all of this - and it was always intended really as a general comment. However, I know the people on the other side are not happy and they are all fighting with each other. You can fight with us for the next three days. It will take your mind off things, so get stuck into us. We know you are all having a bit of a go against each other behind the scenes. If the parliamentary sittings are something of a diversion for you, bully for you, but the Attorney-General, as the Territory’s first law officer, should get his head around this.
As I said earlier, there is concern relating to the restriction on advertising in relation to personal injury claims. That is at clause 290 on page 175 of the bill, which is headed ‘Restriction on advertising in relation to personal injury claims’. In the view of some lawyers practising in the area of personal injury, it is an overly prescriptive provision. There is concern that a lawyer will not be able to say to a potential client: ‘Yes, I think you have a personal injuries claim’ without complying with the provisions of clause 290. There is acceptance of various restrictions on advertising but, it was put to me, the wording of this clause is so overly prescriptive that it may expose lawyers to incurring a fine - the maximum penalty is 50 penalty units - if they indicate to someone in circumstances not prescribed in clause 290 that they have a personal injury claim. I would like some comment on that in the Attorney-General’s reply. If he can contain himself to directly answering that concern, I would also like to know whether other lawyers have pursued this with him. I had three lawyers talk to me about this. I asked one whether he had spoken to government, the Department of Justice or the minister, and he said: ‘Why bother?’ On his behalf, in particular, I am raising that issue.
The next issue that I would like to raise was found in clause 70. You will not know this, of course, Attorney-General, but it starts on page 54 of the bill and keeps going over to page 55 and some of page 56. That section, which is clause 70, needs to be linked to clause 90. Again, for your information, clause 90 is found on page 66 and is the provision for government lawyers to be generally exempt from certain conditions. The exemptions are prescribed in clause 70, in particular, clause 70(3)(a), (b), (d) and also clause 70(4).
Putting it all together, as it were, clause 90(1) states:
I will deal with those sections shortly. Clause 90(2) starts with ‘However’, which I think is the first time I have seen a sentence starting with ‘however’ in legislation, but you get that:
In relation to those two clauses, I ask these questions: first, where are the regulations? What is envisaged by a lawyer holding an office prescribed by those yet-to-exist regulations?
Other questions will require a reading of clause 70, which deals with exemptions for government lawyers. The exemptions are from a requirement to undertake and complete continuing legal education prescribed by the yet-to-be-seen regulations, a requirement to undertake specific legal education and training, and a requirement for a period of supervised legal practice. In other words, this bill provides a mechanism for lawyers to be subject to a number of obligations, responsibilities and restrictions - all lawyers except government lawyers.
By way of an aside and because the Attorney-General does not have his head around the portfolio, I commend to him to find some time to note the concern of the private profession about so many private practitioners being, as they say, sucked in to the government sector. I am not sure I have a particular view on it one way or the other; however, you should at least be aware - given that lawyers are hard to attract to the Territory, and pretty much always have been - that there is a view in some law firms that they get private practitioners up here for a while and, then, they are recruited to the government sector. Bully for the government sector, but that is an issue for the private sector. I sincerely ask the Attorney-General to at least try to get his head around that one.
In any case, the fundamental question is: why should the restrictions that apply to private sector practitioners not apply to government lawyers? What is the policy rationale for that decision? That is a pretty straightforward question. Why are government lawyers not going to be required to undertake continuing legal education, have specific legal educational training, or have a period of a supervised legal practise? Why has that found its way into this area? That is clause 70(3)(a).
In addition, a further difference between private practitioners and government lawyers is that there is no need, apparently, for government lawyers to have particular conditions concerning employment or supervision - and that is to be found in section 70(3)(d) - that is, private practitioners under this bill will be subject to, where appropriate, restrictions concerning their employment or supervision, yet, government lawyers will not be subject to those same restrictions. Again I ask: what are the policy considerations or rationale behind making a distinction such as that?
I am sorry the member for Sanderson is not finding this very interesting - no doubt he would rather be at the cricket. However, these are serious issues. I know it galls members on the other side to have the opposition in here questioning their legislation, but I do so on behalf of those practitioners who spoke with me about this and, indeed, having a read of the bill myself, unlike the Attorney-General.
That probably summarises the questions. I hope that the Attorney-General can dig deep - to use that cricketing expression - and find it within himself to provide a sensible answer to these queries because members of the legal profession are rather hoping that he bothers.
Madam Speaker, with those comments, we are supportive of the bill and congratulate those who have been working on it for many years.
Mr BURKE (Brennan): Madam Speaker, what a pleasure it is to have you back presiding.
Madam SPEAKER: Thank you.
Mr BURKE: As the Attorney-General alluded to in his second reading speech, this bill - some 400-odd pages and 762 sections worth - can be a daunting prospect for anybody to read and comprehend. It is not a bill that even the most dedicated legal professional will need or want to pick up and read from cover to cover. However, I encourage all practitioners to give it their close attention, if only in the areas they feel are particularly relevant to them, and to have it close at hand in their office to refer to.
I can remember when I was pursuing my legal course, one of my lecturers made the comment that, in Victoria, they had a Legal Profession Act, or its equivalent, and it was a shame that not many of the profession actually appeared to read it that often, and they could well do with a refreshing of their memory. I encourage all local practitioners, or interstate practitioners looking to practice in the Territory, to become familiar with it. Local practitioners will be reassured that the bill has been the subject of intense and dedicated scrutiny at national level by Department of Justice officers and, I understand, by the Northern Territory Law Society Council and Executive.
I want to pick up on something that the Leader of the Opposition said, which was that there will be issues that come up. There always is with every new legislation - and certainly something of this size. With anything regulating a course of endeavour, once it is passed issues will come up and there are likely to be amendments made to it. The government has committed across-the-board to its consultation processes, and will be listening to the legal profession regarding unforeseen difficulties which may be caused. I encourage legal practitioners and the Law Society to contact me if they feel there is an issue which they have, as I am very interested in this legislation.
The people who dedicated themselves to putting this legislation together did so, so that practitioners can focus on the practice of the law. They are to be commended for their effort and dedication.
The bill touches on every aspect of legal practice and sets out what practitioners need to do to comply in a relatively straightforward manner. This is something every practitioner, whether they be suburban solicitors, sole practitioner, or associates of a national law firm, will appreciate. At the national level, consistency between jurisdictions will allow practitioners to worry less on the mechanics of conducting their business, and concentrate more on what they are good at: providing high-quality legal advice. This will benefit both the profession and clients.
It is good to see that the Northern Territory is playing its part in leading the way in introducing this final version of the modern bill. The Territory cannot, and should not, be left behind or out of the loop when it comes to such an important area of regulation. If nothing else, it would, perhaps, provide the Commonwealth with the motivation to override yet another Territory power. By influencing development of the bill, the Northern Territory has shown it can play a valuable role on the national stage.
One example of the strong aspect of the legislation is allowing the provision of operational funding to complying community legal centres. Community legal centres play a valuable role in the Northern Territory by providing legal advice to all members of the community. Over the past couple of years, community legal centres which are funded by the Commonwealth have reportedly had their funding slashed. By inserting this provision, payments out of the Fidelity Fund to pay practising certificate fees for community legal centre lawyers, for instance, would make an important practical, as well as symbolic, statement of support for these organisations in the Northern Territory.
I note that the legislation removes the Attorney-General from certain aspects of decision-making. I wish to emphasis that I am not casting any aspersion at the Attorney-General, but it has always seemed odd that a member of the executive arm - formally appointed Queen’s Counsel - became personally involved in complaints against practitioners. The oddity of the involvement in appointing Queen’s Counsel or Senior Counsel can be summed up in one name of a former Chief Minister. This step back and transferral of powers to the judiciary and the statutory supervisor, in my opinion, was a sensible and principled solution.
As I stated before, I understand that the bill has been the result of consultation with the stakeholders over an extended period of time at both local and national levels. I have been made aware that the Law Society of the Northern Territory - its council and executive - actively assisted government by presenting its views on reform and constructively engaging in development. The level of local interest, I understand, was also demonstrated by excellent attendance at information seminars held here and in Alice Springs. By actively engaging with government, practitioners were able to learn more about what it would mean for them and influence areas where possible. That influence has not ended because, as I said, practitioners can always raise with government and its local members issues that they identify in the application of this bill once it has passed through all the phases of this House, assented to and become law.
I want to make one comment in relation to the restriction on advertising, clause 290, which was raised by the Leader of the Opposition. I note that there is provision for a complying statement, and publication of that statement, which sets out advertising which is permissible for those practitioners engaged in a particular area. It includes the ability for details about the area of speciality of a legal practitioner or law practice. Therefore, law firms do have the ability to ensure people are aware of their services, and to provide those services with the best possible rigor and intellectual application.
Madam Speaker, I commend this bill to the House. It will be very valuable legislation in times to come.
Mrs BRAHAM (Braitling): Madam Speaker, my comments will be brief as I am not a lawyer and I really did not understand this bill. I found it very hard to read, it was so vast. I just say to the Attorney-General that, to put a bill of this size on the table and expect the Independents to be able to treat it with any thorough examination, is a joke. It is all right for ministers, their ministerial expenditure is over $12m; the Opposition Leader gets $1m to run her office; the Independents get one position at $70 000.
In the past, we have managed to point out to the Attorney-General errors in the bills he has presented. There are amendments that we have moved that the Attorney-General has accepted because he knows it was wrong. God knows what is in this particular bill. It is just impossible to have asked in five weeks to go through it thoroughly and get feedback. I say to the Attorney-General that your timing is terrible; you could have at least given a little more time for feedback. The feedback I had from any lawyer whom I approached about it is that, like me, they had very little time to read it and they just hope their associations have given the necessary comments.
There are just a couple of things I want the Attorney-General to clarify for me. You say in your bill that you are going to appoint a statutory officer. It does not say what areas they are going to cover. Can you tell me exactly the functions of the statutory officer you are appointing? Are you, in fact, handing over some of your workload, functions and responsibilities to it? It also says that the statutory supervisor may delegate any of the powers and functions to any person or body. What exactly does that mean, minister? You are creating this position and passing over some of these functions to this particular body who then can pass it on to anyone? Could you clarify exactly what you mean by that?
I wonder if you were contravening the Northern Territory (Self-Government) Act? I am not a lawyer, but I ask you to clarify this. Under the Northern Territory (Self-Government) Act, there shall be a number of officers of minister of the Territory having such respected designations as the minister from time to time determines. Under those regulations, some of the responsibilities this minister has are the court system and the legal profession. Are you taking away some of your powers that are conferred by the Northern Territory (Self-Government) Act? These are matters in respect of which ministers of the Territory have executive authority.
I know you have said that you no longer wish to appoint Queen’s Counsel. The Chief Justice may appoint a local legal practitioner as a Queen’s Counsel, so you are passing that responsibility to the Chief Justice. Can you do that under the Northern Territory (Self-Government) Act when the Regulations say that you are responsible for the legal profession? The act says appointment must be made only after consultation with the Attorney-General and other judges, the Law Society and anyone else the Chief Justice considers appropriate. I know this is probably a bit of a knee-jerk reaction to the Shane Stone appointment of QC, but I want to query it. Perhaps you can give me advice, Attorney-General, on whether you are foregoing some of your responsibilities as a minister of this Legislative Assembly and whether you can, in fact, allow the Chief Justice to appoint in this way. It may be a small point, but it is something we need to clarify.
The other point is what statutory functions this supervisor will perform. What functions are you giving up? We are talking about accountability. I listened to what the Leader of the Opposition said because she often contributes in a way that clarifies matters for me when it comes to legal issues. However, I must admit I missed exactly what she was saying. She did make the comment that you are the first law officer of the land. Do you take that responsibility seriously? Does this bill undermine some of the functions you should be performing?
There is also an opportunity for you to look at the accountability of the legal profession. As you know, I have written to you about the Sentencing Advisory Council that has been set up in Victoria. That body has legal representation, senior academics, and community representation. It provides statistical information on sentencing, including information on current sentencing practices; it conducts research and dissemination of information on sentencing matters; it gauges public opinion; it consults on sentencing matters; and advises the Attorney-General on sentencing issues. It seems that this is an opportunity for you to clarify whether you would consider setting up a Sentencing Advisory Council. It seems to me, sometimes, that our legal profession becomes very defensive about some of the things that happen in our courts and judicial system. In like manner, we have to stand up in this House and be accountable, so there should be accountability across other systems, and I include the judiciary.
Having said that, I have always found that any dealings I have personally had with lawyers have always been done in a most professional manner. They have an enormously difficult task. I do not believe this act really – whether it is of comfort to them or not, I do not know. All I can say is it will take a while for us to absorb this and see if it is working in such a way as it is intended to do - make sure the legal profession is a legal profession, and professional in all the things that they do.
Madam Speaker, with those few remarks, I would appreciate the Attorney-General responding to my queries. I will be supporting the bill.
Mr STIRLING (Justice and Attorney-General): Madam Speaker, I thank each of the contributors to the debate. The Leader of the Opposition also acknowledges that it is the largest, single legislation ever to come into the Northern Territory Assembly. We appreciate the huge amount of time and effort put into this legislation by members to consider and raise various aspects. However, it is most important to acknowledge that the bill reflects the hard work of not just Justice officials in the Department of Justice - and that has been a big workload, I am absolutely assured - but the legal profession here and in every jurisdiction in Australia, to bring this bill to fruition.
The main objective of the bill is to achieve national consistency in regulation of the legal profession across Australia, and doing so will remove much regulatory overlap. It will make it easier for practitioners to work across jurisdictions; it will help clients in their dealings with the legal profession. Today, the Territory does its part in making that goal a reality. We are just the second jurisdiction to pass this legislation. New South Wales passed its legislation just last week.
In light of that goal around national consistency, I suppose queries and concerns at the general level, or specific aspects of the bill, do need to be tempered by the fact that most policy issues have been extensively debated and, ultimately agreed to, at that national level. If you were to go it alone as a jurisdiction on nationally important issues such as this by making our legislation different from other places, it would lead to a collapse of the very point of this legislation; that is, to achieve, as far as possible, the exercise of national consistency.
This government has been involved in the development at every step of this bill, so we are confident the bill will fairly and efficiently regulate the Northern Territory legal profession, at the same time, implementing those consistent national standards. As set out in detail in the second reading, it is based on the model bill provisions agreed to at the July 2006 meeting of the Standing Committee of Attorneys-General. Extensive discussion among states and territories during that development has ensured comprehensive, well structured legislation. It will ensure that the Northern Territory meets a uniform national standard for law degrees and practical legal training, trust accounts and fidelity funds, definitions of professional misconduct, legal cost requirements and disclosure to clients, and foreign lawyer entitlements.
As I noted in an address to the Law Society’s recent Pro Bono and Legal Services Conference, society is becoming more and more reliant on legal expertise. At the same time, lawyers are expected to travel and advise people and companies across jurisdictions. As law firms stretch across borders, so ought the regulation of their practice. For the first time, a uniform regulatory system will exist for the legal profession across Australia, and this will mean a more efficient, truly national legal system. National law firms will soon not need to attempt to comply with different and, potentially contradictory, laws. Clients will be better able to understand their rights and obligations and know what costs information they should receive from their legal advisor.
In relation to consultation, it was very extensive with stakeholders over the past five years, both at local and national levels. We acknowledge the support provided to the government by the Law Society in the Northern Territory as an active participant in developing this bill. The Law Council of Australia also made valuable contributions at the national level. Following the drafting of the Northern Territory bill, the Department of Justice held information seminars for legal professionals in Alice Springs and Darwin. Both seminars were very well attended. I understand there was strong support to enact the legislation. Seminars also provided government with the way to fully address any practitioner’s queries or concerns. After the bill is passed, the Law Society, with assistance from the Public Purposes Trust, will be providing a comprehensive education campaign, coordinated by a full-time officer, including the very points raised by the Leader of the Opposition: information sheets, advertising, education sessions and seminars.
Under the current legislation, in relation to the role of statutory supervisor, I, as Attorney-General, have various last-resort roles in respect of Law Society decisions. The government does not consider it appropriate that there be such direct personal involvement by the Attorney-General to compel reconsideration of decisions. In other jurisdictions, this particular role is performed by a position at arms length from the minister; for example, a legal Ombudsman. Because of the small number of such complaints in the Northern Territory, the Solicitor-General will take on the role of the statutory supervisor, and it will remove potential, or inference, of political interference, while ensuring there is a mechanism in place to satisfactorily resolve disputes.
In relation to the question of delegation of that work raised by the member for Braitling, that devolves to the Department of Justice. It is the Solicitor-General who signs off in the end, not the Attorney-General, despite the fact that the work might go to the Department of Justice legal people.
Nothing has changed in clause 290 on advertising from the current situation. I understand the Leader of the Opposition’s dissatisfaction with tort law reform. She made it very clear where she comes from on this issue: lawyers are not making the dollars they used to. Well, isn’t that a pity? We reached a situation where absolutely ridiculous insurance claims were costing insurance companies millions of dollars, forcing capital to flee the insurance market in Australia, and forcing premiums being offered by those companies that still survived in the insurance market to step up their premiums by 40%, 50%, 60%, 80%, 100%, 200%, and 300% - where you could get cover.
We had the ridiculous situation where the Rockhampton Sewers Group could not get public liability insurance, nor could the Nhulunbuy Speedway Club at any cost, nor the Darwin Speedway. Nor could thousands of community organisations around Australia even get a quote on insurance cover. That is what drove insurance ministers around the country, with Senator Helen Coonan the Liberal government minister, to get together to rein in those claims, encouraging people – more than encouraging, forcing people - to take greater individual responsibility for their actions without running to an insurance company when they have done something stupid and suffered an injury as a result of their own stupidity.
I pay tribute - I have before and I do again - to Senator Helen Coonan. She was the lone Liberal minister chairing all the states and territories – all, of course, Labor insurance ministers and, sometimes, Treasurers. She had carriage of this area of work and showed tremendous leadership in working with the states and territories to drive reform right across the insurance area.
I remember Terry McInroth, the Queensland Treasurer, saying the Rockhampton Crochet Club had been in existence for 75 years and could not get public liability insurance. I do not know what the insurance companies were thinking the Rockhampton Crochet Club might get up to, but that is a pertinent example of what was occurring in the availability of insurance across the country at that time.
Since those reforms have gone through - and mostly all of the states and territories have completed that wave of reform; not entirely - there has been a restoration of a balance in insurance. It is now, importantly, available. Capital has come back into the insurance market in Australia and, importantly, it is affordable, which was not the case when that process of reform was commenced.
The Leader of the Opposition decried the fact that lawyers may not be able to make as much money as they used to. She ignores the fact, of course, that many community organisations and small businesses can now afford insurance with the dramatic decreases in premiums we have seen over the past four years. It would be pertinent for the Leader of the Opposition to recognise, particularly that she is not just a member of parliament, but that she is the Leader of the Opposition and has a role and responsibility to represent all constituents in the Northern Territory, not just lawyers, and simply not just the good people of Araluen which is her foremost job.
She made a similar courageous defence of lawyers when the reforms to victims of crime were made. Those reforms are necessary because the system was bleeding many thousands of very soft dollars into lawyers’ pockets, where the victim’s claim was without question. The victim would have been paid out anyway but, of course, a lawyer was there with their hand in taking off many soft dollars.
The member for Braitling said it is all too hard with a bill of this size. It is her responsibility …
Mrs Braham: With one person to share with the other when you have a whole load of people - millions of dollars more ...
Madam SPEAKER: Order, member for Braitling!
Mrs Braham: Come on, we only wanted a bit more time.
Madam SPEAKER: Member for Braitling, cease.
Mr STIRLING: The member for Braitling has the same responsibility as every member of this parliament, including members of government who are not ministers. If she is going to make representation in or around a bill, she has a number of options. She can check with the legal profession. She could have made time to speak with Barbara Bradshaw from the Law Society who would have willingly given her half or three-quarters of an hour to work through the bill and any questions she had. She could have sought advice from lawyers in her own electorate or anywhere through the Northern Territory. She could have had - and she was offered but declined the offer - a briefing on this legislation. So, do not come in here and say it is all too hard, member for Braitling. It suggests you are lazy in your approach to this legislation and you seek to blame the government …
Mrs Braham: It is the timing. I said your timing was bad. You put a huge bill on and give us five weeks to look at it.
Madam SPEAKER: Order, order!
Mr STIRLING: … for failing to carry out your own responsibilities as a member of this parliament.
In relation to the Sentencing Advisory Council, at the moment, the judiciary carries responsibilities for this. I cannot see - and while I am open-minded and remain open-minded until I see some more detail around the member for Braitling’s suggestion - how a Sentencing Advisory Council can advise those who are well briefed in the law - so briefed, in fact, that they have risen to the heights of either judge or magistrate in the system. How would an advisory council interact with these well-remunerated people with extensive experience in law from all sides - defence and prosecution in most cases? If it is an advisory council, surely its advice is advisory only and the judiciary could choose to simply ignore that. They are some of the questions I would have about how this might work. I am aware that somebody has put it in place. I am open-minded but I would, at first glance, find it very difficult to see where a meaningful role might lie for such a Sentencing Advisory Council. I will await further information to come forward.
The restrictions on advertising, I touched on briefly around clause 290. It simply carries on the current restrictions that are already in place. Advertising is allowed according to prescribed methods. The Law Society may permit advertising. It is based on the New South Wales provisions, the bill of which, as I mentioned, was passed last week. We consider that to be a fair and appropriate level of regulation.
The rationale around exemptions for government lawyers is that government lawyers are more strongly regulated here than other jurisdictions. Government lawyers, of course, work to just one client - that is, the government - and advise on specific areas of law. Private practitioners are required, by the nature of their jobs, to serve many clients across the community. The main reason around this is the risk to the fidelity fund. Private practice, of course, can constitute a risk to that fund. Government lawyers, by definition, will not. We do not envisage a situation where government lawyers would be sued by their employer, the government; thereby, putting a risk against the fidelity fund.
In relation to that, it is necessary to go into the committee stage, because we do intend to make some minor amendments to the bill, which go to the admission requirements for practitioners. On advice from the Office of Parliamentary Counsel, the amendments are desirable to clear up minor inconsistencies that crept in through various drafts of the bill. If you look at a bill of 762 clauses overall, three relatively minor amendments are not too bad. I am not quick enough on my feet to work out a percentage, but it would be a very low figure.
Madam Speaker, I thank members for their contribution to the debate and for their support of the bill.
Motion agreed to, bill read a second time.
In committee:
Clauses 1 to 30, by leave, taken together and agreed to.
Clause 31:
Mr STIRLING: Mr Chairman, I move amendment 16.1. Clause 31 of the bill sets out that an applicant for admission as a legal practitioner may seek early consideration of certain matters prior to formally applying. The clause covers situations where, for example, a law student has been convicted of an offence and is wondering whether there is any point in persevering with legal studies. Some offences may prevent practise as a lawyer. This amendment amends clause 31 so that a person seeking such a declaration from the Admission Board must give written notice of the application to the Northern Territory Law Society. Currently, this obligation is inappropriately located within clause 34.
Amendment agreed to.
Clause 31, as amended, agreed to.
Clauses 32 and 33, by leave, taken together and agreed to.
Clause 34:
Mr STIRLING: Mr Chairman, I invite defeat of clause 34. The current clause 34 sets out various matters concerning representation in admission matters and notices to be given in respect of admission matters. However, there are other clauses that deal with related matters. New clause 34 consolidates in one clause the key matters relating to the parties to admission proceedings. These are that the Admission Board is not a respondent to an application for admission and, for matters before the Admission Board, the applicant for admission and the Law Society are entitled to make written representations to the Admission Board. For appeals to the Supreme Court under clause 38, the applicant and the Law Society are entitled to be represented and to be heard. For admission matters and associated matters being considered by the Supreme Court, the Law Society is also entitled to make written submissions and/or be represented and heard. I invite defeat of clause 34 accordingly.
Clause 34 negatived.
New Clause 34:
Mr STIRLING: Mr Chairman, I move amendment 16.2, which is that proposed new clause 34 be inserted in the bill.
New clause 34 agreed to.
Clauses 35 to 40, by leave, taken together and agreed to.
Clause 41:
Mr STIRLING: Mr Chairman, I invite defeat of clause 41. Current clause 41 deals with parties and documents and, in doing so, duplicates part of clauses 34 and 43(4)(A). New clause 41 provides that the Supreme Court may grant leave for other persons to be joined as a party to an appeal, or a reference under clause 32. New clause 41 also provides that the court may appoint counsel to assist it. I invite defeat of clause 41.
Clause 41 negatived.
New clause 41:
Mr STIRLING: I move that the proposed new clause 41 be inserted in the bill.
New clause 41 agreed to.
Clause 42:
Mr STIRLING: Mr Chairman, I invite defeat of clause 42. This amendment omits and replaces clause 42 owing to a variety of changes consequential to the amendments made to clauses 34 and 41.
Clause 42 negatived.
New clause 42:
Mr STIRLING: Mr Chairman, I move that proposed new clause 42 be inserted in the bill.
New clause 42 agreed to.
Clause 43:
Mr STIRLING: Mr Chairman, I move amendment 16.5. Clause 43(4) sets out what documents must be provided by the Admission Board when an admission matter comes before the court. The amendment makes it clear the admission documents and any subsequent documents must be provided to both the Law Society and to any other party.
Amendment agreed to.
Clause 43, as amended, agreed to.
Remainder of bill, by leave, taken as a whole and agreed to.
Bill reported; report adopted.
Mr STIRLING (Justice and Attorney-General): Madam Speaker, I move that the bill be now read a third time.
Motion agreed to; bill read a third time.
MOTION
Note Statement - Indigenous Affairs –
$100m Housing Investment
Continued from 19 October 2006.
Mr BONSON (Millner): Madam Speaker, together with other members, I congratulate you on your return and we look forward to working with you over the next few days. You are looking very well.
Madam SPEAKER: Thank you.
Mr BONSON: Today, I contribute to the Indigenous Affairs, $100m Housing Investment statement for a few simple reasons. When we come into this House, we come in here with big ideals and big goals. A lot of that relates back to our families, our lifestyles, the communities we come from, the culture that we know and the people that we represent. Unfortunately, in the political arena, politicians often do not get the kudos that they should, in particular, on issues such as indigenous housing and, in fact, indigenous affairs, because of the difficult nature the Northern Territory government and the Commonwealth face in dealing with many of the problems.
This statement needs to be put into the context of the history of self-government and what has been happening in this Chamber, and with previous Territory governments. The Chief Minister, in her contribution, outlined the fact that this was a great initiative because it was about the Territory government putting in extra money, or money already given to us by the Grants Commission. It was a sacrifice, as a government, for the right reasons.
We have come up with $20m a year over five years, which is $100m. Depending on the figures you look at on the cost of housing, we are talking about 60 to 100 houses a year, hopefully, being built for indigenous families; families that live in remote areas and do not have an opportunity to get housing as we would in mainstream urban areas. That is 60 to 100 houses a year for the next five years.
What the Opposition Leader does not realise - and in the last couple of days, I downloaded the previous contributions of all ministers – is that people may remember the ridiculous, or shameful, contribution which the Leader of the Opposition made. I looked through it, and what I understood was that the Opposition Leader has no idea of what a family is, and what families mean to the Northern Territory. She has no idea what the lifestyle of the Northern Territory is. On fundamental points of families and lifestyles, the Opposition Leader has no idea. These 60 to 100 families out in the bush who will get housing are mothers and fathers and their kids who will have an opportunity to get a roof over their heads. The Leader of the Opposition, in her diatribe, wanted to talk about every other issue apart from the fact that we were committing $20m a year to give 60 to 100 families an opportunity to have a roof over their heads and have power. That is fathers and mothers, and their children. Her contribution showed that she has no idea what a family is, or of the lifestyle that some Territorians, unfortunately, face.
Over the next few weeks and months, this individual should be exposed. In her contribution, she talked about division. We know for a fact that the majority of the opposition do not even talk to each other - that is a fact. We know for a fact that they come from such politically differing views that, often, their message that they, as a caucus, try to contribute to each other, gets mixed and muddled and arguments happen behind closed doors.
Often, the Opposition Leader contributes to this House in a negative way; screams and yells as with the last bill, the Legal Profession Bill. She rants and raves, she stokes the fire, and cannot sit around and take the comeback. If you have a look at her contribution, it is nothing but vitriol and negativity; I cannot describe any other word than hatred towards individuals on this side.
You have to put it in the context of what this statement is saying. It is talking about 60 to 100 families who at present do not have a house to live in. That is 60 to 100 families - mothers, fathers and children - who are living in conditions that you can only rate as third world, and we are a first world nation.
This government, under the Chief Minister, with its caucus which is widely representative of the Territory electorate, has said within our capacity as a government we are going to find $20m extra, and are hoping the Commonwealth comes to the party and matches it. I am hopeful that they will. I am sure that the minister is in negotiation with them now. We will have 60 to 100 families per year for the next five years who are going to have houses. We already know that this is only touching the surface of what we need to do.
The Chief Minister put it in this context:
As we know, one of the big initiatives of the Territory government is to focus on delivering secondary education into remote communities. It is a shame in this country that communities like Maningrida and Wadeye - communities of 2000 to 4000 people - cannot send their kids to secondary school in their communities; they have to leave their communities. I appreciate the work the former minister has done in this area and I know the new minister will continue to do.
The Chief Minister continued:
The Chief Minister, in a very articulate statement, outlined the future of what we see as important for all families in the Territory, in particular indigenous Territorians. The Opposition Leader came out with a distasteful, angry, bitter response which was an attack on individuals on this side of parliament, including myself - nothing to do with what is the benefit to Territorians. Someone I respect, the member for Barkly, responded by saying:
I would like to touch on that. Like me, the member for Barkly is a born and bred Territorian and he has grown up over - I will not give away his age – has been a little longer than I have on this planet. We come from the knowledge of knowing what Territory families, the Territory lifestyle, and trying to create great opportunities for Territory people is about. After I listened to her contribution, one of the single major issues - and I do not place all the opposition in this box because I know there are genuine people in the opposition who do realise that one of the big issues facing the Territory and Australia as a whole are Aboriginal issues – was that the Opposition Leader had an opportunity to put on record her vision and her contribution.
She spent her time talking about one of the biggest initiatives in the history of Territory politics - being in the gutter, talking about issues that were not related to the statement. That is why the member for Araluen creates a false image of what is really happening in politics, and in the Territory. That false image needs to be put to bed.
What the Leader of the Opposition needs to understand is that all people - black, white, green or purple - want an opportunity to have work, education, housing and health. She needs to understand the lifestyles that different Territorian families live. Her attack was so vitriolic, and it was a personal attack on me and other members. I want to ask her: as a person who is an alternative to the current Chief Minister, where will she retire when she finishes? Her party has a history of nicking off and leaving Territorians holding the bag.
I am a born and bred Territorian whose family has been involved in the Territory for thousands of years but, in particular, in Darwin for the last 150 years and, no doubt, for the next 150 years. Where will she be in 10 years time? Will she still be in this House? Will she be in Alice Springs? Some of the things she said in here, she cannot repeat outside. She is turning this Chamber into a coward’s castle where she hides behind its privilege and protection. Go out into the real world, Leader of the Opposition, and say some of the things you say about members in this House and about the general public and see what happens to you. She is turning this honourable House into a coward’s castle. I have spoken to members who have been in this House a lot longer than me, and they regard some of her performances in here as some of the most shameful in the history of their time.
It is a basic principle for every member to respect the fact that we have privilege; that we can say things in here that we cannot say outside, or normal citizens cannot say. However, the contribution she has made to this debate and others shows that she has no understanding and no recognition that this is a valuable convention. She undermines this Chamber, and she is turning it into a coward’s castle. Let us take her outside so she can say some of the things she says on radio, on TV, to individuals or to public groups, and see how many of those individuals will be willing to cop it on the chin. There would be many Territorians furious about some of the things that she says in this House.
Madam Speaker, we are talking about a $100m investment in the future of Territory families. That is the men, women and children who will lead the Territory in to the future. We are building the Territory’s future. We understand its lifestyle, and we are supporting Territorians in their aspirations to be a part of that lifestyle. If you look at the history of Territory politics, we can generally say that, over the last 30 years or so of self-government, indigenous issues in many ways have been put in to the too-hard basket.
In her statement, the Chief Minister said the problem is overwhelming. What do we do? Do we give up or do we work within the capacity that we have? Do we put money where our mouths are and try to help families? The reality is that we have found $20m a year, and I would love the Commonwealth to match that. We all recognise that we become frustrated at times by what we can and cannot achieve. However, the reality is that, as a government, we are probably the most representative group that has been elected in parliament in the last 30-odd years. We should never forget or underestimate that.
We can go back to governments which were unrepresentative of Territorians, or we can work together with the government, the parliament, and the public service we have, and within the capacity of our budgets, with the Commonwealth government try to deal with some of these issues. I believe we can.
I have read the contributions of each minister. I would like to highlight something that the Minister for Natural Resources, Environment and Heritage said. She mentioned, in her contribution:
The common theme from the government members in the last sittings was that this is a long-outstanding issue that goes way back to self-government. People need to realise the history behind this matter, and I quote from the member for Wanguri’s contribution:
The member for Wanguri has not only been a member of government, but also opposition when the CLP were in government:
I confirm my support for the Chief Minister’s stance on indigenous housing. She has made it quite clear through the 20-year plan that we need to negotiate with the Commonwealth. The reality is, we have a budget of approximately $3bn to deliver health, education, roads, tourism, indigenous housing, and indigenous affairs for all Territorians. We know that the shortfall is estimated at around $1.2bn in Territory Housing, which is 33% of the total budget. The Northern Territory government – and in reflection, previous NT governments - have not had the capacity to deal with indigenous housing issues. We are making a small but very significant contribution to the deficit in housing, and are trying to help 60 to 100 families, hopefully.
The real issue, of course, is that we need to take this to a national level. The 20-year plan offers a vehicle to begin negotiations with the Commonwealth to have long-term strategies. We have a current budget deficit in this country of $10bn to $12bn a year. We are a first world nation, yet we have large populations, and large towns and cities throughout the Northern Territory and Australia that live in third world conditions. I propose that, if you ask the nation if it thinks every Australian should have access to education, health, employment and training, and economic advantage, overwhelmingly, the majority of Australians would say yes.
Madam Speaker, I commend this ministerial statement and this policy for indigenous affairs into the future to this House.
Debate suspended.
Madam SPEAKER: Honourable members, I draw your attention to the presence in the gallery of Parliament House public tour program visitors. On behalf of all honourable members, I extend to you a very warm welcome.
Members: Hear, hear!
Mr HENDERSON (Leader of Government Business): Madam Speaker, I seek leave of absence for the Minister for Parks and Wildlife; Natural Resources, Environment and Heritage; Arts and Museums for the rest of the sitting day due to a significant family illness. I also advise the House that I shall be taking any questions in those portfolio areas.
Motion agreed to.
Madam SPEAKER: I am sure honourable members will extend their sincere best wishes to the member for Arafura’s family at this very sad time.
MOTION
Note Statement - Indigenous Affairs –
$100m Housing Investment
Continued from earlier this day.
Mr HAMPTON (Stuart): Madam Speaker, I support the Chief Minister’s statement on indigenous affairs on 19 October 2006. I am proud to be the sixth indigenous member of this government, and I support the Chief Minister in her capacity as the Indigenous Affairs Minister.
Indigenous affairs is a very complex and difficult area for any government. There are no easy or quick fix solutions to the issues that confront our indigenous communities in the Northern Territory. The CLP failed for 26 years to deal with these issues appropriately. There is much more to be done in partnership with our indigenous communities to improve the key social and economic areas of life, from the bush to the regional centres and town camps. This is one of the primary reasons why I became interested in politics. It also demonstrates that not only a whole-of-community, but a whole-of-government approach is required. Critical to its success will be the level of support that comes from the other tiers of government. It is pleasing to see that COAG has accepted this government’s argument and has set up a committee to consider a proposal for a generational plan in early 2007.
Many members of this Assembly have, in the past, spoken about their vision and ideas to support a better life for our indigenous people. I reflect on the indigenous affairs statement the former member for Arnhem delivered in this House on 7 March 2002. Whilst his statement was a very courageous one, the truth was brutally honest. As I said in my first speech during the October sittings, some five weeks ago, we need to engage indigenous Territorians in building our society. As the Chief Minister’s statement indicated, the plan will not only provide a framework for action, but will provide the mechanism to engage indigenous Territorians as real participants in shaping their own future.
I would like to now specifically address some of the initiatives in the statement. There is no doubt that housing has become both a delicate but desperate issue in the lives of indigenous people living in urban, regional and remote parts of the Territory. Most of us know, see and hear what the outcomes are from housing shortages, overcrowding and the wear and tear on these houses. We must not forget that this problem has occurred over many decades, and the poor health, high rates of homelessness and unsatisfactory crime amongst indigenous Territorians are symptoms of the neglect of our housing stock and programs.
The failure of past governments to plan for the growth in our indigenous communities and regional centres has today placed government in this dire situation. I can remember the former CLP government selling off many public housing dwellings and complexes in Alice Springs during the mid-1990s. As the current Minister for Housing said in his statement in October this year, 33% of public tenancy is indigenous households, and 50% of people on the waiting lists are indigenous. Many of these houses and complexes which were sold back then by the CLP, would well and truly be occupied by those people now placed on waiting lists - many who are forced out of desperation to live with other family members who have a house.
This government’s approach and commitment towards making inroads into the growing housing demand is commendable. As the Chief Minister has told us, it is the biggest program any Northern Territory government has delivered. What we need to see now is the Australian government matching it, working in partnership to overcome these years of neglect. The Northern Territory government’s indigenous housing commitment is not only commendable in the amount of funding going in, but also in the new ways in which we are working with industry to develop new types of housing programs.
In my electorate of Stuart, in particular the Ti Tree region, there are many constituents who are keen to look at the opportunities of private home ownership. There are also others who are keen to gain housing closer to where the job opportunities and services are.
I am also pleased to see that a priority area of this housing package will be continuing in providing new employment and training opportunities in the building industry for indigenous people. I know of indigenous men from Laramba and Ampilatwatja communities in my electorate who have experienced and gained qualifications in the IHANT Builder Trainer program. These young men are eager to continue as part of a building team, and are great role models in their communities.
The cost of building houses in remote areas of the Territory are well known to many of us. I look forward to hearing more on this initiative that will see more houses being built for the amount of dollars being put in. The partnership between Territory Housing and indigenous community housing organisations will also be a good one because of the experience and systems which each group will bring to the partnership, and the benefits this will bring to the tenants in living skills and housing maintenance.
Local government reform is essential. You only have to read the statements by the Chief Minister and the Minister for Local Government to realise this. Local government for all Territorians is a part of our lives but, for many indigenous Territorians living in remote areas, it has a colourful history. If you have been around the Territory long enough, some of the reasons why local government reform is needed might not come as a surprise.
I recognise the importance of the risk assessment conducted in March this year, and I congratulate the Minister for Local Government for conducting it, and his comprehensive approach to the reform. I congratulate him, not because it exposes the huge problems there have been in the 56 councils which were audited, but for a number of other reasons. As I mentioned earlier, indigenous people need to be engaged at all levels of building the Northern Territory. Having strong professional regional local government bodies will bring greater efficiency and higher levels of expertise to assist communities in their development.
The formation of the Alice Springs Town Camp Implementation Committee is another example of the strong, inclusive, whole-of-government approach. The committee has the involvement of the Alice Springs Town Council, Tangentyere Council, Lhere Artepe, the Australian government, and the Northern Territory government agencies. This committee is ensuring the whole community and, in particular the indigenous people, are involved in implementing the task force’s recommendations to give our town camp living areas the same standards of infrastructure and amenities as our suburbs.
I also want to mention the unheralded role indigenous people have played in local government in the Northern Territory, often in the most difficult circumstances. I do not doubt the shire model will provide and deliver stronger organisations and systems which will lead to real jobs, better services for core local government responsibilities, and better use of plant and equipment, meaning better roads and infrastructure.
A major issue that I come across regularly is the pressure put on to indigenous people, particularly where it is exacerbated by delays in the employment of CEOs and staff. The need for greater governance training and being left to recover from incidences of financial mismanagement is essential. I know many indigenous people in my electorate are on the local government community council, land council, school councils, health boards and store committees, to name a few. I am worried that there are too many responsibilities placed on too few people, and I am not surprised when they burn out. Also, the high staff turnover in these remote councils and the long delays in filling CEO positions places enormous pressure on local indigenous people. I add that the establishment of a local government advisory board with an independent chairperson reporting directly to the Minister for Local Government will ensure some of the issues raised here will be addressed. It is another example of this government’s genuine approach in engaging indigenous people towards shaping a brighter future for their communities.
Education underpins all aspects of our communities. Education for me, particularly secondary education, was a critical part of me being able to achieve what I have today. Without a good education it is increasingly hard to get a good job, live independently and have a healthy and long life as well. It is also difficult to take advantage of the opportunities provided in the booming Territory economy. Education in the bush has, for many years under the CLP, been neglected. You only have to look at the lack of secondary education they delivered in their time.
I am proud to be a member of this government that has invested an extra $15.4m over four years in the bush. As the Chief Minister has stated, in 2003 we had our first group of secondary students who graduated through Year 12 at Kalkarindji in my electorate of Stuart. Rhonda Rankin, Lianna Brown, and Meshach Paddy were the trailblazers. In the following year, another six students graduated and, in 2005, it increased to 25, including seven from Wadeye. These types of results are priceless for those communities and the Northern Territory. This Labor government believes in this investment, and the communities in the future will benefit greatly from these young people achieving successes in education. I am looking forward to similar results and achievements as other remote secondary programs commence, including in my electorate at Yuendumu.
This Labor government is concerned about the impact and results emanating from alcohol abuse. Through strong and proactive strategies, working with the community, this government is doing something about the problem of alcohol abuse, and some of the early signs have been positive. The alcohol restrictions that came into effect on 1 October in Alice Springs appear to be having some positive effect. Talking to some town camp residents in my electorate, they are saying things are a lot quieter and, at places like Hidden Valley, residents are showing more interest in attending workshops at the community centre.
In conclusion, public safety in all of our communities from the urban and regional centres, town camps to the bush, must not be seen as a privilege but a right. This Labor government has demonstrated this through its Building Safer Communities strategy that we are not going to be soft on crime and alcohol abuse. This Labor government has also resourced the police force better than ever before, and I look forward to seeing these resources reaching the bush.
I am proud to be a member of this government because we are serious about public safety. As an indigenous member of this government, I will continue to speak on the public record about the issues that we are facing. I am also pleased that the Chief Minister and this government will continue to confront and tackle the challenges the former member for Arnhem spoke about in his statement.
Madam Speaker, I commend the statement to the House.
Mr KNIGHT (Daly): Madam Speaker, I support the Chief Minister’s statement. Since I have come into this House, there have been a number of statements in respect of indigenous affairs, another matter on which this government is keenly focused. It brings together a package of initiatives. The additional $100m towards indigenous housing is a significant part of it, but it incorporates other measures and brings together different portfolios. Local Government is one of those, and local government reform is something that various administrations have tried to achieve over the years. I remember in 1998 the CLP’s reform, The Next Step, which died after about 12 months. I support the minister in the way he has presented this reform, which is to bring better services to the indigenous communities and improve the lives of Aboriginal people in those areas.
The Territory should be fully incorporated. We should be achieving the most amount of roads funding and additional federal government funding that we possibly can for the Northern Territory through full incorporation. There is a great degree of flexibility within the models of governance, and I look forward to working with my community in looking at those areas because governance and service delivery will be the key things. I have in my mind the way models should be structured, and a federated model is something that I will be presenting to my communities. It is a step in the right direction; it is about bringing certainty to communities in respect of better representation and service delivery.
One of the other areas is the indigenous housing reform. The Territory Housing model, about which the Minister for Housing has previously spoken, will bring additional certainty to Aboriginal communities. Having worked on a community for many years, I am aware of the issues associated with delivering IHANT maintenance, construction and management funds. The biggest issue out there is the capacity of those sections of the resource centre or the community government council to deliver those services. When external staff come in, there is a high turnover of those people so they come in for six or 12 months, and they leave and you lose corporate knowledge.
In respect of employing local people, there are issues around the level of attendance and obligations that those people have through ceremony and sporting activities. If there are health-related issues, they result in problems with the attendance of local people in those departments to deliver those services on a regular basis. A model which introduces systems, structures and support around an existing Territory housing model is going to be an advantage.
I believe additional, consistent training will be provided to local staff. The systems can be linked to the mainstream Territory Housing system, so a regional centre, or even Darwin or Alice Springs, can be linked into outlying communities so there is better access for tenants.
There is also a career path. At the moment, there is no career path for indigenous housing department staff in communities. I look forward to the day when you get a trainee on board in a community and you take them right through to working on the third floor of RCG House in Darwin in the Department of Housing. I look forward to that career path, which will make it a lot more attractive for people to get into it.
There will also be a great deal of accountability and transparency with housing allocation, which is always an issue on a community. With those systems in place, you will see a great deal of improvement in maintenance and life expectancy as a result.
The extra $100m over five years is certainly welcome. It is a great contribution from a relatively small budget. It does not go far enough, obviously, with the backlog that we have, but it is certainly a very significant contribution by the Northern Territory government. That money has to go as far as it possibly can, and through the initiatives of the Territory Housing model, things will be improved in that area.
As a snapshot, just from my electorate, those occupancy rates still astound me, even in my time in the Northern Territory. The average occupancy rate in Australia is approximately five to seven people per house. At Wadeye, it is 17. You can imagine, a three-bedroom house with 17 people. I struggle with a few kids in my house but, if you have 17 kids, it is a very hard to keep control of these houses. Down the road at Palumpa, it is slightly less, at 10 people per house. You have to remember that there is no alternative. There is no private rental market, you are dependent on the social housing which is provided. That is a huge issue with those occupancy rates. In Port Keats, it is growing with 90 births a year, and there is really only three or four houses allocated each year, so it is not even keeping up with the birth rate.
Costs are a significant measure in the community. In the bush now, construction costs range between $2000 and $3000 per square metre, so a 200 m2 home will cost you up to $400 000. In Darwin, it is more like $1000 per square metre, so it is significantly less to build a house in Darwin than it is in the bush. You are paying premium prices for builders to go out into the bush. Obviously, having a local building team and a local industry is beneficial. At Wadeye, they have a tilt-up slab system which is working out a lot cheaper at $1200 per square metre.
Also, the Minister for Housing has kicked open the door, in some ways, to these community housing organisations to look at cheaper housing alternatives. I know that the Ngaliwurru-Wuli Association in Timber Creek is certainly doing that. They are working with Lysaght BlueScope Steel to look at kit homes. They have two under construction at the moment and they believe they will come in at around $150 000. The approach the Minister for Housing has taken to encourage the communities to look at alternatives is certainly starting to pay off in the initial stages.
When you are talking about indigenous housing, good governance is certainly a key to it. You have some strong communities out there, like Peppimenarti which has very strong leadership and management, and they run their housing program very efficiently. I believe, coupled with a Territory Housing model, they certainly will get a great deal of bang for their dollar. The costs are coming down largely due to the design. I know a lot of communities are looking at smaller houses, as smaller groups are easier to manage.
The other area that the Chief Minister’s statement touched on was secondary education. One of the most significant secondary education facilities that is occurring in my electorate is the one at Wadeye. The Martin Labor government, in its election campaign, committed $4.5m to not only building a secondary education facility at Wadeye, but providing additional staff housing. Something which always occurs there is that not only is there no social housing, there is no rental housing for additional teachers to be housed in.
The houses are being built. I was lucky enough to accompany the Chief Minister on her trip to Wadeye where we had a look at the site. We have a Katherine building team there, which is great to see that we are keeping that work within the Territory. We had a look around the site with members of the Kardu Diminim, the local landowning group. I can tell you they are very proud of that facility there. I believe it will be the first stage in a greater commitment to secondary education.
It was only last year that I was at the graduation with the Treasurer, the minister for Education at the time, of the first eight secondary school children who had ever graduated at the St Francis Xavier School. That school has been operating since, I believe, the 1950s or 1960s. It is quite extraordinary that you had a situation where, for some 40 years, not a single child graduated through secondary education in the largest indigenous community in Australia.
I look forward to that facility being up and running by either late this year or early next year. I know the community is certainly looking forward to it. It just shows that commitment to secondary education in the bush. I know a lot of parents who want to keep their kids around the community, and there are a lot of other communities that are extending those years out - not just to Year 6 within their existing schools but providing extra classrooms so that those in Years 7, 8 and 9 can stay around in the community and complete their education.
One of the other areas that the Chief Minister spoke about was alcohol reform. This has a significant impact on the lifestyles of people living in remote communities. Having been on a trip to Groote Eylandt and Nhulunbuy, I experienced the change that has happened there. In communities that have had grog and now do not, you can certainly see those communities moving ahead. I would like to see, as I believe the member for Katherine would, a similar change in lifestyle for Katherine. I will keep trying to work in that regard.
I believe that this government is focusing on that area of alcohol reform. We have the Racing and Gaming Commission setting up alcohol management plans. One is occurring at Timber Creek and another is proposed for Daly River. The work that has been done in Alice Springs is impressive. To show you some of the commitment that the departmental staff have - and I guess they have been given a licence by this government to get stuck into alcohol reform - I believe the staff at Racing and Gaming wrote to Woolworths in Katherine about some issues associated with the sale of four litre casks. To Woolworths’ credit - they wrote to their national office - they removed all the four litre casks. Without any decision by the Licensing Commission, they decided, as a corporate body, to remove those casks. Good on them! They know where this government is coming from: we want to see a better lifestyle for people there and we want to clean up this rampant sale of bulk liquor. That, I believe, will have a significant change within the Katherine township.
This is a statement in time. We will see in the future more and more initiatives rolled out. These initiatives are targeted towards unacceptable behaviour. They are not designed for the people who are behaving responsibly; they are being directed towards people who have unacceptable behaviour towards themselves, society, and their families. To curb that behaviour you will improve their lives, and the lives of everybody around them. Along with all those initiatives, there obviously has to be work done, and has been done, with rehabilitation services and, also, across government, with a range of issues which address that underlying demand for alcohol. This government is working towards that significant part of alcohol reduction.
This statement was a package; the Chief Minister presenting a range of initiatives which her government and ministers in their portfolios, are bringing together to make the lifestyle on remote indigenous communities and townships better. There is a lot more to come. These initiatives which have been announced will see the fruits of that labour, and that ideal will be delivered in the future. I look forward to seeing how it all occurs.
Madam Speaker, I endorse the statement of the Chief Minister, and commend the statement to the House.
Dr LIM (Greatorex): Madam Speaker, I join this debate to try to set some records straight. Firstly, I congratulate the Chief Minister on her statement. Committing $20m of new money to indigenous housing could not be seen as anything but a positive step. It is $20m more than has been provided previously, therefore, it means more new homes. It is good to see this government has recognised it has failed in the last five years to provide adequate homes in the bush. This recognition has translated into $20m a year for the next five years. While it might only mean something in the order of 50 new homes out bush, it is 50 more new homes, and it is better than nothing. It is recognition by the government that in the last five years it had failed to provide adequate housing construction out bush. The minister himself …
Ms Martin: This comes from the former Housing minister. How cute.
Dr LIM: The Chief Minister has all the time in the world to respond in her closing remarks.
The Minister for Housing admitted at a previous time that the program under his government in the last five years had failed to keep up with the demand and population growth in the Territory. The money provided by the federal government to the Northern Territory to construct homes, and the minuscule amount which the Northern Territory government contributed to that, had failed to deliver enough homes to cater for population growth. This $20m per year for the next five years will help in some way to catch up on the deficit. I congratulate the Chief Minister for having recognised that, and doing that.
This graph which I am showing - and Chief Minister, I hope you will look at it - says on the top: ‘Total indigenous housing and infrastructure funding by jurisdiction for Year 2005-06’ in millions of dollars. In Queensland, the government provided $82.5m to supplement the federal government’s contribution of $86.8m. Going down the list, Queensland is the best with almost 50% contribution, or almost $1-for-$1 between itself and the federal government. Next is South Australia, then Western Australia at 16.3%, then Victoria at 7.2%, followed by the Northern Territory at $4.8m. The Northern Territory received $93.7m from the federal government and contributed only $4.8m. In other jurisdictions, Queensland contributed $82.5m, a tremendous amount; Western Australia contributed $16.3m; New South Wales contributed $6.7m; South Australia contributed $18.3m; Victoria $7.2m; Tasmania contributed about a third of its total indigenous housing construction program with $1.2m versus a federal contribution of $2.8m; and the ACT provided $3.4m against a contribution of $0.5m by the federal government. Without a doubt, the Northern Territory government did not contribute as much as other jurisdictions.
Mr HENDERSON: A point of order, Madam Speaker! May I request that the member for Greatorex table that graph so we can all have a look at it?
Dr LIM: I will happily table this after I have finished by remarks.
Madam SPEAKER: Would you like to seek leave to table it first? You do not have to. You can just do the process.
Dr LIM: I will table the report after …
Madam SPEAKER: You need to seek leave, member for Greatorex.
Dr LIM: I seek leave to table the report.
Leave granted.
Madam SPEAKER: You may hand it in later.
Dr LIM: Thank you. What it shows is that, while the Northern Territory contributed a small amount in a total of about nearly $100m worth of construction, it was not enough. I am so glad that this government has recognised that and put in $20m per year for the next five years.
Let us go back to the old CLP days and have a look at housing construction. We, in fact, kept up with the population and, in fact, kept eroding into the deficit ...
Mr Henderson: Rubbish!
Dr LIM: This government could not even do that. The minister himself …
Mr Henderson: Rubbish!
Dr LIM: The member for Wanguri keeps interjecting with ‘rubbish’ but, in fact, it was in the statement made by the Minister for Housing not so many months ago. He admitted to it. I suggest members go and read it. I know because it is my portfolio and I have been following the minister’s words very closely. Read it for yourself.
While I congratulate the Chief Minister for putting this money in, I am saying it is to help prop up their own flagging political fortunes and to try to win back some of the support that she has lost from indigenous people across the Territory. There is no doubt the six members of the government who claim, themselves, to be indigenous - and they have said it time and time again …
Members interjecting.
Dr LIM: It was funny. When the Leader of the Opposition referred to six indigenous members, she was criticised by the member for Barkly who said: ‘How dare you say that?’. Every one of them, in their contribution, said: ‘I am an indigenous member of parliament’. You cannot have it both ways. If the Leader of the Opposition says that about you - something that you have accepted yourself - how can you criticise her for using those words? It does not make sense.
The Chief Minister talked about local governance. I will come back to that in a little while, but let us stick to housing for a moment. We heard the Chief Minister and other ministers talk about how we need to review the housing models and what sort of designs we should have. How many times do we have to keep going over and over and over the design? For goodness sake! We spend so much time and money looking at designs that it is no wonder no houses are being constructed. You guys get moribund with so much process that you do not deliver the very things that you keep saying indigenous people want.
Yes, get on with it and deliver but, when you deliver the homes for them to live in, make sure you put side by side with that a program of how to run a home. There is no good constructing lots and lots of homes when, within six, 12 months or five years, the homes are ruined. The Minister for Housing said the average house in suburban Darwin would last 30 years, but out bush would last hardly 17 years. That is your problem; you build homes that are very rapidly destroyed. Therefore, put in place, for goodness sake, a program that will teach people living in these homes how to care for them.
I have always maintained that safe refuge is the most important thing for any one of us. It is what humanity wants and needs - a safe refuge. That means a home that you can live in safety, and that you do not worry about people attacking you, whether you are in your home or outside your home. That is safe refuge. Once you have law and order and safety in homes well and truly in place, then you can worry about getting yourself educated, getting better education and, then, from there, it leads to better health. Those things follow one after the other.
Do not you just say: ‘I am going to embark on a 50 new homes construction per year’- that is about as much as $20m will buy you, but then go no further. I wish I had time to go through this line by line, but there are many things that have been spread by the minister which really does not lead to a long-term view. Again, it is a knee-jerk reaction: ‘Oh, I have been copping it from all sides about indigenous affairs, I better do something right now so that I can claw back some of the support that I have lost’.
I came across the member for Macdonnell’s comments in response to the Chief Minister’s announcement with the $20m per year. I would like to read a couple of lines from what she said:
She praised the program, how happy she was with it, and then she said:
this form of government reform. She went on to say:
Do you know something, Madam Speaker? This Wangka Wilurrara model that the member for Macdonnell was so pleased about, that she was exploring with the Luritja Pintubi people, was done under the Country Liberal Party government ...
Ms Anderson: No, it was not. That was done under Jack Ah Kit, thank you very much.
Dr LIM: I was the minister then, when she was out there exploring. I had a time when the member for Macdonnell, before she became a member, was actually sitting next to me in an aeroplane talking about exactly the same thing that she wanted to do.
Ms Anderson: Was not.
Dr LIM: Do you know what? When she complained about Aboriginal people being completely neglected by the CLP government, before this last election, before she was a member, she said exactly the same thing about the Labor Party. She cannot have it both ways ...
Ms ANDERSON: A point of order, Madam Speaker!
Dr LIM: The next that program …
Madam SPEAKER: Order, member for Greatorex!
Ms ANDERSON: Madam Speaker, that is not true at all. What I was talking about actually happened under the former Local Government Minister, Jack Ah Kit.
Madam SPEAKER: Member for Macdonnell, there is no point of order. If you feel that the member for Greatorex has misled the parliament, then you can approach me to make a personal explanation. Member for Greatorex, please continue.
Dr LIM: Madam Speaker, the problem is that, whatever any government does, we all support each other to develop whatever we want to bring on. The progress of the last 25 years under the previous government is now built upon by this government. For the last five years, we have allowed …
Ms Martin: What, your progress in secondary education in the bush?
Dr LIM: … we have allowed a program to degrade. I do not know why they did it, because I am not in their Cabinet room, but they allowed the program to degrade. Through the complaints that the Chief Minister obviously could not but hear, she now had to bring this program in - and that is fantastic. I am glad she did. I am not knocking the project. More power to you; do more, put more money into it.
In fact, I believe minister Mal Brough said not too long ago that he would like to see that the Northern Territory government followed the Queensland example and put more money into it. Instead of, perhaps, thinking a bit harder, and saying: ‘Maybe we have some options to go a bit further like Queensland has’, every minister has said: ‘Oh, no, we put in $20m, let us hope that the federal government will now contribute more towards the program’. Minister Brough has said: ‘No, we are not going to give you any more; you just make sure that you show some commitment yourself to put money into this program, otherwise you can forget about it’.
As there is not very much time left, I will leave housing for now and come to local government. The Chief Minister spoke about her government’s plan to bring about the shire model for the whole of the Territory. Well and good; that is a good thing to aspire to. However, that has been nothing more than just an idea. When I went for a briefing from the Office of Local Government, I received very little detail. ‘We are thinking about this, we are thinking about that. We have 63 local government councils; five of them are municipal councils, the rest are either community government councils or incorporated associations. We have found out that we have done an assessment, and some 50% of them are just about on the verge of collapse and the others are not much further away. Therefore, we have to do something’.
However, that is as far as it goes. I said: ‘Tell me the details; how are you going to do it?’ ‘Do not know’. ‘How many shires are you going to have?’ ‘Between six and 20’. ‘How are you going to do that? Are you going to incorporate municipal councils or are you not?’ No, they are not. But, yes, suddenly Tennant Creek is now. Tennant Creek will be part of that. Maybe Alice Springs will take in Amoonguna and Santa Teresa. Nobody knows; you do not have any idea.
What the minister is going to do, I understand, is have an advisory committee of people who are in local government to come back with some sort of model. It is an idea at the moment. That is not such a bad thing in leadership: start with a good idea and allow the rest to filter upwards. With regard to having a shire system for the whole of the Northern Territory, it will mean that the Grants Commission will have to look at our funding model in a completely new way. It will be a good exercise and, in the longer term, will be beneficial for the Northern Territory in funding from the Commonwealth government.
Then, the problem is if you currently have some 50% of your local community government councils on the verge of collapse, what that tells me is that their governing structure is falling apart; they just do not have the capacity to govern themselves. Therefore, by creating shires, you are going to have the same personalities involved. For the last five years, in spite of all the rhetoric about providing capacity building and making sure that people out there in the bush are able to govern themselves, this government has failed. Instead of having smaller community government councils that you can train and foster - because they are smaller, they are easier to do - they are going to create these shires. They hope that, somehow, the people who have failed to manage their own small communities will be more successful on managing at the shire level. It does not make sense; it just does not add up. If people failed there and they have not had any capacity building in the last five years to be successful, then, how are they going to be suddenly successful under a shire system? It is not going to happen.
When you ask about what is going to happen to the pastoral properties and how they are going to be brought into a shire model, they have no answers. I understand that the pastoral properties currently provide their own municipal services. They provide their own electricity, water and roads, and deal with their own rubbish. Therefore, why do they need to be incorporated into the shires? What benefits would they get for themselves from a shire? Are they going to be rated? If they are going to be rated, what are they paying their rates for when they are providing their own municipal services?
Those questions have not been answered and, until I get some detail from the government or from the Office of Local Government, I cannot be convinced that is a good idea. I have spoken to the office of the Local Government Association of the Northern Territory. They are genuinely - and I am pleased that they are feeling positive towards this model; likewise, there is potential to be beneficial - concerned about what is going to happen regarding how it is going to be implemented and the detail.
Mrs MILLER: Madam Speaker, I move an extension of time for my colleague to finish his address to parliament subject to Standing Order 77.
Motion agreed to.
Dr LIM: Thank you, Madam Speaker. Some members said they have pored through the previous remarks made by various ministers and other members. I have done likewise and listened closely to the contributions made today as well.
I was very surprised at the attack the member for Millner made towards the Leader of the Opposition. I do not know why. What the Leader of the Opposition was trying to demonstrate, just as I have, is that $20m is not a lot of money. You are, at best, going to develop about 50 new homes in the Territory. In my opinion, that is 50 more than you would get otherwise each year, that the government, in the past five years, has not been able to deliver. That is what the Leader of the Opposition was talking about and, yet, the member for Millner was attacking her.
What takes the cake for me are the remarks made by the member for Nhulunbuy. Just about the whole of his contribution was about the Lateline program. The words that he used! I am surprised nobody pulled him up. Obviously, I was not in the Chamber otherwise I would have done it myself. He used words like ‘grub’. The words he used were unbelievable. For a Deputy Chief Minister to talk like that is unworthy. I dare him to repeat the words that he used for people, including the producers of Lateline and the anchor, Tony Jones, and others. It was just not the thing for somebody like a Deputy Chief Minister to do.
Chief Minister, congratulations on taking this small step. Yes, it is a lot of money in the Northern Territory’s budget - $20m is a lot of money, and that is good. We all recognise it is a small step and, hopefully, there will be some gains. It was a small step that was started by the CLP, scaffolded upon by this Labor government, to allow it to claim it has delivered. Let me give an example. They say that this is the government that, suddenly, has had Aboriginal children graduating with senior school certificates. That is what they keep claiming they delivered. Never mind the years that the children had to go through primary school and parts of secondary school before they finished the last three years under this government to get the senior school certificate. Suddenly, out of the blue, this government produced Year 12 students from nowhere, and said: ‘It is our doing that they got there’. For goodness sake, at least accept that whatever you do is based on what other governments have done previously. At least admit that …
Ms Martin: Not in your case. Not in your case - 27 years - not in your case.
Dr LIM: What? You produced all those Year 12 students out of nothing? Come on! You produced three Year 12 students out of nothing? I am glad you can do that. I do not want to blaspheme, but I doubt that even God can do that. The Deputy Chief Minister said:
Perhaps he might have had some success at Groote Eylandt but, across the Territory? Has he not been aware of alcohol problems across the Territory? What rock has this minister been sleeping under that he cannot recognise the breakdown in law and order in the communities and municipalities? Every day in the papers we read about people who have been stabbed, and houses robbed. In fact, only last week, the house next door to mine was broken in to. Where has he been sleeping not to know every regional centre is suffering under the weight of antisocial behaviour which his government has failed to resolve? This is antisocial behaviour which his government has allowed to flourish through its racist policies - one law for indigenous people, and one law for the rest.
There should be one law for all. This government is prepared to impose alcohol restrictions which it would not consider for Darwin. It is okay to impose them in Alice Springs, Tennant Creek, and Katherine but, when it comes to Darwin, leave it alone. If you want to do it, do it across the Territory; one law for all. Why do you not do that? What is so special about Darwin? You will not touch Darwin, but you are prepared to do anything you like south of Palmerston …
Mr Henderson: You are an embarrassment.
Dr LIM: I am an embarrassment? I have not come to the member for Wanguri’s comments as yet - the member who knows how to stretch truth to such a degree that you cannot recognise the truth in what the member for Wanguri says. That is what he does time and time again. In his contribution, he spoke about how wealthy this nation is and why we cannot put $1.2bn into the construction of homes right across the Territory for our disadvantaged Territorians. Of course, the federal government can do anything if it wants to but, for five years his government did not make a single dent on the housing shortfall for indigenous people - not a dent. No wonder they have been shamed into committing this money.
The member for Wanguri had this to say:
There you go again. That is how he puts it: that this is the first time that any government has provided a substantial amount of money to provide more homes in the bush. For goodness sake; $20m would be minuscule compared to the total amount of money that has been spent on indigenous housing across the Territory since the year dot. This is minuscule. The federal government, in this chart that you want to look at, contributes $93.7m for indigenous housing. It is not as though you are the first government to do it.
I could keep going, but time is running out. Let me say this: Chief Minister, congratulations on putting this money in; it is much needed. I am glad to see that you have noticed that the current program in these last five years has not been adequate to keep pace with the population growth and the needs out there in the bush. Well and good that you can admit to a mistake. I look forward to better housing for indigenous people there.
I am a bit cynical about the local training component. We tried that ourselves in the time when I was the Minister for Housing. It is something that you have to continue to push as hard as you can, but I found that a little difficult to deliver. You have housing construction companies who are eager to go out bush, complete the construction and get out of there as quick as they can, and they do not have time to provide this training. You have to start some sort of local company that will provide that on-the-job training that will persist with the training for several years. Somehow, you need to have, perhaps, one or two houses reserved out of the batch that you are going to build that could be used for training purposes. That way, then you can allow other companies to come in and assist in the construction of the homes and have a couple to train in. Otherwise, only time will tell how this program is going to pan out.
I will look forward to seeing 15 new homes in the bush every year for the next five years, and then what happens for the 15 years after that - who knows?
Madam SPEAKER: Member for Greatorex, your time has expired.
Mr MILLS (Blain): Madam Speaker, I comment on this debate, and to continue the very important point made by the member for Greatorex. I heard it. I am sure that members opposite heard it too, as it was mentioned a number of times: the acknowledgement of the contribution, contained within this statement, of a significant fund to allow for the building of more houses. It was endorsed, supported and congratulated by the CLP opposition.
Other comments that were made were run from the other side of the argument, so that there can be a testing of this whole endeavour to ensure that it does achieve the objectives that are dear to all of us. Though I carry the responsibility in opposition as shadow for indigenous affairs, I have great difficulty in participating in these debates. I find it demeaning and unedifying in the extreme to be involved in debates of this nature, where we have juvenile snipes backwards and forwards, a beating of the chest in reference to the great things that one side has done and the terrible things that the other side has done - backwards and forwards it goes - with the focus principally upon the team that you happen to support. The best interests of your own history is the objective; it is not about those who most need our help. That comes second, sadly.
If we could put that aside for a second, this is one of these issues that we really must find a better place, forum and spirit to discuss these matters if we are going to achieve any progress. At the moment, it appears the way that the energy flows in these kinds of debates, that the current government, the Labor Party, would be completely satisfied and there would be a sense of glee if they could absolutely eradicate the opposition so that the opposition no longer existed; they could root out any form of dissent, as they, in fact, are doing - silencing people within the community who dare raise their voices in opposition. They are becoming quieter and quieter, and I know what is going on. There is a new culture, a new regime, that is in place in the Northern Territory - not an interest in democracy or addressing the real issues, but in controlling the debate and developing a new level of thought within the Northern Territory to advance the very best interests of this current government. I have this awful sense that there would be a celebration somewhere in this building if, after one election, there was no longer an opposition. Then you would turn on yourselves, as you already are.
That aside, that element in all this compounds what really is an issue of concern. In our quiet moments, we spend time together, sometimes at committee meetings. I am very grateful that I have had the opportunity to be involved in the substance abuse committee because it has taught me a lot - not only in the conversations I have had with fellow committee members working in a genuine bipartisanship way, to look at issues of concern to every Territorian. It is quite humbling to hear the stories. I acknowledge the great acclaim that Jessica Mauboy has received, but I cannot help but think of some of the wonderful people we met on some of those substance abuse committees, those people who struggle out in the backblocks of the Northern Territory, who run programs hidden from view for year after year. I would love to see those people applauded and celebrated in the same way as Jessica Mauboy. There are some indigenous and non-indigenous heroes out there who work so hard behind the scenes in very difficult circumstances. I would like to, as I was just going through some of my notes, acknowledge some of those people. I will mention them as I speak about this matter further.
Earlier on in the year, there was a forum - I think once every four or five years - called the Australian Future Directions Forum. It attracted younger leaders from every state and territory. There were a couple of representatives from the Northern Territory who were selected. Out of that group of 90, they agreed on one point as their top priority. That is why it frustrates me, as this is the same objective that we all have - put the politics aside as we all have the same ideals as these 90 of our nation’s young leaders. One of them said that he had a dream of eliminating the disadvantages of Aborigines and Torres Strait Islanders as this nation’s No 1 priority for the next 20 years. That was not just his opinion, but the view of the 90 people aged under 40, each picked for his or her future leadership potential who attended the Australian Future Directions Forum this year.
I go on to quote from this statement:
That was the principal statement issued at the end of this forum. That is why I opened my comments by saying there is a sense of deep satisfaction in these sorts of debates because all of us, one way or another, share that view. However, we are in a position where our politics get in the way. I would have thought, if that be the case, we could find a place where we could work together on these matters. If it is the case that we agree, as Australians from different backgrounds, that there is a single issue that is our most important matter to make positive progress with, then we could find a better way of dealing with it.
There are some good things that happen on the committees. We could get to a place in this parliament where we are able to focus on these matters and to resist the temptation of personal attacks or attacks on the party, and look at the issues square in the face and try to be constructive and find a way forward. Inherent in that – perhaps it is just a romantic notion - there is an acid test: if we cannot do that as 25 members in this parliament, the ones who have been elected to represent our own communities, then what hope is there for those who are struggling in remote communities - if we cannot sort that business out, find a better level of dialogue, and channel our energy more constructively? There is really not much hope because, with the growing cynicism, those we are charged to lead will become discouraged and any flickering hope will fade. They will see that this is more about your own agenda, not their need.
There are many words written on this, but there will come a time when we are required to step out and work in a new way, otherwise we will not have any change. We will spend our time on this stage, give some impassioned speeches, and we might even get to open something or other and have our name on a plaque, but it will not make any difference. There will be figures quoted, dollars spent, programs, investigations, reviews, inquiries, forums, statements made, and the gathering of folk, but there will not be much difference.
I fear that that is what will happen if we just continue. We will have an eye too strongly drawn to when the next election is and, then, we will run our agenda to suit that particular objective: to win the next election. Then we will reset our objectives to fit within another framework, which is largely to satisfy ourselves.
The truth is that if you look at the annual reports from Education - and I have heard these comments from the other side as though I really enjoy saying this. I do not. I have taught, and I know how hard it is to teach. When you have malaise, and try to raise kids, you find that you are not able to do it; it is requiring more and more energy. To find that benchmark results are not as strong now as they were in 2002 is a dreadful concern. To find that there are more drunks apprehended now than there were in 2002 - 25 000 in the last year - is of grave concern. To find that there are now 5000 violent crimes being committed, which is an increase, is a very real concern. To find that the monies spent on gambling in the last few years has increased by $2bn is a serious concern.
Violent crimes include sexual assaults. They have increased. On one of the communities we visited on our tour, the community was requesting more and more police help. If they had just enough, then perhaps their problems would go away or be reduced. They needed more police. How many of you have actually dobbed in someone to the police? No one. If you have that element missing, where you are actually working in partnership with the agencies that have been provided for you, you are not going to get anywhere either - we are just going to keep shovelling money in. Then, you go to the other side and find communities that seem to have less than those communities that have their hands out calling for more, and you have schools full. It was a joy to see Harts Range and Alcoota. The joy and sense of pride in those people was startling. After seeing the whole picture on that tour, I ended up far more encouraged than discouraged.
We conducted the hearings, and those quiet people who spoke of the Mt Theo program gave me cause for hope. Heroes! Barry Abbott from Wallace Rockhole - I was stunned. It warmed my heart to think of the contribution that that man and others have made, perhaps, that we do not even notice. We do not vote for them on the SMS, but they are there, and I reckon they are absolute heroes; they are idols as far as I am concerned. Go to Groote Eylandt and see the quiet ladies. They did not speak much but they exuded wonderful power and they have made a massive difference to their communities. That gives me cause for hope.
It is those things in combination that keep me going. I only hope that we can actually improve the way we approach these issues.
Finishing with what the member for Greatorex had to say, he complimented you, Chief Minister, on the contribution, and made some other comments that were, perhaps, not easy to listen to. However, it is the nature of opposition. You were in opposition once, too. It was a compliment and recognition of the importance of that allocation. Houses are desperately needed.
As for those of us who were at Port Keats, when most of us who are on the committee heard the story of the young ladies, the teachers, we were emotional. There was a local lady who has been a teacher for many years. She wondered why teachers from out of town have nice houses that are fenced off, which provides them with some security, and she does not. It really came home to me because, at that time, my wife had been preparing lessons at home - and she finds that stressful enough. I do not like to talk about it in here. I saw the problems that that hero has with such unbelievable hassles in that house. She is endeavouring to teach lessons in the classroom the next day and she has to look after her children, address the men, and prepare the lessons for the next day. She wonders why the teachers from out of town have really nice houses and whether her silent efforts are recognised. That floored me, and I know there were members from both sides of politics, unbelievably, who were moved. It is not just the ALP members who feel these things, but CLP also, and even Independents. Oh, my goodness! It is probably a little more complex than we would like to think.
We have to get beneath the surface if we are going to make any progress, otherwise it is just a load of - I have been pulled up for saying buggerlugs and all sorts of weird – and slippery is not allowed. What I was going to say was a lot worse than that.
I compliment and congratulate the Chief Minister on the contribution - nothing more, nothing less. Housing is important. I will finish with what I said part-way through: unless we can find a better way of conducting business in this Chamber and as community leaders, we are dreaming if we think we are going to make any substantial change and turn things around.
Mrs MILLER (Katherine): Mr Deputy Speaker, I was not going to contribute to this statement. Having recently been in Ceduna in South Australia and taken the opportunity to look at a transitional accommodation facility, with which I was very impressed, I decided to contribute to this statement.
I put on the record the success that Ceduna is having with their transitional camp. We spend a lot of time in this parliament talking about the plight of indigenous housing in all areas. This is a success story that has come about through partnerships, and it is really working well. I have been watching it now for three years. It was set up in 2003 and I was not going to go and have a look at it until it had been running successfully for a couple of years. I want to put on the Parliamentary Record what is happening there.
I will refer to quite a bit of their report – well, it is not a report, it is talking about their town camp. I am going to place a lot of this on the Parliamentary Record. Maybe the Minister for Indigenous Policy and the Minister for Housing might want to have a look at the Parliamentary Record.
Ceduna had the highest proportion of Aboriginal people of all local government areas in South Australia. The percentage is probably higher than the official figures due to under-enumeration of Aborigines in the Census that was done in South Australia. In addition, there are Aboriginal communities and adjacent unincorporated areas that are, essentially, part of that Ceduna community.
In all, about 25% of the Ceduna community population is Aboriginal, one of the highest percentages in Australia - and perhaps the highest for a community that includes a substantial urban area. Ceduna has a population of around 3600 people, and the community is a complex multicultural society. There are representatives of early European settlers, of Aboriginal communities with substantial previous contact with Europeans, of Aboriginals who continue to live traditional lifestyles, and increasing numbers of recent settlers in Australia.
In this report, they have said that:
When I visited this camp, I was impressed that it is managed by an Aboriginal woman who is of long-standing in the Ceduna community. She started work there as a volunteer and within two years had shown leadership qualities to the point that when the manager had moved on, she was offered the position. She has taken it on very willingly. She is a little dynamo with plenty of enthusiasm. The camp is managed with proper management practices. She is the facility and site manager and employs an administration officer, a facility support worker, up to eight residential workers, and a facility cook. The camp can take up to 80 people at the moment before it is full. The conditions are that you are only allowed to live in that transitional camp for six weeks, you pay a rent per week, and you are provided with two cooked meals per day. The meals are cooked by staff who live at, and are paid for work at, that camp.
The future of the project has attracted much attention from around Australia, especially in South Australia, to the point where they have built another one in Port Augusta, and they are developing one in Coober Pedy. I also called in to see the Mayor of Port Augusta, Joy Baluch, to find out how the facility was going there, and she is very impressed with it, although she said the management of it is not quite as effective as the Ceduna facility. That just highlights the point that there needs to be strong management.
The project in Ceduna, as I said, has attracted attention from around Australia, and has been looked at as a possible solution to addressing homeless people’s situations. It is groundbreaking and an imaginative project, and is an attempt to address the sad situation that faced the Ceduna community for many years. It is demonstrative of reconciliation at work and a community solving its own problems through bold and innovative solutions.
The facility was built quite openly not very far from Ceduna. They then found that the community had to build a security fence around it to ensure the safety of those people who were living there. As a result of the three years of this transitional camp running, the state government has now looked at pathway housing. They are setting it up as a pilot program in Ceduna so that people who choose not to go back to their community from this transitional camp can go into pathway housing. Those units were being built when I was in Ceduna in September, and I had a look at them. They are relatively basic units, easy to keep clean and tidy.
The people who choose to live in those units are very strictly supervised. The units are inspected daily to ensure that they are kept clean, neat and tidy. It is a living skills training program to prepare these people for living in public housing. They can stay in this pathway housing for up to three months and, then from there, should they choose to stay in public housing in Ceduna, they will then be moved to what we would call here Territory Housing, or South Australian Housing Commission homes. Also, they still have to meet the requirements of living in an urban environment when they have moved into the public housing.
I recommend the government go and have a look at this particular program, because it is working. I have not brought it to the parliament before because I wanted to make sure that it did work. It is only working because it has support of the community and all of the indigenous communities around Ceduna.
There are other benefits for those people who live within the confines of that transitional camp for that short period of time which is, as I have said, only six weeks. The people who live there have access to safe accommodation and access to programs and services including: a homemaker’s program; hair care; women’s esteem camp; a homemaker’s program on nutrition; a bush tucker garden, where they grow their own bush tucker and can eat it, of course; participation in programs including diversion therapy with the Ceduna District Health Services, National Heart Week and Reconciliation Week; and a general nutrition program.
The outcome from this facility is that it is an innovative solution to a very difficult social issue that faced Ceduna for many years. There are many communities with similar difficulties paying particular attention to this facility. Ceduna is still confident, three years down the track, of its future success. The Ceduna Council works very well with ATSIS and the Aboriginal Housing Authority in their partnership for this particular program. The Koonibba Aboriginal community CDEP was responsible for the construction of the facility, so there was involvement by indigenous people right from the time the program was being first discussed to the erection of the buildings which are very user-friendly. I was particularly impressed.
As my colleague, the member for Blain said, most times we come into this House and want the same things for Territorians. Most times, we cop a fair bit of flack because everybody thinks we are idiots; there are only four of us and what the hell would we know. Well, we on this side of the House also care.
I encourage members of government to go and have a look at this facility. Why would you not look at something that is working successfully? Ceduna has had some serious indigenous problems for many years. It was an absolute pleasure – with the exception of the reason I was there - to see the difference that this has made to Ceduna. I suggest that the Minister for Indigenous Affairs and the Minister for Housing go and have a look, or send somebody from their department to have a look, at this Ceduna transitional accommodation facility, which is commonly called the town camp. Have a look at their pathway housing and talk to the people there and see the difference that it has made.
Ms MARTIN (Chief Minister): Mr Deputy Speaker, in summing up, I thank all members who contributed to the statement. It is always difficult to single out anyone, but I especially thank the member for Macdonnell for her insightful comments made in the last sessions of parliament, drawing on her personal experience as a long-term resident of the region. Not that others did not draw on their own experiences, but the member for Macdonnell really had people carefully listening to what she had to say. For example, regarding local government reform, the member described how the current system of local government is inequitable and unsustainable. The member spoke with authority when she called for a regional approach to local government. She described the way it will bring the people back together to this land of their tribal people.
That is exactly what we are going to do with our local government initiative. We are going to change the way services are delivered and are going to set benchmarks and standards that have to be adhered to. The development of a regional approach to the delivery of local government services will streamline service delivery, free up valuable resources and standardise, over time, much of our infrastructure in the bush. However, our bold initiative is not just about local government reform as indicated in my statement. It is about an injection of $100m additional into remote housing over the next five years. It is about Territory Housing working closely with indigenous community housing organisations, ICHOs, to manage delivery and housing maintenance in the bush. It is about the continued expansion of secondary education in the bush.
I was moved to listen again when the member for Arafura described her elation when she heard about the graduation of three Year 12 students from Kalkarindji. For the first time in the education history of the Territory, three Aboriginal students graduated from Year 12 while living on their own communities. From these humble beginnings, I believe - and I am sure it is shared by everyone here - a revolution in remote Aboriginal education has begun. Last year, 25 Aboriginal adolescents completed their Year 12, and I know seven of those were in the community of Wadeye. This year, 30 are set to graduate.
It was interesting to hear members of the opposition, including the Leader of the Opposition, almost reject the fact. They were saying - particularly the member for Greatorex - that we were only building on secondary education on what the CLP had done in 27 years. I have difficulty with that because not one student graduated from Year 12 in their bush community in 27 years under the CLP. You could run a kind of strange argument that, somehow or other, we had built on what had been done by the CLP. However, there is the stark fact that secondary education was not in the bush under the CLP, and it is a disgrace that it was not. When we are now attempting to turn that around, you would think that the CLP would cheer us, but we get this half-hearted ‘You are only building on what we did’. It is an absolute disgrace that it never happened for all those years under the CLP. In many ways, we lost a generation of Aboriginal kids because they did not get to Year 12. They did not get an education; many of them barely got to Year 3.
Turning that around is tough. We are not pretending that we have produced magic in five short years but, compared with the damage that was done by 27 years of not even trying or putting the resources there, I do not know how the CLP can even pretend to be a part of this debate. Even more so for the Leader of the Opposition, because she did not even mention education in her contribution to this debate. That is how highly she regards it. Maybe it is the embarrassment of what the CLP did not do for 27 years.
We recognise that, in 2003, to say that there were only three students who graduated from Year 12 in their bush community might have seemed an embarrassment. No, we celebrated it because it was the first time. It was celebrated, certainly in Kalkarindji. The former Education minister has gone to each graduation ceremony and celebrated with communities. These were first times: Maningrida, Shepherdson, Yirrkala, Kalkarindji, and Wadeye. Those communities celebrated as students, for the first time, got to Year 12. We have a hell of a long way to go. We have such a long way to go, but we have started. The inspiration of those first three students has been awesome, particularly over the Top End.
We are not pretending things have changed dramatically. We are struggling with things like MAP testing in Years 3, 5 and 7. We have put a lot more effort and resources in, and it breaks your heart when you look at the last annual report. You would love to see those figures lift and they have not, but it does not mean that we have failed in the sense of putting those resources in and our determination to turn it around. We will continue to do that.
The member for Blain can give his sermon on the mount and say we should all be working together. It would be nice …
Mr Bonson: It would be.
Ms MARTIN: It would be nice, but it is not the things we hear from the CLP; it is just a condemnation, one after the other, of the problems that are in our Aboriginal communities. We know they are there; we are working to turn it around. It is all very well to put your hand on your heart and say: ‘If only we could put aside these enmities or the pressures of the next election’ - and sound like you were on the mount. However, it is not how the CLP is acting. Your leader is particularly venomous with all these complex issues facing Aboriginal Territorians - particularly venomous. Get your lines straight. Either take the line that we are all working together to turn around the problems we have and do not come in here and run a line that is directly opposite to your pretty often venomous leader on this.
In the statement, I talked about our plan in generational reform, and we have indicated to Territorians and to the rest of the country the importance of having a long-term strategy for Aboriginal Australians. Much of that work is being done. Each state and territory is building on the work currently being done. We will come up with a plan to say to Aboriginal Territorians, Aboriginal Australians in 20 years this is where we want to see your benchmarks. Benchmarks is a callous way of saying it, but it is about opportunity, how you lead your life, employment prospects, and educational and health standards. That is what we as a country – and, hopefully, your mates in Canberra will commit to this – want to achieve.
I single out the member for Greatorex because I found his contribution particularly irksome. He said we had only just started after all this time to look at putting additional funds into housing. It was as though it stood in stark contrast to what he had done himself as a Housing minister. It is all very well to come in here and lecture years after the event when he had an opportunity, as Housing minister, to make some difference and made none. It is hypocrisy from members of the CLP who come in here and say: ‘Why are you not doing this? Why are you not doing that?’ when they never did any of it. The member for Greatorex was only Housing minister for a short time - maybe a year-and-a-half or two years at max - but he had predecessors who did nothing. I have been in this place long enough to see the predecessors wring their hands. Part of that was a fair argument; that the Commonwealth government had a responsibility to pick up the backlog of housing that passed to the Northern Territory at self-government. It is a fair argument. Successive Housing ministers here argued it. However, neither side got anywhere with federal governments, which is why we have decided to put this additional money on the table and say to the federal government: with your vast surpluses of - what is it?
Mr Stirling: $15bn.
Ms MARTIN: $15bn of unallocated funds, we are only asking for a small portion of that initially - $20m for five years, $100m additional - to try to do something about one of the core factors facing Aboriginal Territorians in the bush, inadequate housing. We heard the Opposition Leader say: ‘What does housing do? It does not make any difference’. We have heard her in here argue that housing does not make a difference when you look at the myriad problems that face Aboriginal people - whether it is child abuse, health issues, or educational outcomes. We know it makes a difference.
If the opposition wanted to make any impact, you would be down in Canberra with your mates, whom you are so keen on being apologists for - so keen. The member for Greatorex was a disgrace. You would think he would stand up for the Territory. He sounded like a junior minister to Mal Brough.
If you are going to be honest about working on this together, join us in saying to the federal government: ’You have to put in. You have a responsibility, you have those funds, you can make a difference’. When you hear the likes of the federal Indigenous Affairs minister condemn the Territory for not doing enough - he has the funds. He has the funds - well, Canberra has the funds - and could make a difference instead of all the words. We are tired of the Indigenous Affairs minister who comes into the Northern Territory and says: ‘I will do this and I will do that’; says to Wadeye: ‘I have housing for you; says to Galiwinku: ‘I have got housing for you’; promises schools for the Tiwis – and never delivers. Not a cent do we see - not a cent. How many houses are at the outstations out of Wadeye? Do you know how many? None - absolutely none after all those words from the federal minister. None - not even the smell of a house. The expectations of the people of Wadeye who moved back to country were very high. They said to me last time I was there with the local member: ‘What happened to the promises? What happened to the commitments by the federal minister? We have seen nothing’.
If the opposition wanted to be genuine in their concern about the issues facing Aboriginal Territorians, then join us in saying to the federal government, your mates in Canberra: ‘Put some money down now. You are flush with funds, your surplus is healthy. Where are you going to spend it? Let us spend it on the most disadvantaged people in Australia, who happen to be Territorians’. I will be waiting a long time to be joined, I believe, by the opposition on this. You talked about joining together …
Members interjecting.
Ms MARTIN: You did, you talked about it. You did one of your hand on the heart, sermon on the mount-type of speeches and, yet, we are not joined in this by you.
All we suffer is condemnation for a government who has put significant funds into the bush, into Aboriginal health. We are starting to see some turnaround with Aboriginal women particularly, for whom, over the last three years, their life expectancy has grown three years. That is what you can turn around in health. We have a lot more to do. We have Aboriginal birth weights that are moving up and getting closer to the national average. Yes, that is a significant achievement, and that is what you achieve by putting more funds into primary health. We do not back off from the fact that half the Territory’s budget goes to 28% of the population; it is needed. We have seen those growth funds in health and they are starting to make a difference. There is a long way to go, but we are starting to make a difference. Those additional funds in education - again, small steps forward, a long way to go. We are not going to give up.
In areas right across the Northern Territory, we are starting to see some level of turnaround. The member for Greatorex does not recognise it but, in alcohol management, we are starting to see change. It would be nice if the CLP in Alice Springs would support our alcohol measures, rather than trying to undermine them. They are starting to make a difference. In seven weeks of the new alcohol supply and restriction measures in Alice Springs, the hospital is reporting less presentations of wounds from things like stabbings - Congress as well - and the police say aggravated assaults are down 40% in seven weeks. We are not going to take those figures as a given, but we are starting to see some change.
I would like the members who are in Alice Springs to support it. The Opposition Leader is great at condemning, but has she ever come to us and said: ‘I would like to help. I would like to be part of the solutions here in Alice Springs’? No. What we have from the members for Greatorex and Araluen is simply fighting us on trying to find short-term accommodation as part of the solutions of the complex problems in Alice Springs, and saying the best place to have short-term accommodation in Alice Springs is 50 km out of town - let us just look at failure. It is all very well to criticise this government for not doing enough, for some of the poor indicators for Aboriginal people, but you could be part of the solution. You could be part of working with us, if we are going to listen to the member for Blain and take a bipartisan approach on this. Bipartisan means you get on board; you actually commit to a policy and start to make a change. Commit to a policy, start to make a change and recognise when steps forward are being taken …
Mr Mills: We wrote you a letter and you never even responded. I want to see whether you are the real deal.
Mr DEPUTY SPEAKER: Order!
Ms MARTIN: That is what we would like to see from the CLP, this opposition who are full of words but, when it comes to action, they disappear.
Mr Mills: Are you going to answer our letter?
Ms MARTIN: When it comes to action, they disappear. It is a policy-free zone. That is what it is - a policy-free zone on the really tough issues tackling the Territory.
I thank all those who made careful contributions, particularly the member for Stuart who is new to this parliament, but gave a very thoughtful contribution that dealt with the whole area of local government, housing and employment - very much speaking from his own experience in his electorate. The same for you, Mr Deputy Speaker, with the contribution about what we can do with housing and employment; where there is success and what we are learning from that.
The member for Greatorex, obviously, got on my goat when he said: ‘It is all very well to put $20m a year into housing. What will you get? Maybe 50 houses’. You said to stop talking about design, and about doing things differently; we have been there, we have done that. Member for Greatorex, we are doing it differently. If he would like to go to Beswick, he could see the steel-frame house that is being built, which we think will come in at $180 000. If we can do that, that $20m a year will go a lot further than the begrudging number that the member for Greatorex was talking about.
At Wadeye, we have houses on the ground now at $265 000 made out of concrete panels. They are good, solid houses and they are cool. We are going to look at ways where we can bring down the cost of houses in the bush because, if we are going to pay $400 000 to $450 000, we ain’t going to get much! However, if we can bring down those costs, build effective, decent houses in the bush in a different way, then we will continue to do that.
I will leave it there, otherwise I probably will not stop for the next 40 minutes. Thank you all for contributing. Turning around probably two generations of disadvantage for Aboriginal Territorians is such an important part of what we are doing here in the Territory. It is going to be difficult; we are going to have a bumpy time and there are going to be things that do not work. However, we need to work with our Aboriginal community, those people who live in the bush who are an important part of the Territory and, for government, present the toughest challenge. I believe our Aboriginal Territorians want to see change; they are prepared to take that step forward with us. We have great challenges when it comes to roads, housing, health, education, and local governance, but we are out there and we have started. We should be proud of the fact that we are committed, and I believe we will see change. We can build better and more prosperous lives for Aboriginal Territorians. If we can move along that pathway, then we have done something that we all came to government to do.
Motion agreed to; statement noted.
Mr DEPUTY SPEAKER: Honourable members, I advise that we are experiencing some sound difficulties. Hansard is recording but, apparently, it is not being broadcast throughout Parliament House. If you have people who depend on hearing you in this House, you might need to get them to come a bit closer.
Continued from 18 October 2006.
Ms MARTIN (Chief Minister): Mr Deputy Speaker, I am disappointed the Leader of the Opposition is not here to make what should be an important contribution. We only have a strategic review of the Auditor-General’s Office every three years. It is an important review which gives an outside perspective on the effectiveness of our Auditor-General and how, perhaps, there need to be changes.
We have had some recommendations from the Auditor who did the review, Glen Clarke, Executive Director of the Western Australia Office of Auditor-General. I was pleased to report in my statement last sittings that his view is that the Auditor-General’s Office is operating in an efficient and effective manner. He had some recommendations to make about the report into this House. He raised the very important issue of the increased costs of outsourcing those audits, and we have responded to that. We know the cost of doing business in the Territory has risen, and the costs incurred by accounting firms are then reflected in the charge to government. We have increased, on the recommendation of the external auditor of our Auditor-General’s Office, the funding for the office by a further $200 000 this year.
I thank Glen Clarke for his review; we will have another one in three years. I thank our Auditor-General, Frank McGuiness, for his work. We have responded quickly to the recommendations of the external audit, and hope that his work is made more effective by that additional funding going to his office.
I am disappointed there was no input in to this debate from the opposition ...
Mr Mills: Have we lost our chance now, have we?
Ms MARTIN: Absolutely. I am closing debate. If you are going to take this parliament seriously, then issues such as a strategic review of the Auditor-General’s Office is one that you should be participating in. I hope the non-participation of the opposition does not mean that you ignore the importance of the Auditor-General’s Office …
Mr Mills: Not at all, Chief Minister.
Ms MARTIN: It could be interpreted that way. I say to the Auditor-General that I am sorry there has not been any opposition response to this. We will continue to work with our Auditor-General who is an important component of making sure that taxpayers’ dollars are spent well, in a transparent manner and accountably. We think he is important. Obviously, Mr Deputy Speaker, the opposition does not.
Motion agreed to; report noted.
Continued from 24 August 2006.
Mr HENDERSON (Employment, Education and Training): Mr Deputy Speaker, I will be concluding debate on a ministerial statement which was introduced by my predecessor in this portfolio, the member for Nhulunbuy.
The issue of standards in education is, indeed, a matter of importance in the Territory. As the second Education minister in successive Labor governments I will also be aiming high, aiming to lift standards and education outcomes for all Territory students. For too long - 27 years in fact - the CLP government accepted a second-rate education system in the Territory. In a growing economy with a young population, this neglect was nothing short of reprehensible.
In five short years, the government has made huge gains, best demonstrated by the growth in the number of indigenous students completing their NTCE, not to mention the exponential growth in numbers of students completing their studies in their remote home communities. It should be remembered that successive CLP government’s maintained a policy prohibiting this.
Without labouring the point for too long, in our efforts at lifting standards and outcomes, it is also worth mentioning the 100 additional teachers now in the education system; implementation of the Learning Lessons report; and improving the quality of distance education - I visited the Katherine School of the Air the other day and what a fabulous facility that is with great teachers; the introduction of school attendance officers and the school counsellors program as part of our $42m Building Better Schools program. This is a huge investment in infrastructure to provide new schools and secondary facilities in remote communities; and the introduction of middle years across the Territory, which aims to raise the level of student outcomes in the Territory from the bottom of the nation to the top. All of these initiatives are about improving standards and outcomes.
The previous minister included the issue of compulsory school uniforms as part of the debate around improving standards in schools. This was in response to continual representation from parents and other members of the community. In a statement to the House in August, the minister said that government would be making its decision once the feedback was received from school councils. Feedback from schools and school leaders was unequivocal in support of compulsory school uniforms. Forty-three school councils responded to the invitation to comment on the motion of introducing compulsory school uniforms for primary and middle year students. An overwhelming majority of respondents supported the principle of students wearing school uniforms.
Concurrent with seeking feedback from school councils, the Association of Northern Territory Educational Leaders conducted a survey amongst its members on the same issue. Survey results revealed that 72% of school leaders were supportive of compulsory school uniforms. As it stands now, there is no existing system-wide policy that requires school students to wear uniforms. However, many schools have developed school uniform policies on an individual basis. Most urban primary schools have school uniform policies with very high levels of compliance, whilst over a half of urban high schools have no compulsory uniform policy. School uniforms and policies in remote areas are rare.
This morning, I unveiled the government’s new compulsory school uniforms policy. I am very confident this policy will be well received by school councils, parents and principals. In keeping with the government’s resolve to raise educational standards and outcomes in schools, the drivers in developing this policy have been to encourage professional high expectation environments in all schools, including remote schools; to encourage school pride in Years 8 and 9 students; and to remove the high cost, high anxiety fashion battle that clothing young teenagers has become for many parents.
The government’s new compulsory school uniforms policy requires that all students in government schools wear an authorised school uniform. This will apply to students from Transition to Year 9 unless there are exceptional circumstances. Under the policy, each government school, in conjunction with their school council and parents, will develop an implementation plan which contains the following elements: a requirement that students wear an authorised school uniform; suitable measures to address exceptional circumstances, short term or long term, where a student for good reason is unable to comply with this policy – for example, recent arrival at school, unreasonable financial burden being placed on the family or other exceptional circumstances facing the student; measures to maximise compliance with this policy including the use of the $50 Back to School Payment. These measures will not extend to a student being excluded from school on the basis of failure to wear a school uniform. Individual schools, in conjunction with the school council and parents, will determine the appropriate uniform and ensure suitable dress standards. Uniforms will also need to be practical, affordable and meet safety considerations. Each school will be required to submit its proposed implementation plan for ratification by DEET.
Given the extreme diversity of schools across the Territory, it is important to recognise that a one-size-fits-all approach cannot work in the implementation of this policy. It is, therefore, sensible and appropriate that each school develops its own implementation plan. This will be in accordance with a broader framework for implementation that will be provided by the department. Schools will be required to have their plans in place by the end of Semester 1 2007. Implementation of the school uniforms policy will take effect as of the beginning of the 2008 school year.
The government’s firm position on this issue is wholly in keeping with community demands for raising standards in schools. We believe that school uniforms raise standards and that by making them compulsory we will take away the ambiguity that currently exists. Uniforms instil a sense of identity, both in the students’ attachment to their school and, from the community’s point of view, indicate which school the student attends.
Many parents report bullying as an issue, and there is a strong view among educationalists that school uniforms help reduce bullying. This certainly makes sense: peer pressure demands for brand names and designer labels really kick in during the teenage years, an already difficult time, and an age that is referred to time and again in the research around the middle years. The decision to include Years 8 and 9 in the compulsory school uniforms policy is very considered and should provide some relief to the what-to-wear stresses during the middle years.
This policy is very much a family-friendly policy. It will help ease the tension between parents and children in the morning when deciding what clothing will be worn that day. Introduction of compulsory school uniforms will also reduce the cost of educating a child. The cost of modern clothes can be staggering. For low income families, this can be a real issue and a mark of social disadvantage to which students should not be subject. For parents, the purchase of a fixed price uniform will significantly reduce the cost of providing clothes for 200 days of the year. The government has already signalled its support for families in this regard by underwriting the cost of uniforms with a $50 Back to School Payment.
Many schools cited the Back to School Payment as a great help for parents in affording school uniforms, and a factor which has led to an increased incidence of students wearing uniforms. I was recently made aware of a single mum with five kids who strongly supports getting her children to school in uniform. After the expenses of Christmas, $250 provides a very welcome boost during the stressful time of year of preparing her children for the new school year.
In concluding the case for introducing a compulsory school uniform policy, I turn to the survey results of educational leaders as represented by ANTSELL. As stated earlier, survey results revealed that 72% of school leaders were supportive of compulsory school uniforms, and over half believed it would have a positive impact on their school; the reasons being school uniforms would raise pride and tone, lead to the levelling of social distracters, improve the safety of students, and reduce bullying.
The focus of the government’s policy intent is on compulsory school uniforms, but I am aware that some schools are taking the opportunity to extend the discussion to include seeking community opinion on school mottos, school names, and a general corporate image of the school. I encourage this and believe it is a fantastic initiative for all schools and their school community to be involved in designing school uniforms throughout 2007. It is also very timely, given the development of new schools and sub-schools as a result of the middle schools changes.
I thank the previous minister for Education for bringing this debate into parliament. Making anything compulsory usually attracts its share of critics, but the case that you have put and the support you have gained from school councils, school leaders, and parents makes the introduction of this new policy compelling. Thank you for your preparedness to tackle the hard issues.
To the member for Blain, thank you for your contribution and your surety of the cooperation of the opposition in the introduction of compulsory school uniforms. To the member for Nelson, as usual, the recount of your own experiences as a child was valuable beyond compare, and the House notes your claim to have set the trend for wearing green and gold long before it became fashionable for the Australian sporting teams to adopt these colours. I welcome your support for what the government is trying to do and believe that your stated concerns about the need to reduce the wearing of inappropriate clothing will be able to be addressed by the policy, because it allows the school community to be involved in determining what the school uniform will be and what is and is not appropriate.
The member for Braitling, I note that your support for this policy is qualified, but I suggest that your call for us to be bold in the design and give schools a bit of …
Dr LIM: A point of order, Mr Deputy Speaker! Sorry minister, I am not calling a point of order against you. I am just trying to work out – it appears that the minister is now responding as the minister for Education, so he is closing debate.
Mr DEPUTY SPEAKER: He is, yes. There is no point of order.
Dr LIM: I was going to contribute to the debate. I thought the minister was contributing as the member for Wanguri, but I did not realise – because the minister for Education was the member for Nhulunbuy when this was introduced, that is all.
Mr DEPUTY SPEAKER: Member for Greatorex, the minister for Education is the member for Wanguri and he is closing debate.
Mr HENDERSON: Yes, thank you. Member for Greatorex, I was sitting here waiting for somebody else to stand and nobody did. I encourage you, if you have a contribution, to make it in the adjournment debate one night this week.
Dr Lim: I will do that.
Mr HENDERSON: Yes, you can. If you have missed your spot, I am sorry for that.
Member for Braitling, I note that your support for this policy is qualified. I suggest that your call for us to be bold in the design and give schools a bit of creativity so that they really stand out will be accommodated in the implementation of the policy. Already, as I stated earlier, I am told schools are being creative in designing their own uniforms, logos and mottos. I join you in encouraging that. I also note that you suggest students in the south of the Territory will need a winter uniform such as a jumper, a blazer or a jacket. I am not sure yet what we can do about that other than to envy the temperate climate of Alice Springs. Schools in the southern regions can take that into account in the design and the implementation of the policy.
Member for Goyder, thank you for your support and constructive suggestions, especially the reinforcement that school uniforms will assist in enhancing security in school grounds by allowing easy identification of students and visitors.
Mr Deputy Speaker, I urge all members, when visiting the schools in their electorate, to take an active interest in the implementation of the new uniforms policy. I am sure there will be many hours of fascinating debate in school council meetings about this. All of us, as local members, enjoy that and provide the encouragement for this.
Motion agreed to; statement noted.
MOTION
Note Paper - Treasurer’s Annual Financial Report 2005-06
Continued from 19 October 2006.
Mr MILLS (Blain): Mr Deputy Speaker, it appears the way we conduct our business is that the opposition reads the annual financial report and sees different issues or, perhaps, the same, and comments on those that would not be amplified by government. That is the nature of the mechanism we have here in this parliament.
No one would say that times are tough in the Territory; it is one of those times when the economy is strong. Reading the Financial Review on the weekend, it was pleasing to see a report on the housing market in the Northern Territory. The report masked the state so it looked like it could be a place in the nation where it was expected and then it said: ‘Where is it? It is in the Northern Territory’. It indicated that this growth seems to be continuing. If we analyse the reasons for the growth, anyone would tell you that the resources boom drives it significantly, and this has a very significant and noticeable effect on the Territory economy and has such an effect, particularly on our land prices. As we look around the country, that has been the effect as it has flowed from Victoria, New South Wales, right across the country. Now, it is lingering on in the areas where the resource boom is most rampant.
The way that the opposition would approach this, as is reported in the Treasurer’s Annual Financial Report, is that, when there are times of plenty, it requires a particular way of managing those boom times, just as the lean times require particular strategies. We must wisely administer our affairs so that, whilst there is plenty we prepare for the times of less. That is the concern here.
It is probably a quirk of history that my predecessors - I put on the record too that, though I represent as a member of the Country Liberal Party, I have not been a member of the Country Liberal Party in this Chamber for 27 years. We have all played our different parts at different times, and there have been different ebbs and flows through the course of the Northern Territory. We came to the point where there was a change of government. I can say fairly confidently that those who carried responsibility for leading - particularly in economic matters - up until the change of government, there was a sense that there could well be better times ahead because the GST was being sorted out - as well as being opposed by those who were in opposition and who are those who are now the benefactors - and the railway was just being bedded down.
They were tough times. If we take an honest moment and walk in others shoes, I can imagine - and I note to some small degree - how difficult those times were. Now, there has been a change, it has come at a particularly fortunate time in history for this current government. Without a doubt, the GST - which was once resisted and opposed, criticised and serious concerns raised about it - has flowed at a time when the resources boom has unleashed its revenue stream into the states - and all Labor states too. They have had their responsibility to manage that revenue stream. There have been some good and some bad measures taken. I can understand it must be exciting to have that flow running through with such colossal demands and, being new to government, setting your course and agenda.
The story, as I see it, has been that the income of the Northern Territory has been projected as they looked ahead and made their plans and, as the Treasurer’s report stated, made his planned measures of what the income was expected to be, calibrated the whole machinery based upon what is expected to be the income. He endeavours to get some kind of restraint and discipline within the departments, but is getting a bit used to this idea that there is probably going to be a heck of a lot more than you expect. However, you cannot be sure. Then, right at the end after you have set your course, you find that more money flows in than you expected. It must be so fortunate for the Treasurer to be able to pass that off; it masks a multitude of sins and is able to be presented to the Territory community as excellent fiscal management.
There is, perhaps, some of that, but it is very fortunate. A lot of it is more good luck than good management in this respect to be able to have surpluses because, if you are budgeting for a deficit and then you end up getting more than you expected - and much more than you expected such as $250m more than you expected last year - you are able to cover some of the excesses of some of the departments. That is a bonus. At the same time, you have enough left over to say you have done such a good job you have a surplus. That is good luck.
Many people know that it is the role of the opposition to ensure that we recognise that we are in a cycle. I am looking to see more evidence of care taken with things such as the mounting unfunded liability, particularly with superannuation. That is a grave concern as we move ahead. I suspect that the stronger economic times will continue for longer. I am a little more upbeat about that, but I am concerned about the rising levels of superannuation that is unfunded. That debt will compound and it must be dealt with courageously now, rather than leave it for another administration.
Another aspect of the management of the Territory economy is that delicate area of inflation. The negotiation of wages deals prior to elections with the public sector, which comprises a very large proportion of the Northern Territory community, affects the economy and money flow into our Territory economy. It is much greater – I think it is about 30%, I could be wrong – than New South Wales, which is about 10%. Therefore, the effect of wages increases do have quite a pronounced effect on the triggers which drive inflation. That is a concern. It is not to be interpreted as ‘you should not pay more’, ‘they should practice wage restraint’, but it is an acknowledgement of the effect of wage increases on inflation. I would like to see comments made by the government on how we are going to make sure that we keep inflation under control. In the Territory, we seem to exceed the national average on inflation. The inflation rate in the Territory, to my recall, is 4.9% which is way over the national average. That is a concern because of the effect that it has on home ownership. Perhaps not so much on those who are enjoying jobs at this moment where the money is flowing quite well, who already have a unit or a house, have rent being paid to them or might already be in a home, but those who are outside home ownership concern me. They are the ones who trouble me when inflation starts to really kick in because of the cost of living.
I hope that the Treasurer, in his reply, will give me some assurance that there is recognition of the problems of inflation, particularly for those who are on lesser incomes, outside the housing market, and wanting to buy a block of land and build a house and raise young kids. They are the ones to whom we need to shift our attention. We can celebrate in the company of those who have houses but, more and more, we need to be mindful of those who have not yet bought a house, those who are leaving school now, those who have left those decisions too late and are now trying to get in. I really feel for them and that is where inflation bites the hardest. I look forward to comments on that matter.
I would also like to hear comment on counter-cyclical strategies so that, in times of economic strength, you take what strategies are employed to offset and prepare for the difficult times ahead. One, of course, is the unfunded superannuation and the nett debt.
With those comments, I trust that the Treasurer has taken note of those key points. There are many different aspects of the report that I could comment on, but they are the key ones: the GST revenue which is flowing strongly into the Territory, and the obligation on this administration to manage in a time of plenty. Sometimes, that is more difficult than a lean time because, in a lean time, it is clear what you have to do. If you lose some money for your household budget, it really sharpens your thinking, but if it is sloshing around the place, as it is, you start to loosen up a little and your priorities are not as clear. That is the concern I have at this particular time in the Territory’s development.
The waterfront and the effect that it will have on the Territory economy as we move forward is a concern. Its effect on the fragile Territory economy is something the Territory opposition will monitor closely. What measures are being used by this Treasurer to reduce inflation? How are unfunded liabilities being approached and what attitude does the Treasurer and this government have towards rising debt and unfunded liabilities?
Mr STIRLING (Treasurer): Mr Deputy Speaker, falling debt is the key to this and to the successful fiscal management of this government. It remains a high priority for this government, unlike our predecessors who did not see a growing deficit and spiralling debt behind the government as any problem at all. The punters did, come 2001 when they saw a flat economy, when they saw no jobs and, at the same time, debt per capita in the Northern Territory the worst in Australia and growing at an horrific rate.
What drove those debt levels? You have to look at a budget in 2000-01 that predicted a $1m deficit and blew out to $212m. That is in one year. You have to look at the effect that had on the bottom line for debt for Territorians. You have to look at 2001-02, a budget forecast of a $12m deficit and, within weeks, an Under Treasurer telling the incoming government that the budget was in an unsustainable position and we could expect a deficit bottom line at the end of the financial year, if nothing else changed, of between $126m and $134m. That is what we were confronted with: a government that did not care about debt and about future generations of Territorians, and how that might be managed into the future.
In fact, we turned that debt around to come in a minus-$83m. This is the fourth budgetary surplus outcome in a row. If there is one thing we learnt well from the CLP, it was to hold the line - do not say ‘yes’ to every bid that comes across the Cabinet table or at Budget Cabinet; be careful with what you have to spend because we saw the outcome when they did not. There were deficits of $212m, $130m and $100m year in, year out, going to the bottom line. It is a legacy we learnt a valuable lesson from and we are determined to avoid those problems.
At the end of this term of government, the ratio of nett debt and employee liabilities to revenue will be around 113%, compared to 134% when we came to office - still too high in my view, but at least trending in the right way. A whole lot of things have to happen in order to get that ratio down. It is a valuable measure of how government finances are travelling year to year, because it is that ratio of nett debt and employee liabilities to revenue that you can readily compare, state to state, territory to territory, and get a fix on just how they are travelling in an overall sense.
Actual debt will be significantly below the actual debt we inherited, despite a massive capital works program, and the budget will be in balance, meaning the Labor government, by that stage, will have delivered five balanced or surplus budgets out of eight full budgets. That is a record that we remain proud of.
To cover the highlights of the 2005-06 Treasurer’s Annual Financial Report: a general government cash surplus outcome of $40m; a general government accrual nett operating surplus of $27m, importantly, the first such surplus since the introduction of accrual accounting in 2002 and 2003 and, in many ways, a much more meaningful indicator of government responsibility than cash standing out on its own; significant underlying growth of 11% in general government own-sourced revenue due to an increase in business activity and confidence; and a significant reduction in nett debt for the non-financial public sector to $1594m, which is $149m below the high of $1743m recorded back in 2001-02. When measured as a percentage to revenue, both nett debt at 48% and nett debt plus employee liabilities of 112% are, again, and not surprisingly, the lowest since the introduction of accrual accounting.
We are committed to managing the Territory’s finances responsibly, but we have to, at the same time, maintain an appropriate balance between the needs of the community, the needs of the Territory economy, and maintaining a sound fiscal position as we go forward.
I pick up a couple of points made by the member for Blain, where he talked about good luck rather than good management. At other times, he has said that it is all due to Costello and Howard. Well, if it is all a question of luck or, in the second place, it is all due to Howard and Costello, how is it that New South Wales is in a bit of a bind at the moment, that Victoria is struggling. Western Australia and Northern Territory are doing all right with Labor governments. Therefore, it is a bit hard to see that it is all Prime Minister Howard and Treasurer Costello for this wonderful growth in the Northern Territory. Tell that to Premier Iemma how come the Howard and Costello magic is not working for him in New South Wales, or for the recently re-elected Premier Bracks in Victoria.
Mr Mills: You were not listening. I gave you a little history.
Mr STIRLING: You do not want to pay credit where credit is due, and that is the fiscal responsibility that this government has demonstrated over its time in office, in stark contrast to the excesses of the CLP past.
The questions regarding unfunded superannuation and the growth in that will remain a concern for quite some considerable time into the future for the Northern Territory, and will for every other jurisdiction that has a large liability pinned behind superannuation. That is because, when actuaries come in and do these assessments - guess what? - they do not put a lesser figure on what the outgoings might be into the future. That figure is adjusted upwards every time actuaries carry out a review of liabilities in this area. However, whilst the liability is large - and it is large - the key for any jurisdiction, including the Northern Territory, remains the ability to pay those emerging costs as they do emerge. Whilst it is a big figure on the books, and the Northern Territory has a big bill against super, it is not due on any one day; that is the culmination, looking forward, of what is on the books. Of course, if people do not retire, walk out and claim all of their super all on the same day, it is an emerging basis. The key, as I said, is the ability of government to meet those liabilities as they emerge, and the Northern Territory government clearly has that ability.
In relation to living costs, inflation ran below the national average for much of the past five years. The inflation rate itself, and the growth in the inflation rate in Darwin, is the result of the successful economy. The result, in a large part, of that jump in inflation rate is due to the increase in housing prices. It is also influenced by fuel and, to a lesser degree, fruit. Of course, fuel drives transport costs, which has another effect in the mix. However, by and large, the biggest single contributor to the increasing inflation rate is the housing prices. What do we do in order to ameliorate the effects as far as we can on individuals and business in the Northern Territory? For a start, this government puts $56m each year into Power and Water by way of customer service obligation that reduces the electricity, water and sewerage prices that Territorians would otherwise face. That is an enormous effort for the Northern Territory: each year between $50m and $60m across to Power and Water to hold down electricity, water and sewerage prices.
We have provided, to this stage, over 1000 HomeNorth loans. That first home owner base in the Northern Territory has grown incredibly, and we are very proud of that. We have subsidised and reduced heavily or brought in stamp duty concessions on first home owners, and principle place of residence, at a cost of over $40m to the budget since 2002. We even subsidise fuel to the extent of 1.1 per litre. Each of those have an effect on individuals than if those concessions and CSOs were not in place. If you look at business across the world of business and the payroll deductions, the tax exemption is now worth something like $74m in the community, and $134m worth of tax breaks to come on business in the Northern Territory over the life of this parliament. You can see that this government is way ahead in reducing the effects, as far as we can, of a growing economy on individuals and business alike.
It is a good report. Most importantly, it shows that the government is tracking toward its longer-term goals in fiscal management; that we are holding the line. However, we will need to continue to exercise that fiscal discipline right through this term. The result in the end for Territorians will be reducing debt levels, reducing interest payments because of reduced debt levels at the end of that term and, of course, more flexibility for the government of the day to meet the service needs of Territorians right across this Northern Territory.
Mr Deputy Speaker, I commend the 2005-06 Treasurer’s Annual Financial Report to the Assembly.
Motion agreed to; report noted.
Mr DEPUTY SPEAKER: Honourable members, I have received advice on the sound system. Parliamentary staff need to adjust the sound system and we must suspend sittings for a period of five minutes. We will return at 5.40 pm.
The Assembly suspended.
Madam SPEAKER: Honourable members, I have given leave for the Minister for Police, Fire and Emergency Services to make a personal explanation.
Dr BURNS (Police, Fire and Emergency Services): Madam Speaker, I provide the House with additional detail and clarification in relation to a response I gave to a question from the Leader of the Opposition during Question Time.
The Opposition Leader asked a question about the time it had taken police to respond to a call from Mr Bobby Bali of Caf Kashmir in the Nightcliff shops after an incident involving a group of youths. In Question Time, I stated that there had been an arrest in relation to this matter. In fact, a suspect has been interviewed in relation to this matter and, according to police, will be summonsed for aggravated assault and stealing. In my response, I also queried the Opposition Leader’s assertion that the response time was 35 minutes. Superintendent Kate Vanderlaan has stated that the police response time was, in fact, 16 minutes.
Madam SPEAKER: Honourable members, I table the Northern Territory Electoral Commission Annual Report 2005-06.
Ms SACILOTTO (Port Darwin)(by leave): Madam Speaker, I make a statement to update members on its inquiry reference relating to the benefits of Schools Sport NT programs.
As members are aware, I was appointed to the committee in September this year and was, subsequently, elected chair. In reporting on the committee’s activities and deliberations since its establishment 12 months prior to then, I acknowledge the work of my predecessor as chair, the now Minister for Primary Industry and Fisheries. I also acknowledge the work during this period of the member for Arnhem who, until recently, was also a member of the committee. I thank my fellow committee members for their contributions to the ongoing work and for their support they have shown me by electing me as chair. I trust that we will continue to work in a bipartisan way to achieve tangible and lasting changes for young people in the Northern Territory.
The terms of reference for sport and youth give the committee three focal areas upon which to concentrate; namely, the ability and effectiveness of existing structures and programs from grassroots to elite to deliver in urban, regional and remote areas and recommendations for improvement; the role and benefit of School Sport NT programs and links to participation; and demonstrated links between participation in sport and reduced antisocial behaviour.
The task, as I see it, is how we can change or improve the way sporting programs are delivered right across the Northern Territory so that more young people are able to access - and, more importantly, are motivated to do so - a range of sporting activities. I am well aware that I am new to the committee and other members, apart from the member Sanderson who has also just been appointed to the committee, have had the benefit of 12 months of listening, reading and discussing the issues and influences and thinking about them. In stating my views today, I certainly do not intend to pre-empt any committee findings or decisions. I look forward to hearing my fellow committee members’ views on how they see our role.
I believe the health and welfare of our young people is central to the reasons for establishing this committee, and is a subject which is very important to me. Members would be aware of the continuing debate Australia-wide on childhood obesity and how this is threatening the health outcomes of young people. There are many lifestyle factors for this, and the fast food industry cannot be blamed for it all. As well as eating more of the wrong foods, children are much more sedentary these days then ever before. There is the lure of computers and screen-based activities, but this is only part of the equation. Today’s children are much less likely to walk to and from school; instead, being dropped off and picked up each day. In fact, there was an article in the news recently that this has had a greater impact on the increasing weight and worsening health of children than the time spent in front of a screen; that the way forward is to get parents out of cars and walking their children to school.
Of course, the decrease of physical activity of our children is a reflection of lifestyle changes which also impacted upon their parents. An article in The Age on 15 August 2006 reported that Australia is facing an obesity epidemic, particularly with regard to children. I quote:
In this climate, any changes we can make to increase the amount of regular, sustained physical activity can only be beneficial. However, the committee’s terms of reference are not about physical activity per se and how to make young people healthier. The terms of reference specifically refer to sport; about how existing structures are able to effectively deliver sporting programs and services across the Northern Territory. Whether it is for grassroots participation or for nurturing and developing more gifted young sports people, the terms of reference requires us to develop our findings into recommendations to the Assembly on how sporting delivery can be improved. They also ask us to look at how School Sport NT operates and how its operation benefits sports and impacts on overall participation rates. Lastly, the committee is asked to investigate links between participation in sports and reduced antisocial behaviour; that is, does more sporting participation by young people lead them to live more functional lives with a reduction in social problems?
The positive contribution of sporting participation to a healthy and well-balanced individual and society cannot be overstated. As well as improved physical and mental health, it provides a better connection to community and identity. However, there are barriers to sporting participation, particularly for young people who are still grappling with issues of body image and identity. Involvement in sport at an earlier age leads to better skills, confidence and self-esteem, and this can overcome many of the problems in those critical years when they reach puberty.
Participation in sport also means having access to the right facilities and coaching ability. This is a matter the committee will be looking at, particularly in the context of remote communities where service delivery is always challenging. A report released by the Victorian government in 1993 entitled Physical and Sport Education for Victorian Schools, otherwise known as the Moneghetti Report after the chair of the committee, looked at the delivery of sport education in Victorian schools. While over 10 years old, it is relevant to the ongoing debate about school sport. Of particular interest is the distinction it has made between physical education, sport education and sport. In the context of discussing the role of that committee looking at sport for young people, physical education was defined as:
The Moneghetti committee broadly endorsed the definition of sport education given by an earlier Senate standing committee, noting that sport education is a component of the physical education program and teaches the values and knowledge of sport. The definition given was:
Then it defined sport itself as:
In all, the Moneghetti Report made 19 recommendations, and a key finding was that schools need play a significant role in delivering opportunities for sports education and skills development to young people.
The committee will continue to assess the outcomes of that report and others, and their application to the special challenges we face in the Northern Territory. Early in its inquiry, the committee identified a number of areas upon which to concentrate, including the very real difficulties faced in trying to facilitate full sporting programs in regional and remote areas across the Northern Territory. While funds are, obviously, a constraint to equitable delivery of programs in every community, the availability of sufficient numbers of trained people to deliver the program is of equal relevance.
The committee has been looking at how these issues can be best addressed. It has also been looking at:
the relationships between peak sporting bodies and schools, as well as the peak bodies and communities;
participation rates, including gender differences, to identify who is missing out or dropping out, when and why;
These and other questions are still under active review by the committee.
Since establishment, the committee has sought and received official briefings from the Department of Employment, Education and Training; School Sport NT; the Department of Local Government, Housing and Sport; and the Nutrition and Physical Activity Unit of the Department of Health and Community Services. It met with representatives of these agencies early in 2006.
In March this year, the committee commenced advertising for submissions and actively seeking the input of peak sporting organisations, schools, bodies representing the interests of young people, and the general population. This was through advertising in the mainstream press, as well as through targeted e-mail newsletters contacting relevant bodies and the like. An information brochure was also produced and widely distributed through the electorate offices, sporting organisations and schools, etcetera. The then chair spoke at a number of events, including sports workshops and a meeting with the Chief Minister’s Round Table of Young Territorians.
He also travelled with members of the select committee on substance abuse in the community, where they visited five Central Australian and five Top End communities during this year. This followed recognition by members of each committee that the underlying issues of both were often the same. With two members on both committees - and now there are three of us who are on both - it made sense to take advantage of the opportunity to work together in this way. I have already had discussions with my colleague, the member for Macdonnell, who is chair of the substance abuse committee, regarding continuing this where it is appropriate to the terms of reference.
In August this year, a number of additional official briefings were provided at the behest of the committee. These included a presentation from officers of the Northern Territory Police who have been engaged in various capacities in dealing with young people across the Northern Territory. The briefing included information on the mobile activity trailer used by police to deliver sporting opportunities in some communities outside Katherine, and the impact that is having on reducing juvenile crime and other dysfunctional behaviour. This is one program that seems to be having a positive impact, and the committee intends to look at it more closely when it visits the Katherine region. The committee has also received official briefings about the work of the Office of Crime Prevention and the approach taken by NT Correctional Services in its dealing with young people who come under its care. As well, the committee is yet to be briefed by the Northern Territory Institute of Sport, and looks forward to meeting with them in the near future.
As well as official briefings, to date a total of 43 submissions have been received. The committee is currently analysing and assessing these before undertaking the next phase of its investigations, which will be a series of public hearings and meetings around the Northern Territory. This will provide an opportunity for the community to put forward their views on issues under investigation
I recently wrote to all members asking for advice on any sporting initiatives for young people which may be happening in their electorates, especially those programs or events which are showing encouraging outcomes for young people in participation and positive lifestyle changes. Once all these responses are received, the committee will finalise its community consultation program, and this will be well publicised. Final details have yet to be decided, however. Hearings will be held in Darwin, Palmerston and the rural area and in all regional centres and selected communities.
Madam Speaker, I welcome the opportunity which appointment to this committee has given me, to play a part in changing the delivery of sport for young people and to foster greater participation. I see this as a way of having a positive impact on the future of young people and, therefore, the future of the Northern Territory. There is still some way to go until the committee is in a position to report its recommendations to the Legislative Assembly. In the meantime, I look forward to receiving input from members during the course of this debate. Again, I acknowledge and thank my fellow committee members and the two former members.
Madam Speaker, I move that the Assembly take note of the statement.
Mr BONSON (Millner): Madam Speaker, I briefly contribute as one of the original members of the committee. I thank the two previous members for the hard work they did over the last few months gathering the information the new chairperson, the member for Port Darwin, has explained to the House. The previous chair has now become a minister, and congratulations to him. He did an honest and competent job whilst committee chair.
I thank the member for Arnhem who showed a definite interest in all aspects of the committee and, in particular, bush areas and the benefits to little kids. I look forward to working with the member for Sanderson and the new chair, the member for Port Darwin. I know that the opposition and Independent members are very keen for this committee to continue its hard work, and to start on its consultation next year.
I believe in physical education. I believe that through the healthy mind, healthy body principle, we can get some great outcomes for Territory kids into the future. However, I will not speak for too long. I thank everyone who has been involved and those into the future. I hope we can continue to kick goals. Madam Speaker, I seek leave to continue my remarks at a later date.
Leave granted.
Debate adjourned.
Mr STIRLING (Treasurer): Madam Speaker, I table the Report of the Remuneration Tribunal and Determination No 1 of 2006 for Members of the Legislative Assembly, Members of the Executive Council and Ministers of the Territory.
MOTION
Print Paper - Report of the Remuneration Tribunal and Determination No 1 of 2006 for Members of the Legislative Assembly, Members of the Executive Council and Ministers of the Territory
Mr STIRLING (Treasurer): Madam Speaker, I move that the report be printed.
Motion agreed to.
MOTION
Note Paper - Report of the Remuneration Tribunal and Determination No 1 of 2006 for Members of the Legislative Assembly, Members of the Executive Council and Ministers of the Territory
Mr STIRLING (Treasurer): Madam Speaker, It is a requirement of the Assembly Members and Statutory Officers (Remuneration and Other Entitlements) Act 2006 that both (a) a copy of the determination is distributed to each person whose entitlements are affected by the determination; and (b) a copy of the report is tabled in the Assembly within six sitting days of its receipt. I am advised that copies of the determination have been circulated and I am tabling this determination in line with paragraph (b). It is now open for members of this Assembly to consider the determination. Under the legislation we have 10 sitting days to determine whether to bring a disallowance resolution or to allow the determination to stand.
Turning to the key aspects of the report of the tribunal, I note that in accordance with the government’s submission on the matter, the increase and the additional salary given for ministers and parliamentary office holders has been restricted to 3%, in line with the base 3% being offered to NT public sector workers in enterprise bargaining negotiations under the Northern Territory government’s Wages Policy. Provision has been made for members’ annual interstate business trip to be taken in the allocated fleet vehicle, with fuel costs being met by the government. Exercising this option would extinguish the airfare entitlement. The cost of inoculations and travel insurance has been included as allowable components for authorised overseas travel. The Electorate Allowance has been adjusted to allow for a CPI increase and to allow for increases in postal costs.
I can foreshadow that the government sees no reason to disallow any of these key recommendations, and that there is no apparent legal or technical issues pertaining to these central parts of the tribunal’s report and determination.
In regard to the disallowance issue, I draw members’ attention to other issues of a technical and legal nature which may require further examination. In the letter forwarding the report to me, the Chairperson of the Remuneration Tribunal raises the possibility that clause 7 of the determination may be beyond the power of the tribunal and, consequently, of no effect. Clause 7 deals with office entitlements, both in the Legislative Assembly building and for an electorate office, the level of equipment for these offices, and the employment of electorate officers. This matter arose during the year as a result of the Remuneration Tribunal seeking legal advice as to the coverage of the new act; that is, the Assembly Members and Statutory Officers (Remuneration and Other Entitlements) Act 2006 and the basis upon which entitlements be determined by avenues other than the tribunal.
Advice received from the Solicitor for the Northern Territory and from the Solicitor-General, in October 2006, was to the effect that the Remuneration Tribunal is the sole source of authority in regard to payments that are in the nature of remuneration or allowances. However, in regard to entitlements, the tribunal’s jurisdiction is not exhaustive and there are other means by which they may be determined. For example, by way of specific legislative provision such as superannuation legislation; by ministerial determination under section 5 of the Assembly Members and Statutory Officers (Remuneration and Other Entitlements) Act; and by ministerial determination provided there has been the necessary appropriation of funds.
The Remuneration Tribunal had prepared its 2006 determination prior to having received the advice of the Solicitor-General. After considering the advice, it queries whether it has the power to deal with the matters it has in clause 7 of the determination. My department has sought supplementary legal advice on this issue, and this will be available before the passage of the next 10 sitting days. I will advise the Assembly of the nature of this advice and the government’s intentions as soon as practicable.
If the tribunal’s determination is within power then it could stand and become effective once the 10 sitting days had expired. Alternatively, this Assembly may decide to disallow the determination and deal with the issue by some other process. On the other hand, if the tribunal’s determination is not within power it will be necessary to deal with the issue by another method.
The government is also considering the tribunal’s recommendations that there be specific legislation or a determination under section 5 of the Assembly Members and Statutory Officers (Remuneration and Other Entitlements) Act dealing with ministerial staff, ministerial office accommodation and operation, arrangements for staff and the Office of the Speaker, entitlements of the Leader of the Opposition, and electorate office staff.
In regard to this issue, the government is acutely conscious of its responsibility to uphold the institutions of parliament, to protect the democratic electoral system and, at the same time, there is always a need to apply appropriate restraint and for there to be some flexibility in these resourcing matters. Codification of all office equipment and staffing entitlements may provide some occurrence of protecting against arbitrary decisions, but lead to destructive inflexibility. Certainly, codification has not been an issue that previous administrations have sought to pursue. Going down this path may, ultimately, erode the ability for delivery of services by all concerned. Government has not ruled out any option and will be considering these matters with an open mind.
Madam Speaker, I move that the Assembly take note of the report, and seek leave to continue my remarks at a later hour on behalf of the Chief Minister.
Leave granted.
Debate adjourned.
Mr STIRLING (Treasurer): Madam Speaker, again on behalf of the Chief Minister, I table the Report of the Ombudsman 2005-06.
Mr STIRLING (Treasurer): Madam Speaker, I move that the Report of the Ombudsman 2005-06 be printed.
Motion agreed to.
MOTION
Note Paper – Ombudsman’s Report 2005-06
Mr STIRLING (Treasurer): Madam Speaker, the Office of the Ombudsman is a testament to the rights of private citizens to be heard when aggrieved by the actions of those who provide public services. By investigating complaints and making recommendations for their resolution, the Ombudsman assists government agencies to improve the service that they provide to the public. The Ombudsman recommends processes for resolving complaints within agencies and helps to develop mechanisms to ensure that specific complaints do not recur.
As with previous annual reports, the Ombudsman highlights a number of cases where service delivery agencies have not performed adequately. Significantly, in 2005-06 the Ombudsman made some 244 recommendations to agencies to improve administrative practices of which 94% were agreed to. This is a clear indication of the Ombudsman’s impact on improving the processes and procedures of agencies within her jurisdiction.
In 2004-05, the Ombudsman reported that the time taken to complete investigations into the conduct of Northern Territory Police was unacceptable. I note that since then, the Ombudsman and police have both made a concerted effort to reduce these time frames. The Ombudsman, her staff and investigating officers of the Northern Territory Police, are to be commended for their efforts. In 2005-06, approaches to the Ombudsman’s Office decreased by 15% in comparison to 2004-05.
I also note that the Ombudsman sought assistance from Northern Territory Treasury to develop a new format for statistics in this year’s annual report. While this may make comparison with previous years somewhat problematic, I wish to commend the Ombudsman for taking the necessary steps to ensure that the report’s statistics more clearly reflect the activities of the office.
Importantly, and as another example of the government’s ongoing commitment to transparency, ministers will address issues where they are relevant to their portfolios in their responses to the Ombudsman’s annual report.
Madam Speaker, I move that the Assembly take note of this report, and seek leave to continue my remarks at a later hour on behalf of the Chief Minister.
Leave granted.
Debate adjourned.
Mr STIRLING (Treasurer): Madam Speaker, I table the Treasurer’s Mid-Year Report 2006-07.
Mr STIRLING (Treasurer): Madam Speaker, the mid-year report satisfies the requirements of the Fiscal Integrity and Transparency Act and provides updated financial information for 2006-07 through to 2009-10. It also meets the Territory’s mid-year obligations under the Uniform Presentation Framework Agreement.
The 2006-07 mid-year report incorporates the outcomes of the 2005-06 financial year, Cabinet decisions since May 2006, revised Territory revenue estimates including updated GST and taxation revenue, and other minor revenue-related adjustments largely due to changes in specific purpose payments from the Australian government. In addition, this report provides updated information on both the Territory’s economic and fiscal outlook.
The key fiscal highlights in the report include: cash targets unchanged in all years; operating result surpluses predicted from 2006-007 ongoing; further increase to the investment in the Territory’s infrastructure in 2006-007 and all forward years from that announced in May 2006; nett debt down to $1681m by 2009-10, representing an $89m improvement on May 2006 estimates; a nett debt to revenue ratio of 48% in 2006-07, reducing to 45% by 2009-10; and nett debt plus employee liabilities to revenue ratio continuing to fall despite an increase in superannuation liabilities.
From an economic perspective, key highlights include: gross state product revised up from 5.8% to 6.2%; employment growth revised up from 2.3% to 5% due to stronger growth and resident employment across all sectors; and population growth revised up from 1.5% to 1.7% due to stronger than estimated nett interstate migration to the Territory.
State final demand remains at historically high levels, with a forecast growth to decrease by 5% in 2006-07 - a stronger outcome than the 9.1% reduction in growth forecast at the time of the budget. Again, the extension of the Alcan G3 expansion increase in total construction costs are major contributing factors to the more modest decline in state final demand.
Employment is forecast to increase by 5% in 2006-07, revised up from the budget estimate of 2.3%. The major influence on the upward revision is the broadly-based economic growth across industries, including mining, construction, property and business, finance and insurance, retail and tourism.
Population growth is forecast to strengthen to 1.7% to December 2006, stronger than the budget forecast of 1.5%. The forecast of 1.7% incorporates an upward adjustment made by the Australian Bureau of Statistics to the preliminary December 2005 figure.
The inflation outlook reported at the time of the budget was that strengthening demand for goods and services, combined with continuing labour and skill shortages, would put forward pressure on inflation over 2006 and 2007. While this broad outlook remains unchanged, the rate of growth and the Consumer Price Index over 2006 has been stronger than estimated at the time of the budget, when year-on-year inflation to December 2006 was estimated to increase by 2.9%. This has been revised in the mid-year report to 4%. The major contributors to the higher than estimated inflation outcome are housing costs, fruit prices and fuel.
I turn now to the updated 2006-07 fiscal outlook. The general government sector cash outcome for 2006-07 and the forward estimates remains unchanged from the May 2006 budget, with a balanced position projected by 2008-09 and a small surplus of $17m estimated for 2009-10. While the outcome remains unchanged, both receipts and payments have varied by $60m in 2006-07. Operating receipts are expected to increase as a result of: higher payroll tax and conveyancing stamp duty collections of $16m due to increased economic activity; higher GST revenue estimates of $3m due to increased population growth - this increase is one-off as the effect of declining relativities means that GST is estimated to fall by around $17m in all forward years from that projected in the May 2006 estimates; an increase in specific purpose payments from the Australian government of $26m due to several agreements being finalised and the recognition as revenue of amounts received late in 2005-06; an increase in interest revenue estimates of $6m due to higher cash holdings across government and rising interest rates; and an upward revision to mining royalties of $5m associated with increased mining production and rising commodity prices.
Payments for 2006-07 have increased by $60m, due to policy decisions of $6m approved by government including the costs associated with recent road safety initiatives. The carryover of expense obligations from 2005-06 of $33m largely related to receipts from the Australian government late in 2005-06; increased superannuation costs of $13m following the revised actuarial assessment and the expected introduction of the Territory’s death and invalidity scheme; and expenses of $11m related to specific purpose payments from the Australian government in line with increased revenue.
I turn now to the accrual estimates. At the time of the May 2006 budget, the nett operating balance was projected to be in deficit from 2007-08 onwards. The 2006-07 mid-year report now projects a nett operating balance to be in surplus in all years. This improvement largely relates to the recognition of revenue from the Australian government of amounts recorded as deposits held in 2005-06. Members may remember that this change in accounting treatment was mentioned in the 2005-06 Treasurer’s Annual Financial Report. Consistent with the operating results, the fiscal balance also reflects an improved position in all forward years, albeit at a lower rate. This is despite significant ongoing capital investment in the Territory’s infrastructure. This trend of improvement in both the operating and fiscal balances would indicate that the Territory’s aim of a balanced position for both measures by 2012-13 remains achievable.
I turn now to the fiscal targets for the non-financial public sector. Nett worth for 2006-07 has improved by $173m since May 2006, rising to $2755m in 2009-10. This is due to flow-on effect of the improved cash surplus and the increase in the Territory’s asset offset by the increase in the Territory’s own funded superannuation liability. Nett debt is estimated to decrease in 2009-10 from budget time by $89m to $1681m, largely due to the flow-on effect of the improved cash outcome in 2005-06. Nett debt is now forecast to be significantly lower than the $1753m reported in 2001-02, despite the major investment in infrastructure projects across the Territory and increased funding in core service provision areas of health, education, and public safety in the recent years. When measured as a ratio to revenue, the 45% estimated in 2009-10 represents an improvement of 3% since budget time, and is a significant reduction on the 67% recorded in 2001-02.
Nett debt plus employee liabilities is expected to rise to $4172m by 2009-10, $81m over that estimated at budget time. This is largely as the result of the increase in the Territory’s superannuation liability following recent actuarial reassessment as reported in the 2005-06 Treasurer’s Annual Financial Report, together with the estimated outcome of the Commonwealth Superannuation Scheme’s triennial review currently in progress. Revised forward estimates incorporate the likely outcome of the CSS review to include the allocation of financial responsibility for additional members to the Territory that have only just been identified by the scheme’s administrators. The revised estimates also include the expected introduction of the Territory’s death and invalidity scheme. When measured as a ratio to revenue, nett debt plus employee liability remains largely constant at around 113%, 114% through the forward years. It is a significant improvement on the 134% recorded in 2001-02.
In conclusion, Madam Speaker, the 2006-07 mid-year report provides further evidence of the Territory’s growing economy. The improved fiscal outlook underpins the government’s commitment to maintaining its strong fiscal strategy principles, whilst promoting economic activity and growth for the Territory. However, recent indicators of a slowing in GST growth, combined with increases in the Territory’s superannuation liability, mean adherence to this fiscal target remain difficult, but this government remains committed to their achievement. I cannot stress enough the maintenance of tight fiscal discipline as the long-term key to economic growth and development.
The mistake the CLP administration made was to believe that spiralling debt and increasing deficits did not matter in the short term. You cannot be more wrong than that. We are still hampered by the debt. When the CLP government needed to actively stimulate the economy, they simply did not have the wherewithal to do it. Managing the economy is a day-to-day job. Managing budgets and ensuring we are progressing is a tough job - a job I take on every day; and every day I question all things about our expenditure, our priorities, and where we are heading.
I believe we have the balance right to date. The budget has been in surplus four times; we have not gone beyond any predicted deficit. However, as I say, it takes daily management. The public have trusted the Martin Labor government with this job. I believe we are vindicating that trust. After their appalling economic performance in the 1990s, it is self-evident that the CLP cannot be trusted with the finances of the Territory.
Madam Speaker, I commend the 2006-07 Mid-Year Report to the Assembly, and move that the Assembly take note of the report.
Debate adjourned.
Dr BURNS (Health): Mr Deputy Speaker, I move that the Assembly do now adjourn.
Ms CARNEY (Araluen): Mr Deputy Speaker, tonight I talk about one of the many casualties of the government’s decision to remove an open speed limit on Territory roads. The speed limits that are to be introduced on Territory roads next year mean that an international car testing industry estimated to be worth in the vicinity of $9m a year will be lost to Central Australian business.
Car makers from all over the world flock to Central Australia, in particular, for the combination of unrestricted speed limits on roads and extremely hot weather. However, many car makers are now set to abandon their testing programs when the 130 km/h speed limit comes into effect from January next year. Holden, Toyota and Ford performance vehicles will prune, or most likely cease, their Territory car testing programs, and a sports car specialist, Porsche, is expected to relocate to South Africa.
The Territory’s Chamber of Commerce Chief Executive Officer, Chris Young, says from a Chamber perspective the introduction of the speed limit will have a huge effect on the car testing industry, and Chamber of Commerce members stand to lose millions each year. Many Central Australians in businesses such as accommodation, hospitality and tourism, transport, motor products, road houses and security services, will suffer enormously from January 2007. The optimum car-testing season from October to April is well-timed to coincide with the tourism low season. Mr Young has said that the introduction of the speed limits would cost between $6m to $9m a year in lost revenue. It was surprising that the Chief Minister did not know of that assessment when the matter was raised in Question Time today. It shows how ill thought out the entire proposal is. Nor did the Chief Minister have regard to even consider issuing permits or other exemptions to car testing. She seemed to not have any regard to the loss to the Central Australian economy this would cause.
There can be up to 15 engineering teams testing their vehicles between Alice Springs and Tennant Creek at any one time during the hot Centralian summer. Each team requires accommodation and hospitality services for up to 20 people, warehouse facilities, rental cars, and secure car transporters. Team members also regularly dine out in local restaurants, buy souvenirs and, in the down time, participate in tourism and recreational activities. There is no doubt that the car testing teams provide very welcome business at a time when the Wet Season in the Top End and the hot summer in the Centre keeps most of the tourists away.
Central Australian Tourism Industry Association’s General Manager, Craig Catchlove, has said that the new speed limits could cost tourism businesses in Alice Springs alone about $1m over the summer. Craig Catchlove said that the Tourism Industry Association does not believe that the speed limit will reduce the number of tourist accidents, but the association does think it will have a significant economic impact of tourism business. Craig Catchlove puts his best estimate at about $1m, which is very significant in a place the size of Alice Springs.
Holden spokeswoman, Maya Donevska, said the Territory roads have been invaluable for high speed hot weather testing the new VE Commodore, but the speed limits mean that Holden would look elsewhere for future testing needs. Holden will explore alternative locations for testing and in the interim will use the proving ground facility at Lang Lang.
Toyota Manager of Vehicle Evaluation, Mina Rezk, said high speed testing would now most likely be removed from Central Australia and conducted in the Middle East - a significant loss for Central Australia. The Gulf region is a major market for the Toyota Camry and, like Central Australia, the Gulf is a high speed, high temperature environment. One requirement in testing the Camry is to maintain high speeds in high temperatures with the airconditioning on. This puts a full load on the cooling system. With a speed limit in place, Toyota is unable to fully test their vehicles whilst also respecting the law. However, one remaining hope is that Toyota may still use the Territory for dust and off-road testing.
Ford performance vehicle spokesman, Steve Colquhoun said that Ford performance vehicle testing is impacted by the Territory government’s decision and Ford would reassess their performance vehicle testing procedures. Ford spokesman, Andrew Ellis said Ford’s recent decision to expand its testing facilities in Victoria meant it could minimise the effect of the speed limit on their vehicle testing practises. He said the new laboratory at Ford’s Victorian testing ground could replicate conditions ranging from minus-40C to 55C and generate wind speeds of up to 250 km/h. Luckily enough for Ford, the new environmental facility will go online some time next year, thereby eliminating the need to travel to the Territory for high speed hot weather testing.
Mercedes Benz spokesman, David McCarthy, has said that the Territory has made Australia attractive for testing, and local businesses have certainly benefited from it. When German designers and engineers come to the Territory, they left with a thorough understanding of Australian conditions.
Porsche spokesman, Paul Ellis, said that the German prestige car maker had utilised the Territory’s roads for more than 20 years – more than 20 years - but management was evaluating introduction of the speed limit and future testing in the Territory was unlikely. Mr Ellis said Porsche would comply with all regulations and, if driving faster than 130 km/h was prohibited, they would not do it. South Africa is now a favourite to pick up this business.
You can see that the car testing industry is a major industry in Central Australia, in particular, and the government has been short-sighted in introducing a speed limit on Territory roads. Businesses in Alice Springs have approached me detailing how the introduction of the speed limit will impact on their businesses. Some small businesses are very concerned about the viability of their businesses once the car testing industry relocates, and I am very sympathetic to their concerns.
As my colleagues will appreciate, I live in Alice Springs and see firsthand the value of the car testing industry to our community. I wonder if the government has any intention to offer small businesses involved in the car testing industry any dispensation. Judging from the Chief Minister’s answer today, it seems plain that no dispensation of any description will be offered, and that is immensely disappointing.
I also should point out to the government that it should consider introducing a permit system to vehicle manufacturers who conduct car testing in Central Australia. Such a permit would allow car testing vehicles to travel at speeds in excess of the legislated speed limit. The introduction of such a permit system allows the car testing industry to continue in the Territory and, in doing so, allows many small businesses to continue in their line of business while, at the same time, not be quite so adversely affected by the introduction of the 130 km/h speed limit on our highway system.
Finally, if the government is as serious as they claim to be about reducing one death each week on Territory roads, it would have been wiser to enforce the current laws such as the need to wear seat belts, eliminating overloaded vehicles and drunk drivers, taking cars away from repeat drunk drivers, and ensuring all cars on Territory roads are in a roadworthy condition.
It is a mystery to those in the car testing industry as well as businesses in Central Australia and Alice Springs, in particular, that the government has made this decision. Perhaps, had they consulted, the government, and the Chief Minister in particular, would have understood this issue and the impact on businesses in Central Australia. Clearly, the arrogance shown by the Chief Minister demonstrates that she does not care which, no doubt, explains why her parliamentary colleagues - apparently most of them - want her out of the job.
I turn to another Alice Springs issue. I was delighted that the Alice Springs Town Council has finally agreed to support the installation of security cameras in trouble spots in the central business district of Alice Springs. I am pleased, put simply, that the council has finally caught up. It was some years ago - perhaps three or four - that I made a representation to the Alice Springs Town Council about the installation of security cameras. I spoke to businessmen and women in the Todd Mall and the level of support was enormous. However, at that time the council rejected the proposal, and I specifically made a representation to the council outlining why CCTV cameras were required.
The Mayor, in 2003 - that is, former Labor candidate Fran Kilgariff - said that installing and monitoring security cameras was ‘quite a big cost; why bother?’ The CLP wanted security cameras and a youth curfew before the last election, and the council rejected the ideas. In fact, the Mayor, the Labor candidate, just prior to the Territory election, used her casting vote last year to reject a call for the youth curfew. In the past six weeks, a group of business people have each pledged $1000 towards the installation of security cameras in the Todd Mall and the CBD of Alice Springs. They have done so because they care about the town of Alice Springs, and the Chief Minister does not. The Mayor of Alice Springs is on the record about her position on the matter.
As a direct result of the initiative of this group of business people, at the November Corporate and Community Services Committee meeting, council received a deputation from local businesses requesting that the council introduce CCTV in the CBD to reduce the incidences of antisocial behaviour. The installation of closed circuit TV cameras is a case of better late than never for the Alice Springs Town Council. Now the Northern Territory government must take action. It is no good denying the problems in Alice Springs or, indeed, being critical of anyone who identifies the problems, as I have done in the past as a member of parliament based in Alice Springs. The council has no option but to pursue the safety of the community, and there has been limited success in the current programs.
The Territory crime stats have shown a concerning and increasing trend in reported offences in Alice Springs, and it is imperative that coordinated action is taken to reverse this trend. Some members of the community expressed a view that they feel unsafe in the CBD of Alice Springs in the evening. Every Territorian has a right to feel safe. Safety is closely linked to the feelings of health and wellbeing, and also inter-related to the person’s perception of their environment and sense of belonging in their community.
Tourism is a major industry for Alice Springs. The negative national media has promoted Alice Springs as the murder capital of the world. There is need for urgent action to be taken to demonstrate that Alice Springs is a safe place, and reverse the publicity that Alice Springs has recently received. In receiving publicity, there is no point denying the problems. We need to be sensible in identifying the problems as well as providing solutions. The Alice Springs business community has provided a solution, and that is why they approached the Alice Springs Town Council to install CCTV cameras to combat vandalism, assault and antisocial behaviour, particularly alcohol offenders in the CBD area, and they clearly demonstrated a commitment to improving our town.
It is with pleasure I advise the Assembly tonight that, at an Alice Springs Town Council meeting held last night, council voted to support the introduction of CCTV cameras in hot spots in the CBD. To further the installation of the CCTV cameras, the council will apply to the federal government for funding. The National Crime Prevention Fund has a funding round that closes on Friday, 1 December this year. The Alice Springs Town Council has prepared a submission, in consultation with the business sector and the Northern Territory Chamber of Commerce and Northern Territory Police, asking the federal government for a contribution of $150 000. Total expenditure to install and commission CCTV in the CBD totals about $230 000: $5000 for the development of specifications for the system; $60 000 for fibre optic cables; $60 000 for hand tilt zoom cameras; $30 000 for digital reporting and split screen monitors and physical fit-out; and $42 000 for in-kind management and coordination from the Alice Springs Town Council.
A $30 000 in-kind contribution has been made by the group of local business people who initially made the deputation to council. I expect that the Alice Springs Town Council will request - and should request - the Northern Territory government to make at least a $30 000 contribution which would replace the in-kind contribution made by the concerned, motivated and forward-thinking group of local business people.
The government has to stop playing politics with safety issues in Alice Springs and listen to the community. The government should support the council’s youth curfew and provide funds for the installation and operation of security cameras in hot spots in the CBD. Alice Springs, like many regional centres of the Northern Territory, needs a greater police presence and other means of ensuring the safety of the community. There should be no more excuses. The Alice Springs Town Council and the Northern Territory Labor government should simply get on with it. There is a concern in the community that this matter, now that the council has agreed to it, is being flicked to the federal government.
I expect - and you do not have to be terribly clever to know - that in the lead-up to the next Territory election, various references will be made to the federal government. We have seen it in relation to the swimming pool. I note the reference by the Sport minister. I believe it was ‘$3m is beer money’ or words to that effect; ‘It is a drop in the ocean for the federal government’. Why should the federal government pay for a swimming pool in Alice Springs? This is a local government and Territory government responsibility.
Mr Deputy Speaker, installation of close circuit television cameras in Alice Springs, to ensure the people of Alice Springs are safe, cannot be avoided by this Territory government. If funds can be obtained from the Commonwealth government, that is fine. However, I would hate to see a situation where this Territory government said: ‘No, we are not providing you with funds, you go to the feds’. That would be an offensive position for this government to take. I know the Chief Minister does not like Alice Springs and does not think very much of the people who live there. However, I urge her to get on with the job of protecting their safety - that is for as long as she has the job. She should just do the decent thing and provide funding to assist the good people of Alice Springs and, importantly, make them feel safe at home and on the streets.
Mr NATT (Drysdale): Mr Deputy Speaker, tonight I would like to talk about a few events that I have been involved in, in my electorate of Drysdale since the last sittings. Drysdale is a dynamic electorate and the people who live in it are very supportive and really enjoy the lifestyle of Darwin and Palmerston. Many good things are happening in and around my electorate, and I would like to mention a few of them.
On Friday, 27 October, Palmerston held its last night market for 2006. Throughout the year, along with my colleagues, the members for Brennan and Goyder, with support from my colleagues and many ministers, I participated by having a stall at the markets. The stalls have been a wonderful opportunity for us, as members, to provide greater access to the local Palmerston and rural community to engage with their elected representatives. It gives us a chance to hear firsthand the issues that people are happy with and, of course, those issues that are causing concern.
The Palmerston night markets have been a huge success and are immensely popular with locals and visitors alike. I use this opportunity to acknowledge a couple of people who deserve much credit for their success. Julia Battison does a marvellous in coordinating the stallholders and ensuring everything runs smoothly. The house DJ, Geoff Snider, spins popular music discs and has all the kids up dancing, singing and joining in with the many activities he has organised. He is ably assisted by his enthusiastic support crew dressed as court jesters. His assistants encourage all onlookers to become involved, and they really try to put a smile on everyone’s face.
On its last night of 2006, Santa made a special appearance along with little helpers. One of the little helpers was Shad McDonald, the president of our Palmerston Branch, and I thank him for his assistance that night.
I extend my appreciation and gratitude to the many people who have participated and contributed to make this market a fabulous community activity, and thank all of our branch members who have assisted throughout the year, in particular Shad McDonald, Merv Hunt and Simon Hall. Special thanks also to our electorate officers, Jo Flesfader, Sarah Schubert and Russell Wilson for their continued support to the stall and at the markets.
While still on the theme of food and stalls, I want to also mention the good work Lavinia Mills and her staff at the Kentish Family Day Care perform. My office assisted in one of their fundraising activities last week – a sausage sizzle at Bunnings Palmerston. This was a fun day and I know the funds generated will be put to good use. I also make you aware of some of their good work. On Saturday, 28 October, they held Short Stories, Tall Stories and More Stories at Target in Palmerston. Various dignitaries and invited guests were given a 10-minute allocation to read or sing a story or two to children and their parents. Their learning and integrated play sessions, more commonly referred to as the KLIPS program, has provided a wonderful range of learning experiences and outings for the children and the service delivery team. I extend my gratitude to Lavinia and her team and all the volunteers and carers who make this possible.
A few weeks ago at the Durack Primary School, I spent a Saturday morning with the school, students, staff and parents as we started on a little school project to install a vegetable garden to predominately help children with learning difficulties focus on a task. On this particular morning, we managed to pour a concrete slab for the garden shed and erect a fence around the garden. It was terrific to see the kids get enthusiastically behind the project, and also receive fabulous response and support from parents, school staff and community members. It is gratifying to see that the community spirit still exists to such an extent that the old adage – many hands make light work – was reinforced. The Durack area is a wonderful little spot where families interact positively and share a pride in their surrounds and the activities that are undertaken. The Durack Primary School is a great little school that receives fantastic support from its principal, teachers, parents and volunteers.
Many thanks are extended to the many volunteers and businesses which got behind this project including Bunnings and Readymix Concrete. I congratulate the Durack Primary School for this initiative and all those involved, particularly the project coordinator Rachel Dickman, her husband, Peter who, along with school caretaker, Joe Walter, did an amazing job on that morning - and many thanks to them. Many thanks are also extended to Brendan Cabry, Joe Sinclair, Tony Nicholson from Readymix Concrete, Lara and Dean Sinclair and their sons, Joseph and Jack, Jack Gilmore, Aaron Clark, and his sons, Cameron and Joshua, and all the students who gave up their free time to be involved.
Many thanks to Tony Nicholson from Readymix Concrete for donating the concrete to the project, and to Bunnings at Palmerston for their donation of the garden shed, irrigation equipment and garden tools. Berrimah Second Hand Building Supplies gave me some great discounts on the fencing materials and they are to be thanked as well for their contribution to the school. Well done to everyone, and I look forward to my first feed of bok choy.
At Kormilda College, another school of excellence within the Drysdale electorate, reside three young indigenous students who have just receive the Duke of Edinburgh’s Gold Award. It has been 10 years since an indigenous youth has received the Duke of Edinburgh’s Gold Award in the Northern Territory. Clifford Duncan, Anton Plummer and Nico Farrell are boarding students at Kormilda College and come from the remote Aboriginal communities of Urapunga, Wugularr and Ngukurr. These boys are also the first indigenous students from Kormilda College to achieve their Gold Award. It has been an incredible journey for these young men who, during the past three years, have grown from shy, quiet boys into strong, confident, young men. What an outstanding result. They will, undoubtedly, be great role models in their community and I am sure their families are very proud of them. This is an example of how, working together, great things can be achieved for young indigenous males: strong community, strong youth.
While talking of Kormilda, I also want to again formally thank one of the Drysdale constituents, the Right Reverend Dr Phillip Freier for his very good work as chairman of the Kormilda’s Board of Directors. Phillip has served with Kormilda Board for sometime and is soon to commence his appointment as Archbishop of Melbourne Diocese. Phillip will depart for Melbourne next month to take up his post. I wish Phillip and his wife, Joy, the very best of luck in their new post.
Whilst on notes of departure I am compelled to comment on another constituent who departed the electorate recently for what I hope will be a very short time. On Wednesday, 22 November 2006, a story in the NT News featured a story on Mr Ray Bradshaw, his wife, Nicole, and their children, eight-year-old Dylan, and his four-year-old sister, Jasmine. Ray has departed for Afghanistan with the Australian Defence Force as part of the 1st Reconstruction Task Force. The story detailed his six-month tour as the longest that Ray will spend away from his family. It will also be the first Christmas his children have spent without him. This article was a timely reminder for us of all the families undergoing separation for reasons such as this. I am also intimately aware that a high percentage of Drysdale constituents may also be, or already be, called upon for similar service. I acknowledge the importance of Ray’s work and his fellow Defence Force colleagues, and the danger that accompanies deployments such as these. I pray that he and his colleagues return safely home to their waiting families. I also acknowledge the support and sacrifice made by the families of our Defence Force troops. It would be especially hard to manage a family at this particular time of the year with a partner overseas on deployment. Our thoughts and hearts are with you.
On a matter of outstanding achievement, I want to draw the Assembly’s attention to a sporting achievement of the latest emerging talent of the Territory to hit the national and international sports stage. Just in case anyone missed the headlines, last Friday the NT News reported that Aaron Pike, a 21-year-old amateur golfer, enjoyed a fabulous start with the Australian Golf Masters with an eagle on the first hole. If that was not enough of an achievement, Aaron continued his great form by finishing the day with a course equaling eight under par 64 to head the leader board at the day’s end. Aaron comes from my electorate of Drysdale where his parents Evelyn and Terrance, and his brother, Owen, live. Aaron learnt his craft from former Palmerston Pro Tony Albon. Aaron carried his good form throughout the championships and, although he did not finish with the tournament’s coveted trophy, he did finish a very creditable fourth and just three shots behind the Master’s winner at Huntingdale. I am confident that we have not seen the last of Aaron. I am sure everyone here in this Assembly wishes Aaron every success with this golfing career ahead.
Another local constituent also deserving of praise is Debbie Smith, a health worker at the Palmerston Community Care Centre. She was nominated and was amongst the finalists at the Territory’s first Aboriginal Health Excellence Awards. Although she did not manage to pull off the top prize, I congratulate Debbie on her nomination and wish her the very best as she progress through her career. I am sure she will continue her great work in the Palmerston Community Care Centre.
Finally, as this is the last sittings before Christmas, I want to extend season’s greetings and thanks to many community organisations that enrich the quality of living for many of us throughout the electorate. These, to name just a few, include: Loraine Watson and the staff at Banyan House; Alva Whitbread and her husband Brian, and Ann Brown at Palmerston Senior Bowls and, of course, all their colleagues who enjoy their Thursday bowls session and then wander over to Cazaly’s to have a game of bingo; Ian Walsh and everyone at the Pensioners’ Workshop at Winnellie; Bob Lee and Maggie Schoenfisch at U3A; Judy Joyce and her colleagues who organise the Alexandra Day Club for many Palmerston seniors; the hard-working committee of the Palmerston Golf Club, of which I am patron; thanks to Gary Shipway and his predecessor Dallas Frakking and his staff at the Palmerston Sun for their continued support; the Palmerston City Council staff and, in particular, their Chief Executive, Rodney Donne, and Technical Service Director Lucio Cercarelli; and a very special mention to all the sporting clubs, their management committees, volunteers and participants who put a lot of work in throughout the year to ensure the great life style of Palmerston is maintained.
I want to acknowledge all of the schools within my electorate for the good work that they have done. To this end, I want to thank the principals: Mr Julian Denholm from Good Shepherd Lutheran College; Chris Dias from the Palmerston High School; Malcolm Pritchard from Kormilda College; Jo Wynn from Durack Primary School; Cindy McGarry from Gray Primary School; and Rob Presswell from Driver Primary School. My congratulations and gratitude also goes to the staff and volunteers at all of these schools who have done a great job this year. I have really enjoyed my interaction with the schools, staff and students this year and I look forward to that continuing next year. No doubt, between now and the commencement of the new school year, there will be some movement of staff between schools, and I wish them the very best if they are moving on and thank them for their contribution to my electorate.
A very quick congratulations to Karen Sheldon and her partners in crime, Sarah Hickey, Amanda Swift and Julie Calvert in Karen’s Kitchen. I was extremely pleased to see the article in the NT News last week recognising the hard work of this group to deliver a successful growing business in the very volatile food industry. Karen and I worked closely together in my days at the AFLNT. She managed Kantilla’s Function Centre and was a wonderful support to me, my wife and the league. Karen’s generosity and amiable nature was greatly appreciated, and I am extremely pleased to see her business flourishing in partnership with Sarah, Julie and Amanda. Well done, guys; keep up the great work.
In closing, Mr Acting Deputy Speaker, I hope all have a very happy and safe Christmas holiday break. I look forward to the new year and getting involved again in 2007, which I feel will be a very prosperous year for all.
Dr LIM (Greatorex): Mr Acting Deputy Speaker, I start by reading a letter to the editor by a Darwinian in the NT News on 22 November this year. He was talking about the Territory lifestyle that that has been lost and I will read it in full for the record:
Since then, we have had more and more antisocial behaviour in our streets. A while ago, I said that there was so much strife that it was almost like anarchy in the streets. Law and order is not being maintained in our communities. We keep saying there are not enough police resources. Government says: ‘Oh yes, we are putting on so many police’. It is a fact that we are going to lose some 20 police in Alice Springs shortly. Tennant Creek cannot get enough officers to go down there because they do not want to go. The commissioner tried to force them to go there. The TRG is losing something like six officers shortly, and more and more police are moving away because they are unhappy with what is happening.
They brought in pool fence laws and made such a botch-up of it ...
Mr Stirling: And how many have died since? How many have died since compared to your record? How many? Zero!
Dr LIM: You made such a botch-up of your swimming pool laws, but now your current laws says: ‘Do what you like’ ...
Mr Stirling: You were too gutless to do it, you blokes. You were too gutless to bring in public policy.
Mr ACTING DEPUTY SPEAKER: Order!
Dr LIM: What is the legislation now? Do what you want, and it is on your own head what you do with your swimming pool. What sort of pool fencing law is that?
Now, speed limits and demerits points - no evidence ...
Mr Stirling: Read the report.
Dr LIM: I pick up the minister’s interjection to read the report. I have read the report. This minister cannot understand that there is no evidence to suggest that there are many fatalities, if any, above 130 km/h. It is amazing that this government would continue to make life in the Territory so bad that people are moving away in droves. Talk to the removalists. People are moving away in droves because life in the Territory is no longer what it used to be.
People in the southern states, when they look at the Northern Territory - Alice Springs, Tennant Creek, Katherine, Nhulunbuy, Darwin - they say: ‘They are probably harsh places to live. It might be the climate, the distance from family, the build-up, they are all difficult things. Maybe we should go there because it is an opportunity to make a better life for ourselves’. Wages were pretty good in those days that people were prepared to come up here, put up with some of the hardships. However, they were compensated by Territory lifestyle - a lifestyle second to none.
I have lived here 25 years and I am one of the few fortunate people who have been able to travel between Alice Springs and Darwin quite regularly to appreciate the difference between the communities. However, people who live at the other end of the Territory all came because there was something special about the Territory. More and more, we are made to be like just another southern state and our Territory-ness has disappeared. More and more they are disappearing …
Mr Stirling: The one or two toddlers a year drowning, that was fine? That was okay; that was part of the part of the lifestyle?
Dr LIM: When law and order is breaking down, this government does not seem to understand. When it makes laws, it makes laws that, to my way of looking at it, are racist - one law for indigenous people and another law for the rest of Territorians. That is just …
Mr STIRLING: A point of order, Mr Acting Deputy Speaker! If he wants to declare this government being racist, I suggest it ought be by way of a substantive motion.
Dr Lim: You do it all the time, Deputy Chief Minister. You do it all the time. What are you talking about?
Mr STIRLING: That ought be by way of substantive motion. You ought be prepared to back it up.
Mr ACTING DEPUTY SPEAKER: Member for Greatorex, please sit down for a moment. There has been a point of order raised, and I will seek some advice on that. Having considered advice, I rule that there is no point of order on the basis that the member for Greatorex has not directly suggested the government is racist. However, I make comment that if you do say something as direct as that, member for Greatorex, then a point of order will be substantiated.
Dr LIM: Thank you very much, Mr Acting Deputy Speaker.
The cost of living is just humungous. This government, when in opposition, was screaming just about every day about the cost of food, petrol, power, and housing. What have they done about it since they have been in government? Absolutely nothing these last five years. Absolutely nothing! When the CLP was in government, we did the food price survey. We made recommendations, which Treasury took up, by publicising every three months lists of food baskets that were purchased across the Territory so that people knew where they could get their food at the cheapest place. People voted with their feet and retailers then competed for that, and ensured that they were competitively pricing their food.
Petrol pricing was the other thing. The Chief Minister, then in opposition, was screaming about how irresponsible the CLP was in not being able to keep the petrol prices down. Under her regime, prices went up to $1.40, $1.50 ...
Mr Stirling interjecting.
Dr LIM: The Deputy Chief Minister sniggers under his beard. For goodness sake …
Mr Stirling: What did Mr Howard do about it - your hero?
Dr LIM: Under your regime you did nothing - absolutely nothing! You dare to stand up and say: ‘Oh, the CLP had to do it’. Electricity and the cost of power - you raised it 2.4% in April this year ...
Mr Stirling: Yes, we carried a five-year freeze
Dr LIM: There you go, the Deputy Chief Minister admits that he has done it. Therefore, do not come back and tell us that the CLP did all those things when your government, in these last five years, has done more to rip off Territorians than ever.
What have you done about land release? You have landlocked Alice Springs completely. When people want to release land they have to go through hurdle after hurdle because of what this government has put against them. The cost of entry market housing for first home buyers is just about non-existent. Nobody can get in to buy their first home because the cost is so expensive now.
Mr Stirling: What did you do for first home loan borrowers? Nothing. How much stamp duty relief did you give them? Nothing.
Dr LIM: How many blocks of land have you released in your five years that is affordable for first home buyers? Not much at all.
You give all our parks estate away. Recently, I saw a letter written by the Minister for Parks and Wildlife, telling everybody we have entered into a contract with groups and which is, essentially, locking up those parks for the next 99 years. I wonder why Territorians are so angry? It is because they see their rights living in this community slowly being whittled away. You wonder why you see letters like that written by Dave Collins of Darwin on 22 November 2006 in the Northern Territory News. I will go back to his letter. I ended before with the words ‘what happened’. He continued:
That is really the problem with this government. It has allowed the spirit of the Territorian to be whittled bit by bit so that there is now a sense of despair out there in the public - a real sense of despair. Every day, they wake up and see that they are no different to any other capital city in Australia for people living in Darwin and, as far as Alice Springs is concerned, they just feel that this government is continuing to strangle the community to such a degree that very little development is even possible.
The minister will just have to go down - the government has to go down - and talk to the people in Alice Springs. They will tell you they are sick of being strangled. You heard the Leader of the Opposition talk about CCTV for the mall. This started several years ago because of the law and order issues in Alice Springs, but this government continued to ignore it. Alice Springs Town Council continues to ignore it. Well, the people have now declared that they want it. In fact, the council has even come out in support of it. I ask the government to take heed. They are destroying the Territory. It is time to stop.
Ms MARTIN (Fannie Bay): Mr Acting Deputy Speaker, I take this opportunity to recognise one of Darwin’s oldest institutions this evening, the Darwin Bowls and Social Club. The club is very important to the Fannie Bay electorate. It provides sporting and social activities for many Territorians as well as many of our visitors. The Darwin Bowls Club is managed by the board and the current office bearers are: chair and Bowls NT rep, John Bennett; vice chair, Stuart Bell; treasurer, Roger Hammill; secretary and social director, Robyn Byers; greens director, Michael Holdstock; and bowls committee reps, Ian and Carole Belsham.
The club runs a bar and kitchen that not only services members but also caters for groups wishing to hire the facilities. A real effort has been made to keep the prices within the reach of those on pensions and limited incomes and provide real value for money. The hard-working volunteers are the main reasons why it has succeeded. Special thanks go to Stuart Bell, Roger Hammill, Les Dunlop, Jeff, Fester, Charles Hopper who is called Chopper, John Bennett, Tony Shelley, Robyn Byers, John Laurie, Carole Belsham, Don Poundford, Paul Royce, Matthew Pooley and Christine Bradley.
The club’s two greens are the club’s greatest assets and, over the past 12 months, the club has upgraded them. This is no small investment with each green costing around $100 000 to redevelop and then approximately $70 000 each year to maintain them both. Many thanks to project manager Russell Knight and all the club’s volunteers on greens: Roger Hamill, John Bennett, Stuart Bell, Rob Calder, Tony Shelley, Ian Belsham, Ken Hill, Paul Rodin, Peter Killington, Shane Lampe, Norm Snider and the Nightcliff Bowls Club volunteers.
The bowls club runs lawn bowls competitions, including internal club competitions, men’s and ladies single, pairs, triples and fours. There are also the Bowls NT competitions, the Top End Shield and the Darwin Carnival. These competitions attract many interstate players, especially to those events held in our beautiful Dry Season. Social bowls competitions are open to the general public four days a week. In the Wet Season, ‘mufti bowls’ takes place on Saturday afternoons sponsored by NT General Store. There is the gala event and dress-up on Darwin Cup Open Day. I have heard the club is also fuelling trans-Tasman rivalry with Kiwi and Aussie teams vying for the ‘Bladder Slow’ Cup.
The Darwin Bowls Club is very community- minded. They support a range of groups, including Darwin High School, Blind Bowlers NT, Tracks Dance, our Defence forces and the Pride Festival.
The club enters a new era next year with the retirement of long-standing chairperson, Russell Knight. Russell has steered the club from a precarious financial situation to one where the club is able to undertake major projects like the greens upgrade. I know the club wants to keep up the momentum and become recognised as the nation’s best bowls club north of the 26th parallel within the next five years. They want to become recognised for the quality of their greens, their facility, their hospitality and their access to the bowling public. I extend my sincere thanks to Russell for his hard work and achievements over the years and to say his contribution will never be forgotten, even though he is heading off for New South Wales; he will be long remembered here at the Darwin Bowls Club.
The Parap Village Traders Association has been up and running now for over 20 years. The main aim of the association is to enhance the Parap Village area and improve business. The association also holds the licence for the famous Parap Village Markets and works hard to ensure that the markets are managed as well as possible to attract as many people as possible.
The Parap Village Traders Association recently held their annual general meeting. After many years at the helm as President, Ann Alderslade, who also owned Frangipani Fabrics, has retired and moved to Tasmania with her husband, Phil. Sadly, Frangipani Fabrics has closed its doors. The new president is Ken Houghton. Ken and his wife, Shirley, whom I have known for many years, own and manage Brumby’s Bakery at Parap. Ken will bring experience and enthusiasm to the role of the President of the Parap Village Traders Association and I wish him the best of luck.
Neville Pantazis from Parap Fine Foods remains as vice president. Neville and his family have played a key role in making Parap Village the vibrant place it is today. I am very pleased that Neville will continue to contribute to the association.
The new treasurer is Chris Moffitt who owns Rochelle’s Fine Jewellery. Chris has been in the jewellery business for over 20 years and has been at Parap Village for about three. I know that Chris has become more and more involved in the business of boosting Parap Village over the past year, and I am happy to see that he has taken an active role with the traders association. Many thanks to Roger Pearson from Arafura Catering and Equipment who served as treasurer before Chris. Roger’s business has grown significantly over recent years and now turns over millions of dollars. He and his wife, Sharon, have a great team at Arafura Catering, and it is good to know that Roger will continue to play a part in the association as a committee member.
Another newcomer to the association is Fiona Vong from Toppy’s Sandwich Bar. Toppy’s is a crucial business in Parap Village. I order sandwiches from there when catering for electorate events. Fiona is the new secretary of the association, which is a very challenging role. Many thanks to Aaron Mead, who owns Toppy’s, for fulfilling the role over the last year.
A dedicated team of staff manage the markets and the site. Many thanks to Louis Kemnitz, Maurice Foley, Lee Petrusis, Rory McMahon and Nandi Schroeder. You have all done a great job.
Parap Primary School’s annual concert was held at the Darwin Entertainment Centre on Wednesday, 8 November. It was a great night, and I know that everyone who attended had a lot of fun. Eleven classes took part from Year 3 to Year 7. The very talented school choir was lead by Judy Weepers and Annie Richards and they sang up a storm. The school band was also very impressive led by Matthew Sutton and other instructors from the NT School of Music.
The comperes for the evening were members of the Student Executive Council: School Captains, Hannah Cox and Ryan Davis, plus Allicia Cann, Shari Fuller, Matthew Zarimis and Sasha Hanton. Congratulations to them all; they did a great job.
Special thanks must go to the concert’s production managers, Kerry Hudson and Yvonne Harding. They were assisted by many parents and friends who helped out with things like costumes, props and choreography. I thoroughly enjoyed the night and each of the classes did a great job.
Wati Dzulkifly’s Year 4/3 performance was based on The Simpsons, which went down a treat. Ellie Richards can take a bow for the excellent choreography. Kim Rowe’s Year 5/6 class brought a circus atmosphere to the evening, and Nicola Hanssen’s Year 3/4 class relaxed with yoga and were instructed by yoga teacher, Sanjit Das. Tania Hardy’s and Petra Jenkin’s Year 6/7 class were consumed by aliens, while Colleen Williams’ and Gayle Cann’s combined class celebrated 50 years of television. Special thanks to Erynne Fildes, Monica van den Nieuwenhof and Debbie Jessop for their generous assistance.
Letichia Boekel’s Year 5/6 class performed their own Parap Idol and, while there was no Jess, they certainly kept the audience entertained, as did Anne Gray’s Year 3/4 class who all had Wednesday Night Fever. Thanks again to Erynne as well as Paula Pantazis. Melanie Brown’s Year 6/7 showed off 10 Aussie inventions and icons. I particularly liked the little vegemite sequence and the rose on every cheek. Hats off to Nan and Jill Edgar for their input there. Krissy Quinell’s and Brian Hyke’s Year 4/5 finished the performances with a Dance through the Decades. A big thank you to Cassie Williams, Ed Houston, Karen Brown and Tori Hayman for their assistance.
Following the school captain’s speech and the principal’s address, the Year 7s sang Forever Young, a fitting song to acknowledge their time at Parap. Thank you to all students, parents, teachers and all Parap staff for their efforts in putting the production together.
Mrs MILLER (Katherine): Mr Acting Deputy Speaker, tonight I wish to place on the Parliamentary Record the commitment by Fred Murphy to the development of the AFLNT football competition in Katherine, especially in the Under 18 age group. Fred first approached me in 2004 to talk of his plans for a leadership program for the Katherine region to involve as many young people as possible. The motivation for participation in this program was linked to school attendance, skill and attitude. Fred is totally committed to getting young people to be as fit and healthy as possible and believed that sport, especially Aussie Rules football, was a good base to start. I could not agree with him more and, as such, have been a supporter of the work that Fred began back then. The young players who participate in his leadership program are great mentors for the younger people and their communities.
Through Fred’s persistence, young players from many outlying communities have had the opportunity to play competition football in Katherine. It has been an absolute pleasure to watch these games. I have not been to as many as I would like, but whenever I have had the opportunity, I have been very pleased to see the enthusiasm of the players on the ground.
The Katherine Oval at the showgrounds has been a great venue for these competitions, with the environment being very family friendly with no alcohol permitted into the grounds on competition days. It is a pleasure to be able to sit and watch these games without drunken behaviour around. Fred Murphy’s commitment to AFL and these young players is so encouraging; he has great ambitions for their future and, through the competition that he has put together, is giving many of the players a great opportunity to further themselves through football. Fred has opened up a whole new world to many of these young blokes.
His negotiations with Collingwood Football Club saw four of these young players, Alistair Evans, Cody Williams, Alphanso Carew and Josh Blitner travel to Victoria in July and train with the Collingwood players. What a buzz it was for these young men, and what an incentive to continue improving their skills through football. The possibilities are endless. This is the first time that an AFL league club has supported Under 17 grassroots junior competition players and, hopefully, the beginning of many more opportunities.
Fred has organised an AFLNT Under 17 six-round competition which is current. The teams that are playing are the Katherine Kannons, the Ngukurr Bulldogs, the Minyerri Tigers and, for the first time, the Timber Creek Demons. I do not know if the members of this House are aware of the distances that some of these players have to travel to play in this competition, but the return trip totals several hundreds of kilometres for most of these young men. The support that each of these teams has is fantastic. There are some fabulous young talented players, and I sincerely hope that those who want to develop their skills further are given the opportunity.
From the current competition, a rep side will be chosen by Tim Alcorn and Lewis Fammartino to come to Darwin to play St Mary’s Under 18 and Kormilda College. I believe that the first match is on 5 December so, watch out, you Top Enders, you are in for a surprise when you see how good these young players are. I know they will do very well.
The AFL committee in Katherine consists of Sandy Talbot, Gavin Greenoff, Allan Girdler Jr, Beno Toby, Rick Fletcher and policeman Steve. I congratulate these people for their commitment to ensuring the game keeps alive and well.
To all the coaches, boundary, goal and field umpires, well done for supporting junior AFL. You are helping these young players to adopt a healthy attitude to life and sport by your encouragement and involvement.
My role is really quite easy. I get the enjoyment of being a spectator and providing the sausages for sausage sizzles after the game - all easy and very pleasurable. I acknowledge tonight the wonderful work that Fred Murphy does for the young people right throughout the Katherine region. It is people like Fred who bring out the best in others, and it is a delight to be associated with the work that he does. Well done, Fred, and all the volunteers who so willingly assist you.
It is also a pleasure tonight that I place on the record the names of the Year 12 students from Katherine High School 2006 who celebrated their final school assembly last Friday, 24 November. It was pleasing to see the minister for Education present to address these young people as they end their school years and begin another phase of their life’s journey. Many parents and friends attended the whole-of-school assembly and were entertained by some of the talented Year 12 students.
Items were presented by Giulio Puccetti on guitar assisted by Year 10 students, Alex Brindell on bongos and Rachael McLellan on guitar, also assisted by Alex. It was a pleasure to listen to these young talented performers. The assembly also enjoyed two videos by the movie makers, Rosemary Jennings and Amy Domaschenz, assisted by Rachel Dixon. Well done to all of you.
Stemmed glasses with the school logo etched on the side were presented to each of the Year 12 students by principal, Ken Barnes, and Year 12 student coordinator, Tim Alcorn, as a memento of their years at Katherine High School. The logo on the glasses has special significance as it was designed by Year 11 student, James Geritz. Well done, James, your design is permanently etched in the memories of the Year 12 students of 2006. Some frivolity was appropriately targeted at the stemmed glasses, with suggestions that they be used for drinking water or milk. However, they are a lovely memento for the students to have as a remembrance of 2006.
Also for the record, I am going to read the names of the Year 12 students of Katherine High School of 2006. They are Amy Barton, Nicholas Brindell, Kyle Briscoe, Jessica Canning, Briony Carson, Jared Cheetham, Sally Cook, Thea De Leon, Rachel Dixon, Amy Domaschenz, Keran Donzow, Alistair Evans, Rebecca Ferguson, Kylee Fletcher, Wayne Furness, Jarred Hawke, Tommy Jack, Rosemary Jennings, Talya Johnston, Maris Lalim, Hunter Linton, Sinead Linton, Caitlyn Lowe, Nathan Lye, Magnus Malmerin-Fejo, Rachael McLellan, Oliver Ogilvie, Tasha Paddy, Giulio Puccetti, Chelsea Ryan-South, Sinead Stubbs, Susan Symes, Shannon Trattles, Keira Wardley, Lisa Wilton and Thomas Wuttke. Well done to you all.
The assembly listened to an emotional speech by one of the Year 12 students, Caitlyn Lowe, which I am sure summed up the feelings of the other students. I would like to place her speech on record. I quote:
It was a delight to speak to some of the students at morning tea following the assembly and to hear what plans they have for their future. Quite a few will have to leave Katherine to further their studies to realise their dreams. Hopefully, they will return in the future to contribute to our community. I wish them all well in whatever path they choose to take, and feel confident that they will achieve the success that they desire. Whatever you do, students, enjoy it and be happy.
While talking about Katherine High School, I acknowledge the success of students who entered the Westpac Australian Mathematics Competition 2006. Twenty-nine students obtained a credit or distinction, with several of the students ranking in the top 10% in the Northern Territory. It shows that, despite the size of the school, there are students who are highly academic. Maths Senior Teacher, David Purins, was very pleased with the result and, in particular, congratulated Year 9 Maths teacher, Ms Elliot. Her Year 9s stole the show with 15 of them gaining a credit or a distinction. Mathew Kirk, Glen Humphries and Peter Bell all ranked in the highest when compared with their peers across the Territory.
While the Year 9s had the highest number of successful students, the top three scores for the school were won by Year 8 students; Justin Heim, Alex Fraser and Tahrini Connop. Well done, Year 8s.
The students who entered the competition were: Year 8 - as I just mentioned, Justin Heim, Alex Fraser and Tahrini Connop; Year 9 - Mathew Kirk, Glen Humphries, Peter Bell, Timothy Mathas, Daniel Brummitt, Benjamin Daw, Nicholas Westra Van Holthe, Bryney Rollinson, Nicholas Hanks, Riley Vaughan, Thomas McGregor, Arryn Perner, Sarah Johnston, Melissa Harding and Edward Hannah; Year 10 - Bryan Quill, David Humphries and Robert Mackie; Year 11 - Jake Saunders, Tamarah King, Colleen Crowley, Rachael McGraw and Phillip Morrow; and Year 12 - Susan Symes, Amy Barton and Caitlyn Lowe.
While there was a reduced number of entries this year from Katherine High School, the results were an improvement over last year. The challenge is there for the students of 2007. Well done to all the staff and students at Katherine High School for a very busy and successful 2006.
Clive Fenton Primary School also took part in the mathematics competition and, while I have not got the names of the students to place on record, I congratulate Assistant Principal, Tanya Lambert, on the students’ success. As Tanya said, the competition showed that students in small town schools were able to achieve high standards and take part in a range of activities.
Another school in my electorate is Casuarina Street Primary School. It is always a delight to visit when they have assembly to watch the young students either perform or to be acknowledged for their achievements. One of the awards that is highly prized amongst students at Casuarina Street School is the Casuarina Award. Students have to work consistently over a long period of time to receive this award, so it is quite significant to receive a Casuarina Award. A Casuarina Award is presented after a student earns five Principal’s Awards. Each Principal’s Award requires a student to earn 100 Merit Awards which are given for a range of positive acts such as kindness to others, a helping hand to other students, diligently completing school work including homework on time, working well in class and, generally, being a good all round student.
Student, Hannah McGraw was recently presented with a Casuarina Award at assembly by the Mayor of Katherine, Anne Shepherd. Hannah’s win was particularly gratifying for her as her two older siblings had received this award previously - her sister, Rachael, in 2002 and her brother, Ben, in 2005. All three of the McGraw children have contributed extremely well to Casuarina Street Primary School. Hannah was very gracious in her acceptance speech, thanking all of the teachers for helping her get the award. Mum and dad, Kim and Gareth, are justifiably very proud.
I must also mention that only two of these highly prized awards have been presented during 2006. The first one was to Shannon Perkins. Congratulations, Shannon and Hannah. Keep up the wonderful spirit for which you have received these awards; it will stand you in great stead for the future.
In other news about young people in Katherine, I congratulate two students who have been selected to represent the Territory for the School Sport Australia Track and Field Exchange in Cairns. Ten-year-old Liam McGregor and 11-year-old Rebecca Robins have been selected to complete at the national competition with Liam competing in the 100 m sprint, 800 m long jump, shot put, and 4 x 100 m relay, and Rebecca competing in the 100 m sprint, 200 m sprint and the 4 x 100 m relay in their respective age and gender sections.
The two athletes were selected for the Territory team during September’s combined club and school athletics carnival at Marrara where young sports people from across the Northern Territory competed for a place in the team. Liam and Rebecca trained very hard for this competition two to three times per week, and were very enthusiastic about competing. Both athletes are trained by Rodney Gregg who has been very impressed with the dedication of Liam and Rebecca. Both athletes headed to Darwin on 20 November for a three-day training camp at Marrara before flying to Cairns on the 23rd. Unfortunately, for tonight’s adjournment I was unable to determine the results of the meet, even though my electorate secretary tried very hard today. Hopefully, I will be able to report the result from the Cairns carnival.
Mrs BRAHAM (Braitling): Mr Acting Deputy Speaker, last Saturday, 25 November, was White Ribbon Day, a day on which we all get together to talk very strongly against violence against women.
Mark Coffey, the Superintendent of Alice Springs police, put on a morning tea. I was pleased to join with him and hear some of the speakers who spoke so eloquently - all men. One, in particular, with whom I was very impressed was the legal aid lawyer, Russell Goldflam. Too often, we think that defence lawyers become desensitised to violence within our community, but that was not the message from Russell.
Tonight, I would like to share with members some of his thoughts as a defence lawyer in his stance on violence against women. Russell said that he was pleased for me to pass on his thoughts, noting that they are his own personal thoughts and not those of the organisation at which he works.
He told the story of how he saw a young woman being bashed by a man in the Todd, how he walked over to intervene and stop what was happening and how, by his personal intervention, it did, in fact, stop. As he reminded everyone, the woman could have easily been killed that morning and that she was, as a Northern Territory indigenous woman, 12 times more likely to be violently killed than other Australian women.
Visitors to Alice Springs - and we have all had these sort of conversations - tell us they are shocked by what they see. As Russell said, we must not stop being shocked by what we see. If you see violence and the results of violence and you are not shocked, you walk or drive past. I will read from Russell’s notes:
I urge the government to think seriously about how we can bring in measures to address the number of people within our gaols at the moment, and those who are in our gaols who could be in another place of rehabilitation. I would like the government to look at what is happening now. I do not believe there are enough programs offered to prisoners. I do not believe the courts’ sentence people to go through some of these programs. Perhaps they do not do that because they are not available.
However, the one message that came through on that Saturday when we all got together was that there is too much violence against women in our communities - too much violence for Aboriginal women, in particular. Too many times we look away. Too many times we walk away because we do not quite know how to handle it. Then, we get the dilemma of the defenders of the offenders - and we have to appreciate the dilemma that people like Russell Goldflam must find themselves in. However, his professional attitude in all he does means that he brings justice for his clients and, hopefully, we all see that the victims can get some sort of justice by having that offender rehabilitated in such a way that it never occurs again.
I know there are many of us who attended White Ribbon Days throughout the Territory. I just hope you made a commitment there and then, as parliamentarians, to see what you could do to improve the situation within our communities. Go to an Emergency Department in any hospital and see for yourself what the nurses in our hospitals see. Go and see what the police see and what they have to handle. It is not something we can hold our heads up high about. Sure, the Territory is a wonderful place, but this is the dark side of the Territory. This is the side we do not want to admit is there; that we do not really know how to improve it.
Tomorrow I will be introducing my amendment to the Bail Act. It is about presumption of bail being removed for serious sexual assault. We have to start somewhere. We have to start doing things that tell our community that we are as concerned as some of the lawyers who have to deal with these cases. We need to think seriously about what is the best way to manage these things but, most of all in all that we do, we need to remember the victims who, often themselves, do not have a voice, and who often live for the rest of their life with the injustice that has been done to them. I can tell many sad stories and I will bring a few of them to the parliament’s attention tomorrow when I introduce this amendment.
Mr Acting Deputy Speaker, I thank Mark Coffey for bringing us all together for White Ribbon Day. I thank Russell Goldflam for sharing his words with me. I was a bit surprised at his honesty and integrity; it was refreshing. However, there was something special about him standing up, as a legal aid lawyer who defends the offenders so often, talking about things we should do to lessen the violence against women.
Ms McCARTHY (Arnhem): Mr Acting Deputy Speaker, we are nearing the end of the year, and I take this opportunity in my adjournment tonight to thank those people who have played a major part in assisting me in my duties as a member.
There are 16 communities in the Arnhem electorate, and each time I visit there are many people who make those visits very warm and welcoming ones. Along with many individuals and their families across the electorate, I thank the teachers, the councils, the health professionals, police, the rangers, and the many outstation resource centre staff for their support this year. With over 130 000 km to cover, I am deeply grateful for the care and concern of all these people in the communities. Yes, while I am there to do a job, it is often the unwritten, unscripted part of the job description that warms the heart; that is, the cheery welcome from individuals in the communities on each visit. These people include: John Morgan and Jennifer Baker at Millingimbi; Bula Bula Arts mob; Belinda and Louise at Ramingining, and Coralyn Armstrong and the school staff at Ramingining; Pauline and Morris Higgins, Graham Phelps and Jennifer Fry, Nancy Lalara and Grant Burgoyne, and Greg Arnott at Groote Eylandt; the Anindilyakwa Land Council staff, especially the ALC Board, thank you. Special mention to Mimi Henry Nungumbajbarr and Dad Henry, Bridgett and Earnest, Moses, and Mildred Numuridirdi at Numbulwar; Doris Joe and Joyce Dirdi, Noughie Ruth Friday and Kuku Solomon Daniels and Eddie Chisholm at Ngukurr; Arnold Von Senden and Cherryl Lardy at Jilkminggan; the Charlie and Riley families at Minyerri; the Lee and Ashley families at Barunga and Wugularr; and the Murray and Miller families at Bulman.
These people are just a few who assist me in every way possible on my journey through Arnhem Land.
In the Assembly this time last year, I spoke of the Wugularr community’s requests for a new school building. That call has been heard by our government and tenders are now under way for a new $2.5m school to be build in the new year. This will add to the new $1m school built down the road at Manyallaluk and opened this year by our new Education minister, Paul Henderson.
Then there are the silent soldiers, the ones who work behind the scenes in assisting MLAs in their duties and in prominent roles in the Northern Territory parliament. It is at this point I would like to acknowledge the Clerk of the Assembly, Ian McNeill, and Deputy Clerk, David Horton. There are a few others I would like to name, in particular, Steven Stokes and Annette Brown for the numerous amounts of paper that fly back and forwards on our desk and, most importantly, the bottomless glasses of water. Also to Graham Gadd, Jan Sporn, Brian Cook, Joanne Carbone, Vicki Long, and Anna Marie Socci.
To Helen Allmich and the Hansard staff - where would any parliament or politician be without you guys, without Hansard? Thank you for your perseverance in correct spelling, not only of names of people and places in English, but also those in Aboriginal languages. I know some of my speeches and pronunciations have been an interesting challenge for you. Thank you for trying to always get them right.
To Tony Hibberd for your dedication to safety in the building and for checking our offices - you and I know what that means, Tony. To Jan Bradley, thank you for the assistance and the changing and servicing of the electorate vehicles. Sincere wishes to you, Madam Speaker, especially in light of your personal challenges this year. You are an inspiration to all women. May your Christmas break be even more special. Those dinners are just fantastic. I look forward to them continuing. A special thank you to your staff, Chris Grace and Kent Rowe.
In our Parliamentary Library a very big thank you to Trudi Maly. Thanks to parliamentary photographer, Todd Sinclair, for your support this year, especially with photos for functions and school visits.
Special mention to the Parliamentary Protocol Team. Our evening celebrations for the cast and visitors of the film Ten Canoes here in the Hall of Parliament was a huge success. The film was made at Ramingining with Yolngu actors and continues to be an award winning hit across the world. The next stop is the Oscars in February.
As a recently elected Chair to the Legal and Constitutional Affairs Committee and the Statehood Steering Committee, I acknowledge my co-chair, Sue Bradley. Sue, thank you for your patience and support in my settling-in process as Chair. Next year is going to be a great year for our committee members, and I am looking forward to us moving together towards statehood. To the Statehood Steering Committee members, Brian Martin, Daniel Bourchier, Jamey Robertson, Jenny Medwell, Kathleen Chong Fong, Irene Nangala, Stuart Kenny, Kezia Purick, Maurie Ryan Japarta, Pete Davies, Margaret Vigants, Loraine Braham MLA, Terry Mills MLA, Wayne Connop, Ray Wooldridge and legal advisor, Graham Nicholson, thank you for your support in my newly-elected role as Chair of the Statehood Steering Committee. It will be a wonderful year ahead. I am delighted to be working with each and every one of you. I certainly got an insight to the challenges that are ahead of us, especially with the recent inquiry in the Territory into statehood by the House of Representatives.
I would like to pay tribute to the staff of the office of the chairman. Executive Officer, Michael Tatham, thank you for your enthusiasm and dedication to the process of statehood and for your insight in the matters of legal and historical significance that often seem so complicated until you explain, Michael, quite clearly and ever so simply. Thank you. To Nora Kempster and Sharon McAlear, thank you for your daily commitment to the statehood process. Thank you for your patience, especially during the uncertain times of funding decisions. Ladies, now it is full steam ahead.
To the parliamentary committee teams, Terry Hanley and Pat Hancock, thank you. Pat, your knowledge and advice on parliamentary process is greatly valued, especially now in my role as Chair. To Robyn Smith, special commendations to you, Robyn, for the research work conducted during my time in the Sport and Youth Committee. To Brian Lloyd, thank you. I appreciated your efforts on research regarding examples from overseas on indigenous land ownership, and just recently with statehood. I look forward to working with you next year.
The silent soldiers also include our government staff on the fifth floor and across the Northern Territory. Thank you to each of you for your support this year in my many queries and requests and, often, concerns regarding my constituents of Arnhem. Your professionalism at all times has been very much respected and appreciated.
I pay public tribute and extend my gratitude to my electorate officer, Phillip Powling. Phil, you are absolutely invaluable. Thank you for the consistent committed and professional way you support me in my role as the member for Arnhem. I wish you and your family, Melanie, Naida, David, Kane and Craig a wonderful Christmas break and look forward to the challenges of 2007.
To my mother, Maisie Charlie, and my sister, Selina, and the children, thank you for your efforts in newsletters, office support and accompanying me where necessary. You are always there to support me, and for that I thank you. My husband, Norm, sons, CJ and Grayson, thank you for the tireless support only family can give their loved ones at all times - support that no words can describe adequately. I know our Christmas break will be a very special one.
Sincere wishes to each one of my parliamentary colleagues on the opposite side of the House, and your families, over the Christmas break. To my caucus colleagues, it has been an amazing year in more ways than one. Thank you for the struggles we have shared and will continue to do so in our most privileged position of representing the people of the Northern Territory. I wish each and every one of you a safe and very happy Christmas.
Mr HAMPTON (Stuart): Mr Acting Deputy Speaker, I am pleased and relieved to have survived my first few sessions of parliament and the sittings. I, like the member for Arnhem, would like to thank the Department of the Legislative Assembly staff for their support and advice in my first couple of months of being a member of parliament. I am looking forward to sittings next year, particularly with sittings being held in Alice Springs in April. I am sure it is going to be an exciting year for me and the community of Alice Springs.
As this is the last sittings of the year and we are all moving into the Christmas spirit, I would like to acknowledge some people in my electorate of Stuart. First, I recognise and congratulate a local lady in Alice Springs – actually, a lady who lives at the town camp of White Gate. Magdaline Johnson is a lady who has achieved something none of us could dream of achieving; that is, reach the age of 101 years. The story that was in the Centralian Advocate last week was truly amazing. It is equally amazing, given the fact that the average lifespan of an indigenous people is 20 years below other Australians. Magdaline’s memory of the old days, so clearly told in the Centralian Advocate story, is remarkable. I look forward to visiting Magdaline after the sittings and listening to her stories firsthand.
There are number of people who are leaving the electorate of Stuart and I would like to acknowledge the work and contributions they have made during the year. I say goodbye to Scott McConnell who has recently left the Ingkerreke Outstation Resource Centre for Newhaven Station. Scott is one of those blokes who puts everything into his work and gives nothing less than 110%. To Scott and his wife, Cathy, I thank them for the work they have done for the Ingkerreke Outstation Resource Centre, and wish them a very safe Christmas and all the best for the future. Added to that, I would like to thank all the staff of Ingkerreke and the communities in the Ingkerreke region for their support and advice to me over the past few months.
Viv and Cathy, the store managers at Ampilatwatja community, are heading off to Queensland. I wish them all the best and a safe and merry Christmas. Viv and Cathy both had big shoes to fill when they first took over managing the store at Ampilatawatja, and I have no problems in saying that they have done a very good job. Ampilatwatja Store is a previous winner of the Tidy Towns Award for the Best Store, and you only have to walk inside to see why.
I also acknowledge a lady who has recently left Alice Springs, Rose Connelly, who I met through the local Alice Springs Branch of the Labor Party some five years ago. I am sure Rose’s decision to leave after 17 years in Alice Springs was a hard one. I thank her for her contributions, both to the party and the advice she has given me personally during my time as a member. I understand that she is moving to Theodore in Queensland, and I am sure that the local branch of the Alice Springs Labor Party will miss her.
To my acting electorate officer, Judy Buckley, who has filled in at a very busy time and done a fantastic job, I would like to say thanks to her especially. I imagine that most electorate officers, especially those bush members and their offices, can agree that things do get very busy from time to time. Judy, in her own unique way, deals with the multitude of issues that come through the office from day to day. Having to juggle these responsibilities along with her family obligation has been testing for Judy and, once again, I thank her for her dedication during this time. To Judy and her husband, Graham, and her family, I wish a very safe and merry Christmas.
I also send my best wishes to a couple of other ladies in Alice Springs and their families who are currently having some hard times and are in hospital. Barbara Ross and Barbara Campbell are two ladies I have known for a long time, along with their families, and I wish them and their families well in the coming months.
This year, we celebrated the 40th anniversary of the Wave Hill walk-off that paved the way for the rights of indigenous people to be recognised on a national scene. The walk-off event 40 years ago also resulted in the formation of the Aboriginal Land Rights (Northern Territory) Act and indigenous rights as well on the national scene. Sadly, this year, we have lost two important members of this movement from the communities of Daguragu and Kalkarindji. I recognise these people by placing their names on the public record and showing respect to their families. Earlier this year, Mr V Vincent passed away suddenly and, unfortunately, before the 40th anniversary and festival. I would like to pass on my sympathies to his families and the community of Daguragu for this loss. Old Man, Mr M Rangiari was a truly remarkable Territorian and someone who has passed away recently. I am sure many of us would agree that this old man has taken with him a big part of Australian history.
It is very concerning as well, given that we are celebrating the 40th anniversary of this significant event, that we see the Australian government attacking the rights of indigenous people in a way that we have never seen before. I believe the attitude and direction that we are seeing the Australian government tackling of indigenous affairs is absolutely disgraceful. I urge every member of this parliament to stand up and fight against what they are doing.
As we move closer to 2007, I look forward to Alice Springs continuing to develop as we have seen this year. As I said earlier in my statement supporting the Chief Minister, we are seeing positive signs with the new alcohol restrictions that were introduced into Alice Springs in October. I am sure, if you get the chance and you drive around Alice Springs today, you will see many construction projects under way. We have the Yipirinya redevelopment project; Imparja Television’s new offices being built; and apartments along South Terrace.
As the Minister for Sport and Recreation spoke about today during Question Time, there has been $8.1m released for the aquatic centre to the town council, $350 000 for the shooting range in Alice Springs, and $800 000 for the new drag strip, to name just a few. In fact, I believe the minister said a total of $12.75m of funding has gone into sporting facilities in Alice Springs.
I would now like to talk about an initiative I am currently undertaking through my electorate office. I have named the initiative Local Heroes and Role Models. The aim is to identify and promote local people who are achievers, leaders and community orientated people. These heroes or role models are not the people we read about in the local papers or see on television. They are not the AFL footballers or sports stars we recognise on the national level. I would like to mention three of my inaugural local heroes tonight.
I am proud to say that Robert Charles, Sebastian Watson and Jeany Campbell are three worthy people I would like to put up as local role models and heroes. Robert Charles, from the Aboriginal community of Pmara Jutunta near Ti Tree won a national award acknowledging outstanding community leadership by a Year 12 student living in a rural and regional Australian community in October 2005. Robert attended as a border the St Phillip’s College in Alice Springs since Year 8, and was a very popular student. To his credit since leaving St Phillip’s, he has gone back to his community in Ti Tree and, with the support of the Anmatjere Council and his family, has a job and is helping his community move forward. Robert has high ambition, which is good. In fact, he has aspirations of becoming a doctor or registered nurse. I have no doubts about Robert being able to achieve this because of the strong support he has and the drive that has seen him complete Year 12 through St Phillip’s.
Sebastian Watson from the community of Yuendumu, who is a relative of mine, has recently graduated as an Aboriginal Community Police Officer. It is also pleasing to see Sebastian return to his home community of Yuendumu and work with his people. Sebastian also was, and is still currently, an active worker in the Mt Theo program to assist young people affected by substance abuse.
Jeany Campbell from the community of Ti Tree was nominated in the first Indigenous Health Worker Awards in the Northern Territory recently. I have known Jeany for some time and, during this time, she has always put to me her aspirations of becoming a home buyer in Ti Tree. I wish Jeany and her sister, April, the best of wishes for Christmas and I look forward to working with them again next year as well.
To my colleagues, both in caucus and the other members of Parliament House, I wish them and their families a safe and merry Christmas as well. I look forward to working with them next year.
Finally, I thank my family for all their support this year. It has been a big year for my family with many challenges that we have had to face together. I thank them for their support and I am sure that next year will be a good year for me and my family. Their continued support is something that I look forward to.
Mr BURKE (Brennan): Mr Acting Deputy Speaker, tonight I provide a report on a conference I recently attended, the fifth Canadian Parliamentary Seminar for New Members of Parliament, held in Ottawa, Canada, from 22 to 28 October. Canada is a beautiful country and the people are extremely friendly.
The theme of the seminar was Strengthening Democracy and the Role of Parliamentarian: Challenges and Solutions. I enjoyed the seminar program greatly. I thank at the outset Carol Chafe, Kathleen Gallahue, Lynne Frappier, Danielle Gougeon, and Kelly-Ann Benoit. It is solely due to these ladies that no one was lost or eaten by giant Canadian beavers. They also provided delegates with explanations of Canadian politics and current issues. Thank you, ladies, for looking after the member for Port Darwin and me, and making us feel extremely welcome. Ms Frappier was preparing for a marathon while we were there, so I wish her all the best with that.
I thank Mr Russ Hiebert MP, Chair of the Canadian Branch of the Commonwealth Parliamentarian Association, Hon Noel Kinsella, Speaker of the Senate, and Hon Peter Milliken, Speaker of the House of Commons, for their hospitality while we were there.
The delegates at the seminar were very appreciative of the number of senators and members of parliament who gave their time to attend the seminars and contribute. I add my thanks to them. I have with me biographies of presenters. I seek leave to table the biographies of presenters and the names of the senators and members of parliament.
Leave granted.
Mr BURKE: I also thank my fellow seminar delegates for sharing their experience with me. Delegates came from as far away as Malaysia, India, Malta and Malawi, and as near as the Canadian provinces of Manitoba and New Brunswick. Sessions of the seminar included topics such as the Commonwealth and the Role of the Commonwealth Parliamentarians Association, the Canadian Political Scene, Political Recruiting, and Women in the Political Process.
I was not aware until my election that the CPA even existed, let alone its role. The association provides a valuable resource for parliamentarians as well as opportunities for those of us elected to, or who otherwise hold, parliamentary office in the various Commonwealth parliaments, to share ideas on the working of parliaments that share the many traditions we do.
I found it interesting that attracting women into politics in Canada is as difficult as here in Australia. I can inform the Assembly that the member for Port Darwin and I took great pleasure informing all and sundry that our parliament sports a female Chief Minister, Leader of the Opposition, and Speaker. It was equally satisfying but, perhaps even more important, to be able to say that 10 out of 25 members of our Assembly are women.
The session on how an MPs office works included presentations by Madame Nicole Demers, MP, and Ms Nancy Karetak-Lindell, MP. Madam Demers’ electorate - or Riding as the Canadians call it - is urban, whereas Ms Karetak-Lindell represents Nunavut, the newly-created Canadian territory that represents one-fifth of Canada’s land mass. I believe Ms Karetak-Lindell may just pip our own Warren Snowdon for geographic area represented, even when the Territory was one federal seat. However, just like our federal representatives, Ms Karetak-Lindell racks up the kilometres in flights. She said she once had a journalist chasing her about her massive Riding travel expenditure, but the story seemed to die a quick death after she discovered why she had to cover such distances by air.
There was a session on parliamentary committees. What became immediately apparent was that there is not one single answer to how committees ought to run. As we all know, committees play an important role in parliamentary business and our role as parliamentarians.
We had a session on the role of party caucuses in our parliaments. Canadian political parties allow a slightly greater degree of freedom to their members to cross the floor than our tradition in Australia or the United Kingdom. I would not say that that freedom is much more, but it appeared to me a bit more relaxed. I do not think this is necessarily better or worse, just different. Certainly, the political parties of Canada have a well organised system of Whips. I noted India also seems to have a culture of strict party voting.
I have the program of the seminar with me and invite honourable members to contact me for a copy if they wish one.
Before our return, the member for Port Darwin and I took the opportunity to visit the Legislative Assembly of British Columbia. The assembly is based in Victoria. I thank our Clerk for organising this visit for us. I also thank the Clerk of British Columbia’s Legislative Assembly, Mr George MacMinn QC, and his staff for their hospitality.
During our stay in Ottawa, we were invited to visit Australia’s High Commissioner to Canada. He made an interesting suggestion: that the Northern Territory send a delegation to Alberta, the Northwest Territory and Nunavut. Alberta’s economy is surging ahead as a result of, primarily, increased mining. This has led to an extreme labour shortage in Alberta. However, all of Canada is experiencing a labour shortage, such that every fourth shop seemed to have a ‘help wanted’ sign up. The suggestion of the High Commissioner is worth considering, and I add my own suggestion that any such trip, should it be planned, be made during the Canadian summer. Those members from the Centre might be able to handle minus-40C, but those of us from the Top End, I suspect, will struggle. I thank the High Commissioner and his wife for their hospitality in entertaining the member for Port Darwin and me.
Last, but by no means least, I wish to thank Mrs Norma Lapointe. I met Norma and her work colleague, Brenda, in the flight lounge at Vancouver Airport. Our connection to Ottawa was delayed and there was nothing to do but wait - and who waits in silence? This chance meeting led to Norma showing the member for Port Darwin and me so much in and around Ottawa and taking us to Montreal. Such was her generosity and hospitality, I thought she must have been a Territorian.
One of the things I was keen to do while in Canada was to see an ice hockey game. Because of Norma, we got to see the Montreal Canadiens play the Toronto Maple Leaves. In fact, I have the ticket with me here tonight. There is absolutely no way, though, that I am seeking leave to table the ticket; it will take a place in my scrapbook amongst my memorabilia. As Norma explained, there is no bigger rivalry in the ice hockey league than the Canadiens and the Maple Leaves. The stadium was packed and we only got the tickets due to another accident of chance and a fair degree of negotiation.
Norma lives a little way out from Ottawa. She and her husband own some 50 acres of which they lease 49 or so to a wheat farmer. We stopped in at Norma’s place on the drive from Ottawa to Montreal and I was bowled over by the fact that the wheat field started literally on her backdoor step. What a sight!
Honourable members, I understand that this is a report on the seminar rather than a travelogue, but think of Norma as a cultural guide. She introduced us to such Canadian institutions as the beaver tail, a Canadian culinary delicacy coated in your choice of toppings such as maple butter. You can look it up on the web if you are interested. Norma also has a very distinctive way of dealing with police officers. Suffice to say I have studied it, but not, as yet, put it into practice.
Honourable members, if you get the chance to go to Ottawa do travel across to the Gatineau side. It is beautiful. It includes one of Canada’s biggest casinos. I am not personally much of a gambler, probably because I am absolutely no good at it; however, it was eye opening to wander about the casino, which I guess was about five or six times the size of SKYCITY here in Darwin. It appeared, being on the French side, that French was the first language, although Canada is a marvellous advert for bilingualism.
Norma, thank you very much for everything you did for us and enabled us to see. One thing is for sure: I will be having the warmer Christmas.
Ms SACILOTTO (Port Darwin): Mr Acting Deputy Speaker, this evening I speak of the importance of caring for people in our community. We all lead busy lives and tend to get caught up in what is happening in our own space.
There are people out there who give of themselves and their time to ensure that others can still be a part of the community and enjoy themselves. Kerrie Read and Carmel McGregor from Alzheimer’s Australia Northern Territory are such people. The Port Darwin electorate office has been hosting the Alzheimer’s Home Club this year, and Kerrie and Carmel are two individuals who organise the social events for people who suffer from Alzheimer’s. The original concept of Home Club was developed by Alzheimer’s Australia Western Australia in 1997. They promoted very small meeting groups in the support worker’s home. In 2002, Home Club was commenced in Darwin.
The program has developed significantly over the last four years, with a change of focus. Alzheimer’s Australia Northern Territory felt that many of their clients were becoming socially isolated due to not leaving their home often and, when they did, it was generally not without their carer or family member, therefore, they became out of touch with their community.
Currently, there are three Alzheimer’s Home Clubs in Darwin, which are providing up to five hours of respite for people with dementia each week. What this means is that clients can enjoy socialising in various community venues or at the day respite worker’s home. Other outings are also offered, such as visits to local scenic spots, barbecues, drives, picnics, local events and festivals in and around Darwin. Also, guest speakers are introduced to the groups on a range of informative topics. The cost of this activity is a reasonable $10.50 and includes pick-up and drop-off service, morning tea and lunch. Home Clubs operate Monday and Thursday in the Darwin area, and on Tuesday in the rural areas. If people are interested to know more about Home Club, Kerrie or Sue can be contacted on 1800 100 500.
Alzheimer’s Australia NT is very aware that people who have loved ones who are affected by dementia also need support and care. That is why they have a carers’ support group that meets monthly at their headquarters at Unit 3, 18 Bauhinia Street, Nightcliff. These meetings are held on the third Thursday of each month from 10 am to 12 noon. Alzheimer’s Australia NT provides support, counselling, information and education to help people living with dementia. If families are seeking assistance in caring for a loved one, there is a whole range of information that is available by simply contacting them. It is a worthy organisation assisting people from all sections of the community. I heartily congratulate Alzheimer’s NT, and the Port Darwin electorate office will continue our support.
The Northern Territory education event, The Beat also benefits from community-minded people, organisations and businesses who, year after year, give their time and expertise to work and support our young talented students. This year, The Beat celebrated its 27-year anniversary, and would not be possible without the involvement of these special individuals. I thank Dr Michael Myers, who is the chairman, and all of his dedicated team for making this year’s The Beat very entertaining and special. All of these community-minded people continually give their time and expertise to ensure The Beat tradition of excellence is attained every year. It is a perfect way for our students to display their talents in music, dance and other areas of performing arts.
I would like to mention and thank the many organisations, schools and sponsors that have contributed so very willingly of their time and money, a generous display of cooperation across all levels. I congratulate Trudy Proctor and the Larrakeyah school students, as well as Raz Dejongh and Stuart Park students for their hard work and beautiful voices in the choir. Congratulations to students from Darwin High and Julia Quinn for their participation and dedication to the dance sequences. Also, a special thank you to Inge Clements, a Port Darwin constituent, for the magnificent costumes she and Shirley Knight provided to the performers.
News from the schools in Port Darwin is that St Mary’s Build-up Ball was a roaring success, with $115 000 raised, all in one night. I was, again, a very watchful spotter for the auction, and enjoyed the night with good company. The very successful function could not have been possible without caring and giving people in the community again wanting to ensure a secure future for St Mary’s school. Congratulations to Laura Kenyon Slaney and the ball committee, Rachael Shanahan, Lynda Valentine, Karen McLean, Alicia Tollner, Liz Kelly, Tracey Grist, Sue Leeder, Sue McLean, Anne Hurley and Cathy Blockey - a really great event, once again.
At a whole school assembly of Larrakeyah Primary School on 15 September 2006, I had a very special task with principal, Graham Chadwick. It was to present Sophie Philip with the International Competitions and Assessments Medal (ICAS). Sophie was a successful candidate from the Northern Territory/South Australia division. This competition is organised by the University of New South Wales and is a great achievement for Sophie and her family. Her parents, Neil and Sue Philip, can be very proud. Well done, Sophie.
It is amazing to think we are only four weeks away from Christmas. I take this opportunity today to thank a number of people and organisations I have had the privilege of working with over this past year as the member for Port Darwin. This is part one, as there are so many wonderful people in my electorate it is difficult to speak without forgetting someone very important. I will try my best.
I thank the Clerk of the Legislative Assembly, Mr Ian McNeill, and all of the staff of the Legislative Assembly: Vicki Long; Mary-Anne Almond; Cherie Thorpe; Annette Post; and Helen Allmich, Editor of Debates and her staff for their hard work and long hours; the same goes for Graham Gadd, Clerk Assistant and his staff in the Table Office; Jan Sporn; and Karen Turner, Administrative Officer for electorate staffing matters. I also thank the support staff of the committees: Pat Hancock, Secretary to Committees; Brian Lloyd, Research Officer; Joanne Carbone; Captain David Horton; Terry Hanley, Committee Secretary; Maria Viegas, Research Officer, and Kim Cowcher also from that office.
I wish the following school councils members a very merry Christmas and safe and happy new year for 2007: Larrakeyah School Council members, Principal Graham Chadwick, Chairperson Bertram Birk, former principal Jo Wynn, Richard Wiltshire, Juliet Cooper, Emma Liveris, Charles Staples, Julie Pudney, Steven Smith, Kathy Hamilton, Wendy Alp, Michael Calwell, Robyn Appleby, Angela Wear, Susan Proft, Susan Rae, Vicky Godden. Welcome and congratulations to Graham Chadwick as the new principal of Larrakeyah Primary. Graham comes to the position with a wealth of experience, having acted as principal at Maningrida, Nhulunbuy and Ludmilla schools. Mr Chadwick has extensive experience in music and has been involved in The Beat, and is a past member of the NT Music School. I look forward to a strong and productive working relationship with Mr Chadwick.
I wish a very merry Christmas to Darwin High School Council members, Peter Garrigan, Graeme Lewis, Marion Guppy, Esther Egger, Rob Speirs, Charlie Manolis, Thevi Chelliah, Anne White, Robyn Liddle, Tony Copland, Denise Phelps, Col Browne, Stephen Davis, Jan MacPherson, Jodi-anne Williamson, and Bernie Millevoy.
I welcome Mr Marcus Dixon as the future principal of the new Darwin Middle School. I was very happy to renew my acquaintance with Mr Dixon this month and discuss our fantastic middle school which is currently being constructed.
I extend a very merry Christmas to Stuart Park council members: principal, Bernie Bree, Ros Coggans, Paul Clark, Ian O’Rielly, Leonie Warburton, Leonie Cramer, Danielle Stafford, Carol Metcalfe, Richard Woodside, Lynne Wallis, Nea Harrison, Helen Miralles, Philomena Smith, Barbara White and Alexandra Mullins.
I also extend Christmas wishes to all of the teachers and staff of Larrakeyah Primary School, St Mary’s Primary School, Darwin High School and St John’s College.
I also say a merry Christmas to the community organisations using the Port Darwin community room: the Darwin City Action Group members, Mr Robert Parker, Gavin, Rod Godden, Judy Miller, Danny Bacon, Cliff Campbell, Helen Galton, James Groombridge, Tony Maroulis, Heather Sjoberg, Ian Spooner, David Swift and Roger Dee. Also to Pat Williams from Cradle NT and Keith Williams from Prostate Support Group. Also, to Ms Jenny Radtke and Ms Elizabeth Burns, my acting electorate officers, and Ms Sandra Wanka, my electorate officer - merry Christmas and thank you sincerely for your hard work and support throughout the year.
Also to the Stuart Park Residence Association: John and Joan Brears, Cyril and Pauline Young, Chris Bond, Steve McCallum, Beryl and Alex Warne, Jill Ferry, Liz Nicholls, Heather Sjoberg, Chris Millowick, Roger Dee, Anna Vandenberg, Jill Rechner and John Leishman.
Congratulations to the office holders re-elected at Monday night’s AGM. Thank you to the new members and a huge thank you to those who have been office holders in the past. Thank you for all your hard work during the year in the view of maintaining and improving the fantastic Stuart Park area. I wish everyone a happy and healthy Christmas and new year for 2007.
Mr KIELY (Sanderson): Mr Acting Deputy Speaker, tonight I talk about Sanderson High School Stage 2 Year 12 awards that I, the minister for Education, and the Minister for Infrastructure and Transport, the member for Karama, attended at the Bullocky Point Museum and Art Gallery tonight.
It was a fantastic awards presentation night. I have attended this ceremony for the last six years since I have had the honour of being elected to the position of the member for Sanderson. I have seen many of these students commence in Year 7 in Sanderson High and go through to their graduation ceremony. It was, indeed, a very happy time for me. It was more of a joyous and happy occasion for all the parents who were there. The auditorium was full to the brim with very proud parents and siblings and friends who cheered and clapped and had a really good time.
Quite a number of students graduated at the Stage 2 ceremony, and I will mention them. The opening ceremony was conducted by Sarah Figg and Kimberley Smith, who stood in for Raymond Jones. The principal, Ms Denise Wilkowski, gave the welcoming address. I also put on the record Ms Wilkowski’s great work at Sanderson High. She is leaving to take up a different position within Education. I am sure she will retain her links with Sanderson. At the end of the Stage 2 Awards program, all the students, parents and other teachers wished Ms Wilkowski well for her new endeavours and also thanked her for all the work she had put in over those many years at Sanderson High.
The key note address, as I said, was delivered by the Minister for Employment, Education and Training. He spoke from the heart about his time as a youth when he left school and took up an apprenticeship as a marine fitter. He spoke about the opportunities that life has to offer, how you can never be too sure what is around the corner, and of the richness of the challenges that are put in one’s pathway as one travels through life and the rewards that can be gained. He encouraged the students not to be scared of what lies ahead, but to embrace life and life-long learning. It was a very apt and a laudable speech given by the minister.
The certificates of acknowledgement were presented by Mr Greg Gibbs who is the chairperson of the school council. Mr Gibbs has been there for many years and this will probably be his last presentation. His son was in the group that graduated. I believe that will be the last one for him and he probably will be stepping down from the council next year. On behalf of the people and the community of Sanderson High, I thank Mr Gibbs for all the work that he has done for the school over those many years.
The students who were graduating at the Stage 2 presentation were Andrew Ah Kit, Lyle Ah Sam, Faye Armstrong, Roy Assan, John Baird, Shannon Bell, Jay Bound, Travis Brown, Michelle Carr, Nathan Challis, Anthony Chappell, Adam De Ausan, Nicholas de Leeuw, Chantal Delhaye, Eunice Delos Reyes, Soraya Djawas, Alfjev Ferrer, Chez Garling, Adam Gibbs, Wayne Kellner, Toni-Lee Kirby, Shannon Lay, Kali Lodge, Jason Long, Anne-Marie Lundin, Lachlan McGregor, Dale McKeller, Jennifer Miles, Marley Mitchell, Friska Mogo, Kane Mola, Nathan Nguyen, Gemma Perkins, Christopher Rice, Michael Schulz, Amina Sherif, Alyssa Weisse, Jasmine Weisse and Heath Wolter. Quite a debonair, beautiful, handsome looking bunch of students they were too. They were all in their finery and they looked the part, and it showed in their presentation.
There were number of presentations on the night and the ‘Personal Best’ Awards, which were presented by Mr John Glasby, Executive Director of Top End Schools, went to the Travis Brown, Anthony Chappell, Chantal Delhaye, Eunice Delos Reyes, Adam Gibbs, Toni-Lee Kirby, Shannon Lay, Kali Lodge, Lachlan McGregor, Dale McKeller, Jennifer Miles, Marley Mitchell and Kane Mola.
The Caltex Best All Rounder Award, which was presented by Hon Delia Lawrie who, as I said, is the member for Karama and shares the Sanderson School with me - our electorates adjoin. Families from both our electorates are the predominant population attending Sanderson. Delia was happy and proud to present that award to Dale McKeller who is a good Northlakes resident. He is a wonderful lad. I watched him grow up; I know his family.
The Principal’s Vocational Education and Training Award was presented by Ms Denise Wilkowski to Kane Mola.
The 2006 Sanderson High School Stage 2 Service Award, which is the one I have been giving all these years and which I am proud to sponsor, went to Kali Lodge. Good on you, Kali; a wonderful effort.
The School Council Award for Indigenous Student of the Year was presented by Ms Elizabeth Tak who told me that this will also be her last presentation because her son has completed his schooling. Elizabeth, thank you for all the work that you have done for the school council; you have been a great help. The award went to Adam Gibbs, the son of Mr Greg Gibbs, so that was a wonderful turn of event. Greg said at the end how very proud he was of his son, and someone from the audience made the quip: ‘So you should be, and we are all proud of our kids’. That was a wonderful achievement.
The School Council Award for the Student of the Year went to Travis Brown, and that was presented by Greg.
The NT Board of Studies Award for the Top Achiever, Indigenous Year 12 was awarded to Marley Mitchell. It was presented by Ms Margaret Banks, CEO of the Department of Employment, Education and Training.
The NT Board of Studies Top Achiever Year 12 went to Travis Brown. Well done, Travis. That was an excellent result.
When the principal was presenting the award to Kane Mola, she said she was going to tell the audience some things that Kane did not know. On Friday, she was advised that Kane Mola had been acknowledged as the best VET trainee in Australia. He was nominated by the Holiday Inn. I will say that again for the record: the best VET student in Australia. That was from the Holiday Inn. He is picking up $2000 for that award. That is another fine achievement from the youth of Sanderson.
Closing comments were made by Travis Brown, Jennifer Miles and Gemma Perkins. The pride they have in their school, the love and affection they have for their parents, the respect that they have for their teachers and their fellow students, came through in what they were saying. They each provided little pearls of wisdom for the people to think about, and did a fabulous job of winding up the night.
In wrapping up acknowledgement of the Year 12 Stage 2 Awards, it was great to see the youth of the northern suburbs presented with these awards, to see them there in their finery. As I said before in this place, there are so many people out there who are so busy and find it easy to knock our youth, but let them have closer look. Let them see what our youth are doing. I am sure they will be a little more effusive in their praise and provide a little more positive reinforcement instead of the negative comments we so often hear in the political process so that a few people get a cheap headline in the newspaper.
Well done, to all those people for the Stage 2 Awards 2006. I look forward to being there next year for the 2007 awards. The quality of the students coming through is fantastic. With those remarks, I say well done to all the teachers for the work they have done for the students of Sanderson High School.
Motion agreed to; the Assembly adjourned.
MESSAGE FROM ADMINISTRATOR
Message No 14
Message No 14
Madam SPEAKER: Honourable members, I have received from His Honour the Administrator message No 14 notifying assent to bills passed in the October 2006 sittings of the Assembly.
VISITORS
Madam SPEAKER: Honourable members, I advise of the presence in the gallery of students from Years 3 to 6 from Wugularr School, accompanied by Rosemary Murray, and Years 5 to 8 students from Maningrida CSC, accompanied by Shannon Alexander and Pamela Hepburn. On behalf of honourable members, I extend to you a very warm welcome.
Members: Hear, hear!
RESPONSE TO PETITION
The CLERK: Madam Speaker, pursuant to Standing Order 100A, I advise honourable members a response to petition No 47 has been received and circulated to honourable members.
- Petition No 47
CP Zoned Land at Dundee Beach
Date presented: 18 October 2006
Presented by: Mr Warren
- Lands
Date response due: 18 April 2007
Date response received:
10 November 2006
Date response presented:
28 November 2006
Response
- Dundee Beach Pty Ltd has applied to amend the provisions of the NT Planning Scheme, being the Namarada Area Plan 1990 (as amended), to rezone sections 3230 and 3231 Dunheved Road, Hundred of Glyde from Community Purpose (CP) to Living 1 (L1) and to rezone sections 3055 and 3056 Namarada Drive, Hundred of Glyde from CP to Living 3 (L3), to facilitate residential development of the sites.
A public hearing to hear submissions in relation to this matter will be held at Dundee Beach School on 6 November 2006. All public submissions and petitions will receive due consideration, in accordance with the requirements of the Planning Act.
Following receipt of the submissions and reports from the Chairman of the Development Consent Authority and the Department of Planning and Infrastructure, I will be in a position to properly consider this matter.
MINISTERIAL REPORTS
Rebuilding the Police Force
Rebuilding the Police Force
Dr BURNS (Police, Fire and Emergency Services): Madam Speaker, I report to the House on progress made by this government on rebuilding the Northern Territory Police Force. This government is proud of its commitment to the Northern Territory Police Force. We have provided our police with record funding through our $75m plan to rebuild the Northern Territory Police Force.
Since 2001, this has resulted in the NT Police, Fire and Emergency Services budget increasing by 55%. We have also seen record rates of police recruitment which is set to deliver an extra 200 police on the beat by the end of the year. For those who somehow perceive that this is not enough, I remind them of the shameful fact revealed …
Members interjecting.
Madam SPEAKER: Order!
Dr BURNS: I remind them of the shameful fact revealed in the O’Sullivan Report, particularly in the early 1990s. Under the CLP administration, the Territory Police Force went three years without a single constable recruit.
In an ideal world, the rate of recruitment should equal the rate of officers leaving the force. In the last three financial years, the rate of recruitment into the Northern Territory police has been double the rate of officers leaving. I pay tribute to my predecessor as Police minister, the member for Wanguri, whose determination to upgrade both the police force and the number of our police is now paying rich dividends.
Earlier this month, I had great pleasure in attending the graduation of police Recruit Squad 86 - my first as Police minister - and welcoming another 24 constables into the Northern Territory Police Force. Members of Recruit Squad 86 survived a tough recruitment selection process and an even more demanding and challenging training course.
I particularly acknowledge Constable Mark Berry, who was awarded the Rod Evans Memorial Trophy for the highest academic achievement; Constable Boyd McMahon, who won the Commissioner’s Trophy for overall performance; Constable Clinton Richardson from Darwin, who won the Physical Training Trophy; and Constable Peter Brown from Alice Springs, who was awarded the Glen Huitson Trophy for most consistent application in all areas of training throughout the recruit training course. They and their fellow graduates are a credit to themselves, their families and the staff of the police training college.
I was particularly pleased to see the member for Araluen at the graduation ceremony. She would have noticed that 50 trainees from Recruit Squad 87 and Recruit Squad 88 took part in the graduation ceremony. Recruit Squad 88 commenced two weeks ago. In all, there are currently 77 recruits at various stages of their training.
The Northern Territory government’s commitment to building and supporting its police force is absolutely clear and unwavering. As growth in police strength continues this year, so too does the growth in facilities such as the police post at Mutitjulu commissioned last month as part of a joint federal/Territory agreement. As well as the two ACPOs at Mutitjulu, we have also stationed an extra constable at Yulara to provide additional support to the community. Meanwhile, we are rolling out mobile police stations in Darwin, Alice Springs, and soon in Katherine. There are also new vehicles for Aboriginal Community Police Officers, and new policing equipment such as the rigid hull inflatable boat which I helped to launch last week.
The dedicated Police Traffic Branch, which was scrapped by the CLP in 1991, will be reformed next month in Alice Springs and Darwin, in time for the Christmas road safety campaign. We are also creating highway patrols to operate out of Katherine and Alice Springs, and forming the remote area traffic patrols to provide coverage throughout the Territory – all this building on other initiatives which followed the 2003 O’Sullivan Report into police resources.
Madam Speaker, we have a fantastic police force whose professionalism and dedication has resulted in significant reduction in crime over the past few years, particularly property crime. I am very proud to be the Police minister in this exciting time in our force’s history.
Ms CARNEY (Opposition Leader): Madam Speaker, how nice it is to be back in parliament, hearing the dulcet tones of the minister. The dulcet tones of the minister do not get him away from the truth. The truth is that the member for Wanguri lost the job as Police minister because he was so bad at it. I note with interest that there has been so much written about the leadership – or the Chief Minister’s lack of it - in recent times. I thought the article on crikey.com was best. I note with great interest that the author has described the minister for Police as a Chief Ministerial supporter. I note the irony then, that he paid tribute to the former Police minister. One wonders what is going on behind the scenes of the Labor caucus and within Labor caucus ...
Mr Henderson: Get on with the report!
Ms CARNEY The aspiring Chief Minister on the other side wants to have a go – and how Territorians are missing hearing from him!
Back to police. Has the Chief Minister read the Police Association’s media release of 10 November in which it is stated:
- The Northern Territory Police Association today disputed the NT government’s position on police numbers and increases likely to be achieved under the O’Sullivan Report.
In comments made prior to this release, the minister failed to mention – and he still fails to mention – the fact that more than 209 police officers have left the force since July 2003. Mr Vince Kelly went on and said that the government’s position is now apparently that there would be an extra 200 police personnel by 2007, and not necessarily police on the beat.
We now know, of course, that so many of them will be dedicated to traffic duties, sitting somewhere between Darwin and Alice Springs on the highway, pinging people for exceeding 130 km/h. Police minister …
Mr Henderson: They will not be breathalysed …
Ms CARNEY: … if you want to do better than the last fellow in the job you now have, you had better start telling the truth, for which he is not well known.
Mrs BRAHAM (Braitling): Madam Speaker, we all know the demands made on our police are enormous. As we pass legislation in this House, more and more are made, so less and less police are seen doing the things that we would like to see them doing; that is, be on the beat on the street.
Too many police, in my opinion, are caught up on non-operational duties. I mention something like Neighbourhood Watch. I realise these Neighbourhood Watch people are at the end of their career, but why should this particular job be taken up by the police? There is a lot of time police have to spend reporting these days. Sometimes, with domestic or family violence, police sent out spend hours writing reports. That needs to be streamlined. We need to have a system where we do not tie up police on doing administrative matters rather than doing things that we want to do. Minister, I ask you to, perhaps, address that.
Regarding the vacancies in remote communities at senior levels; we are all aware that it is not an attractive job. Forced transfers are, obviously, not acceptable to the police union. I suggest that you need to put in some type of incentive to cover the remote centres where we have them. I also suggest that you need to have more Aboriginal Community Police Officers trained. They do a remarkable job; they should get that.
I wondered why you did not, when you had the graduation ceremony, invite the members to the barracks – and I am talking, of course, of the member for Nelson. Why are people on this side not being invited to functions that are in their electorate? Too often, this particular government has said: ‘No, you are not getting invited’. We find that the member whose electorate the barracks are in has lost that opportunity to meet with the people he is representing. I ask the government to put this right. Do not be petty. If something is happening in an electorate, the local member, no matter who they are, should be invited.
Madam SPEAKER: Member for Braitling, your time has expired.
Dr BURNS (Police, Fire and Emergency Services): Madam Speaker, I thank the member for Braitling for her comments. I did not organise the graduation, but I will feed that information on. I believe that all members should be invited to such functions. Regarding streamlining processes, I am always interested in streamlining processes, and I will pass your comments on to the Police Commissioner.
The member for Araluen, she did everything; she threw the dust in the air - everything to avoid the real issue which was the freeze on police recruiting during the 1990s, and this government’s successful efforts in rebuilding our police force.
Regarding Mr Vince Kelly’s comments about 209 police officers leaving the police force - wrong, wrong, wrong! I believe Mr Kelly got his figures from the Government Gazette. How he can string together 209 police from …
Ms Carney: Stop talking down the police.
Dr BURNS: … the Government Gazette, I do not know. The fact is that our recruitment is double our attrition. We are on target to make that extra 200 police officers. The community knows …
Ms Carney: No, you are not, you slippery …
Madam SPEAKER: Order, Leader of the Opposition!
Dr BURNS: … they see those police out on the beat …
Madam SPEAKER: Please pause, minister. Leader of the Opposition, I ask you to withdraw that comment.
Ms CARNEY: Slippery, Madam Speaker?
Madam SPEAKER: Indeed.
Ms CARNEY: I withdraw the comment, Madam Speaker.
Madam SPEAKER: Thank you, Leader of the Opposition. Have you finished, minister?
Dr BURNS: Yes, Madam Speaker.
Ms Carney interjecting.
Madam SPEAKER: Leader of the Opposition, I would appreciate you not making comments like that when I have asked you to withdraw.
Heritage Register Declarations
Ms SCRYMGOUR (Natural Resources, Environment and Heritage): Madam Speaker, one month ago, on 28 October, I listed five new sites across the Territory as heritage places. These sites represent the enormous diversity of our history and heritage here in the Territory - history that tells the story of the Northern Territory and makes it what it is today.
One is the declaration of a Milkwood tree not more than 0.5 km from where we are now, on the corner of Foelsche and Wood Streets. Astonishingly - especially for such an urbanised area as Darwin - this tree is a remnant of the original vegetation of the Darwin Peninsula, and has been standing there since before European arrival in 1869, an entirely unlikely possibility for any other jurisdiction in the nation. It is a wonderful example, along with the redevelopment of Old Admiralty House as a restaurant that I reported on last month, of the history of old Darwin being represented in a meaningful way in our modern development, and contributing to today’s lifestyle.
Two of the sites declared last month represent aspects of our colonial past: the church site at Warruwi and the town markers from the site of a town - Virginia - that has never been built.
The church at Warruwi on South Goulburn Island was built by the Methodist Mission between 1925 and 1928. It is the oldest existing church in Arnhem Land, and remains a significant building in the community.
Telling another part of our colonial past are the stone survey trenches and ironwood survey pegs located in the Virginia town site, which are the only remaining physical evidence of George Woodroffe Goyder’s 1869 survey of Port Darwin and its surrounds. Goyder’s story is a remarkable one. He and his team surveyed 270 000 ha in eight months from Port Darwin to south of Adelaide River and west beyond the Finniss River. The survey also included the town sites of Palmerston - now called Darwin, of course - Southport, Virginia and Daly. The survey defined the capital of South Australia’s new northern province of the Northern Territory and laid the foundation of modern Darwin. To be able to preserve some of the original survey trenches and markers helps tell the story of Darwin’s beginnings.
Another of the sites I declared last month is the crash site of the B24 Bomber, Nothing Sacred, and is another piece in the jigsaw of World War II history. The remains of the bomber, and its crash site near Hayes Creek, are tangible reminders of the air war conducted against the Japanese during World War II from Australian soil.
Finally, I also declared as heritage places sites associated with the Wave Hill walk-off and strike of 40 years ago, which represent an important episode in the nation’s history of the land rights struggle.
Earlier this year, I launched on behalf of the Chief Minister The Value and Nature of Heritage Tourism in Alice Springs: A Summary Report and Action Plan. That publication marks an important step in recognising the value of our heritage to our tourism industry and, indeed, our modern lives as Territorians.
People, both locals and tourists, are interested in our history and our heritage and want to experience it. For example, the very building we are sitting in now, Parliament House, was close to the site of the old Post Office where a number of civilians were killed on the first raids on 19 February 1942. As a modern building, it is a very long way from being a heritage site, yet, it contains the remnants of a wall of the old Post Office, as well as other memorabilia from that fateful day. It is a modern building that, nevertheless, holds memories far older than the fabric of the building itself. History and heritage can be accommodated in modern development, and development need not be compromised by the presence of historically significant sites. We have proved that time and time again here in the Territory. It is a balance which works for us here.
Madam Speaker, while we often call the Territory a ‘young’ place, of course, we know that Territorians are custodians of ancient stories that are embedded; for example, in the rock art of our region. However, the story of the Northern Territory is a continuing one, which is why we celebrate events and movements in our more recent past. Our heritage is part of our environment and I am delighted that we are able to combine our history with our development in the Northern Territory.
Mrs MILLER (Katherine): Madam Speaker, I thank the minister for her report this morning. Heritage and conserving our history is extremely important. While the Territory is not terribly old, it is important that we ensure that we do conserve as much heritage as we possibly can.
I suggest to the minister that she have a look at an area in my electorate which I believe would be quite significant for our heritage tourism; that is, Manbulloo Homestead, which has some wonderful historical old sheds and buildings on it. It also has one of the last remaining solid timber stockyards in the Northern Territory. I had a look at it last week and was impressed by the solidness of this wonderful area. It is not in huge disrepair; it is being utilised at present. It is a wonderful stockyard area, with fabulous tamarind trees that have been there for a long time and have a great amount of history. The homestead is designed in Territory style - it is a unique style with a space between the roof and the ceilings to allow air flow. It does not have any airconditioning. It is a wonderful place. It is used as a tourist park at the moment.
I have not spoken to the minister about this before, but I suggest that it is a unique area. If we are looking after the history of the Northern Territory, this does need to be looked at.
Mr WOOD (Nelson): Madam Speaker, I have to slightly disagree with the member for Katherine, I believe we actually have some very old heritage in the Northern Territory. It depends on what perspective you are coming from.
I congratulate the government on naming these five sites. I would like to make a couple of quick comments. I mentioned last time that I had a look at Old Admiralty House. I must admit that I do not think the gardens have done anything for Old Admiralty House. It is a very modern garden, almost like an architecturally designed garden by a landscaper. That old-fashioned garden was part of what Admiralty House was about. That is what made it unique, of that era. It had plants that we remember from old Darwin, and now it has manicured fig trees in pots. It might look nice but I believe we have lost something with that change.
The Virginia town site – I noticed in the Gazette that you have taken a portion of that and declared it a heritage site. I am interested to know what you are going to do with it. For the average person going to the Virginia town site, it is a piece of bush. There would need to be protection and some interpretative signage to tell people what that bit of bush is being preserved for. Whether there is a possibility of some development there, as in Southport - in other words, it is used as a housing area with the streets maintained as they were originally surveyed - that might be an option.
Making the B24 crash site a heritage site would be a great thing. I know Steve Barnes has been on to me many times, as he has you, minister. Bob Alford was working hard on that as well. It is important that it is now a heritage site. We should start looking at all our World War II airstrips. The Chief Minister, in her report about her Vision of Darwin, talked about an opportunity to maintain our unique military history. We have to be going forward now and saying that our airstrips should be heritage sites. I would hope the Strauss Airstrip is expanded to be one as well.
Ms SCRYMGOUR (Natural Resources, Environment and Heritage): Madam Speaker, I thank both members for their responses. Firstly, member for Katherine, the Heritage Advisory Council, you will be happy to know, has already started assessing with the Jawoyn the history of Manbulloo and their ties with that. That work is already currently under way. Hopefully, once they complete that work, that recommendation will come to me for heritage listing. It is certainly an important part of our history. I remember talking to people like old Lofty Bardayal who lives on the escarpment in west Arnhem, who has vast knowledge and history of that, along with the Chinese and many different players.
Member for Nelson, regarding the garden at Old Admiralty House, yes, I agree plants were removed. The whole architectural process with the garden was done with the Heritage Advisory Council, which had worked with …
Madam SPEAKER: Minister, your time has expired. Minister!
Ms SCRYMGOUR: … those people, but I would be happy to give you a briefing.
Planning and Growth Forum for 2007
Ms LAWRIE (Planning and Lands): Madam Speaker, today I report on the Martin Labor government’s continued commitment to balance development and growing our strong Territory economy. This government has a vision for the future of Darwin, a vision we set out in creating Darwin’s future which was launched by the Chief Minister in October of this year. Our vision is one of protecting our unique Territory lifestyle with more recreation facilities for Territorians and more green, open spaces. It is about honouring our heritage, and drawing on this heritage to create unique tourism opportunities for the Territory. Our experience of World War II, totally different from the rest of Australia, is a prime example. Our vision is also about continued residential and industrial development that grows our already strong economy while protecting our environment.
One of the key initiatives of creating Darwin’s future is a forum in early 2007 to engage the community and industry on the planning issues affecting the future development of Darwin. The forum will be about exchanging ideas, discussing our way forward, and developing key themes for the future planning of our tropical city. We already conduct extensive consultation under statutory provisions of the Planning Act. This forum will be an opportunity to go beyond this, and to really pick the brains of those committed to the growth, development and future shape of Darwin. Key stakeholders in the future planning, growth and development of Darwin will be invited to the forum including representatives from local government, the urban planning and design community, property developers and representatives from community, environmental and resident action groups.
To kick-start the debate and make sure stakeholders are thinking about the key forum issues, a series of discussion papers will be developed, including papers on what is happening in planning globally, population and housing, employment, transport, the Darwin CBD, and a sustainable environment. These are important issues for our future. I am sure that there are many within the industries and the community who will seize the opportunity to engage with government on progressing them.
The forum will be a single-day event with keynote speakers on each of the key themes, followed by workshops with expert panels. Keynote speakers and panel members will be selected for their expertise and experience in urban renewal projects Australia-wide and locally. The intention is to compile results from the forum and disseminate the information to participants and the broader community. Outcomes may result in amendments to the Northern Territory Planning Scheme. Other feedback might influence existing projects being undertaken by government including, but not limited to, Myilly Point and the Stuart Park tank farm.
Planning is not a straightforward portfolio. There are probably as many views on a future Darwin town plan as there are people in Darwin. Whilst this diversity exists and is welcomed, there is one matter on which we would all agree: that Darwin will continue to develop and grow as the lifestyle capital of Australia. I look forward to hosting the planning forum in early 2007 and encourage all members of the Assembly to participate in that. I will make sure that the discussion papers are available to them and look forward to their input.
Ms CARNEY (Opposition Leader): Madam Speaker, the minister is clearly ill; I hope the minister recovers. Thank you for the report. I am sure you will be well aware that there is a view in Darwin that the glossy brochures put out by the Chief Minister a month or so ago did not go down terribly well because most people in Darwin knew of the Darwin City Council’s proposal and its vision for Darwin. Everyone knows that the Chief Minister tried desperately to gazump the Darwin City Council’s plan ...
Mr Bonson: Stop pulling Darwin down.
Ms CARNEY: Everybody knows, and if they do not, they should. Everybody knows that the relevant department and the back room people up on the fifth floor were working day and night to pump out those brochures. Everybody knows so it is a little disingenuous for the minister to now say: ‘We are going to consult and we are just caring, sharing people’. You must consult. It did not also go down well that, in the Chief Minister’s vision for Darwin - which she wants very much to look like Singapore, which is a mystery to many people, but she wants it to look like Singapore - the pictures in the glossies have to some extent, or are at risk of, being seen to pre-empt any consultation.
We note with interest that there were no costings from government. Some of these things would not be possible in the next decade or 20 years partly because there just would not be the money available for them. Some of the things are just pie-in-the-sky plans and the Chief Minister’s Darwin dreaming adventure.
In any case, we encourage people to contribute. Now that you have backed them into something of a corner, they should contribute. Clearly, this is not something the government can do by itself; it must work with the Darwin City Council. Interestingly, between the two, they cannot even do a skate park, but we wish you well with delivering those pictures on the glossies. We ask: what about Alice Springs, Tennant Creek, Katherine and everywhere else in between? What are you going to do about those spots?
Madam SPEAKER: Leader of the Opposition, your time has expired.
Mr WOOD (Nelson): Madam Speaker, I thank the minister for the report. The statement for the vision for Darwin has to be the whole of Darwin. We already have what they call the Regional Land Use Structure Plan for the Darwin area. We cannot just focus on Darwin city; we must focus on the entire harbour. That is what is missing. The government has been in for over six years now and has now brought in a vision. In that time, unfortunately, we have 33-storey buildings built boundary to boundary with no open space except for the balconies and a little space at the swimming pool.
The Chief Minister wants streetscapes with trees. We have not allowed any room for that to happen in our city. We have not allowed setbacks on public buildings. There has been an opportunity for this government to do something through the Planning Act and it has not acted. To some extent, it is too late. There is Hong Kong, as I call it, near the NT News building. You cannot tell me that that is a pretty site - all those blocks and blocks of flats there? It is ugly. I have not heard anyone say anything nice about it. That is destroying our tropical lifestyle. We should have been able to do better. In those Defence buildings on the other side of Carey Street; at least there is space and room, and it gives you a feeling you are in a tropical city. You, as the government, have allowed this overdevelopment of Darwin, and that is to our shame.
Anyone who goes through Palmerston will see the new suburb of Farrar. The roads can only take two cars. That means people then park on nature strips. Is that good planning? It is lousy planning. It is developers getting away with just using the minimum requirements instead of the government setting out maximum requirements for three cars on little roads. You might not think it is important, but it will make the streetscapes for those suburbs terrible because cars will park there. Mitchell Creek: how much effort have we tried to do to save that creek? Yet, we still see straight drains going into it; no modern concepts of environmental engineering design. There are many things. The last thing I point out is that we have ruined the centre of the harbour by allowing it to be a gravel scrape. That is where the vision was missing. It is too late now. The minister says it will cost too much money to fix it. It is sad to see that is where it has gone ...
Madam SPEAKER: Member for Nelson, your time has expired.
Ms LAWRIE (Planning and Lands): Madam Speaker, I thank the members opposite for their contribution. The shadow minister is clearly out of touch with the community of Darwin. I stood in shopping centres with the display of creating Darwin’s future, and I have to say people were overwhelmingly delighted to see it. They said it was good to see government paying attention to the future planning of Darwin and prompting public debate about what it will look like, and what components there will be. The shadow minister is clearly out of touch with the people of Darwin.
Regarding the role of the Darwin City Council, the Capital City Committee, which comprises the Northern Territory government and the Darwin City Council, has been fully briefed on the idea of this planning forum, and they will be participating partners in it. I look forward to their contribution.
In respect of the member for Nelson, all of the issues you raised will be the focus of discussion and debate at the planning forum: Darwin Harbour and the sustainable environment, how we, as a city, develop around our harbour, and what that looks like. What we allow to occur will be an important part of debate, as will be issues of CBD heights, building setbacks and streetscapes ...
Madam SPEAKER: Minister, your time has expired.
Sabah Meat Technology Centre
Mr NATT (Primary Industry and Fisheries): Madam Speaker, I report on my recent trip to Sabah for the opening of the Sabah Meat Technology Centre, and the continuing development of our relationship with the government of Sabah. It is a key priority that we diversify our markets for livestock exports to safeguard Northern Territory producers in the event of a downturn; for instance, in demand from Indonesia. Our work in Sabah is part of that diversification.
The memorandum of cooperation in place between my department and the Sabah Department of Veterinary Services and Animal Industries is the foundation stone on which the formal relationship is constructed. This memorandum defines the role of my department in relation to advice on training services, food hygiene and meat processing, and was integral to the establishment of the Sabah Meat Technology Centre.
Officers from my department have played a key role in the centre’s development by providing technical input and on-ground assistance through the memorandum of cooperation. The centre will be a model in Sabah for whole-of-supply-chain meat processing, from first-class livestock holding yards to state-of-the-art abattoir facilities and, finally, a modern retail outlet providing a selection of processed meats. Importantly, the government of Sabah is determined to develop export markets within the region for processed Halal product, and it will look to the Northern Territory for the supply of feeder and breeder stock.
I particularly acknowledge the work done by Mr Robert McFarlane from my department in assisting with the establishment of the centre. He has done a wonderful job with the establishment of the abattoir, and I know that his efforts have been appreciated by the government of Sabah.
My visit also included a tour of government livestock facilities and a private sector feed lot where many Northern Territory cattle are placed, and an inspection of the Sabah government’s Agricultural Training Centre. The work of Dr David Ffoulkes from my department, who manages our activities in Sabah, and Mr Alister Trier, Director of Pastoral Production, both of whom accompanied me to Sabah, also needs to be acknowledged.
Following my return to Darwin, Dr Ffoulkes and Mr Trier visited palm oil plantations to assess the management of imported Northern Territory cattle, and the Tawau Government Veterinary Laboratory where they were able to provide advice on the construction of a temporary holding facility for imported Territory cattle. Mr Trier also gave presentations at technical workshops held in Sarawak and Sabah with the overall aim of identifying key concepts and principles of breeder cattle management to ensure that Australian cattle imported for breeder purposes in palm oil plantations are properly cared for.
It is worth noting that the Livestock Manager from the Sawit Kinabalu Oil Palm Company attended my department’s training course on beef cattle management, and now runs breeding herds of over 5000 head of cattle in six palm oil estates for the primary purpose of reducing weed management costs. The Brahman breeders were sourced from the Northern Territory, and further imports to the company are expected over the next year to increase total cattle numbers to 10 000, which is good news for exporters.
All predictions are that Malaysia will always be a nett importer of beef and, so, by assisting in their current development, we place ourselves in a prime position to supply breeder cattle under the palm program, as well as in the long term. Through the successful training provided by my department’s Livestock Export Development program, it is expected that live cattle exports of Northern Territory cattle will continue to grow to meet these expanding markets.
With this in mind, I raised the issue of extending the current memorandum of cooperation beyond the 2008 expiry date with Hon Datuk Abdul Rahim Ismail, Minister of Agriculture and Food Industry. I am pleased to say that there is goodwill from both jurisdictions for this agreement to be extended, and I look forward to developing this and entrenching our working relationships in the area.
I acknowledge the work done by my predecessor, Hon Kon Vatskalis MLA, who helped to establish a solid working relationship with the Sabah government and put in place industry development arrangements for the two jurisdictions to share information and skills. Minister Vatskalis and the staff of my Department of Primary Industry, Fisheries and Mines laid the groundwork for what is becoming an important emerging export avenue for the Territory’s cattle industry.
Madam SPEAKER: The time for ministerial reports has expired.
Reports noted pursuant to standing orders.
LEGAL PROFESSION BILL
(Serial 75)
Continued from 19 October 2006.
Ms CARNEY (Opposition Leader): Madam Speaker, I can indicate to the Attorney-General - and should have done so earlier, my apologies - that we will be supporting the bill. No surprises there, I guess. I note again that people from the Law Society have graced us with their presence - welcome. This is, indeed, a significant day and, as we all know, this the biggest act in the Northern Territory’s history.
It is big for a number of reasons. It is not as though the issues contained in this legislation affect just the Northern Territory’s legal profession. They are issues that affect, and have affected, the profession around this country for many years. This bill does not have its genesis in the Northern Territory. Its genesis comes from, I believe it was SCAG in around 2001, although suggestions for a model or uniform bill have been kicking around for probably close to a decade or so. So, no surprise, Madam Speaker, that the bill has been introduced. We welcome it.
For my part, I would like to see a model Criminal Code come before us with similar speed. I note that the previous Attorney-General and I had discussions, both formal and informal, about the model Criminal Code, and I wish that that would pick up pace.
In relation to this very large bill, which a lawyer friend of mine in Alice Springs described as the best doorstop he has ever seen, I make a number of comments. I would like the Attorney-General to respond to these points in his reply. I am closely watching him move seats, and I am hoping that he will take some notes, because they are important questions. Some of them have been put to me by solicitors around the Northern Territory. That lawyers around the Northern Territory have not been falling over themselves to talk about this bill would not come as a surprise.
My take on it is that very few lawyers have actually read it from cover to cover. No surprises there as well. However, the relatively small group of legal practitioners who have - and some of them have had a long-standing interest in this area - have raised several issues with me. I should say, for the sake of the Parliamentary Record, a few weeks ago I spoke with Barbara Bradshaw about some of those matters, and I thank her for her assistance. I should also say that, on balance, the Law Society of the Northern Territory is supportive of this bill.
I am yet to find perfect legislation and, no doubt, a bill of this size will have difficulties in years from now, I am sure. That should not surprise any of us, given not only the length of this bill - I believe it has nearly 700 clauses - but also because of some of the issues that are involved.
My first question - and I hope the Attorney-General will answer this: what sort of education has been provided to the legal profession about this bill? Has it been simply a letter enclosing the bill and asking for comments, or has there been - and if there has not, will there be - after this bill passes, everything from information sheets to seminars commenced by the Department of Justice to assist the legal profession gets its collective head around this bill? I know that some lawyers are concerned. They have told me that they are not fussed about it because they figure that all will become clear in due course. I ask the Attorney-General whether he, as the Territory’s first law officer, will undertake to assist our very busy legal profession with understanding and getting their collective heads around the bill? That is important.
One other issue that came to me was the concern expressed as a result of clause 290 of the act; that is, the restriction on advertising in relation to personal injuries claims. The Attorney-General should know - his predecessor did - that there remains widespread dissatisfaction with tort law reform in this jurisdiction and, indeed, around the country. I note that all state and territory governments joined with the Commonwealth some time after the 11 September attacks. I believe I am on record at the time as saying that it amounted to something of a knee-jerk response to embark on a comprehensive tort law reform package which saw, inter alia, the capping of damages in a number of respects ...
Mr Stirling: Enabling small business to get insurance cover. What a dreadful thing to do.
Ms CARNEY: Madam Speaker, the Attorney-General has, for reasons unknown, not only got out of his seat, which is fine, but he is having a chat on the way around. If the Attorney-General does not know that there is dissatisfaction with tort law reform in this jurisdiction and elsewhere, then he should get a briefing. Insurance premiums have not gone down, they have gone up, and the rights of potential litigants remain compromised and diminished as a result of governments in this country having what can only be described as a knee-jerk response to the insurance industry …
Ms Martin: Your federal mates had a knee-jerk response too, did they?
Ms CARNEY: I find it extraordinary that the Chief Minister is also having a go. She does not know anything about this. She does not know much about anything, but she certainly does not know much about this. It is …
A member: She knows more than you do.
Mr Stirling: Helen Coonan got it all wrong. Helen Coonan was wrong.
Madam SPEAKER: Order!
Ms CARNEY: It just beggars belief that they are - I cannot hear exactly what they are saying but their muttering is clearly along the lines of this is nonsense. It is not nonsense. I do not know how many practising lawyers you know, but you should get out more. You should go to the firms in Darwin and Alice Springs and ask them about their personal injuries claims. You should ask them whether they are making the same amount of money now as they were making in 2000-01 in relation to personal injuries …
Ms Martin: Oh that is what it is about: lawyers making money!
Members interjecting.
Madam SPEAKER: Order, order!
Ms CARNEY: You should also ask them how many clients they have had to turn away because the legal system has been attacked by you and your colleagues around this country, because those potential litigants do not have claims anymore - or if they do have claims, they cannot claim very much. If you think that is satisfactory, bully for you. It is not satisfactory. How can you say the Australian Labor Party is a friend of the worker …
Mr Stirling: Filling lawyers’ pockets; that is what you are on about.
Ms CARNEY: … the friend of the worker when they fall over and hurt themselves and you do not believe they should receive more than $2.50. This is an outrage, Attorney-General …
Mr Stirling: Filling lawyers’ pockets; that is the aim of the opposition.
Ms CARNEY: I am staggered beyond description!
Members interjecting.
Madam SPEAKER: Order, order!
Ms CARNEY: You just do not get it, you idiot. I will withdraw ‘idiot’, Madam Speaker.
Madam SPEAKER: Withdraw.
Ms CARNEY: Madam Speaker, this is …
Madam SPEAKER: Leader of the Opposition, will you please resume your seat.
Honourable members, I would like to make a general comment. I have been out of the Territory for six weeks amongst people who are not politicians. One of the things that people said to me while I was away was about the rude behaviour of politicians. I have to say that I do not want this to happen in this parliament today. I am in no mood; I have had a lot of treatment over a long time. I think people need to get their act together and remember that we are all elected here to represent people in our electorates. I would appreciate you behaving like adults today.
Ms CARNEY: Thank you, Madam Speaker. It beggars belief …
Mr Kiely: No hysterics.
Madam SPEAKER: Member for Sanderson, please!
Ms CARNEY: … that the Territory’s first law officer does not have his head around tort law reforms undertaken thus far - and I understand there are more in the pipeline. It is just extraordinary. In fact, as a result of his comments and those of his colleagues, divided though they are, I hope that they have been picked up on Hansard because they should be. I will send them to the Territory’s legal profession.
I know there has been concern for some recent years and that concern is growing. What sort of first law officer does the Territory now have who does not even show any understanding of the difficulties facing the profession? That is a damning indictment of the Territory’s first law officer who ought know much better …
Mr STIRLING: A point of order, Madam Speaker! I appreciate the Leader of the Opposition’s fulsome backing of lawyers who want to fill their pockets - the same lawyers who drove insurance costs through the roof so that small businesses - even small community groups - could not get insurance for their activities whether they were weavers or basket makers, or whatever they were. That was the reality that all jurisdictions were facing. I am happy to have that debated at any time. It has nothing whatsoever to do with the Legal Profession Bill before us today.
Madam SPEAKER: Deputy Chief Minister, there is no point of order. I ask you, Leader of the Opposition, to direct your comments to the bill as closely as possible.
Ms CARNEY: I will, Madam Speaker. It again shows and demonstrates to anyone listening and anyone who will, subsequently, read this Parliamentary Record, that the Attorney-General of the Northern Territory does not even know what is in this bill. The Attorney-General says references to personal injury has nothing to do with this bill. Have a look at the bill, Attorney-General; there are clauses about personal injury claims, responsibilities and obligations. My comments, in fact, have everything to do with this bill.
Again, I say that the Attorney-General should give himself a briefing on this bill and personal injuries law in the Northern Territory. If he is going to introduce, as I understand, further law reform, then the least he can do is show some level of understanding to the Territory’s legal profession. This argument or debate that is occurring generally within - and only within - the profession, is not as the Australian Labor Party would have us believe: all about lawyers costs. It is about potential claimants being deprived of claiming in response to someone else’s negligence …
Mr Stirling: That is not what you said before.
Ms CARNEY: I will not suggest to the Attorney-General that he pick up a law book, but I can say to him that the judgment of Donoghue versus Stevenson the old snail in the bottle case, is a ripper yarn. It is a good read and you should at least indulge in that one so that you can have some semblance of understanding of the law of negligence. Am I concerned as a lawyer and a politician that my fellow Territorians claims are being diminished as a result of tort law reform? Absolutely, I am. I am stunned that others in this Chamber do not share my concern. I am stunned that you, seemingly, ignore the concerns of constituents who must surely be coming into your office to talk about this. I am stunned that some of your lawyer friends and you are particularly close to some of them …
Mr Stirling: They came in when they could not get insurance. They flooded in the door when they could not get insurance.
Ms CARNEY: There he goes again, Madam Speaker. He does not care about Territorians who are injured and who might have a claim for personal injury. It is going to be a very interesting sittings. I did not think the Attorney-General was so lacking in his understanding. However, we can have that debate another day.
What started all of this - and it was always intended really as a general comment. However, I know the people on the other side are not happy and they are all fighting with each other. You can fight with us for the next three days. It will take your mind off things, so get stuck into us. We know you are all having a bit of a go against each other behind the scenes. If the parliamentary sittings are something of a diversion for you, bully for you, but the Attorney-General, as the Territory’s first law officer, should get his head around this.
As I said earlier, there is concern relating to the restriction on advertising in relation to personal injury claims. That is at clause 290 on page 175 of the bill, which is headed ‘Restriction on advertising in relation to personal injury claims’. In the view of some lawyers practising in the area of personal injury, it is an overly prescriptive provision. There is concern that a lawyer will not be able to say to a potential client: ‘Yes, I think you have a personal injuries claim’ without complying with the provisions of clause 290. There is acceptance of various restrictions on advertising but, it was put to me, the wording of this clause is so overly prescriptive that it may expose lawyers to incurring a fine - the maximum penalty is 50 penalty units - if they indicate to someone in circumstances not prescribed in clause 290 that they have a personal injury claim. I would like some comment on that in the Attorney-General’s reply. If he can contain himself to directly answering that concern, I would also like to know whether other lawyers have pursued this with him. I had three lawyers talk to me about this. I asked one whether he had spoken to government, the Department of Justice or the minister, and he said: ‘Why bother?’ On his behalf, in particular, I am raising that issue.
The next issue that I would like to raise was found in clause 70. You will not know this, of course, Attorney-General, but it starts on page 54 of the bill and keeps going over to page 55 and some of page 56. That section, which is clause 70, needs to be linked to clause 90. Again, for your information, clause 90 is found on page 66 and is the provision for government lawyers to be generally exempt from certain conditions. The exemptions are prescribed in clause 70, in particular, clause 70(3)(a), (b), (d) and also clause 70(4).
Putting it all together, as it were, clause 90(1) states:
- A government lawyer’s local practising certificate is not subject to conditions of the kind referred to in section 70(3)(a), (b) and (d) or 74, other than a condition relating to continuing legal education.
I will deal with those sections shortly. Clause 90(2) starts with ‘However’, which I think is the first time I have seen a sentence starting with ‘however’ in legislation, but you get that:
- However, a government lawyer’s local practising certificate is not subject to a condition relating to continuing legal education if the lawyer holds an office prescribed by the regulations.’
In relation to those two clauses, I ask these questions: first, where are the regulations? What is envisaged by a lawyer holding an office prescribed by those yet-to-exist regulations?
Other questions will require a reading of clause 70, which deals with exemptions for government lawyers. The exemptions are from a requirement to undertake and complete continuing legal education prescribed by the yet-to-be-seen regulations, a requirement to undertake specific legal education and training, and a requirement for a period of supervised legal practice. In other words, this bill provides a mechanism for lawyers to be subject to a number of obligations, responsibilities and restrictions - all lawyers except government lawyers.
By way of an aside and because the Attorney-General does not have his head around the portfolio, I commend to him to find some time to note the concern of the private profession about so many private practitioners being, as they say, sucked in to the government sector. I am not sure I have a particular view on it one way or the other; however, you should at least be aware - given that lawyers are hard to attract to the Territory, and pretty much always have been - that there is a view in some law firms that they get private practitioners up here for a while and, then, they are recruited to the government sector. Bully for the government sector, but that is an issue for the private sector. I sincerely ask the Attorney-General to at least try to get his head around that one.
In any case, the fundamental question is: why should the restrictions that apply to private sector practitioners not apply to government lawyers? What is the policy rationale for that decision? That is a pretty straightforward question. Why are government lawyers not going to be required to undertake continuing legal education, have specific legal educational training, or have a period of a supervised legal practise? Why has that found its way into this area? That is clause 70(3)(a).
In addition, a further difference between private practitioners and government lawyers is that there is no need, apparently, for government lawyers to have particular conditions concerning employment or supervision - and that is to be found in section 70(3)(d) - that is, private practitioners under this bill will be subject to, where appropriate, restrictions concerning their employment or supervision, yet, government lawyers will not be subject to those same restrictions. Again I ask: what are the policy considerations or rationale behind making a distinction such as that?
I am sorry the member for Sanderson is not finding this very interesting - no doubt he would rather be at the cricket. However, these are serious issues. I know it galls members on the other side to have the opposition in here questioning their legislation, but I do so on behalf of those practitioners who spoke with me about this and, indeed, having a read of the bill myself, unlike the Attorney-General.
That probably summarises the questions. I hope that the Attorney-General can dig deep - to use that cricketing expression - and find it within himself to provide a sensible answer to these queries because members of the legal profession are rather hoping that he bothers.
Madam Speaker, with those comments, we are supportive of the bill and congratulate those who have been working on it for many years.
Mr BURKE (Brennan): Madam Speaker, what a pleasure it is to have you back presiding.
Madam SPEAKER: Thank you.
Mr BURKE: As the Attorney-General alluded to in his second reading speech, this bill - some 400-odd pages and 762 sections worth - can be a daunting prospect for anybody to read and comprehend. It is not a bill that even the most dedicated legal professional will need or want to pick up and read from cover to cover. However, I encourage all practitioners to give it their close attention, if only in the areas they feel are particularly relevant to them, and to have it close at hand in their office to refer to.
I can remember when I was pursuing my legal course, one of my lecturers made the comment that, in Victoria, they had a Legal Profession Act, or its equivalent, and it was a shame that not many of the profession actually appeared to read it that often, and they could well do with a refreshing of their memory. I encourage all local practitioners, or interstate practitioners looking to practice in the Territory, to become familiar with it. Local practitioners will be reassured that the bill has been the subject of intense and dedicated scrutiny at national level by Department of Justice officers and, I understand, by the Northern Territory Law Society Council and Executive.
I want to pick up on something that the Leader of the Opposition said, which was that there will be issues that come up. There always is with every new legislation - and certainly something of this size. With anything regulating a course of endeavour, once it is passed issues will come up and there are likely to be amendments made to it. The government has committed across-the-board to its consultation processes, and will be listening to the legal profession regarding unforeseen difficulties which may be caused. I encourage legal practitioners and the Law Society to contact me if they feel there is an issue which they have, as I am very interested in this legislation.
The people who dedicated themselves to putting this legislation together did so, so that practitioners can focus on the practice of the law. They are to be commended for their effort and dedication.
The bill touches on every aspect of legal practice and sets out what practitioners need to do to comply in a relatively straightforward manner. This is something every practitioner, whether they be suburban solicitors, sole practitioner, or associates of a national law firm, will appreciate. At the national level, consistency between jurisdictions will allow practitioners to worry less on the mechanics of conducting their business, and concentrate more on what they are good at: providing high-quality legal advice. This will benefit both the profession and clients.
It is good to see that the Northern Territory is playing its part in leading the way in introducing this final version of the modern bill. The Territory cannot, and should not, be left behind or out of the loop when it comes to such an important area of regulation. If nothing else, it would, perhaps, provide the Commonwealth with the motivation to override yet another Territory power. By influencing development of the bill, the Northern Territory has shown it can play a valuable role on the national stage.
One example of the strong aspect of the legislation is allowing the provision of operational funding to complying community legal centres. Community legal centres play a valuable role in the Northern Territory by providing legal advice to all members of the community. Over the past couple of years, community legal centres which are funded by the Commonwealth have reportedly had their funding slashed. By inserting this provision, payments out of the Fidelity Fund to pay practising certificate fees for community legal centre lawyers, for instance, would make an important practical, as well as symbolic, statement of support for these organisations in the Northern Territory.
I note that the legislation removes the Attorney-General from certain aspects of decision-making. I wish to emphasis that I am not casting any aspersion at the Attorney-General, but it has always seemed odd that a member of the executive arm - formally appointed Queen’s Counsel - became personally involved in complaints against practitioners. The oddity of the involvement in appointing Queen’s Counsel or Senior Counsel can be summed up in one name of a former Chief Minister. This step back and transferral of powers to the judiciary and the statutory supervisor, in my opinion, was a sensible and principled solution.
As I stated before, I understand that the bill has been the result of consultation with the stakeholders over an extended period of time at both local and national levels. I have been made aware that the Law Society of the Northern Territory - its council and executive - actively assisted government by presenting its views on reform and constructively engaging in development. The level of local interest, I understand, was also demonstrated by excellent attendance at information seminars held here and in Alice Springs. By actively engaging with government, practitioners were able to learn more about what it would mean for them and influence areas where possible. That influence has not ended because, as I said, practitioners can always raise with government and its local members issues that they identify in the application of this bill once it has passed through all the phases of this House, assented to and become law.
I want to make one comment in relation to the restriction on advertising, clause 290, which was raised by the Leader of the Opposition. I note that there is provision for a complying statement, and publication of that statement, which sets out advertising which is permissible for those practitioners engaged in a particular area. It includes the ability for details about the area of speciality of a legal practitioner or law practice. Therefore, law firms do have the ability to ensure people are aware of their services, and to provide those services with the best possible rigor and intellectual application.
Madam Speaker, I commend this bill to the House. It will be very valuable legislation in times to come.
Mrs BRAHAM (Braitling): Madam Speaker, my comments will be brief as I am not a lawyer and I really did not understand this bill. I found it very hard to read, it was so vast. I just say to the Attorney-General that, to put a bill of this size on the table and expect the Independents to be able to treat it with any thorough examination, is a joke. It is all right for ministers, their ministerial expenditure is over $12m; the Opposition Leader gets $1m to run her office; the Independents get one position at $70 000.
In the past, we have managed to point out to the Attorney-General errors in the bills he has presented. There are amendments that we have moved that the Attorney-General has accepted because he knows it was wrong. God knows what is in this particular bill. It is just impossible to have asked in five weeks to go through it thoroughly and get feedback. I say to the Attorney-General that your timing is terrible; you could have at least given a little more time for feedback. The feedback I had from any lawyer whom I approached about it is that, like me, they had very little time to read it and they just hope their associations have given the necessary comments.
There are just a couple of things I want the Attorney-General to clarify for me. You say in your bill that you are going to appoint a statutory officer. It does not say what areas they are going to cover. Can you tell me exactly the functions of the statutory officer you are appointing? Are you, in fact, handing over some of your workload, functions and responsibilities to it? It also says that the statutory supervisor may delegate any of the powers and functions to any person or body. What exactly does that mean, minister? You are creating this position and passing over some of these functions to this particular body who then can pass it on to anyone? Could you clarify exactly what you mean by that?
I wonder if you were contravening the Northern Territory (Self-Government) Act? I am not a lawyer, but I ask you to clarify this. Under the Northern Territory (Self-Government) Act, there shall be a number of officers of minister of the Territory having such respected designations as the minister from time to time determines. Under those regulations, some of the responsibilities this minister has are the court system and the legal profession. Are you taking away some of your powers that are conferred by the Northern Territory (Self-Government) Act? These are matters in respect of which ministers of the Territory have executive authority.
I know you have said that you no longer wish to appoint Queen’s Counsel. The Chief Justice may appoint a local legal practitioner as a Queen’s Counsel, so you are passing that responsibility to the Chief Justice. Can you do that under the Northern Territory (Self-Government) Act when the Regulations say that you are responsible for the legal profession? The act says appointment must be made only after consultation with the Attorney-General and other judges, the Law Society and anyone else the Chief Justice considers appropriate. I know this is probably a bit of a knee-jerk reaction to the Shane Stone appointment of QC, but I want to query it. Perhaps you can give me advice, Attorney-General, on whether you are foregoing some of your responsibilities as a minister of this Legislative Assembly and whether you can, in fact, allow the Chief Justice to appoint in this way. It may be a small point, but it is something we need to clarify.
The other point is what statutory functions this supervisor will perform. What functions are you giving up? We are talking about accountability. I listened to what the Leader of the Opposition said because she often contributes in a way that clarifies matters for me when it comes to legal issues. However, I must admit I missed exactly what she was saying. She did make the comment that you are the first law officer of the land. Do you take that responsibility seriously? Does this bill undermine some of the functions you should be performing?
There is also an opportunity for you to look at the accountability of the legal profession. As you know, I have written to you about the Sentencing Advisory Council that has been set up in Victoria. That body has legal representation, senior academics, and community representation. It provides statistical information on sentencing, including information on current sentencing practices; it conducts research and dissemination of information on sentencing matters; it gauges public opinion; it consults on sentencing matters; and advises the Attorney-General on sentencing issues. It seems that this is an opportunity for you to clarify whether you would consider setting up a Sentencing Advisory Council. It seems to me, sometimes, that our legal profession becomes very defensive about some of the things that happen in our courts and judicial system. In like manner, we have to stand up in this House and be accountable, so there should be accountability across other systems, and I include the judiciary.
Having said that, I have always found that any dealings I have personally had with lawyers have always been done in a most professional manner. They have an enormously difficult task. I do not believe this act really – whether it is of comfort to them or not, I do not know. All I can say is it will take a while for us to absorb this and see if it is working in such a way as it is intended to do - make sure the legal profession is a legal profession, and professional in all the things that they do.
Madam Speaker, with those few remarks, I would appreciate the Attorney-General responding to my queries. I will be supporting the bill.
Mr STIRLING (Justice and Attorney-General): Madam Speaker, I thank each of the contributors to the debate. The Leader of the Opposition also acknowledges that it is the largest, single legislation ever to come into the Northern Territory Assembly. We appreciate the huge amount of time and effort put into this legislation by members to consider and raise various aspects. However, it is most important to acknowledge that the bill reflects the hard work of not just Justice officials in the Department of Justice - and that has been a big workload, I am absolutely assured - but the legal profession here and in every jurisdiction in Australia, to bring this bill to fruition.
The main objective of the bill is to achieve national consistency in regulation of the legal profession across Australia, and doing so will remove much regulatory overlap. It will make it easier for practitioners to work across jurisdictions; it will help clients in their dealings with the legal profession. Today, the Territory does its part in making that goal a reality. We are just the second jurisdiction to pass this legislation. New South Wales passed its legislation just last week.
In light of that goal around national consistency, I suppose queries and concerns at the general level, or specific aspects of the bill, do need to be tempered by the fact that most policy issues have been extensively debated and, ultimately agreed to, at that national level. If you were to go it alone as a jurisdiction on nationally important issues such as this by making our legislation different from other places, it would lead to a collapse of the very point of this legislation; that is, to achieve, as far as possible, the exercise of national consistency.
This government has been involved in the development at every step of this bill, so we are confident the bill will fairly and efficiently regulate the Northern Territory legal profession, at the same time, implementing those consistent national standards. As set out in detail in the second reading, it is based on the model bill provisions agreed to at the July 2006 meeting of the Standing Committee of Attorneys-General. Extensive discussion among states and territories during that development has ensured comprehensive, well structured legislation. It will ensure that the Northern Territory meets a uniform national standard for law degrees and practical legal training, trust accounts and fidelity funds, definitions of professional misconduct, legal cost requirements and disclosure to clients, and foreign lawyer entitlements.
As I noted in an address to the Law Society’s recent Pro Bono and Legal Services Conference, society is becoming more and more reliant on legal expertise. At the same time, lawyers are expected to travel and advise people and companies across jurisdictions. As law firms stretch across borders, so ought the regulation of their practice. For the first time, a uniform regulatory system will exist for the legal profession across Australia, and this will mean a more efficient, truly national legal system. National law firms will soon not need to attempt to comply with different and, potentially contradictory, laws. Clients will be better able to understand their rights and obligations and know what costs information they should receive from their legal advisor.
In relation to consultation, it was very extensive with stakeholders over the past five years, both at local and national levels. We acknowledge the support provided to the government by the Law Society in the Northern Territory as an active participant in developing this bill. The Law Council of Australia also made valuable contributions at the national level. Following the drafting of the Northern Territory bill, the Department of Justice held information seminars for legal professionals in Alice Springs and Darwin. Both seminars were very well attended. I understand there was strong support to enact the legislation. Seminars also provided government with the way to fully address any practitioner’s queries or concerns. After the bill is passed, the Law Society, with assistance from the Public Purposes Trust, will be providing a comprehensive education campaign, coordinated by a full-time officer, including the very points raised by the Leader of the Opposition: information sheets, advertising, education sessions and seminars.
Under the current legislation, in relation to the role of statutory supervisor, I, as Attorney-General, have various last-resort roles in respect of Law Society decisions. The government does not consider it appropriate that there be such direct personal involvement by the Attorney-General to compel reconsideration of decisions. In other jurisdictions, this particular role is performed by a position at arms length from the minister; for example, a legal Ombudsman. Because of the small number of such complaints in the Northern Territory, the Solicitor-General will take on the role of the statutory supervisor, and it will remove potential, or inference, of political interference, while ensuring there is a mechanism in place to satisfactorily resolve disputes.
In relation to the question of delegation of that work raised by the member for Braitling, that devolves to the Department of Justice. It is the Solicitor-General who signs off in the end, not the Attorney-General, despite the fact that the work might go to the Department of Justice legal people.
Nothing has changed in clause 290 on advertising from the current situation. I understand the Leader of the Opposition’s dissatisfaction with tort law reform. She made it very clear where she comes from on this issue: lawyers are not making the dollars they used to. Well, isn’t that a pity? We reached a situation where absolutely ridiculous insurance claims were costing insurance companies millions of dollars, forcing capital to flee the insurance market in Australia, and forcing premiums being offered by those companies that still survived in the insurance market to step up their premiums by 40%, 50%, 60%, 80%, 100%, 200%, and 300% - where you could get cover.
We had the ridiculous situation where the Rockhampton Sewers Group could not get public liability insurance, nor could the Nhulunbuy Speedway Club at any cost, nor the Darwin Speedway. Nor could thousands of community organisations around Australia even get a quote on insurance cover. That is what drove insurance ministers around the country, with Senator Helen Coonan the Liberal government minister, to get together to rein in those claims, encouraging people – more than encouraging, forcing people - to take greater individual responsibility for their actions without running to an insurance company when they have done something stupid and suffered an injury as a result of their own stupidity.
I pay tribute - I have before and I do again - to Senator Helen Coonan. She was the lone Liberal minister chairing all the states and territories – all, of course, Labor insurance ministers and, sometimes, Treasurers. She had carriage of this area of work and showed tremendous leadership in working with the states and territories to drive reform right across the insurance area.
I remember Terry McInroth, the Queensland Treasurer, saying the Rockhampton Crochet Club had been in existence for 75 years and could not get public liability insurance. I do not know what the insurance companies were thinking the Rockhampton Crochet Club might get up to, but that is a pertinent example of what was occurring in the availability of insurance across the country at that time.
Since those reforms have gone through - and mostly all of the states and territories have completed that wave of reform; not entirely - there has been a restoration of a balance in insurance. It is now, importantly, available. Capital has come back into the insurance market in Australia and, importantly, it is affordable, which was not the case when that process of reform was commenced.
The Leader of the Opposition decried the fact that lawyers may not be able to make as much money as they used to. She ignores the fact, of course, that many community organisations and small businesses can now afford insurance with the dramatic decreases in premiums we have seen over the past four years. It would be pertinent for the Leader of the Opposition to recognise, particularly that she is not just a member of parliament, but that she is the Leader of the Opposition and has a role and responsibility to represent all constituents in the Northern Territory, not just lawyers, and simply not just the good people of Araluen which is her foremost job.
She made a similar courageous defence of lawyers when the reforms to victims of crime were made. Those reforms are necessary because the system was bleeding many thousands of very soft dollars into lawyers’ pockets, where the victim’s claim was without question. The victim would have been paid out anyway but, of course, a lawyer was there with their hand in taking off many soft dollars.
The member for Braitling said it is all too hard with a bill of this size. It is her responsibility …
Mrs Braham: With one person to share with the other when you have a whole load of people - millions of dollars more ...
Madam SPEAKER: Order, member for Braitling!
Mrs Braham: Come on, we only wanted a bit more time.
Madam SPEAKER: Member for Braitling, cease.
Mr STIRLING: The member for Braitling has the same responsibility as every member of this parliament, including members of government who are not ministers. If she is going to make representation in or around a bill, she has a number of options. She can check with the legal profession. She could have made time to speak with Barbara Bradshaw from the Law Society who would have willingly given her half or three-quarters of an hour to work through the bill and any questions she had. She could have sought advice from lawyers in her own electorate or anywhere through the Northern Territory. She could have had - and she was offered but declined the offer - a briefing on this legislation. So, do not come in here and say it is all too hard, member for Braitling. It suggests you are lazy in your approach to this legislation and you seek to blame the government …
Mrs Braham: It is the timing. I said your timing was bad. You put a huge bill on and give us five weeks to look at it.
Madam SPEAKER: Order, order!
Mr STIRLING: … for failing to carry out your own responsibilities as a member of this parliament.
In relation to the Sentencing Advisory Council, at the moment, the judiciary carries responsibilities for this. I cannot see - and while I am open-minded and remain open-minded until I see some more detail around the member for Braitling’s suggestion - how a Sentencing Advisory Council can advise those who are well briefed in the law - so briefed, in fact, that they have risen to the heights of either judge or magistrate in the system. How would an advisory council interact with these well-remunerated people with extensive experience in law from all sides - defence and prosecution in most cases? If it is an advisory council, surely its advice is advisory only and the judiciary could choose to simply ignore that. They are some of the questions I would have about how this might work. I am aware that somebody has put it in place. I am open-minded but I would, at first glance, find it very difficult to see where a meaningful role might lie for such a Sentencing Advisory Council. I will await further information to come forward.
The restrictions on advertising, I touched on briefly around clause 290. It simply carries on the current restrictions that are already in place. Advertising is allowed according to prescribed methods. The Law Society may permit advertising. It is based on the New South Wales provisions, the bill of which, as I mentioned, was passed last week. We consider that to be a fair and appropriate level of regulation.
The rationale around exemptions for government lawyers is that government lawyers are more strongly regulated here than other jurisdictions. Government lawyers, of course, work to just one client - that is, the government - and advise on specific areas of law. Private practitioners are required, by the nature of their jobs, to serve many clients across the community. The main reason around this is the risk to the fidelity fund. Private practice, of course, can constitute a risk to that fund. Government lawyers, by definition, will not. We do not envisage a situation where government lawyers would be sued by their employer, the government; thereby, putting a risk against the fidelity fund.
In relation to that, it is necessary to go into the committee stage, because we do intend to make some minor amendments to the bill, which go to the admission requirements for practitioners. On advice from the Office of Parliamentary Counsel, the amendments are desirable to clear up minor inconsistencies that crept in through various drafts of the bill. If you look at a bill of 762 clauses overall, three relatively minor amendments are not too bad. I am not quick enough on my feet to work out a percentage, but it would be a very low figure.
Madam Speaker, I thank members for their contribution to the debate and for their support of the bill.
Motion agreed to, bill read a second time.
In committee:
Clauses 1 to 30, by leave, taken together and agreed to.
Clause 31:
Mr STIRLING: Mr Chairman, I move amendment 16.1. Clause 31 of the bill sets out that an applicant for admission as a legal practitioner may seek early consideration of certain matters prior to formally applying. The clause covers situations where, for example, a law student has been convicted of an offence and is wondering whether there is any point in persevering with legal studies. Some offences may prevent practise as a lawyer. This amendment amends clause 31 so that a person seeking such a declaration from the Admission Board must give written notice of the application to the Northern Territory Law Society. Currently, this obligation is inappropriately located within clause 34.
Amendment agreed to.
Clause 31, as amended, agreed to.
Clauses 32 and 33, by leave, taken together and agreed to.
Clause 34:
Mr STIRLING: Mr Chairman, I invite defeat of clause 34. The current clause 34 sets out various matters concerning representation in admission matters and notices to be given in respect of admission matters. However, there are other clauses that deal with related matters. New clause 34 consolidates in one clause the key matters relating to the parties to admission proceedings. These are that the Admission Board is not a respondent to an application for admission and, for matters before the Admission Board, the applicant for admission and the Law Society are entitled to make written representations to the Admission Board. For appeals to the Supreme Court under clause 38, the applicant and the Law Society are entitled to be represented and to be heard. For admission matters and associated matters being considered by the Supreme Court, the Law Society is also entitled to make written submissions and/or be represented and heard. I invite defeat of clause 34 accordingly.
Clause 34 negatived.
New Clause 34:
Mr STIRLING: Mr Chairman, I move amendment 16.2, which is that proposed new clause 34 be inserted in the bill.
New clause 34 agreed to.
Clauses 35 to 40, by leave, taken together and agreed to.
Clause 41:
Mr STIRLING: Mr Chairman, I invite defeat of clause 41. Current clause 41 deals with parties and documents and, in doing so, duplicates part of clauses 34 and 43(4)(A). New clause 41 provides that the Supreme Court may grant leave for other persons to be joined as a party to an appeal, or a reference under clause 32. New clause 41 also provides that the court may appoint counsel to assist it. I invite defeat of clause 41.
Clause 41 negatived.
New clause 41:
Mr STIRLING: I move that the proposed new clause 41 be inserted in the bill.
New clause 41 agreed to.
Clause 42:
Mr STIRLING: Mr Chairman, I invite defeat of clause 42. This amendment omits and replaces clause 42 owing to a variety of changes consequential to the amendments made to clauses 34 and 41.
Clause 42 negatived.
New clause 42:
Mr STIRLING: Mr Chairman, I move that proposed new clause 42 be inserted in the bill.
New clause 42 agreed to.
Clause 43:
Mr STIRLING: Mr Chairman, I move amendment 16.5. Clause 43(4) sets out what documents must be provided by the Admission Board when an admission matter comes before the court. The amendment makes it clear the admission documents and any subsequent documents must be provided to both the Law Society and to any other party.
Amendment agreed to.
Clause 43, as amended, agreed to.
Remainder of bill, by leave, taken as a whole and agreed to.
Bill reported; report adopted.
Mr STIRLING (Justice and Attorney-General): Madam Speaker, I move that the bill be now read a third time.
Motion agreed to; bill read a third time.
MOTION
Note Statement - Indigenous Affairs –
$100m Housing Investment
Continued from 19 October 2006.
Mr BONSON (Millner): Madam Speaker, together with other members, I congratulate you on your return and we look forward to working with you over the next few days. You are looking very well.
Madam SPEAKER: Thank you.
Mr BONSON: Today, I contribute to the Indigenous Affairs, $100m Housing Investment statement for a few simple reasons. When we come into this House, we come in here with big ideals and big goals. A lot of that relates back to our families, our lifestyles, the communities we come from, the culture that we know and the people that we represent. Unfortunately, in the political arena, politicians often do not get the kudos that they should, in particular, on issues such as indigenous housing and, in fact, indigenous affairs, because of the difficult nature the Northern Territory government and the Commonwealth face in dealing with many of the problems.
This statement needs to be put into the context of the history of self-government and what has been happening in this Chamber, and with previous Territory governments. The Chief Minister, in her contribution, outlined the fact that this was a great initiative because it was about the Territory government putting in extra money, or money already given to us by the Grants Commission. It was a sacrifice, as a government, for the right reasons.
We have come up with $20m a year over five years, which is $100m. Depending on the figures you look at on the cost of housing, we are talking about 60 to 100 houses a year, hopefully, being built for indigenous families; families that live in remote areas and do not have an opportunity to get housing as we would in mainstream urban areas. That is 60 to 100 houses a year for the next five years.
What the Opposition Leader does not realise - and in the last couple of days, I downloaded the previous contributions of all ministers – is that people may remember the ridiculous, or shameful, contribution which the Leader of the Opposition made. I looked through it, and what I understood was that the Opposition Leader has no idea of what a family is, and what families mean to the Northern Territory. She has no idea what the lifestyle of the Northern Territory is. On fundamental points of families and lifestyles, the Opposition Leader has no idea. These 60 to 100 families out in the bush who will get housing are mothers and fathers and their kids who will have an opportunity to get a roof over their heads. The Leader of the Opposition, in her diatribe, wanted to talk about every other issue apart from the fact that we were committing $20m a year to give 60 to 100 families an opportunity to have a roof over their heads and have power. That is fathers and mothers, and their children. Her contribution showed that she has no idea what a family is, or of the lifestyle that some Territorians, unfortunately, face.
Over the next few weeks and months, this individual should be exposed. In her contribution, she talked about division. We know for a fact that the majority of the opposition do not even talk to each other - that is a fact. We know for a fact that they come from such politically differing views that, often, their message that they, as a caucus, try to contribute to each other, gets mixed and muddled and arguments happen behind closed doors.
Often, the Opposition Leader contributes to this House in a negative way; screams and yells as with the last bill, the Legal Profession Bill. She rants and raves, she stokes the fire, and cannot sit around and take the comeback. If you have a look at her contribution, it is nothing but vitriol and negativity; I cannot describe any other word than hatred towards individuals on this side.
You have to put it in the context of what this statement is saying. It is talking about 60 to 100 families who at present do not have a house to live in. That is 60 to 100 families - mothers, fathers and children - who are living in conditions that you can only rate as third world, and we are a first world nation.
This government, under the Chief Minister, with its caucus which is widely representative of the Territory electorate, has said within our capacity as a government we are going to find $20m extra, and are hoping the Commonwealth comes to the party and matches it. I am hopeful that they will. I am sure that the minister is in negotiation with them now. We will have 60 to 100 families per year for the next five years who are going to have houses. We already know that this is only touching the surface of what we need to do.
The Chief Minister put it in this context:
- Today, I want to outline a significant package of measures that will improve economic and social outcomes for Aboriginal Territorians, and provide a significant boost to our regional economy.
The centrepiece of this package is an extra $100m investment in remote housing over the next five years - an investment that will make a real impact. Other elements of the package are: a new local government model that will improve governance and service delivery; Territory Housing to work in partnerships with existing indigenous housing organisations to manage delivery and maintenance in the bush; the continued expansion of secondary education in the bush ...
As we know, one of the big initiatives of the Territory government is to focus on delivering secondary education into remote communities. It is a shame in this country that communities like Maningrida and Wadeye - communities of 2000 to 4000 people - cannot send their kids to secondary school in their communities; they have to leave their communities. I appreciate the work the former minister has done in this area and I know the new minister will continue to do.
The Chief Minister continued:
… further roll-out of innovative approaches to alcohol; and the provision of new police stations in remote locations to improve community safety - working in that area specifically with the Commonwealth.
These measures are specific initiatives to address immediate needs -- needs that will improve the social and economic status of Aboriginal Territorians. They will be incorporated into our agenda for action and the COAG generational plan.
The Chief Minister, in a very articulate statement, outlined the future of what we see as important for all families in the Territory, in particular indigenous Territorians. The Opposition Leader came out with a distasteful, angry, bitter response which was an attack on individuals on this side of parliament, including myself - nothing to do with what is the benefit to Territorians. Someone I respect, the member for Barkly, responded by saying:
- The Leader of the Opposition, the member for Araluen, had that same opportunity to place on record her credentials, her vision, as an alternative Chief Minister. She failed miserably - she failed. There can be no better description. As a member of this House, you come into this place because you believe in what you are doing. There is no doubt today that we witnessed possibly one of the most shameful responses to a statement or a real vision. She had the opportunity to place on record her response and her commitment to the indigenous people of the Northern Territory but, more importantly, to the people of the Northern Territory. Again, I honestly believe that she has no credentials whatsoever in the concept of being an alternative Chief Minister, or in even being part of the Territory.
I would like to touch on that. Like me, the member for Barkly is a born and bred Territorian and he has grown up over - I will not give away his age – has been a little longer than I have on this planet. We come from the knowledge of knowing what Territory families, the Territory lifestyle, and trying to create great opportunities for Territory people is about. After I listened to her contribution, one of the single major issues - and I do not place all the opposition in this box because I know there are genuine people in the opposition who do realise that one of the big issues facing the Territory and Australia as a whole are Aboriginal issues – was that the Opposition Leader had an opportunity to put on record her vision and her contribution.
She spent her time talking about one of the biggest initiatives in the history of Territory politics - being in the gutter, talking about issues that were not related to the statement. That is why the member for Araluen creates a false image of what is really happening in politics, and in the Territory. That false image needs to be put to bed.
What the Leader of the Opposition needs to understand is that all people - black, white, green or purple - want an opportunity to have work, education, housing and health. She needs to understand the lifestyles that different Territorian families live. Her attack was so vitriolic, and it was a personal attack on me and other members. I want to ask her: as a person who is an alternative to the current Chief Minister, where will she retire when she finishes? Her party has a history of nicking off and leaving Territorians holding the bag.
I am a born and bred Territorian whose family has been involved in the Territory for thousands of years but, in particular, in Darwin for the last 150 years and, no doubt, for the next 150 years. Where will she be in 10 years time? Will she still be in this House? Will she be in Alice Springs? Some of the things she said in here, she cannot repeat outside. She is turning this Chamber into a coward’s castle where she hides behind its privilege and protection. Go out into the real world, Leader of the Opposition, and say some of the things you say about members in this House and about the general public and see what happens to you. She is turning this honourable House into a coward’s castle. I have spoken to members who have been in this House a lot longer than me, and they regard some of her performances in here as some of the most shameful in the history of their time.
It is a basic principle for every member to respect the fact that we have privilege; that we can say things in here that we cannot say outside, or normal citizens cannot say. However, the contribution she has made to this debate and others shows that she has no understanding and no recognition that this is a valuable convention. She undermines this Chamber, and she is turning it into a coward’s castle. Let us take her outside so she can say some of the things she says on radio, on TV, to individuals or to public groups, and see how many of those individuals will be willing to cop it on the chin. There would be many Territorians furious about some of the things that she says in this House.
Madam Speaker, we are talking about a $100m investment in the future of Territory families. That is the men, women and children who will lead the Territory in to the future. We are building the Territory’s future. We understand its lifestyle, and we are supporting Territorians in their aspirations to be a part of that lifestyle. If you look at the history of Territory politics, we can generally say that, over the last 30 years or so of self-government, indigenous issues in many ways have been put in to the too-hard basket.
In her statement, the Chief Minister said the problem is overwhelming. What do we do? Do we give up or do we work within the capacity that we have? Do we put money where our mouths are and try to help families? The reality is that we have found $20m a year, and I would love the Commonwealth to match that. We all recognise that we become frustrated at times by what we can and cannot achieve. However, the reality is that, as a government, we are probably the most representative group that has been elected in parliament in the last 30-odd years. We should never forget or underestimate that.
We can go back to governments which were unrepresentative of Territorians, or we can work together with the government, the parliament, and the public service we have, and within the capacity of our budgets, with the Commonwealth government try to deal with some of these issues. I believe we can.
I have read the contributions of each minister. I would like to highlight something that the Minister for Natural Resources, Environment and Heritage said. She mentioned, in her contribution:
- In responding the Chief Minister, I would like to focus on the ambitions and hopes of Aboriginal people in the Territory. I am not just talking about the here and now, not just for this moment talking here in parliament, and not just for the current electoral cycle, but for the long term. In saying this, I am telling members of this Assembly that I am sick of the cheap advice, and slick promises and short-term-ism. I am sick of people telling Aboriginal Territorians what is good for them.
- Let me make things perfectly clear. I have been around politics for around 20 years in local government, land council, and the health sector for the most part and, for the last five years, in parliament. If I have not learnt anything over that time, I have learnt that Aboriginal Territorians will get nowhere without resources, and unless we start taking things seriously and plan those resources for the long term.
That is why I came into politics: to work, not just for the warm and fuzzy feel or the short-term fix, but for the long haul. That is why I fully support the announcement by the Chief Minister early this year that the Labor government is working towards plans in indigenous affairs that takes us out 20 years. It is why, on this day, I welcome the Chief Minister’s statement with its particular emphasis on housing. It is also why I join with the Chief Minister in saying there is much more work yet to be done.
The common theme from the government members in the last sittings was that this is a long-outstanding issue that goes way back to self-government. People need to realise the history behind this matter, and I quote from the member for Wanguri’s contribution:
We had many debates in the seven years that I have been in parliament about indigenous housing and the deficit in housing needs across the Territory.
The member for Wanguri has not only been a member of government, but also opposition when the CLP were in government:
- Going back to self-government in 1978, goodness knows how many debates have occurred on indigenous housing. However, the difference between this debate and all those preceding debates over the years is that this is the first time that any government in the history of the Northern Territory has committed so substantively out of its own resources to additional housing in the bush. That is a fact. Any student of history who looks at the history of indigenous housing will see that. We should not be afraid of history because people are going to look back at our government’s term in office - however long that is going to last - and examine this history of this government.
I confirm my support for the Chief Minister’s stance on indigenous housing. She has made it quite clear through the 20-year plan that we need to negotiate with the Commonwealth. The reality is, we have a budget of approximately $3bn to deliver health, education, roads, tourism, indigenous housing, and indigenous affairs for all Territorians. We know that the shortfall is estimated at around $1.2bn in Territory Housing, which is 33% of the total budget. The Northern Territory government – and in reflection, previous NT governments - have not had the capacity to deal with indigenous housing issues. We are making a small but very significant contribution to the deficit in housing, and are trying to help 60 to 100 families, hopefully.
The real issue, of course, is that we need to take this to a national level. The 20-year plan offers a vehicle to begin negotiations with the Commonwealth to have long-term strategies. We have a current budget deficit in this country of $10bn to $12bn a year. We are a first world nation, yet we have large populations, and large towns and cities throughout the Northern Territory and Australia that live in third world conditions. I propose that, if you ask the nation if it thinks every Australian should have access to education, health, employment and training, and economic advantage, overwhelmingly, the majority of Australians would say yes.
Madam Speaker, I commend this ministerial statement and this policy for indigenous affairs into the future to this House.
Debate suspended.
VISITORS
Madam SPEAKER: Honourable members, I draw your attention to the presence in the gallery of Parliament House public tour program visitors. On behalf of all honourable members, I extend to you a very warm welcome.
Members: Hear, hear!
LEAVE OF ABSENCE
Member for Arafura
Member for Arafura
Mr HENDERSON (Leader of Government Business): Madam Speaker, I seek leave of absence for the Minister for Parks and Wildlife; Natural Resources, Environment and Heritage; Arts and Museums for the rest of the sitting day due to a significant family illness. I also advise the House that I shall be taking any questions in those portfolio areas.
Motion agreed to.
Madam SPEAKER: I am sure honourable members will extend their sincere best wishes to the member for Arafura’s family at this very sad time.
MOTION
Note Statement - Indigenous Affairs –
$100m Housing Investment
Continued from earlier this day.
Mr HAMPTON (Stuart): Madam Speaker, I support the Chief Minister’s statement on indigenous affairs on 19 October 2006. I am proud to be the sixth indigenous member of this government, and I support the Chief Minister in her capacity as the Indigenous Affairs Minister.
Indigenous affairs is a very complex and difficult area for any government. There are no easy or quick fix solutions to the issues that confront our indigenous communities in the Northern Territory. The CLP failed for 26 years to deal with these issues appropriately. There is much more to be done in partnership with our indigenous communities to improve the key social and economic areas of life, from the bush to the regional centres and town camps. This is one of the primary reasons why I became interested in politics. It also demonstrates that not only a whole-of-community, but a whole-of-government approach is required. Critical to its success will be the level of support that comes from the other tiers of government. It is pleasing to see that COAG has accepted this government’s argument and has set up a committee to consider a proposal for a generational plan in early 2007.
Many members of this Assembly have, in the past, spoken about their vision and ideas to support a better life for our indigenous people. I reflect on the indigenous affairs statement the former member for Arnhem delivered in this House on 7 March 2002. Whilst his statement was a very courageous one, the truth was brutally honest. As I said in my first speech during the October sittings, some five weeks ago, we need to engage indigenous Territorians in building our society. As the Chief Minister’s statement indicated, the plan will not only provide a framework for action, but will provide the mechanism to engage indigenous Territorians as real participants in shaping their own future.
I would like to now specifically address some of the initiatives in the statement. There is no doubt that housing has become both a delicate but desperate issue in the lives of indigenous people living in urban, regional and remote parts of the Territory. Most of us know, see and hear what the outcomes are from housing shortages, overcrowding and the wear and tear on these houses. We must not forget that this problem has occurred over many decades, and the poor health, high rates of homelessness and unsatisfactory crime amongst indigenous Territorians are symptoms of the neglect of our housing stock and programs.
The failure of past governments to plan for the growth in our indigenous communities and regional centres has today placed government in this dire situation. I can remember the former CLP government selling off many public housing dwellings and complexes in Alice Springs during the mid-1990s. As the current Minister for Housing said in his statement in October this year, 33% of public tenancy is indigenous households, and 50% of people on the waiting lists are indigenous. Many of these houses and complexes which were sold back then by the CLP, would well and truly be occupied by those people now placed on waiting lists - many who are forced out of desperation to live with other family members who have a house.
This government’s approach and commitment towards making inroads into the growing housing demand is commendable. As the Chief Minister has told us, it is the biggest program any Northern Territory government has delivered. What we need to see now is the Australian government matching it, working in partnership to overcome these years of neglect. The Northern Territory government’s indigenous housing commitment is not only commendable in the amount of funding going in, but also in the new ways in which we are working with industry to develop new types of housing programs.
In my electorate of Stuart, in particular the Ti Tree region, there are many constituents who are keen to look at the opportunities of private home ownership. There are also others who are keen to gain housing closer to where the job opportunities and services are.
I am also pleased to see that a priority area of this housing package will be continuing in providing new employment and training opportunities in the building industry for indigenous people. I know of indigenous men from Laramba and Ampilatwatja communities in my electorate who have experienced and gained qualifications in the IHANT Builder Trainer program. These young men are eager to continue as part of a building team, and are great role models in their communities.
The cost of building houses in remote areas of the Territory are well known to many of us. I look forward to hearing more on this initiative that will see more houses being built for the amount of dollars being put in. The partnership between Territory Housing and indigenous community housing organisations will also be a good one because of the experience and systems which each group will bring to the partnership, and the benefits this will bring to the tenants in living skills and housing maintenance.
Local government reform is essential. You only have to read the statements by the Chief Minister and the Minister for Local Government to realise this. Local government for all Territorians is a part of our lives but, for many indigenous Territorians living in remote areas, it has a colourful history. If you have been around the Territory long enough, some of the reasons why local government reform is needed might not come as a surprise.
I recognise the importance of the risk assessment conducted in March this year, and I congratulate the Minister for Local Government for conducting it, and his comprehensive approach to the reform. I congratulate him, not because it exposes the huge problems there have been in the 56 councils which were audited, but for a number of other reasons. As I mentioned earlier, indigenous people need to be engaged at all levels of building the Northern Territory. Having strong professional regional local government bodies will bring greater efficiency and higher levels of expertise to assist communities in their development.
The formation of the Alice Springs Town Camp Implementation Committee is another example of the strong, inclusive, whole-of-government approach. The committee has the involvement of the Alice Springs Town Council, Tangentyere Council, Lhere Artepe, the Australian government, and the Northern Territory government agencies. This committee is ensuring the whole community and, in particular the indigenous people, are involved in implementing the task force’s recommendations to give our town camp living areas the same standards of infrastructure and amenities as our suburbs.
I also want to mention the unheralded role indigenous people have played in local government in the Northern Territory, often in the most difficult circumstances. I do not doubt the shire model will provide and deliver stronger organisations and systems which will lead to real jobs, better services for core local government responsibilities, and better use of plant and equipment, meaning better roads and infrastructure.
A major issue that I come across regularly is the pressure put on to indigenous people, particularly where it is exacerbated by delays in the employment of CEOs and staff. The need for greater governance training and being left to recover from incidences of financial mismanagement is essential. I know many indigenous people in my electorate are on the local government community council, land council, school councils, health boards and store committees, to name a few. I am worried that there are too many responsibilities placed on too few people, and I am not surprised when they burn out. Also, the high staff turnover in these remote councils and the long delays in filling CEO positions places enormous pressure on local indigenous people. I add that the establishment of a local government advisory board with an independent chairperson reporting directly to the Minister for Local Government will ensure some of the issues raised here will be addressed. It is another example of this government’s genuine approach in engaging indigenous people towards shaping a brighter future for their communities.
Education underpins all aspects of our communities. Education for me, particularly secondary education, was a critical part of me being able to achieve what I have today. Without a good education it is increasingly hard to get a good job, live independently and have a healthy and long life as well. It is also difficult to take advantage of the opportunities provided in the booming Territory economy. Education in the bush has, for many years under the CLP, been neglected. You only have to look at the lack of secondary education they delivered in their time.
I am proud to be a member of this government that has invested an extra $15.4m over four years in the bush. As the Chief Minister has stated, in 2003 we had our first group of secondary students who graduated through Year 12 at Kalkarindji in my electorate of Stuart. Rhonda Rankin, Lianna Brown, and Meshach Paddy were the trailblazers. In the following year, another six students graduated and, in 2005, it increased to 25, including seven from Wadeye. These types of results are priceless for those communities and the Northern Territory. This Labor government believes in this investment, and the communities in the future will benefit greatly from these young people achieving successes in education. I am looking forward to similar results and achievements as other remote secondary programs commence, including in my electorate at Yuendumu.
This Labor government is concerned about the impact and results emanating from alcohol abuse. Through strong and proactive strategies, working with the community, this government is doing something about the problem of alcohol abuse, and some of the early signs have been positive. The alcohol restrictions that came into effect on 1 October in Alice Springs appear to be having some positive effect. Talking to some town camp residents in my electorate, they are saying things are a lot quieter and, at places like Hidden Valley, residents are showing more interest in attending workshops at the community centre.
In conclusion, public safety in all of our communities from the urban and regional centres, town camps to the bush, must not be seen as a privilege but a right. This Labor government has demonstrated this through its Building Safer Communities strategy that we are not going to be soft on crime and alcohol abuse. This Labor government has also resourced the police force better than ever before, and I look forward to seeing these resources reaching the bush.
I am proud to be a member of this government because we are serious about public safety. As an indigenous member of this government, I will continue to speak on the public record about the issues that we are facing. I am also pleased that the Chief Minister and this government will continue to confront and tackle the challenges the former member for Arnhem spoke about in his statement.
Madam Speaker, I commend the statement to the House.
Mr KNIGHT (Daly): Madam Speaker, I support the Chief Minister’s statement. Since I have come into this House, there have been a number of statements in respect of indigenous affairs, another matter on which this government is keenly focused. It brings together a package of initiatives. The additional $100m towards indigenous housing is a significant part of it, but it incorporates other measures and brings together different portfolios. Local Government is one of those, and local government reform is something that various administrations have tried to achieve over the years. I remember in 1998 the CLP’s reform, The Next Step, which died after about 12 months. I support the minister in the way he has presented this reform, which is to bring better services to the indigenous communities and improve the lives of Aboriginal people in those areas.
The Territory should be fully incorporated. We should be achieving the most amount of roads funding and additional federal government funding that we possibly can for the Northern Territory through full incorporation. There is a great degree of flexibility within the models of governance, and I look forward to working with my community in looking at those areas because governance and service delivery will be the key things. I have in my mind the way models should be structured, and a federated model is something that I will be presenting to my communities. It is a step in the right direction; it is about bringing certainty to communities in respect of better representation and service delivery.
One of the other areas is the indigenous housing reform. The Territory Housing model, about which the Minister for Housing has previously spoken, will bring additional certainty to Aboriginal communities. Having worked on a community for many years, I am aware of the issues associated with delivering IHANT maintenance, construction and management funds. The biggest issue out there is the capacity of those sections of the resource centre or the community government council to deliver those services. When external staff come in, there is a high turnover of those people so they come in for six or 12 months, and they leave and you lose corporate knowledge.
In respect of employing local people, there are issues around the level of attendance and obligations that those people have through ceremony and sporting activities. If there are health-related issues, they result in problems with the attendance of local people in those departments to deliver those services on a regular basis. A model which introduces systems, structures and support around an existing Territory housing model is going to be an advantage.
I believe additional, consistent training will be provided to local staff. The systems can be linked to the mainstream Territory Housing system, so a regional centre, or even Darwin or Alice Springs, can be linked into outlying communities so there is better access for tenants.
There is also a career path. At the moment, there is no career path for indigenous housing department staff in communities. I look forward to the day when you get a trainee on board in a community and you take them right through to working on the third floor of RCG House in Darwin in the Department of Housing. I look forward to that career path, which will make it a lot more attractive for people to get into it.
There will also be a great deal of accountability and transparency with housing allocation, which is always an issue on a community. With those systems in place, you will see a great deal of improvement in maintenance and life expectancy as a result.
The extra $100m over five years is certainly welcome. It is a great contribution from a relatively small budget. It does not go far enough, obviously, with the backlog that we have, but it is certainly a very significant contribution by the Northern Territory government. That money has to go as far as it possibly can, and through the initiatives of the Territory Housing model, things will be improved in that area.
As a snapshot, just from my electorate, those occupancy rates still astound me, even in my time in the Northern Territory. The average occupancy rate in Australia is approximately five to seven people per house. At Wadeye, it is 17. You can imagine, a three-bedroom house with 17 people. I struggle with a few kids in my house but, if you have 17 kids, it is a very hard to keep control of these houses. Down the road at Palumpa, it is slightly less, at 10 people per house. You have to remember that there is no alternative. There is no private rental market, you are dependent on the social housing which is provided. That is a huge issue with those occupancy rates. In Port Keats, it is growing with 90 births a year, and there is really only three or four houses allocated each year, so it is not even keeping up with the birth rate.
Costs are a significant measure in the community. In the bush now, construction costs range between $2000 and $3000 per square metre, so a 200 m2 home will cost you up to $400 000. In Darwin, it is more like $1000 per square metre, so it is significantly less to build a house in Darwin than it is in the bush. You are paying premium prices for builders to go out into the bush. Obviously, having a local building team and a local industry is beneficial. At Wadeye, they have a tilt-up slab system which is working out a lot cheaper at $1200 per square metre.
Also, the Minister for Housing has kicked open the door, in some ways, to these community housing organisations to look at cheaper housing alternatives. I know that the Ngaliwurru-Wuli Association in Timber Creek is certainly doing that. They are working with Lysaght BlueScope Steel to look at kit homes. They have two under construction at the moment and they believe they will come in at around $150 000. The approach the Minister for Housing has taken to encourage the communities to look at alternatives is certainly starting to pay off in the initial stages.
When you are talking about indigenous housing, good governance is certainly a key to it. You have some strong communities out there, like Peppimenarti which has very strong leadership and management, and they run their housing program very efficiently. I believe, coupled with a Territory Housing model, they certainly will get a great deal of bang for their dollar. The costs are coming down largely due to the design. I know a lot of communities are looking at smaller houses, as smaller groups are easier to manage.
The other area that the Chief Minister’s statement touched on was secondary education. One of the most significant secondary education facilities that is occurring in my electorate is the one at Wadeye. The Martin Labor government, in its election campaign, committed $4.5m to not only building a secondary education facility at Wadeye, but providing additional staff housing. Something which always occurs there is that not only is there no social housing, there is no rental housing for additional teachers to be housed in.
The houses are being built. I was lucky enough to accompany the Chief Minister on her trip to Wadeye where we had a look at the site. We have a Katherine building team there, which is great to see that we are keeping that work within the Territory. We had a look around the site with members of the Kardu Diminim, the local landowning group. I can tell you they are very proud of that facility there. I believe it will be the first stage in a greater commitment to secondary education.
It was only last year that I was at the graduation with the Treasurer, the minister for Education at the time, of the first eight secondary school children who had ever graduated at the St Francis Xavier School. That school has been operating since, I believe, the 1950s or 1960s. It is quite extraordinary that you had a situation where, for some 40 years, not a single child graduated through secondary education in the largest indigenous community in Australia.
I look forward to that facility being up and running by either late this year or early next year. I know the community is certainly looking forward to it. It just shows that commitment to secondary education in the bush. I know a lot of parents who want to keep their kids around the community, and there are a lot of other communities that are extending those years out - not just to Year 6 within their existing schools but providing extra classrooms so that those in Years 7, 8 and 9 can stay around in the community and complete their education.
One of the other areas that the Chief Minister spoke about was alcohol reform. This has a significant impact on the lifestyles of people living in remote communities. Having been on a trip to Groote Eylandt and Nhulunbuy, I experienced the change that has happened there. In communities that have had grog and now do not, you can certainly see those communities moving ahead. I would like to see, as I believe the member for Katherine would, a similar change in lifestyle for Katherine. I will keep trying to work in that regard.
I believe that this government is focusing on that area of alcohol reform. We have the Racing and Gaming Commission setting up alcohol management plans. One is occurring at Timber Creek and another is proposed for Daly River. The work that has been done in Alice Springs is impressive. To show you some of the commitment that the departmental staff have - and I guess they have been given a licence by this government to get stuck into alcohol reform - I believe the staff at Racing and Gaming wrote to Woolworths in Katherine about some issues associated with the sale of four litre casks. To Woolworths’ credit - they wrote to their national office - they removed all the four litre casks. Without any decision by the Licensing Commission, they decided, as a corporate body, to remove those casks. Good on them! They know where this government is coming from: we want to see a better lifestyle for people there and we want to clean up this rampant sale of bulk liquor. That, I believe, will have a significant change within the Katherine township.
This is a statement in time. We will see in the future more and more initiatives rolled out. These initiatives are targeted towards unacceptable behaviour. They are not designed for the people who are behaving responsibly; they are being directed towards people who have unacceptable behaviour towards themselves, society, and their families. To curb that behaviour you will improve their lives, and the lives of everybody around them. Along with all those initiatives, there obviously has to be work done, and has been done, with rehabilitation services and, also, across government, with a range of issues which address that underlying demand for alcohol. This government is working towards that significant part of alcohol reduction.
This statement was a package; the Chief Minister presenting a range of initiatives which her government and ministers in their portfolios, are bringing together to make the lifestyle on remote indigenous communities and townships better. There is a lot more to come. These initiatives which have been announced will see the fruits of that labour, and that ideal will be delivered in the future. I look forward to seeing how it all occurs.
Madam Speaker, I endorse the statement of the Chief Minister, and commend the statement to the House.
Dr LIM (Greatorex): Madam Speaker, I join this debate to try to set some records straight. Firstly, I congratulate the Chief Minister on her statement. Committing $20m of new money to indigenous housing could not be seen as anything but a positive step. It is $20m more than has been provided previously, therefore, it means more new homes. It is good to see this government has recognised it has failed in the last five years to provide adequate homes in the bush. This recognition has translated into $20m a year for the next five years. While it might only mean something in the order of 50 new homes out bush, it is 50 more new homes, and it is better than nothing. It is recognition by the government that in the last five years it had failed to provide adequate housing construction out bush. The minister himself …
Ms Martin: This comes from the former Housing minister. How cute.
Dr LIM: The Chief Minister has all the time in the world to respond in her closing remarks.
The Minister for Housing admitted at a previous time that the program under his government in the last five years had failed to keep up with the demand and population growth in the Territory. The money provided by the federal government to the Northern Territory to construct homes, and the minuscule amount which the Northern Territory government contributed to that, had failed to deliver enough homes to cater for population growth. This $20m per year for the next five years will help in some way to catch up on the deficit. I congratulate the Chief Minister for having recognised that, and doing that.
This graph which I am showing - and Chief Minister, I hope you will look at it - says on the top: ‘Total indigenous housing and infrastructure funding by jurisdiction for Year 2005-06’ in millions of dollars. In Queensland, the government provided $82.5m to supplement the federal government’s contribution of $86.8m. Going down the list, Queensland is the best with almost 50% contribution, or almost $1-for-$1 between itself and the federal government. Next is South Australia, then Western Australia at 16.3%, then Victoria at 7.2%, followed by the Northern Territory at $4.8m. The Northern Territory received $93.7m from the federal government and contributed only $4.8m. In other jurisdictions, Queensland contributed $82.5m, a tremendous amount; Western Australia contributed $16.3m; New South Wales contributed $6.7m; South Australia contributed $18.3m; Victoria $7.2m; Tasmania contributed about a third of its total indigenous housing construction program with $1.2m versus a federal contribution of $2.8m; and the ACT provided $3.4m against a contribution of $0.5m by the federal government. Without a doubt, the Northern Territory government did not contribute as much as other jurisdictions.
Mr HENDERSON: A point of order, Madam Speaker! May I request that the member for Greatorex table that graph so we can all have a look at it?
Dr LIM: I will happily table this after I have finished by remarks.
Madam SPEAKER: Would you like to seek leave to table it first? You do not have to. You can just do the process.
Dr LIM: I will table the report after …
Madam SPEAKER: You need to seek leave, member for Greatorex.
Dr LIM: I seek leave to table the report.
Leave granted.
Madam SPEAKER: You may hand it in later.
Dr LIM: Thank you. What it shows is that, while the Northern Territory contributed a small amount in a total of about nearly $100m worth of construction, it was not enough. I am so glad that this government has recognised that and put in $20m per year for the next five years.
Let us go back to the old CLP days and have a look at housing construction. We, in fact, kept up with the population and, in fact, kept eroding into the deficit ...
Mr Henderson: Rubbish!
Dr LIM: This government could not even do that. The minister himself …
Mr Henderson: Rubbish!
Dr LIM: The member for Wanguri keeps interjecting with ‘rubbish’ but, in fact, it was in the statement made by the Minister for Housing not so many months ago. He admitted to it. I suggest members go and read it. I know because it is my portfolio and I have been following the minister’s words very closely. Read it for yourself.
While I congratulate the Chief Minister for putting this money in, I am saying it is to help prop up their own flagging political fortunes and to try to win back some of the support that she has lost from indigenous people across the Territory. There is no doubt the six members of the government who claim, themselves, to be indigenous - and they have said it time and time again …
Members interjecting.
Dr LIM: It was funny. When the Leader of the Opposition referred to six indigenous members, she was criticised by the member for Barkly who said: ‘How dare you say that?’. Every one of them, in their contribution, said: ‘I am an indigenous member of parliament’. You cannot have it both ways. If the Leader of the Opposition says that about you - something that you have accepted yourself - how can you criticise her for using those words? It does not make sense.
The Chief Minister talked about local governance. I will come back to that in a little while, but let us stick to housing for a moment. We heard the Chief Minister and other ministers talk about how we need to review the housing models and what sort of designs we should have. How many times do we have to keep going over and over and over the design? For goodness sake! We spend so much time and money looking at designs that it is no wonder no houses are being constructed. You guys get moribund with so much process that you do not deliver the very things that you keep saying indigenous people want.
Yes, get on with it and deliver but, when you deliver the homes for them to live in, make sure you put side by side with that a program of how to run a home. There is no good constructing lots and lots of homes when, within six, 12 months or five years, the homes are ruined. The Minister for Housing said the average house in suburban Darwin would last 30 years, but out bush would last hardly 17 years. That is your problem; you build homes that are very rapidly destroyed. Therefore, put in place, for goodness sake, a program that will teach people living in these homes how to care for them.
I have always maintained that safe refuge is the most important thing for any one of us. It is what humanity wants and needs - a safe refuge. That means a home that you can live in safety, and that you do not worry about people attacking you, whether you are in your home or outside your home. That is safe refuge. Once you have law and order and safety in homes well and truly in place, then you can worry about getting yourself educated, getting better education and, then, from there, it leads to better health. Those things follow one after the other.
Do not you just say: ‘I am going to embark on a 50 new homes construction per year’- that is about as much as $20m will buy you, but then go no further. I wish I had time to go through this line by line, but there are many things that have been spread by the minister which really does not lead to a long-term view. Again, it is a knee-jerk reaction: ‘Oh, I have been copping it from all sides about indigenous affairs, I better do something right now so that I can claw back some of the support that I have lost’.
I came across the member for Macdonnell’s comments in response to the Chief Minister’s announcement with the $20m per year. I would like to read a couple of lines from what she said:
- I remember when I was at Papunya, I worked on some form of reform which is similar to what the minister is suggesting, and it was called the Wangka Wilurrara model. It was to do with the people who live to the west of Alice Springs - it was the shire. We spoke about it for three or four years.
She praised the program, how happy she was with it, and then she said:
- … we, as a people and as a clan, have worked towards …
this form of government reform. She went on to say:
- That is something that we all want to see, and we should have seen that 27 years ago, but we did not. I lived on an Aboriginal community for that 27 years under the CLP, where we were absolutely neglected.
Do you know something, Madam Speaker? This Wangka Wilurrara model that the member for Macdonnell was so pleased about, that she was exploring with the Luritja Pintubi people, was done under the Country Liberal Party government ...
Ms Anderson: No, it was not. That was done under Jack Ah Kit, thank you very much.
Dr LIM: I was the minister then, when she was out there exploring. I had a time when the member for Macdonnell, before she became a member, was actually sitting next to me in an aeroplane talking about exactly the same thing that she wanted to do.
Ms Anderson: Was not.
Dr LIM: Do you know what? When she complained about Aboriginal people being completely neglected by the CLP government, before this last election, before she was a member, she said exactly the same thing about the Labor Party. She cannot have it both ways ...
Ms ANDERSON: A point of order, Madam Speaker!
Dr LIM: The next that program …
Madam SPEAKER: Order, member for Greatorex!
Ms ANDERSON: Madam Speaker, that is not true at all. What I was talking about actually happened under the former Local Government Minister, Jack Ah Kit.
Madam SPEAKER: Member for Macdonnell, there is no point of order. If you feel that the member for Greatorex has misled the parliament, then you can approach me to make a personal explanation. Member for Greatorex, please continue.
Dr LIM: Madam Speaker, the problem is that, whatever any government does, we all support each other to develop whatever we want to bring on. The progress of the last 25 years under the previous government is now built upon by this government. For the last five years, we have allowed …
Ms Martin: What, your progress in secondary education in the bush?
Dr LIM: … we have allowed a program to degrade. I do not know why they did it, because I am not in their Cabinet room, but they allowed the program to degrade. Through the complaints that the Chief Minister obviously could not but hear, she now had to bring this program in - and that is fantastic. I am glad she did. I am not knocking the project. More power to you; do more, put more money into it.
In fact, I believe minister Mal Brough said not too long ago that he would like to see that the Northern Territory government followed the Queensland example and put more money into it. Instead of, perhaps, thinking a bit harder, and saying: ‘Maybe we have some options to go a bit further like Queensland has’, every minister has said: ‘Oh, no, we put in $20m, let us hope that the federal government will now contribute more towards the program’. Minister Brough has said: ‘No, we are not going to give you any more; you just make sure that you show some commitment yourself to put money into this program, otherwise you can forget about it’.
As there is not very much time left, I will leave housing for now and come to local government. The Chief Minister spoke about her government’s plan to bring about the shire model for the whole of the Territory. Well and good; that is a good thing to aspire to. However, that has been nothing more than just an idea. When I went for a briefing from the Office of Local Government, I received very little detail. ‘We are thinking about this, we are thinking about that. We have 63 local government councils; five of them are municipal councils, the rest are either community government councils or incorporated associations. We have found out that we have done an assessment, and some 50% of them are just about on the verge of collapse and the others are not much further away. Therefore, we have to do something’.
However, that is as far as it goes. I said: ‘Tell me the details; how are you going to do it?’ ‘Do not know’. ‘How many shires are you going to have?’ ‘Between six and 20’. ‘How are you going to do that? Are you going to incorporate municipal councils or are you not?’ No, they are not. But, yes, suddenly Tennant Creek is now. Tennant Creek will be part of that. Maybe Alice Springs will take in Amoonguna and Santa Teresa. Nobody knows; you do not have any idea.
What the minister is going to do, I understand, is have an advisory committee of people who are in local government to come back with some sort of model. It is an idea at the moment. That is not such a bad thing in leadership: start with a good idea and allow the rest to filter upwards. With regard to having a shire system for the whole of the Northern Territory, it will mean that the Grants Commission will have to look at our funding model in a completely new way. It will be a good exercise and, in the longer term, will be beneficial for the Northern Territory in funding from the Commonwealth government.
Then, the problem is if you currently have some 50% of your local community government councils on the verge of collapse, what that tells me is that their governing structure is falling apart; they just do not have the capacity to govern themselves. Therefore, by creating shires, you are going to have the same personalities involved. For the last five years, in spite of all the rhetoric about providing capacity building and making sure that people out there in the bush are able to govern themselves, this government has failed. Instead of having smaller community government councils that you can train and foster - because they are smaller, they are easier to do - they are going to create these shires. They hope that, somehow, the people who have failed to manage their own small communities will be more successful on managing at the shire level. It does not make sense; it just does not add up. If people failed there and they have not had any capacity building in the last five years to be successful, then, how are they going to be suddenly successful under a shire system? It is not going to happen.
When you ask about what is going to happen to the pastoral properties and how they are going to be brought into a shire model, they have no answers. I understand that the pastoral properties currently provide their own municipal services. They provide their own electricity, water and roads, and deal with their own rubbish. Therefore, why do they need to be incorporated into the shires? What benefits would they get for themselves from a shire? Are they going to be rated? If they are going to be rated, what are they paying their rates for when they are providing their own municipal services?
Those questions have not been answered and, until I get some detail from the government or from the Office of Local Government, I cannot be convinced that is a good idea. I have spoken to the office of the Local Government Association of the Northern Territory. They are genuinely - and I am pleased that they are feeling positive towards this model; likewise, there is potential to be beneficial - concerned about what is going to happen regarding how it is going to be implemented and the detail.
Mrs MILLER: Madam Speaker, I move an extension of time for my colleague to finish his address to parliament subject to Standing Order 77.
Motion agreed to.
Dr LIM: Thank you, Madam Speaker. Some members said they have pored through the previous remarks made by various ministers and other members. I have done likewise and listened closely to the contributions made today as well.
I was very surprised at the attack the member for Millner made towards the Leader of the Opposition. I do not know why. What the Leader of the Opposition was trying to demonstrate, just as I have, is that $20m is not a lot of money. You are, at best, going to develop about 50 new homes in the Territory. In my opinion, that is 50 more than you would get otherwise each year, that the government, in the past five years, has not been able to deliver. That is what the Leader of the Opposition was talking about and, yet, the member for Millner was attacking her.
What takes the cake for me are the remarks made by the member for Nhulunbuy. Just about the whole of his contribution was about the Lateline program. The words that he used! I am surprised nobody pulled him up. Obviously, I was not in the Chamber otherwise I would have done it myself. He used words like ‘grub’. The words he used were unbelievable. For a Deputy Chief Minister to talk like that is unworthy. I dare him to repeat the words that he used for people, including the producers of Lateline and the anchor, Tony Jones, and others. It was just not the thing for somebody like a Deputy Chief Minister to do.
Chief Minister, congratulations on taking this small step. Yes, it is a lot of money in the Northern Territory’s budget - $20m is a lot of money, and that is good. We all recognise it is a small step and, hopefully, there will be some gains. It was a small step that was started by the CLP, scaffolded upon by this Labor government, to allow it to claim it has delivered. Let me give an example. They say that this is the government that, suddenly, has had Aboriginal children graduating with senior school certificates. That is what they keep claiming they delivered. Never mind the years that the children had to go through primary school and parts of secondary school before they finished the last three years under this government to get the senior school certificate. Suddenly, out of the blue, this government produced Year 12 students from nowhere, and said: ‘It is our doing that they got there’. For goodness sake, at least accept that whatever you do is based on what other governments have done previously. At least admit that …
Ms Martin: Not in your case. Not in your case - 27 years - not in your case.
Dr LIM: What? You produced all those Year 12 students out of nothing? Come on! You produced three Year 12 students out of nothing? I am glad you can do that. I do not want to blaspheme, but I doubt that even God can do that. The Deputy Chief Minister said:
- Government has also played an active role in combating crime on communities. The crime prevention, Community Harmony, the alcohol policy staff we have across government have been pushing back on issues of crime, antisocial behaviour and substance abuse, particularly alcohol in the communities across the Territory.
Perhaps he might have had some success at Groote Eylandt but, across the Territory? Has he not been aware of alcohol problems across the Territory? What rock has this minister been sleeping under that he cannot recognise the breakdown in law and order in the communities and municipalities? Every day in the papers we read about people who have been stabbed, and houses robbed. In fact, only last week, the house next door to mine was broken in to. Where has he been sleeping not to know every regional centre is suffering under the weight of antisocial behaviour which his government has failed to resolve? This is antisocial behaviour which his government has allowed to flourish through its racist policies - one law for indigenous people, and one law for the rest.
There should be one law for all. This government is prepared to impose alcohol restrictions which it would not consider for Darwin. It is okay to impose them in Alice Springs, Tennant Creek, and Katherine but, when it comes to Darwin, leave it alone. If you want to do it, do it across the Territory; one law for all. Why do you not do that? What is so special about Darwin? You will not touch Darwin, but you are prepared to do anything you like south of Palmerston …
Mr Henderson: You are an embarrassment.
Dr LIM: I am an embarrassment? I have not come to the member for Wanguri’s comments as yet - the member who knows how to stretch truth to such a degree that you cannot recognise the truth in what the member for Wanguri says. That is what he does time and time again. In his contribution, he spoke about how wealthy this nation is and why we cannot put $1.2bn into the construction of homes right across the Territory for our disadvantaged Territorians. Of course, the federal government can do anything if it wants to but, for five years his government did not make a single dent on the housing shortfall for indigenous people - not a dent. No wonder they have been shamed into committing this money.
The member for Wanguri had this to say:
- … the difference between this debate and all those preceding debates over the years is that this is the first time that any government in the history of the Northern Territory has committed so substantively out of its own resources to additional housing in the bush.
There you go again. That is how he puts it: that this is the first time that any government has provided a substantial amount of money to provide more homes in the bush. For goodness sake; $20m would be minuscule compared to the total amount of money that has been spent on indigenous housing across the Territory since the year dot. This is minuscule. The federal government, in this chart that you want to look at, contributes $93.7m for indigenous housing. It is not as though you are the first government to do it.
I could keep going, but time is running out. Let me say this: Chief Minister, congratulations on putting this money in; it is much needed. I am glad to see that you have noticed that the current program in these last five years has not been adequate to keep pace with the population growth and the needs out there in the bush. Well and good that you can admit to a mistake. I look forward to better housing for indigenous people there.
I am a bit cynical about the local training component. We tried that ourselves in the time when I was the Minister for Housing. It is something that you have to continue to push as hard as you can, but I found that a little difficult to deliver. You have housing construction companies who are eager to go out bush, complete the construction and get out of there as quick as they can, and they do not have time to provide this training. You have to start some sort of local company that will provide that on-the-job training that will persist with the training for several years. Somehow, you need to have, perhaps, one or two houses reserved out of the batch that you are going to build that could be used for training purposes. That way, then you can allow other companies to come in and assist in the construction of the homes and have a couple to train in. Otherwise, only time will tell how this program is going to pan out.
I will look forward to seeing 15 new homes in the bush every year for the next five years, and then what happens for the 15 years after that - who knows?
Madam SPEAKER: Member for Greatorex, your time has expired.
Mr MILLS (Blain): Madam Speaker, I comment on this debate, and to continue the very important point made by the member for Greatorex. I heard it. I am sure that members opposite heard it too, as it was mentioned a number of times: the acknowledgement of the contribution, contained within this statement, of a significant fund to allow for the building of more houses. It was endorsed, supported and congratulated by the CLP opposition.
Other comments that were made were run from the other side of the argument, so that there can be a testing of this whole endeavour to ensure that it does achieve the objectives that are dear to all of us. Though I carry the responsibility in opposition as shadow for indigenous affairs, I have great difficulty in participating in these debates. I find it demeaning and unedifying in the extreme to be involved in debates of this nature, where we have juvenile snipes backwards and forwards, a beating of the chest in reference to the great things that one side has done and the terrible things that the other side has done - backwards and forwards it goes - with the focus principally upon the team that you happen to support. The best interests of your own history is the objective; it is not about those who most need our help. That comes second, sadly.
If we could put that aside for a second, this is one of these issues that we really must find a better place, forum and spirit to discuss these matters if we are going to achieve any progress. At the moment, it appears the way that the energy flows in these kinds of debates, that the current government, the Labor Party, would be completely satisfied and there would be a sense of glee if they could absolutely eradicate the opposition so that the opposition no longer existed; they could root out any form of dissent, as they, in fact, are doing - silencing people within the community who dare raise their voices in opposition. They are becoming quieter and quieter, and I know what is going on. There is a new culture, a new regime, that is in place in the Northern Territory - not an interest in democracy or addressing the real issues, but in controlling the debate and developing a new level of thought within the Northern Territory to advance the very best interests of this current government. I have this awful sense that there would be a celebration somewhere in this building if, after one election, there was no longer an opposition. Then you would turn on yourselves, as you already are.
That aside, that element in all this compounds what really is an issue of concern. In our quiet moments, we spend time together, sometimes at committee meetings. I am very grateful that I have had the opportunity to be involved in the substance abuse committee because it has taught me a lot - not only in the conversations I have had with fellow committee members working in a genuine bipartisanship way, to look at issues of concern to every Territorian. It is quite humbling to hear the stories. I acknowledge the great acclaim that Jessica Mauboy has received, but I cannot help but think of some of the wonderful people we met on some of those substance abuse committees, those people who struggle out in the backblocks of the Northern Territory, who run programs hidden from view for year after year. I would love to see those people applauded and celebrated in the same way as Jessica Mauboy. There are some indigenous and non-indigenous heroes out there who work so hard behind the scenes in very difficult circumstances. I would like to, as I was just going through some of my notes, acknowledge some of those people. I will mention them as I speak about this matter further.
Earlier on in the year, there was a forum - I think once every four or five years - called the Australian Future Directions Forum. It attracted younger leaders from every state and territory. There were a couple of representatives from the Northern Territory who were selected. Out of that group of 90, they agreed on one point as their top priority. That is why it frustrates me, as this is the same objective that we all have - put the politics aside as we all have the same ideals as these 90 of our nation’s young leaders. One of them said that he had a dream of eliminating the disadvantages of Aborigines and Torres Strait Islanders as this nation’s No 1 priority for the next 20 years. That was not just his opinion, but the view of the 90 people aged under 40, each picked for his or her future leadership potential who attended the Australian Future Directions Forum this year.
I go on to quote from this statement:
- We stand diminished as a nation unless we act immediately and decisively to address the marginalisation of indigenous people across all areas of life.
That was the principal statement issued at the end of this forum. That is why I opened my comments by saying there is a sense of deep satisfaction in these sorts of debates because all of us, one way or another, share that view. However, we are in a position where our politics get in the way. I would have thought, if that be the case, we could find a place where we could work together on these matters. If it is the case that we agree, as Australians from different backgrounds, that there is a single issue that is our most important matter to make positive progress with, then we could find a better way of dealing with it.
There are some good things that happen on the committees. We could get to a place in this parliament where we are able to focus on these matters and to resist the temptation of personal attacks or attacks on the party, and look at the issues square in the face and try to be constructive and find a way forward. Inherent in that – perhaps it is just a romantic notion - there is an acid test: if we cannot do that as 25 members in this parliament, the ones who have been elected to represent our own communities, then what hope is there for those who are struggling in remote communities - if we cannot sort that business out, find a better level of dialogue, and channel our energy more constructively? There is really not much hope because, with the growing cynicism, those we are charged to lead will become discouraged and any flickering hope will fade. They will see that this is more about your own agenda, not their need.
There are many words written on this, but there will come a time when we are required to step out and work in a new way, otherwise we will not have any change. We will spend our time on this stage, give some impassioned speeches, and we might even get to open something or other and have our name on a plaque, but it will not make any difference. There will be figures quoted, dollars spent, programs, investigations, reviews, inquiries, forums, statements made, and the gathering of folk, but there will not be much difference.
I fear that that is what will happen if we just continue. We will have an eye too strongly drawn to when the next election is and, then, we will run our agenda to suit that particular objective: to win the next election. Then we will reset our objectives to fit within another framework, which is largely to satisfy ourselves.
The truth is that if you look at the annual reports from Education - and I have heard these comments from the other side as though I really enjoy saying this. I do not. I have taught, and I know how hard it is to teach. When you have malaise, and try to raise kids, you find that you are not able to do it; it is requiring more and more energy. To find that benchmark results are not as strong now as they were in 2002 is a dreadful concern. To find that there are more drunks apprehended now than there were in 2002 - 25 000 in the last year - is of grave concern. To find that there are now 5000 violent crimes being committed, which is an increase, is a very real concern. To find that the monies spent on gambling in the last few years has increased by $2bn is a serious concern.
Violent crimes include sexual assaults. They have increased. On one of the communities we visited on our tour, the community was requesting more and more police help. If they had just enough, then perhaps their problems would go away or be reduced. They needed more police. How many of you have actually dobbed in someone to the police? No one. If you have that element missing, where you are actually working in partnership with the agencies that have been provided for you, you are not going to get anywhere either - we are just going to keep shovelling money in. Then, you go to the other side and find communities that seem to have less than those communities that have their hands out calling for more, and you have schools full. It was a joy to see Harts Range and Alcoota. The joy and sense of pride in those people was startling. After seeing the whole picture on that tour, I ended up far more encouraged than discouraged.
We conducted the hearings, and those quiet people who spoke of the Mt Theo program gave me cause for hope. Heroes! Barry Abbott from Wallace Rockhole - I was stunned. It warmed my heart to think of the contribution that that man and others have made, perhaps, that we do not even notice. We do not vote for them on the SMS, but they are there, and I reckon they are absolute heroes; they are idols as far as I am concerned. Go to Groote Eylandt and see the quiet ladies. They did not speak much but they exuded wonderful power and they have made a massive difference to their communities. That gives me cause for hope.
It is those things in combination that keep me going. I only hope that we can actually improve the way we approach these issues.
Finishing with what the member for Greatorex had to say, he complimented you, Chief Minister, on the contribution, and made some other comments that were, perhaps, not easy to listen to. However, it is the nature of opposition. You were in opposition once, too. It was a compliment and recognition of the importance of that allocation. Houses are desperately needed.
As for those of us who were at Port Keats, when most of us who are on the committee heard the story of the young ladies, the teachers, we were emotional. There was a local lady who has been a teacher for many years. She wondered why teachers from out of town have nice houses that are fenced off, which provides them with some security, and she does not. It really came home to me because, at that time, my wife had been preparing lessons at home - and she finds that stressful enough. I do not like to talk about it in here. I saw the problems that that hero has with such unbelievable hassles in that house. She is endeavouring to teach lessons in the classroom the next day and she has to look after her children, address the men, and prepare the lessons for the next day. She wonders why the teachers from out of town have really nice houses and whether her silent efforts are recognised. That floored me, and I know there were members from both sides of politics, unbelievably, who were moved. It is not just the ALP members who feel these things, but CLP also, and even Independents. Oh, my goodness! It is probably a little more complex than we would like to think.
We have to get beneath the surface if we are going to make any progress, otherwise it is just a load of - I have been pulled up for saying buggerlugs and all sorts of weird – and slippery is not allowed. What I was going to say was a lot worse than that.
I compliment and congratulate the Chief Minister on the contribution - nothing more, nothing less. Housing is important. I will finish with what I said part-way through: unless we can find a better way of conducting business in this Chamber and as community leaders, we are dreaming if we think we are going to make any substantial change and turn things around.
Mrs MILLER (Katherine): Mr Deputy Speaker, I was not going to contribute to this statement. Having recently been in Ceduna in South Australia and taken the opportunity to look at a transitional accommodation facility, with which I was very impressed, I decided to contribute to this statement.
I put on the record the success that Ceduna is having with their transitional camp. We spend a lot of time in this parliament talking about the plight of indigenous housing in all areas. This is a success story that has come about through partnerships, and it is really working well. I have been watching it now for three years. It was set up in 2003 and I was not going to go and have a look at it until it had been running successfully for a couple of years. I want to put on the Parliamentary Record what is happening there.
I will refer to quite a bit of their report – well, it is not a report, it is talking about their town camp. I am going to place a lot of this on the Parliamentary Record. Maybe the Minister for Indigenous Policy and the Minister for Housing might want to have a look at the Parliamentary Record.
Ceduna had the highest proportion of Aboriginal people of all local government areas in South Australia. The percentage is probably higher than the official figures due to under-enumeration of Aborigines in the Census that was done in South Australia. In addition, there are Aboriginal communities and adjacent unincorporated areas that are, essentially, part of that Ceduna community.
In all, about 25% of the Ceduna community population is Aboriginal, one of the highest percentages in Australia - and perhaps the highest for a community that includes a substantial urban area. Ceduna has a population of around 3600 people, and the community is a complex multicultural society. There are representatives of early European settlers, of Aboriginal communities with substantial previous contact with Europeans, of Aboriginals who continue to live traditional lifestyles, and increasing numbers of recent settlers in Australia.
In this report, they have said that:
- … it is fair to say that in the past Ceduna had the reputation of being one of the most racist towns in Australia. This was until approximately 12 years prior to this, so, until 1991. At that time, most leaders of the community realised that attitudes had to change if the town was to grow and be one of which they could all be proud to live in. Since then, Ceduna Council has worked consistently to improve liaison and communications between the council and representative organisations of the Aboriginal people, Koonibba Community Council, Yalata Council and Tjutjunaku Worka Tjuta, called TWT, which provides CDEP program activities in Ceduna. Council, both directly and through its officers, have implemented an action program to maintain, implement or improve its commitment to Aboriginal people in the district.
From the close liaison with the Aboriginal communities and the problem of transient people living in parks and other public areas of the town, it became very obvious that accommodation for those people needed to be built ...
Ceduna Council was granted $345 000 from ATSIC to study the type of accommodation required, the purchasing of a suitable site, and with any funds remaining to be utilised to commence the building of such facilities. A Town Camp Planning and Development Committee was established by council to commence the facility’s development. On that committee was the Mayor, the District Clerk of Ceduna, and there were four regional representatives of Aboriginal communities, and council officers assisting the committee were the Chief Executive Officer, the Manager for Technical Services and Works and the Manager for Environmental Services and Planning.
- … advance the planning and development of that town camp to be situated near Ceduna, and by advising and making recommendations to council.
When I visited this camp, I was impressed that it is managed by an Aboriginal woman who is of long-standing in the Ceduna community. She started work there as a volunteer and within two years had shown leadership qualities to the point that when the manager had moved on, she was offered the position. She has taken it on very willingly. She is a little dynamo with plenty of enthusiasm. The camp is managed with proper management practices. She is the facility and site manager and employs an administration officer, a facility support worker, up to eight residential workers, and a facility cook. The camp can take up to 80 people at the moment before it is full. The conditions are that you are only allowed to live in that transitional camp for six weeks, you pay a rent per week, and you are provided with two cooked meals per day. The meals are cooked by staff who live at, and are paid for work at, that camp.
The future of the project has attracted much attention from around Australia, especially in South Australia, to the point where they have built another one in Port Augusta, and they are developing one in Coober Pedy. I also called in to see the Mayor of Port Augusta, Joy Baluch, to find out how the facility was going there, and she is very impressed with it, although she said the management of it is not quite as effective as the Ceduna facility. That just highlights the point that there needs to be strong management.
The project in Ceduna, as I said, has attracted attention from around Australia, and has been looked at as a possible solution to addressing homeless people’s situations. It is groundbreaking and an imaginative project, and is an attempt to address the sad situation that faced the Ceduna community for many years. It is demonstrative of reconciliation at work and a community solving its own problems through bold and innovative solutions.
The facility was built quite openly not very far from Ceduna. They then found that the community had to build a security fence around it to ensure the safety of those people who were living there. As a result of the three years of this transitional camp running, the state government has now looked at pathway housing. They are setting it up as a pilot program in Ceduna so that people who choose not to go back to their community from this transitional camp can go into pathway housing. Those units were being built when I was in Ceduna in September, and I had a look at them. They are relatively basic units, easy to keep clean and tidy.
The people who choose to live in those units are very strictly supervised. The units are inspected daily to ensure that they are kept clean, neat and tidy. It is a living skills training program to prepare these people for living in public housing. They can stay in this pathway housing for up to three months and, then from there, should they choose to stay in public housing in Ceduna, they will then be moved to what we would call here Territory Housing, or South Australian Housing Commission homes. Also, they still have to meet the requirements of living in an urban environment when they have moved into the public housing.
I recommend the government go and have a look at this particular program, because it is working. I have not brought it to the parliament before because I wanted to make sure that it did work. It is only working because it has support of the community and all of the indigenous communities around Ceduna.
There are other benefits for those people who live within the confines of that transitional camp for that short period of time which is, as I have said, only six weeks. The people who live there have access to safe accommodation and access to programs and services including: a homemaker’s program; hair care; women’s esteem camp; a homemaker’s program on nutrition; a bush tucker garden, where they grow their own bush tucker and can eat it, of course; participation in programs including diversion therapy with the Ceduna District Health Services, National Heart Week and Reconciliation Week; and a general nutrition program.
The outcome from this facility is that it is an innovative solution to a very difficult social issue that faced Ceduna for many years. There are many communities with similar difficulties paying particular attention to this facility. Ceduna is still confident, three years down the track, of its future success. The Ceduna Council works very well with ATSIS and the Aboriginal Housing Authority in their partnership for this particular program. The Koonibba Aboriginal community CDEP was responsible for the construction of the facility, so there was involvement by indigenous people right from the time the program was being first discussed to the erection of the buildings which are very user-friendly. I was particularly impressed.
As my colleague, the member for Blain said, most times we come into this House and want the same things for Territorians. Most times, we cop a fair bit of flack because everybody thinks we are idiots; there are only four of us and what the hell would we know. Well, we on this side of the House also care.
I encourage members of government to go and have a look at this facility. Why would you not look at something that is working successfully? Ceduna has had some serious indigenous problems for many years. It was an absolute pleasure – with the exception of the reason I was there - to see the difference that this has made to Ceduna. I suggest that the Minister for Indigenous Affairs and the Minister for Housing go and have a look, or send somebody from their department to have a look, at this Ceduna transitional accommodation facility, which is commonly called the town camp. Have a look at their pathway housing and talk to the people there and see the difference that it has made.
Ms MARTIN (Chief Minister): Mr Deputy Speaker, in summing up, I thank all members who contributed to the statement. It is always difficult to single out anyone, but I especially thank the member for Macdonnell for her insightful comments made in the last sessions of parliament, drawing on her personal experience as a long-term resident of the region. Not that others did not draw on their own experiences, but the member for Macdonnell really had people carefully listening to what she had to say. For example, regarding local government reform, the member described how the current system of local government is inequitable and unsustainable. The member spoke with authority when she called for a regional approach to local government. She described the way it will bring the people back together to this land of their tribal people.
That is exactly what we are going to do with our local government initiative. We are going to change the way services are delivered and are going to set benchmarks and standards that have to be adhered to. The development of a regional approach to the delivery of local government services will streamline service delivery, free up valuable resources and standardise, over time, much of our infrastructure in the bush. However, our bold initiative is not just about local government reform as indicated in my statement. It is about an injection of $100m additional into remote housing over the next five years. It is about Territory Housing working closely with indigenous community housing organisations, ICHOs, to manage delivery and housing maintenance in the bush. It is about the continued expansion of secondary education in the bush.
I was moved to listen again when the member for Arafura described her elation when she heard about the graduation of three Year 12 students from Kalkarindji. For the first time in the education history of the Territory, three Aboriginal students graduated from Year 12 while living on their own communities. From these humble beginnings, I believe - and I am sure it is shared by everyone here - a revolution in remote Aboriginal education has begun. Last year, 25 Aboriginal adolescents completed their Year 12, and I know seven of those were in the community of Wadeye. This year, 30 are set to graduate.
It was interesting to hear members of the opposition, including the Leader of the Opposition, almost reject the fact. They were saying - particularly the member for Greatorex - that we were only building on secondary education on what the CLP had done in 27 years. I have difficulty with that because not one student graduated from Year 12 in their bush community in 27 years under the CLP. You could run a kind of strange argument that, somehow or other, we had built on what had been done by the CLP. However, there is the stark fact that secondary education was not in the bush under the CLP, and it is a disgrace that it was not. When we are now attempting to turn that around, you would think that the CLP would cheer us, but we get this half-hearted ‘You are only building on what we did’. It is an absolute disgrace that it never happened for all those years under the CLP. In many ways, we lost a generation of Aboriginal kids because they did not get to Year 12. They did not get an education; many of them barely got to Year 3.
Turning that around is tough. We are not pretending that we have produced magic in five short years but, compared with the damage that was done by 27 years of not even trying or putting the resources there, I do not know how the CLP can even pretend to be a part of this debate. Even more so for the Leader of the Opposition, because she did not even mention education in her contribution to this debate. That is how highly she regards it. Maybe it is the embarrassment of what the CLP did not do for 27 years.
We recognise that, in 2003, to say that there were only three students who graduated from Year 12 in their bush community might have seemed an embarrassment. No, we celebrated it because it was the first time. It was celebrated, certainly in Kalkarindji. The former Education minister has gone to each graduation ceremony and celebrated with communities. These were first times: Maningrida, Shepherdson, Yirrkala, Kalkarindji, and Wadeye. Those communities celebrated as students, for the first time, got to Year 12. We have a hell of a long way to go. We have such a long way to go, but we have started. The inspiration of those first three students has been awesome, particularly over the Top End.
We are not pretending things have changed dramatically. We are struggling with things like MAP testing in Years 3, 5 and 7. We have put a lot more effort and resources in, and it breaks your heart when you look at the last annual report. You would love to see those figures lift and they have not, but it does not mean that we have failed in the sense of putting those resources in and our determination to turn it around. We will continue to do that.
The member for Blain can give his sermon on the mount and say we should all be working together. It would be nice …
Mr Bonson: It would be.
Ms MARTIN: It would be nice, but it is not the things we hear from the CLP; it is just a condemnation, one after the other, of the problems that are in our Aboriginal communities. We know they are there; we are working to turn it around. It is all very well to put your hand on your heart and say: ‘If only we could put aside these enmities or the pressures of the next election’ - and sound like you were on the mount. However, it is not how the CLP is acting. Your leader is particularly venomous with all these complex issues facing Aboriginal Territorians - particularly venomous. Get your lines straight. Either take the line that we are all working together to turn around the problems we have and do not come in here and run a line that is directly opposite to your pretty often venomous leader on this.
In the statement, I talked about our plan in generational reform, and we have indicated to Territorians and to the rest of the country the importance of having a long-term strategy for Aboriginal Australians. Much of that work is being done. Each state and territory is building on the work currently being done. We will come up with a plan to say to Aboriginal Territorians, Aboriginal Australians in 20 years this is where we want to see your benchmarks. Benchmarks is a callous way of saying it, but it is about opportunity, how you lead your life, employment prospects, and educational and health standards. That is what we as a country – and, hopefully, your mates in Canberra will commit to this – want to achieve.
I single out the member for Greatorex because I found his contribution particularly irksome. He said we had only just started after all this time to look at putting additional funds into housing. It was as though it stood in stark contrast to what he had done himself as a Housing minister. It is all very well to come in here and lecture years after the event when he had an opportunity, as Housing minister, to make some difference and made none. It is hypocrisy from members of the CLP who come in here and say: ‘Why are you not doing this? Why are you not doing that?’ when they never did any of it. The member for Greatorex was only Housing minister for a short time - maybe a year-and-a-half or two years at max - but he had predecessors who did nothing. I have been in this place long enough to see the predecessors wring their hands. Part of that was a fair argument; that the Commonwealth government had a responsibility to pick up the backlog of housing that passed to the Northern Territory at self-government. It is a fair argument. Successive Housing ministers here argued it. However, neither side got anywhere with federal governments, which is why we have decided to put this additional money on the table and say to the federal government: with your vast surpluses of - what is it?
Mr Stirling: $15bn.
Ms MARTIN: $15bn of unallocated funds, we are only asking for a small portion of that initially - $20m for five years, $100m additional - to try to do something about one of the core factors facing Aboriginal Territorians in the bush, inadequate housing. We heard the Opposition Leader say: ‘What does housing do? It does not make any difference’. We have heard her in here argue that housing does not make a difference when you look at the myriad problems that face Aboriginal people - whether it is child abuse, health issues, or educational outcomes. We know it makes a difference.
If the opposition wanted to make any impact, you would be down in Canberra with your mates, whom you are so keen on being apologists for - so keen. The member for Greatorex was a disgrace. You would think he would stand up for the Territory. He sounded like a junior minister to Mal Brough.
If you are going to be honest about working on this together, join us in saying to the federal government: ’You have to put in. You have a responsibility, you have those funds, you can make a difference’. When you hear the likes of the federal Indigenous Affairs minister condemn the Territory for not doing enough - he has the funds. He has the funds - well, Canberra has the funds - and could make a difference instead of all the words. We are tired of the Indigenous Affairs minister who comes into the Northern Territory and says: ‘I will do this and I will do that’; says to Wadeye: ‘I have housing for you; says to Galiwinku: ‘I have got housing for you’; promises schools for the Tiwis – and never delivers. Not a cent do we see - not a cent. How many houses are at the outstations out of Wadeye? Do you know how many? None - absolutely none after all those words from the federal minister. None - not even the smell of a house. The expectations of the people of Wadeye who moved back to country were very high. They said to me last time I was there with the local member: ‘What happened to the promises? What happened to the commitments by the federal minister? We have seen nothing’.
If the opposition wanted to be genuine in their concern about the issues facing Aboriginal Territorians, then join us in saying to the federal government, your mates in Canberra: ‘Put some money down now. You are flush with funds, your surplus is healthy. Where are you going to spend it? Let us spend it on the most disadvantaged people in Australia, who happen to be Territorians’. I will be waiting a long time to be joined, I believe, by the opposition on this. You talked about joining together …
Members interjecting.
Ms MARTIN: You did, you talked about it. You did one of your hand on the heart, sermon on the mount-type of speeches and, yet, we are not joined in this by you.
All we suffer is condemnation for a government who has put significant funds into the bush, into Aboriginal health. We are starting to see some turnaround with Aboriginal women particularly, for whom, over the last three years, their life expectancy has grown three years. That is what you can turn around in health. We have a lot more to do. We have Aboriginal birth weights that are moving up and getting closer to the national average. Yes, that is a significant achievement, and that is what you achieve by putting more funds into primary health. We do not back off from the fact that half the Territory’s budget goes to 28% of the population; it is needed. We have seen those growth funds in health and they are starting to make a difference. There is a long way to go, but we are starting to make a difference. Those additional funds in education - again, small steps forward, a long way to go. We are not going to give up.
In areas right across the Northern Territory, we are starting to see some level of turnaround. The member for Greatorex does not recognise it but, in alcohol management, we are starting to see change. It would be nice if the CLP in Alice Springs would support our alcohol measures, rather than trying to undermine them. They are starting to make a difference. In seven weeks of the new alcohol supply and restriction measures in Alice Springs, the hospital is reporting less presentations of wounds from things like stabbings - Congress as well - and the police say aggravated assaults are down 40% in seven weeks. We are not going to take those figures as a given, but we are starting to see some change.
I would like the members who are in Alice Springs to support it. The Opposition Leader is great at condemning, but has she ever come to us and said: ‘I would like to help. I would like to be part of the solutions here in Alice Springs’? No. What we have from the members for Greatorex and Araluen is simply fighting us on trying to find short-term accommodation as part of the solutions of the complex problems in Alice Springs, and saying the best place to have short-term accommodation in Alice Springs is 50 km out of town - let us just look at failure. It is all very well to criticise this government for not doing enough, for some of the poor indicators for Aboriginal people, but you could be part of the solution. You could be part of working with us, if we are going to listen to the member for Blain and take a bipartisan approach on this. Bipartisan means you get on board; you actually commit to a policy and start to make a change. Commit to a policy, start to make a change and recognise when steps forward are being taken …
Mr Mills: We wrote you a letter and you never even responded. I want to see whether you are the real deal.
Mr DEPUTY SPEAKER: Order!
Ms MARTIN: That is what we would like to see from the CLP, this opposition who are full of words but, when it comes to action, they disappear.
Mr Mills: Are you going to answer our letter?
Ms MARTIN: When it comes to action, they disappear. It is a policy-free zone. That is what it is - a policy-free zone on the really tough issues tackling the Territory.
I thank all those who made careful contributions, particularly the member for Stuart who is new to this parliament, but gave a very thoughtful contribution that dealt with the whole area of local government, housing and employment - very much speaking from his own experience in his electorate. The same for you, Mr Deputy Speaker, with the contribution about what we can do with housing and employment; where there is success and what we are learning from that.
The member for Greatorex, obviously, got on my goat when he said: ‘It is all very well to put $20m a year into housing. What will you get? Maybe 50 houses’. You said to stop talking about design, and about doing things differently; we have been there, we have done that. Member for Greatorex, we are doing it differently. If he would like to go to Beswick, he could see the steel-frame house that is being built, which we think will come in at $180 000. If we can do that, that $20m a year will go a lot further than the begrudging number that the member for Greatorex was talking about.
At Wadeye, we have houses on the ground now at $265 000 made out of concrete panels. They are good, solid houses and they are cool. We are going to look at ways where we can bring down the cost of houses in the bush because, if we are going to pay $400 000 to $450 000, we ain’t going to get much! However, if we can bring down those costs, build effective, decent houses in the bush in a different way, then we will continue to do that.
I will leave it there, otherwise I probably will not stop for the next 40 minutes. Thank you all for contributing. Turning around probably two generations of disadvantage for Aboriginal Territorians is such an important part of what we are doing here in the Territory. It is going to be difficult; we are going to have a bumpy time and there are going to be things that do not work. However, we need to work with our Aboriginal community, those people who live in the bush who are an important part of the Territory and, for government, present the toughest challenge. I believe our Aboriginal Territorians want to see change; they are prepared to take that step forward with us. We have great challenges when it comes to roads, housing, health, education, and local governance, but we are out there and we have started. We should be proud of the fact that we are committed, and I believe we will see change. We can build better and more prosperous lives for Aboriginal Territorians. If we can move along that pathway, then we have done something that we all came to government to do.
Motion agreed to; statement noted.
STATEMENT BY DEPUTY SPEAKER
Parliamentary Broadcast Difficulties
Parliamentary Broadcast Difficulties
Mr DEPUTY SPEAKER: Honourable members, I advise that we are experiencing some sound difficulties. Hansard is recording but, apparently, it is not being broadcast throughout Parliament House. If you have people who depend on hearing you in this House, you might need to get them to come a bit closer.
MOTION
Note Paper - Strategic Review of the Northern Territory Auditor-General’s Office 2006
Note Paper - Strategic Review of the Northern Territory Auditor-General’s Office 2006
Continued from 18 October 2006.
Ms MARTIN (Chief Minister): Mr Deputy Speaker, I am disappointed the Leader of the Opposition is not here to make what should be an important contribution. We only have a strategic review of the Auditor-General’s Office every three years. It is an important review which gives an outside perspective on the effectiveness of our Auditor-General and how, perhaps, there need to be changes.
We have had some recommendations from the Auditor who did the review, Glen Clarke, Executive Director of the Western Australia Office of Auditor-General. I was pleased to report in my statement last sittings that his view is that the Auditor-General’s Office is operating in an efficient and effective manner. He had some recommendations to make about the report into this House. He raised the very important issue of the increased costs of outsourcing those audits, and we have responded to that. We know the cost of doing business in the Territory has risen, and the costs incurred by accounting firms are then reflected in the charge to government. We have increased, on the recommendation of the external auditor of our Auditor-General’s Office, the funding for the office by a further $200 000 this year.
I thank Glen Clarke for his review; we will have another one in three years. I thank our Auditor-General, Frank McGuiness, for his work. We have responded quickly to the recommendations of the external audit, and hope that his work is made more effective by that additional funding going to his office.
I am disappointed there was no input in to this debate from the opposition ...
Mr Mills: Have we lost our chance now, have we?
Ms MARTIN: Absolutely. I am closing debate. If you are going to take this parliament seriously, then issues such as a strategic review of the Auditor-General’s Office is one that you should be participating in. I hope the non-participation of the opposition does not mean that you ignore the importance of the Auditor-General’s Office …
Mr Mills: Not at all, Chief Minister.
Ms MARTIN: It could be interpreted that way. I say to the Auditor-General that I am sorry there has not been any opposition response to this. We will continue to work with our Auditor-General who is an important component of making sure that taxpayers’ dollars are spent well, in a transparent manner and accountably. We think he is important. Obviously, Mr Deputy Speaker, the opposition does not.
Motion agreed to; report noted.
MOTION
Note Statement - Compulsory School
Uniforms Policy for Students to Year 9
Note Statement - Compulsory School
Uniforms Policy for Students to Year 9
Continued from 24 August 2006.
Mr HENDERSON (Employment, Education and Training): Mr Deputy Speaker, I will be concluding debate on a ministerial statement which was introduced by my predecessor in this portfolio, the member for Nhulunbuy.
The issue of standards in education is, indeed, a matter of importance in the Territory. As the second Education minister in successive Labor governments I will also be aiming high, aiming to lift standards and education outcomes for all Territory students. For too long - 27 years in fact - the CLP government accepted a second-rate education system in the Territory. In a growing economy with a young population, this neglect was nothing short of reprehensible.
In five short years, the government has made huge gains, best demonstrated by the growth in the number of indigenous students completing their NTCE, not to mention the exponential growth in numbers of students completing their studies in their remote home communities. It should be remembered that successive CLP government’s maintained a policy prohibiting this.
Without labouring the point for too long, in our efforts at lifting standards and outcomes, it is also worth mentioning the 100 additional teachers now in the education system; implementation of the Learning Lessons report; and improving the quality of distance education - I visited the Katherine School of the Air the other day and what a fabulous facility that is with great teachers; the introduction of school attendance officers and the school counsellors program as part of our $42m Building Better Schools program. This is a huge investment in infrastructure to provide new schools and secondary facilities in remote communities; and the introduction of middle years across the Territory, which aims to raise the level of student outcomes in the Territory from the bottom of the nation to the top. All of these initiatives are about improving standards and outcomes.
The previous minister included the issue of compulsory school uniforms as part of the debate around improving standards in schools. This was in response to continual representation from parents and other members of the community. In a statement to the House in August, the minister said that government would be making its decision once the feedback was received from school councils. Feedback from schools and school leaders was unequivocal in support of compulsory school uniforms. Forty-three school councils responded to the invitation to comment on the motion of introducing compulsory school uniforms for primary and middle year students. An overwhelming majority of respondents supported the principle of students wearing school uniforms.
Concurrent with seeking feedback from school councils, the Association of Northern Territory Educational Leaders conducted a survey amongst its members on the same issue. Survey results revealed that 72% of school leaders were supportive of compulsory school uniforms. As it stands now, there is no existing system-wide policy that requires school students to wear uniforms. However, many schools have developed school uniform policies on an individual basis. Most urban primary schools have school uniform policies with very high levels of compliance, whilst over a half of urban high schools have no compulsory uniform policy. School uniforms and policies in remote areas are rare.
This morning, I unveiled the government’s new compulsory school uniforms policy. I am very confident this policy will be well received by school councils, parents and principals. In keeping with the government’s resolve to raise educational standards and outcomes in schools, the drivers in developing this policy have been to encourage professional high expectation environments in all schools, including remote schools; to encourage school pride in Years 8 and 9 students; and to remove the high cost, high anxiety fashion battle that clothing young teenagers has become for many parents.
The government’s new compulsory school uniforms policy requires that all students in government schools wear an authorised school uniform. This will apply to students from Transition to Year 9 unless there are exceptional circumstances. Under the policy, each government school, in conjunction with their school council and parents, will develop an implementation plan which contains the following elements: a requirement that students wear an authorised school uniform; suitable measures to address exceptional circumstances, short term or long term, where a student for good reason is unable to comply with this policy – for example, recent arrival at school, unreasonable financial burden being placed on the family or other exceptional circumstances facing the student; measures to maximise compliance with this policy including the use of the $50 Back to School Payment. These measures will not extend to a student being excluded from school on the basis of failure to wear a school uniform. Individual schools, in conjunction with the school council and parents, will determine the appropriate uniform and ensure suitable dress standards. Uniforms will also need to be practical, affordable and meet safety considerations. Each school will be required to submit its proposed implementation plan for ratification by DEET.
Given the extreme diversity of schools across the Territory, it is important to recognise that a one-size-fits-all approach cannot work in the implementation of this policy. It is, therefore, sensible and appropriate that each school develops its own implementation plan. This will be in accordance with a broader framework for implementation that will be provided by the department. Schools will be required to have their plans in place by the end of Semester 1 2007. Implementation of the school uniforms policy will take effect as of the beginning of the 2008 school year.
The government’s firm position on this issue is wholly in keeping with community demands for raising standards in schools. We believe that school uniforms raise standards and that by making them compulsory we will take away the ambiguity that currently exists. Uniforms instil a sense of identity, both in the students’ attachment to their school and, from the community’s point of view, indicate which school the student attends.
Many parents report bullying as an issue, and there is a strong view among educationalists that school uniforms help reduce bullying. This certainly makes sense: peer pressure demands for brand names and designer labels really kick in during the teenage years, an already difficult time, and an age that is referred to time and again in the research around the middle years. The decision to include Years 8 and 9 in the compulsory school uniforms policy is very considered and should provide some relief to the what-to-wear stresses during the middle years.
This policy is very much a family-friendly policy. It will help ease the tension between parents and children in the morning when deciding what clothing will be worn that day. Introduction of compulsory school uniforms will also reduce the cost of educating a child. The cost of modern clothes can be staggering. For low income families, this can be a real issue and a mark of social disadvantage to which students should not be subject. For parents, the purchase of a fixed price uniform will significantly reduce the cost of providing clothes for 200 days of the year. The government has already signalled its support for families in this regard by underwriting the cost of uniforms with a $50 Back to School Payment.
Many schools cited the Back to School Payment as a great help for parents in affording school uniforms, and a factor which has led to an increased incidence of students wearing uniforms. I was recently made aware of a single mum with five kids who strongly supports getting her children to school in uniform. After the expenses of Christmas, $250 provides a very welcome boost during the stressful time of year of preparing her children for the new school year.
In concluding the case for introducing a compulsory school uniform policy, I turn to the survey results of educational leaders as represented by ANTSELL. As stated earlier, survey results revealed that 72% of school leaders were supportive of compulsory school uniforms, and over half believed it would have a positive impact on their school; the reasons being school uniforms would raise pride and tone, lead to the levelling of social distracters, improve the safety of students, and reduce bullying.
The focus of the government’s policy intent is on compulsory school uniforms, but I am aware that some schools are taking the opportunity to extend the discussion to include seeking community opinion on school mottos, school names, and a general corporate image of the school. I encourage this and believe it is a fantastic initiative for all schools and their school community to be involved in designing school uniforms throughout 2007. It is also very timely, given the development of new schools and sub-schools as a result of the middle schools changes.
I thank the previous minister for Education for bringing this debate into parliament. Making anything compulsory usually attracts its share of critics, but the case that you have put and the support you have gained from school councils, school leaders, and parents makes the introduction of this new policy compelling. Thank you for your preparedness to tackle the hard issues.
To the member for Blain, thank you for your contribution and your surety of the cooperation of the opposition in the introduction of compulsory school uniforms. To the member for Nelson, as usual, the recount of your own experiences as a child was valuable beyond compare, and the House notes your claim to have set the trend for wearing green and gold long before it became fashionable for the Australian sporting teams to adopt these colours. I welcome your support for what the government is trying to do and believe that your stated concerns about the need to reduce the wearing of inappropriate clothing will be able to be addressed by the policy, because it allows the school community to be involved in determining what the school uniform will be and what is and is not appropriate.
The member for Braitling, I note that your support for this policy is qualified, but I suggest that your call for us to be bold in the design and give schools a bit of …
Dr LIM: A point of order, Mr Deputy Speaker! Sorry minister, I am not calling a point of order against you. I am just trying to work out – it appears that the minister is now responding as the minister for Education, so he is closing debate.
Mr DEPUTY SPEAKER: He is, yes. There is no point of order.
Dr LIM: I was going to contribute to the debate. I thought the minister was contributing as the member for Wanguri, but I did not realise – because the minister for Education was the member for Nhulunbuy when this was introduced, that is all.
Mr DEPUTY SPEAKER: Member for Greatorex, the minister for Education is the member for Wanguri and he is closing debate.
Mr HENDERSON: Yes, thank you. Member for Greatorex, I was sitting here waiting for somebody else to stand and nobody did. I encourage you, if you have a contribution, to make it in the adjournment debate one night this week.
Dr Lim: I will do that.
Mr HENDERSON: Yes, you can. If you have missed your spot, I am sorry for that.
Member for Braitling, I note that your support for this policy is qualified. I suggest that your call for us to be bold in the design and give schools a bit of creativity so that they really stand out will be accommodated in the implementation of the policy. Already, as I stated earlier, I am told schools are being creative in designing their own uniforms, logos and mottos. I join you in encouraging that. I also note that you suggest students in the south of the Territory will need a winter uniform such as a jumper, a blazer or a jacket. I am not sure yet what we can do about that other than to envy the temperate climate of Alice Springs. Schools in the southern regions can take that into account in the design and the implementation of the policy.
Member for Goyder, thank you for your support and constructive suggestions, especially the reinforcement that school uniforms will assist in enhancing security in school grounds by allowing easy identification of students and visitors.
Mr Deputy Speaker, I urge all members, when visiting the schools in their electorate, to take an active interest in the implementation of the new uniforms policy. I am sure there will be many hours of fascinating debate in school council meetings about this. All of us, as local members, enjoy that and provide the encouragement for this.
Motion agreed to; statement noted.
MOTION
Note Paper - Treasurer’s Annual Financial Report 2005-06
Continued from 19 October 2006.
Mr MILLS (Blain): Mr Deputy Speaker, it appears the way we conduct our business is that the opposition reads the annual financial report and sees different issues or, perhaps, the same, and comments on those that would not be amplified by government. That is the nature of the mechanism we have here in this parliament.
No one would say that times are tough in the Territory; it is one of those times when the economy is strong. Reading the Financial Review on the weekend, it was pleasing to see a report on the housing market in the Northern Territory. The report masked the state so it looked like it could be a place in the nation where it was expected and then it said: ‘Where is it? It is in the Northern Territory’. It indicated that this growth seems to be continuing. If we analyse the reasons for the growth, anyone would tell you that the resources boom drives it significantly, and this has a very significant and noticeable effect on the Territory economy and has such an effect, particularly on our land prices. As we look around the country, that has been the effect as it has flowed from Victoria, New South Wales, right across the country. Now, it is lingering on in the areas where the resource boom is most rampant.
The way that the opposition would approach this, as is reported in the Treasurer’s Annual Financial Report, is that, when there are times of plenty, it requires a particular way of managing those boom times, just as the lean times require particular strategies. We must wisely administer our affairs so that, whilst there is plenty we prepare for the times of less. That is the concern here.
It is probably a quirk of history that my predecessors - I put on the record too that, though I represent as a member of the Country Liberal Party, I have not been a member of the Country Liberal Party in this Chamber for 27 years. We have all played our different parts at different times, and there have been different ebbs and flows through the course of the Northern Territory. We came to the point where there was a change of government. I can say fairly confidently that those who carried responsibility for leading - particularly in economic matters - up until the change of government, there was a sense that there could well be better times ahead because the GST was being sorted out - as well as being opposed by those who were in opposition and who are those who are now the benefactors - and the railway was just being bedded down.
They were tough times. If we take an honest moment and walk in others shoes, I can imagine - and I note to some small degree - how difficult those times were. Now, there has been a change, it has come at a particularly fortunate time in history for this current government. Without a doubt, the GST - which was once resisted and opposed, criticised and serious concerns raised about it - has flowed at a time when the resources boom has unleashed its revenue stream into the states - and all Labor states too. They have had their responsibility to manage that revenue stream. There have been some good and some bad measures taken. I can understand it must be exciting to have that flow running through with such colossal demands and, being new to government, setting your course and agenda.
The story, as I see it, has been that the income of the Northern Territory has been projected as they looked ahead and made their plans and, as the Treasurer’s report stated, made his planned measures of what the income was expected to be, calibrated the whole machinery based upon what is expected to be the income. He endeavours to get some kind of restraint and discipline within the departments, but is getting a bit used to this idea that there is probably going to be a heck of a lot more than you expect. However, you cannot be sure. Then, right at the end after you have set your course, you find that more money flows in than you expected. It must be so fortunate for the Treasurer to be able to pass that off; it masks a multitude of sins and is able to be presented to the Territory community as excellent fiscal management.
There is, perhaps, some of that, but it is very fortunate. A lot of it is more good luck than good management in this respect to be able to have surpluses because, if you are budgeting for a deficit and then you end up getting more than you expected - and much more than you expected such as $250m more than you expected last year - you are able to cover some of the excesses of some of the departments. That is a bonus. At the same time, you have enough left over to say you have done such a good job you have a surplus. That is good luck.
Many people know that it is the role of the opposition to ensure that we recognise that we are in a cycle. I am looking to see more evidence of care taken with things such as the mounting unfunded liability, particularly with superannuation. That is a grave concern as we move ahead. I suspect that the stronger economic times will continue for longer. I am a little more upbeat about that, but I am concerned about the rising levels of superannuation that is unfunded. That debt will compound and it must be dealt with courageously now, rather than leave it for another administration.
Another aspect of the management of the Territory economy is that delicate area of inflation. The negotiation of wages deals prior to elections with the public sector, which comprises a very large proportion of the Northern Territory community, affects the economy and money flow into our Territory economy. It is much greater – I think it is about 30%, I could be wrong – than New South Wales, which is about 10%. Therefore, the effect of wages increases do have quite a pronounced effect on the triggers which drive inflation. That is a concern. It is not to be interpreted as ‘you should not pay more’, ‘they should practice wage restraint’, but it is an acknowledgement of the effect of wage increases on inflation. I would like to see comments made by the government on how we are going to make sure that we keep inflation under control. In the Territory, we seem to exceed the national average on inflation. The inflation rate in the Territory, to my recall, is 4.9% which is way over the national average. That is a concern because of the effect that it has on home ownership. Perhaps not so much on those who are enjoying jobs at this moment where the money is flowing quite well, who already have a unit or a house, have rent being paid to them or might already be in a home, but those who are outside home ownership concern me. They are the ones who trouble me when inflation starts to really kick in because of the cost of living.
I hope that the Treasurer, in his reply, will give me some assurance that there is recognition of the problems of inflation, particularly for those who are on lesser incomes, outside the housing market, and wanting to buy a block of land and build a house and raise young kids. They are the ones to whom we need to shift our attention. We can celebrate in the company of those who have houses but, more and more, we need to be mindful of those who have not yet bought a house, those who are leaving school now, those who have left those decisions too late and are now trying to get in. I really feel for them and that is where inflation bites the hardest. I look forward to comments on that matter.
I would also like to hear comment on counter-cyclical strategies so that, in times of economic strength, you take what strategies are employed to offset and prepare for the difficult times ahead. One, of course, is the unfunded superannuation and the nett debt.
With those comments, I trust that the Treasurer has taken note of those key points. There are many different aspects of the report that I could comment on, but they are the key ones: the GST revenue which is flowing strongly into the Territory, and the obligation on this administration to manage in a time of plenty. Sometimes, that is more difficult than a lean time because, in a lean time, it is clear what you have to do. If you lose some money for your household budget, it really sharpens your thinking, but if it is sloshing around the place, as it is, you start to loosen up a little and your priorities are not as clear. That is the concern I have at this particular time in the Territory’s development.
The waterfront and the effect that it will have on the Territory economy as we move forward is a concern. Its effect on the fragile Territory economy is something the Territory opposition will monitor closely. What measures are being used by this Treasurer to reduce inflation? How are unfunded liabilities being approached and what attitude does the Treasurer and this government have towards rising debt and unfunded liabilities?
Mr STIRLING (Treasurer): Mr Deputy Speaker, falling debt is the key to this and to the successful fiscal management of this government. It remains a high priority for this government, unlike our predecessors who did not see a growing deficit and spiralling debt behind the government as any problem at all. The punters did, come 2001 when they saw a flat economy, when they saw no jobs and, at the same time, debt per capita in the Northern Territory the worst in Australia and growing at an horrific rate.
What drove those debt levels? You have to look at a budget in 2000-01 that predicted a $1m deficit and blew out to $212m. That is in one year. You have to look at the effect that had on the bottom line for debt for Territorians. You have to look at 2001-02, a budget forecast of a $12m deficit and, within weeks, an Under Treasurer telling the incoming government that the budget was in an unsustainable position and we could expect a deficit bottom line at the end of the financial year, if nothing else changed, of between $126m and $134m. That is what we were confronted with: a government that did not care about debt and about future generations of Territorians, and how that might be managed into the future.
In fact, we turned that debt around to come in a minus-$83m. This is the fourth budgetary surplus outcome in a row. If there is one thing we learnt well from the CLP, it was to hold the line - do not say ‘yes’ to every bid that comes across the Cabinet table or at Budget Cabinet; be careful with what you have to spend because we saw the outcome when they did not. There were deficits of $212m, $130m and $100m year in, year out, going to the bottom line. It is a legacy we learnt a valuable lesson from and we are determined to avoid those problems.
At the end of this term of government, the ratio of nett debt and employee liabilities to revenue will be around 113%, compared to 134% when we came to office - still too high in my view, but at least trending in the right way. A whole lot of things have to happen in order to get that ratio down. It is a valuable measure of how government finances are travelling year to year, because it is that ratio of nett debt and employee liabilities to revenue that you can readily compare, state to state, territory to territory, and get a fix on just how they are travelling in an overall sense.
Actual debt will be significantly below the actual debt we inherited, despite a massive capital works program, and the budget will be in balance, meaning the Labor government, by that stage, will have delivered five balanced or surplus budgets out of eight full budgets. That is a record that we remain proud of.
To cover the highlights of the 2005-06 Treasurer’s Annual Financial Report: a general government cash surplus outcome of $40m; a general government accrual nett operating surplus of $27m, importantly, the first such surplus since the introduction of accrual accounting in 2002 and 2003 and, in many ways, a much more meaningful indicator of government responsibility than cash standing out on its own; significant underlying growth of 11% in general government own-sourced revenue due to an increase in business activity and confidence; and a significant reduction in nett debt for the non-financial public sector to $1594m, which is $149m below the high of $1743m recorded back in 2001-02. When measured as a percentage to revenue, both nett debt at 48% and nett debt plus employee liabilities of 112% are, again, and not surprisingly, the lowest since the introduction of accrual accounting.
We are committed to managing the Territory’s finances responsibly, but we have to, at the same time, maintain an appropriate balance between the needs of the community, the needs of the Territory economy, and maintaining a sound fiscal position as we go forward.
I pick up a couple of points made by the member for Blain, where he talked about good luck rather than good management. At other times, he has said that it is all due to Costello and Howard. Well, if it is all a question of luck or, in the second place, it is all due to Howard and Costello, how is it that New South Wales is in a bit of a bind at the moment, that Victoria is struggling. Western Australia and Northern Territory are doing all right with Labor governments. Therefore, it is a bit hard to see that it is all Prime Minister Howard and Treasurer Costello for this wonderful growth in the Northern Territory. Tell that to Premier Iemma how come the Howard and Costello magic is not working for him in New South Wales, or for the recently re-elected Premier Bracks in Victoria.
Mr Mills: You were not listening. I gave you a little history.
Mr STIRLING: You do not want to pay credit where credit is due, and that is the fiscal responsibility that this government has demonstrated over its time in office, in stark contrast to the excesses of the CLP past.
The questions regarding unfunded superannuation and the growth in that will remain a concern for quite some considerable time into the future for the Northern Territory, and will for every other jurisdiction that has a large liability pinned behind superannuation. That is because, when actuaries come in and do these assessments - guess what? - they do not put a lesser figure on what the outgoings might be into the future. That figure is adjusted upwards every time actuaries carry out a review of liabilities in this area. However, whilst the liability is large - and it is large - the key for any jurisdiction, including the Northern Territory, remains the ability to pay those emerging costs as they do emerge. Whilst it is a big figure on the books, and the Northern Territory has a big bill against super, it is not due on any one day; that is the culmination, looking forward, of what is on the books. Of course, if people do not retire, walk out and claim all of their super all on the same day, it is an emerging basis. The key, as I said, is the ability of government to meet those liabilities as they emerge, and the Northern Territory government clearly has that ability.
In relation to living costs, inflation ran below the national average for much of the past five years. The inflation rate itself, and the growth in the inflation rate in Darwin, is the result of the successful economy. The result, in a large part, of that jump in inflation rate is due to the increase in housing prices. It is also influenced by fuel and, to a lesser degree, fruit. Of course, fuel drives transport costs, which has another effect in the mix. However, by and large, the biggest single contributor to the increasing inflation rate is the housing prices. What do we do in order to ameliorate the effects as far as we can on individuals and business in the Northern Territory? For a start, this government puts $56m each year into Power and Water by way of customer service obligation that reduces the electricity, water and sewerage prices that Territorians would otherwise face. That is an enormous effort for the Northern Territory: each year between $50m and $60m across to Power and Water to hold down electricity, water and sewerage prices.
We have provided, to this stage, over 1000 HomeNorth loans. That first home owner base in the Northern Territory has grown incredibly, and we are very proud of that. We have subsidised and reduced heavily or brought in stamp duty concessions on first home owners, and principle place of residence, at a cost of over $40m to the budget since 2002. We even subsidise fuel to the extent of 1.1 per litre. Each of those have an effect on individuals than if those concessions and CSOs were not in place. If you look at business across the world of business and the payroll deductions, the tax exemption is now worth something like $74m in the community, and $134m worth of tax breaks to come on business in the Northern Territory over the life of this parliament. You can see that this government is way ahead in reducing the effects, as far as we can, of a growing economy on individuals and business alike.
It is a good report. Most importantly, it shows that the government is tracking toward its longer-term goals in fiscal management; that we are holding the line. However, we will need to continue to exercise that fiscal discipline right through this term. The result in the end for Territorians will be reducing debt levels, reducing interest payments because of reduced debt levels at the end of that term and, of course, more flexibility for the government of the day to meet the service needs of Territorians right across this Northern Territory.
Mr Deputy Speaker, I commend the 2005-06 Treasurer’s Annual Financial Report to the Assembly.
Motion agreed to; report noted.
STATEMENT BY DEPUTY SPEAKER
Parliamentary Broadcast
Parliamentary Broadcast
Mr DEPUTY SPEAKER: Honourable members, I have received advice on the sound system. Parliamentary staff need to adjust the sound system and we must suspend sittings for a period of five minutes. We will return at 5.40 pm.
The Assembly suspended.
PERSONAL EXPLANATION
Minister for Police, Fire and
Emergency Services
Minister for Police, Fire and
Emergency Services
Madam SPEAKER: Honourable members, I have given leave for the Minister for Police, Fire and Emergency Services to make a personal explanation.
Dr BURNS (Police, Fire and Emergency Services): Madam Speaker, I provide the House with additional detail and clarification in relation to a response I gave to a question from the Leader of the Opposition during Question Time.
The Opposition Leader asked a question about the time it had taken police to respond to a call from Mr Bobby Bali of Caf Kashmir in the Nightcliff shops after an incident involving a group of youths. In Question Time, I stated that there had been an arrest in relation to this matter. In fact, a suspect has been interviewed in relation to this matter and, according to police, will be summonsed for aggravated assault and stealing. In my response, I also queried the Opposition Leader’s assertion that the response time was 35 minutes. Superintendent Kate Vanderlaan has stated that the police response time was, in fact, 16 minutes.
TABLED PAPER
Northern Territory Electoral Commission Annual Report 2005-06
Northern Territory Electoral Commission Annual Report 2005-06
Madam SPEAKER: Honourable members, I table the Northern Territory Electoral Commission Annual Report 2005-06.
STATEMENT
Sessional Committee on Sport and Youth
Update on Inquiry – Benefits of
Schools Sport NT Programs
Sessional Committee on Sport and Youth
Update on Inquiry – Benefits of
Schools Sport NT Programs
Ms SACILOTTO (Port Darwin)(by leave): Madam Speaker, I make a statement to update members on its inquiry reference relating to the benefits of Schools Sport NT programs.
As members are aware, I was appointed to the committee in September this year and was, subsequently, elected chair. In reporting on the committee’s activities and deliberations since its establishment 12 months prior to then, I acknowledge the work of my predecessor as chair, the now Minister for Primary Industry and Fisheries. I also acknowledge the work during this period of the member for Arnhem who, until recently, was also a member of the committee. I thank my fellow committee members for their contributions to the ongoing work and for their support they have shown me by electing me as chair. I trust that we will continue to work in a bipartisan way to achieve tangible and lasting changes for young people in the Northern Territory.
The terms of reference for sport and youth give the committee three focal areas upon which to concentrate; namely, the ability and effectiveness of existing structures and programs from grassroots to elite to deliver in urban, regional and remote areas and recommendations for improvement; the role and benefit of School Sport NT programs and links to participation; and demonstrated links between participation in sport and reduced antisocial behaviour.
The task, as I see it, is how we can change or improve the way sporting programs are delivered right across the Northern Territory so that more young people are able to access - and, more importantly, are motivated to do so - a range of sporting activities. I am well aware that I am new to the committee and other members, apart from the member Sanderson who has also just been appointed to the committee, have had the benefit of 12 months of listening, reading and discussing the issues and influences and thinking about them. In stating my views today, I certainly do not intend to pre-empt any committee findings or decisions. I look forward to hearing my fellow committee members’ views on how they see our role.
I believe the health and welfare of our young people is central to the reasons for establishing this committee, and is a subject which is very important to me. Members would be aware of the continuing debate Australia-wide on childhood obesity and how this is threatening the health outcomes of young people. There are many lifestyle factors for this, and the fast food industry cannot be blamed for it all. As well as eating more of the wrong foods, children are much more sedentary these days then ever before. There is the lure of computers and screen-based activities, but this is only part of the equation. Today’s children are much less likely to walk to and from school; instead, being dropped off and picked up each day. In fact, there was an article in the news recently that this has had a greater impact on the increasing weight and worsening health of children than the time spent in front of a screen; that the way forward is to get parents out of cars and walking their children to school.
Of course, the decrease of physical activity of our children is a reflection of lifestyle changes which also impacted upon their parents. An article in The Age on 15 August 2006 reported that Australia is facing an obesity epidemic, particularly with regard to children. I quote:
- Australia has the fastest growing childhood obesity rate in the world, leading the way in a global trend that has resulted in overweight people outnumbering the malnourished for the first time.
…
Leading American nutritionist Barry Popkin said his research showed Australia was the only country in the world where childhood obesity rates had overtaken adult rates.
Professor Popkin’s research shows that in the past decade an extra 1.7% of Australian children have become overweight each year compared with 0.8% in the US and 0.5% in Britain.
In this climate, any changes we can make to increase the amount of regular, sustained physical activity can only be beneficial. However, the committee’s terms of reference are not about physical activity per se and how to make young people healthier. The terms of reference specifically refer to sport; about how existing structures are able to effectively deliver sporting programs and services across the Northern Territory. Whether it is for grassroots participation or for nurturing and developing more gifted young sports people, the terms of reference requires us to develop our findings into recommendations to the Assembly on how sporting delivery can be improved. They also ask us to look at how School Sport NT operates and how its operation benefits sports and impacts on overall participation rates. Lastly, the committee is asked to investigate links between participation in sports and reduced antisocial behaviour; that is, does more sporting participation by young people lead them to live more functional lives with a reduction in social problems?
The positive contribution of sporting participation to a healthy and well-balanced individual and society cannot be overstated. As well as improved physical and mental health, it provides a better connection to community and identity. However, there are barriers to sporting participation, particularly for young people who are still grappling with issues of body image and identity. Involvement in sport at an earlier age leads to better skills, confidence and self-esteem, and this can overcome many of the problems in those critical years when they reach puberty.
Participation in sport also means having access to the right facilities and coaching ability. This is a matter the committee will be looking at, particularly in the context of remote communities where service delivery is always challenging. A report released by the Victorian government in 1993 entitled Physical and Sport Education for Victorian Schools, otherwise known as the Moneghetti Report after the chair of the committee, looked at the delivery of sport education in Victorian schools. While over 10 years old, it is relevant to the ongoing debate about school sport. Of particular interest is the distinction it has made between physical education, sport education and sport. In the context of discussing the role of that committee looking at sport for young people, physical education was defined as:
- Physical education is an all encompassing term, including fitness, skills, movement, dance recreation, health, games and sports plus the appropriate values and knowledge of each.
The Moneghetti committee broadly endorsed the definition of sport education given by an earlier Senate standing committee, noting that sport education is a component of the physical education program and teaches the values and knowledge of sport. The definition given was:
- Sport education includes the development of sports skills, an understanding of rules of various sports and an appreciation of codes of behaviour.
Then it defined sport itself as:
- … vigorous physical activity that, for the purposes of discovering the limits of one’s capabilities, or for fun, amusement and diversion, involves competition against oneself or another, or a confrontation with natural elements.
In all, the Moneghetti Report made 19 recommendations, and a key finding was that schools need play a significant role in delivering opportunities for sports education and skills development to young people.
The committee will continue to assess the outcomes of that report and others, and their application to the special challenges we face in the Northern Territory. Early in its inquiry, the committee identified a number of areas upon which to concentrate, including the very real difficulties faced in trying to facilitate full sporting programs in regional and remote areas across the Northern Territory. While funds are, obviously, a constraint to equitable delivery of programs in every community, the availability of sufficient numbers of trained people to deliver the program is of equal relevance.
The committee has been looking at how these issues can be best addressed. It has also been looking at:
the relationships between peak sporting bodies and schools, as well as the peak bodies and communities;
participation rates, including gender differences, to identify who is missing out or dropping out, when and why;
These and other questions are still under active review by the committee.
Since establishment, the committee has sought and received official briefings from the Department of Employment, Education and Training; School Sport NT; the Department of Local Government, Housing and Sport; and the Nutrition and Physical Activity Unit of the Department of Health and Community Services. It met with representatives of these agencies early in 2006.
In March this year, the committee commenced advertising for submissions and actively seeking the input of peak sporting organisations, schools, bodies representing the interests of young people, and the general population. This was through advertising in the mainstream press, as well as through targeted e-mail newsletters contacting relevant bodies and the like. An information brochure was also produced and widely distributed through the electorate offices, sporting organisations and schools, etcetera. The then chair spoke at a number of events, including sports workshops and a meeting with the Chief Minister’s Round Table of Young Territorians.
He also travelled with members of the select committee on substance abuse in the community, where they visited five Central Australian and five Top End communities during this year. This followed recognition by members of each committee that the underlying issues of both were often the same. With two members on both committees - and now there are three of us who are on both - it made sense to take advantage of the opportunity to work together in this way. I have already had discussions with my colleague, the member for Macdonnell, who is chair of the substance abuse committee, regarding continuing this where it is appropriate to the terms of reference.
In August this year, a number of additional official briefings were provided at the behest of the committee. These included a presentation from officers of the Northern Territory Police who have been engaged in various capacities in dealing with young people across the Northern Territory. The briefing included information on the mobile activity trailer used by police to deliver sporting opportunities in some communities outside Katherine, and the impact that is having on reducing juvenile crime and other dysfunctional behaviour. This is one program that seems to be having a positive impact, and the committee intends to look at it more closely when it visits the Katherine region. The committee has also received official briefings about the work of the Office of Crime Prevention and the approach taken by NT Correctional Services in its dealing with young people who come under its care. As well, the committee is yet to be briefed by the Northern Territory Institute of Sport, and looks forward to meeting with them in the near future.
As well as official briefings, to date a total of 43 submissions have been received. The committee is currently analysing and assessing these before undertaking the next phase of its investigations, which will be a series of public hearings and meetings around the Northern Territory. This will provide an opportunity for the community to put forward their views on issues under investigation
I recently wrote to all members asking for advice on any sporting initiatives for young people which may be happening in their electorates, especially those programs or events which are showing encouraging outcomes for young people in participation and positive lifestyle changes. Once all these responses are received, the committee will finalise its community consultation program, and this will be well publicised. Final details have yet to be decided, however. Hearings will be held in Darwin, Palmerston and the rural area and in all regional centres and selected communities.
Madam Speaker, I welcome the opportunity which appointment to this committee has given me, to play a part in changing the delivery of sport for young people and to foster greater participation. I see this as a way of having a positive impact on the future of young people and, therefore, the future of the Northern Territory. There is still some way to go until the committee is in a position to report its recommendations to the Legislative Assembly. In the meantime, I look forward to receiving input from members during the course of this debate. Again, I acknowledge and thank my fellow committee members and the two former members.
Madam Speaker, I move that the Assembly take note of the statement.
Mr BONSON (Millner): Madam Speaker, I briefly contribute as one of the original members of the committee. I thank the two previous members for the hard work they did over the last few months gathering the information the new chairperson, the member for Port Darwin, has explained to the House. The previous chair has now become a minister, and congratulations to him. He did an honest and competent job whilst committee chair.
I thank the member for Arnhem who showed a definite interest in all aspects of the committee and, in particular, bush areas and the benefits to little kids. I look forward to working with the member for Sanderson and the new chair, the member for Port Darwin. I know that the opposition and Independent members are very keen for this committee to continue its hard work, and to start on its consultation next year.
I believe in physical education. I believe that through the healthy mind, healthy body principle, we can get some great outcomes for Territory kids into the future. However, I will not speak for too long. I thank everyone who has been involved and those into the future. I hope we can continue to kick goals. Madam Speaker, I seek leave to continue my remarks at a later date.
Leave granted.
Debate adjourned.
TABLED PAPER
Report of the Remuneration Tribunal and Determination No 1 of 2006 for Members of the Legislative Assembly, Members of the Executive Council and Ministers of the Territory
Report of the Remuneration Tribunal and Determination No 1 of 2006 for Members of the Legislative Assembly, Members of the Executive Council and Ministers of the Territory
Mr STIRLING (Treasurer): Madam Speaker, I table the Report of the Remuneration Tribunal and Determination No 1 of 2006 for Members of the Legislative Assembly, Members of the Executive Council and Ministers of the Territory.
MOTION
Print Paper - Report of the Remuneration Tribunal and Determination No 1 of 2006 for Members of the Legislative Assembly, Members of the Executive Council and Ministers of the Territory
Mr STIRLING (Treasurer): Madam Speaker, I move that the report be printed.
Motion agreed to.
MOTION
Note Paper - Report of the Remuneration Tribunal and Determination No 1 of 2006 for Members of the Legislative Assembly, Members of the Executive Council and Ministers of the Territory
Mr STIRLING (Treasurer): Madam Speaker, It is a requirement of the Assembly Members and Statutory Officers (Remuneration and Other Entitlements) Act 2006 that both (a) a copy of the determination is distributed to each person whose entitlements are affected by the determination; and (b) a copy of the report is tabled in the Assembly within six sitting days of its receipt. I am advised that copies of the determination have been circulated and I am tabling this determination in line with paragraph (b). It is now open for members of this Assembly to consider the determination. Under the legislation we have 10 sitting days to determine whether to bring a disallowance resolution or to allow the determination to stand.
Turning to the key aspects of the report of the tribunal, I note that in accordance with the government’s submission on the matter, the increase and the additional salary given for ministers and parliamentary office holders has been restricted to 3%, in line with the base 3% being offered to NT public sector workers in enterprise bargaining negotiations under the Northern Territory government’s Wages Policy. Provision has been made for members’ annual interstate business trip to be taken in the allocated fleet vehicle, with fuel costs being met by the government. Exercising this option would extinguish the airfare entitlement. The cost of inoculations and travel insurance has been included as allowable components for authorised overseas travel. The Electorate Allowance has been adjusted to allow for a CPI increase and to allow for increases in postal costs.
I can foreshadow that the government sees no reason to disallow any of these key recommendations, and that there is no apparent legal or technical issues pertaining to these central parts of the tribunal’s report and determination.
In regard to the disallowance issue, I draw members’ attention to other issues of a technical and legal nature which may require further examination. In the letter forwarding the report to me, the Chairperson of the Remuneration Tribunal raises the possibility that clause 7 of the determination may be beyond the power of the tribunal and, consequently, of no effect. Clause 7 deals with office entitlements, both in the Legislative Assembly building and for an electorate office, the level of equipment for these offices, and the employment of electorate officers. This matter arose during the year as a result of the Remuneration Tribunal seeking legal advice as to the coverage of the new act; that is, the Assembly Members and Statutory Officers (Remuneration and Other Entitlements) Act 2006 and the basis upon which entitlements be determined by avenues other than the tribunal.
Advice received from the Solicitor for the Northern Territory and from the Solicitor-General, in October 2006, was to the effect that the Remuneration Tribunal is the sole source of authority in regard to payments that are in the nature of remuneration or allowances. However, in regard to entitlements, the tribunal’s jurisdiction is not exhaustive and there are other means by which they may be determined. For example, by way of specific legislative provision such as superannuation legislation; by ministerial determination under section 5 of the Assembly Members and Statutory Officers (Remuneration and Other Entitlements) Act; and by ministerial determination provided there has been the necessary appropriation of funds.
The Remuneration Tribunal had prepared its 2006 determination prior to having received the advice of the Solicitor-General. After considering the advice, it queries whether it has the power to deal with the matters it has in clause 7 of the determination. My department has sought supplementary legal advice on this issue, and this will be available before the passage of the next 10 sitting days. I will advise the Assembly of the nature of this advice and the government’s intentions as soon as practicable.
If the tribunal’s determination is within power then it could stand and become effective once the 10 sitting days had expired. Alternatively, this Assembly may decide to disallow the determination and deal with the issue by some other process. On the other hand, if the tribunal’s determination is not within power it will be necessary to deal with the issue by another method.
The government is also considering the tribunal’s recommendations that there be specific legislation or a determination under section 5 of the Assembly Members and Statutory Officers (Remuneration and Other Entitlements) Act dealing with ministerial staff, ministerial office accommodation and operation, arrangements for staff and the Office of the Speaker, entitlements of the Leader of the Opposition, and electorate office staff.
In regard to this issue, the government is acutely conscious of its responsibility to uphold the institutions of parliament, to protect the democratic electoral system and, at the same time, there is always a need to apply appropriate restraint and for there to be some flexibility in these resourcing matters. Codification of all office equipment and staffing entitlements may provide some occurrence of protecting against arbitrary decisions, but lead to destructive inflexibility. Certainly, codification has not been an issue that previous administrations have sought to pursue. Going down this path may, ultimately, erode the ability for delivery of services by all concerned. Government has not ruled out any option and will be considering these matters with an open mind.
Madam Speaker, I move that the Assembly take note of the report, and seek leave to continue my remarks at a later hour on behalf of the Chief Minister.
Leave granted.
Debate adjourned.
TABLED PAPER
Ombudsman’s Report 2005-06
Ombudsman’s Report 2005-06
Mr STIRLING (Treasurer): Madam Speaker, again on behalf of the Chief Minister, I table the Report of the Ombudsman 2005-06.
MOTION
Print Paper – Ombudsman’s Report 2005-06
Print Paper – Ombudsman’s Report 2005-06
Mr STIRLING (Treasurer): Madam Speaker, I move that the Report of the Ombudsman 2005-06 be printed.
Motion agreed to.
MOTION
Note Paper – Ombudsman’s Report 2005-06
Mr STIRLING (Treasurer): Madam Speaker, the Office of the Ombudsman is a testament to the rights of private citizens to be heard when aggrieved by the actions of those who provide public services. By investigating complaints and making recommendations for their resolution, the Ombudsman assists government agencies to improve the service that they provide to the public. The Ombudsman recommends processes for resolving complaints within agencies and helps to develop mechanisms to ensure that specific complaints do not recur.
As with previous annual reports, the Ombudsman highlights a number of cases where service delivery agencies have not performed adequately. Significantly, in 2005-06 the Ombudsman made some 244 recommendations to agencies to improve administrative practices of which 94% were agreed to. This is a clear indication of the Ombudsman’s impact on improving the processes and procedures of agencies within her jurisdiction.
In 2004-05, the Ombudsman reported that the time taken to complete investigations into the conduct of Northern Territory Police was unacceptable. I note that since then, the Ombudsman and police have both made a concerted effort to reduce these time frames. The Ombudsman, her staff and investigating officers of the Northern Territory Police, are to be commended for their efforts. In 2005-06, approaches to the Ombudsman’s Office decreased by 15% in comparison to 2004-05.
I also note that the Ombudsman sought assistance from Northern Territory Treasury to develop a new format for statistics in this year’s annual report. While this may make comparison with previous years somewhat problematic, I wish to commend the Ombudsman for taking the necessary steps to ensure that the report’s statistics more clearly reflect the activities of the office.
Importantly, and as another example of the government’s ongoing commitment to transparency, ministers will address issues where they are relevant to their portfolios in their responses to the Ombudsman’s annual report.
Madam Speaker, I move that the Assembly take note of this report, and seek leave to continue my remarks at a later hour on behalf of the Chief Minister.
Leave granted.
Debate adjourned.
TABLED PAPER
Treasurer’s Mid-Year Report, 2006-07
Treasurer’s Mid-Year Report, 2006-07
Mr STIRLING (Treasurer): Madam Speaker, I table the Treasurer’s Mid-Year Report 2006-07.
MOTION
Note Paper - Treasurer’s Mid-Year Report, 2006-07
Note Paper - Treasurer’s Mid-Year Report, 2006-07
Mr STIRLING (Treasurer): Madam Speaker, the mid-year report satisfies the requirements of the Fiscal Integrity and Transparency Act and provides updated financial information for 2006-07 through to 2009-10. It also meets the Territory’s mid-year obligations under the Uniform Presentation Framework Agreement.
The 2006-07 mid-year report incorporates the outcomes of the 2005-06 financial year, Cabinet decisions since May 2006, revised Territory revenue estimates including updated GST and taxation revenue, and other minor revenue-related adjustments largely due to changes in specific purpose payments from the Australian government. In addition, this report provides updated information on both the Territory’s economic and fiscal outlook.
The key fiscal highlights in the report include: cash targets unchanged in all years; operating result surpluses predicted from 2006-007 ongoing; further increase to the investment in the Territory’s infrastructure in 2006-007 and all forward years from that announced in May 2006; nett debt down to $1681m by 2009-10, representing an $89m improvement on May 2006 estimates; a nett debt to revenue ratio of 48% in 2006-07, reducing to 45% by 2009-10; and nett debt plus employee liabilities to revenue ratio continuing to fall despite an increase in superannuation liabilities.
From an economic perspective, key highlights include: gross state product revised up from 5.8% to 6.2%; employment growth revised up from 2.3% to 5% due to stronger growth and resident employment across all sectors; and population growth revised up from 1.5% to 1.7% due to stronger than estimated nett interstate migration to the Territory.
State final demand remains at historically high levels, with a forecast growth to decrease by 5% in 2006-07 - a stronger outcome than the 9.1% reduction in growth forecast at the time of the budget. Again, the extension of the Alcan G3 expansion increase in total construction costs are major contributing factors to the more modest decline in state final demand.
Employment is forecast to increase by 5% in 2006-07, revised up from the budget estimate of 2.3%. The major influence on the upward revision is the broadly-based economic growth across industries, including mining, construction, property and business, finance and insurance, retail and tourism.
Population growth is forecast to strengthen to 1.7% to December 2006, stronger than the budget forecast of 1.5%. The forecast of 1.7% incorporates an upward adjustment made by the Australian Bureau of Statistics to the preliminary December 2005 figure.
The inflation outlook reported at the time of the budget was that strengthening demand for goods and services, combined with continuing labour and skill shortages, would put forward pressure on inflation over 2006 and 2007. While this broad outlook remains unchanged, the rate of growth and the Consumer Price Index over 2006 has been stronger than estimated at the time of the budget, when year-on-year inflation to December 2006 was estimated to increase by 2.9%. This has been revised in the mid-year report to 4%. The major contributors to the higher than estimated inflation outcome are housing costs, fruit prices and fuel.
I turn now to the updated 2006-07 fiscal outlook. The general government sector cash outcome for 2006-07 and the forward estimates remains unchanged from the May 2006 budget, with a balanced position projected by 2008-09 and a small surplus of $17m estimated for 2009-10. While the outcome remains unchanged, both receipts and payments have varied by $60m in 2006-07. Operating receipts are expected to increase as a result of: higher payroll tax and conveyancing stamp duty collections of $16m due to increased economic activity; higher GST revenue estimates of $3m due to increased population growth - this increase is one-off as the effect of declining relativities means that GST is estimated to fall by around $17m in all forward years from that projected in the May 2006 estimates; an increase in specific purpose payments from the Australian government of $26m due to several agreements being finalised and the recognition as revenue of amounts received late in 2005-06; an increase in interest revenue estimates of $6m due to higher cash holdings across government and rising interest rates; and an upward revision to mining royalties of $5m associated with increased mining production and rising commodity prices.
Payments for 2006-07 have increased by $60m, due to policy decisions of $6m approved by government including the costs associated with recent road safety initiatives. The carryover of expense obligations from 2005-06 of $33m largely related to receipts from the Australian government late in 2005-06; increased superannuation costs of $13m following the revised actuarial assessment and the expected introduction of the Territory’s death and invalidity scheme; and expenses of $11m related to specific purpose payments from the Australian government in line with increased revenue.
I turn now to the accrual estimates. At the time of the May 2006 budget, the nett operating balance was projected to be in deficit from 2007-08 onwards. The 2006-07 mid-year report now projects a nett operating balance to be in surplus in all years. This improvement largely relates to the recognition of revenue from the Australian government of amounts recorded as deposits held in 2005-06. Members may remember that this change in accounting treatment was mentioned in the 2005-06 Treasurer’s Annual Financial Report. Consistent with the operating results, the fiscal balance also reflects an improved position in all forward years, albeit at a lower rate. This is despite significant ongoing capital investment in the Territory’s infrastructure. This trend of improvement in both the operating and fiscal balances would indicate that the Territory’s aim of a balanced position for both measures by 2012-13 remains achievable.
I turn now to the fiscal targets for the non-financial public sector. Nett worth for 2006-07 has improved by $173m since May 2006, rising to $2755m in 2009-10. This is due to flow-on effect of the improved cash surplus and the increase in the Territory’s asset offset by the increase in the Territory’s own funded superannuation liability. Nett debt is estimated to decrease in 2009-10 from budget time by $89m to $1681m, largely due to the flow-on effect of the improved cash outcome in 2005-06. Nett debt is now forecast to be significantly lower than the $1753m reported in 2001-02, despite the major investment in infrastructure projects across the Territory and increased funding in core service provision areas of health, education, and public safety in the recent years. When measured as a ratio to revenue, the 45% estimated in 2009-10 represents an improvement of 3% since budget time, and is a significant reduction on the 67% recorded in 2001-02.
Nett debt plus employee liabilities is expected to rise to $4172m by 2009-10, $81m over that estimated at budget time. This is largely as the result of the increase in the Territory’s superannuation liability following recent actuarial reassessment as reported in the 2005-06 Treasurer’s Annual Financial Report, together with the estimated outcome of the Commonwealth Superannuation Scheme’s triennial review currently in progress. Revised forward estimates incorporate the likely outcome of the CSS review to include the allocation of financial responsibility for additional members to the Territory that have only just been identified by the scheme’s administrators. The revised estimates also include the expected introduction of the Territory’s death and invalidity scheme. When measured as a ratio to revenue, nett debt plus employee liability remains largely constant at around 113%, 114% through the forward years. It is a significant improvement on the 134% recorded in 2001-02.
In conclusion, Madam Speaker, the 2006-07 mid-year report provides further evidence of the Territory’s growing economy. The improved fiscal outlook underpins the government’s commitment to maintaining its strong fiscal strategy principles, whilst promoting economic activity and growth for the Territory. However, recent indicators of a slowing in GST growth, combined with increases in the Territory’s superannuation liability, mean adherence to this fiscal target remain difficult, but this government remains committed to their achievement. I cannot stress enough the maintenance of tight fiscal discipline as the long-term key to economic growth and development.
The mistake the CLP administration made was to believe that spiralling debt and increasing deficits did not matter in the short term. You cannot be more wrong than that. We are still hampered by the debt. When the CLP government needed to actively stimulate the economy, they simply did not have the wherewithal to do it. Managing the economy is a day-to-day job. Managing budgets and ensuring we are progressing is a tough job - a job I take on every day; and every day I question all things about our expenditure, our priorities, and where we are heading.
I believe we have the balance right to date. The budget has been in surplus four times; we have not gone beyond any predicted deficit. However, as I say, it takes daily management. The public have trusted the Martin Labor government with this job. I believe we are vindicating that trust. After their appalling economic performance in the 1990s, it is self-evident that the CLP cannot be trusted with the finances of the Territory.
Madam Speaker, I commend the 2006-07 Mid-Year Report to the Assembly, and move that the Assembly take note of the report.
Debate adjourned.
ADJOURNMENT
Dr BURNS (Health): Mr Deputy Speaker, I move that the Assembly do now adjourn.
Ms CARNEY (Araluen): Mr Deputy Speaker, tonight I talk about one of the many casualties of the government’s decision to remove an open speed limit on Territory roads. The speed limits that are to be introduced on Territory roads next year mean that an international car testing industry estimated to be worth in the vicinity of $9m a year will be lost to Central Australian business.
Car makers from all over the world flock to Central Australia, in particular, for the combination of unrestricted speed limits on roads and extremely hot weather. However, many car makers are now set to abandon their testing programs when the 130 km/h speed limit comes into effect from January next year. Holden, Toyota and Ford performance vehicles will prune, or most likely cease, their Territory car testing programs, and a sports car specialist, Porsche, is expected to relocate to South Africa.
The Territory’s Chamber of Commerce Chief Executive Officer, Chris Young, says from a Chamber perspective the introduction of the speed limit will have a huge effect on the car testing industry, and Chamber of Commerce members stand to lose millions each year. Many Central Australians in businesses such as accommodation, hospitality and tourism, transport, motor products, road houses and security services, will suffer enormously from January 2007. The optimum car-testing season from October to April is well-timed to coincide with the tourism low season. Mr Young has said that the introduction of the speed limits would cost between $6m to $9m a year in lost revenue. It was surprising that the Chief Minister did not know of that assessment when the matter was raised in Question Time today. It shows how ill thought out the entire proposal is. Nor did the Chief Minister have regard to even consider issuing permits or other exemptions to car testing. She seemed to not have any regard to the loss to the Central Australian economy this would cause.
There can be up to 15 engineering teams testing their vehicles between Alice Springs and Tennant Creek at any one time during the hot Centralian summer. Each team requires accommodation and hospitality services for up to 20 people, warehouse facilities, rental cars, and secure car transporters. Team members also regularly dine out in local restaurants, buy souvenirs and, in the down time, participate in tourism and recreational activities. There is no doubt that the car testing teams provide very welcome business at a time when the Wet Season in the Top End and the hot summer in the Centre keeps most of the tourists away.
Central Australian Tourism Industry Association’s General Manager, Craig Catchlove, has said that the new speed limits could cost tourism businesses in Alice Springs alone about $1m over the summer. Craig Catchlove said that the Tourism Industry Association does not believe that the speed limit will reduce the number of tourist accidents, but the association does think it will have a significant economic impact of tourism business. Craig Catchlove puts his best estimate at about $1m, which is very significant in a place the size of Alice Springs.
Holden spokeswoman, Maya Donevska, said the Territory roads have been invaluable for high speed hot weather testing the new VE Commodore, but the speed limits mean that Holden would look elsewhere for future testing needs. Holden will explore alternative locations for testing and in the interim will use the proving ground facility at Lang Lang.
Toyota Manager of Vehicle Evaluation, Mina Rezk, said high speed testing would now most likely be removed from Central Australia and conducted in the Middle East - a significant loss for Central Australia. The Gulf region is a major market for the Toyota Camry and, like Central Australia, the Gulf is a high speed, high temperature environment. One requirement in testing the Camry is to maintain high speeds in high temperatures with the airconditioning on. This puts a full load on the cooling system. With a speed limit in place, Toyota is unable to fully test their vehicles whilst also respecting the law. However, one remaining hope is that Toyota may still use the Territory for dust and off-road testing.
Ford performance vehicle spokesman, Steve Colquhoun said that Ford performance vehicle testing is impacted by the Territory government’s decision and Ford would reassess their performance vehicle testing procedures. Ford spokesman, Andrew Ellis said Ford’s recent decision to expand its testing facilities in Victoria meant it could minimise the effect of the speed limit on their vehicle testing practises. He said the new laboratory at Ford’s Victorian testing ground could replicate conditions ranging from minus-40C to 55C and generate wind speeds of up to 250 km/h. Luckily enough for Ford, the new environmental facility will go online some time next year, thereby eliminating the need to travel to the Territory for high speed hot weather testing.
Mercedes Benz spokesman, David McCarthy, has said that the Territory has made Australia attractive for testing, and local businesses have certainly benefited from it. When German designers and engineers come to the Territory, they left with a thorough understanding of Australian conditions.
Porsche spokesman, Paul Ellis, said that the German prestige car maker had utilised the Territory’s roads for more than 20 years – more than 20 years - but management was evaluating introduction of the speed limit and future testing in the Territory was unlikely. Mr Ellis said Porsche would comply with all regulations and, if driving faster than 130 km/h was prohibited, they would not do it. South Africa is now a favourite to pick up this business.
You can see that the car testing industry is a major industry in Central Australia, in particular, and the government has been short-sighted in introducing a speed limit on Territory roads. Businesses in Alice Springs have approached me detailing how the introduction of the speed limit will impact on their businesses. Some small businesses are very concerned about the viability of their businesses once the car testing industry relocates, and I am very sympathetic to their concerns.
As my colleagues will appreciate, I live in Alice Springs and see firsthand the value of the car testing industry to our community. I wonder if the government has any intention to offer small businesses involved in the car testing industry any dispensation. Judging from the Chief Minister’s answer today, it seems plain that no dispensation of any description will be offered, and that is immensely disappointing.
I also should point out to the government that it should consider introducing a permit system to vehicle manufacturers who conduct car testing in Central Australia. Such a permit would allow car testing vehicles to travel at speeds in excess of the legislated speed limit. The introduction of such a permit system allows the car testing industry to continue in the Territory and, in doing so, allows many small businesses to continue in their line of business while, at the same time, not be quite so adversely affected by the introduction of the 130 km/h speed limit on our highway system.
Finally, if the government is as serious as they claim to be about reducing one death each week on Territory roads, it would have been wiser to enforce the current laws such as the need to wear seat belts, eliminating overloaded vehicles and drunk drivers, taking cars away from repeat drunk drivers, and ensuring all cars on Territory roads are in a roadworthy condition.
It is a mystery to those in the car testing industry as well as businesses in Central Australia and Alice Springs, in particular, that the government has made this decision. Perhaps, had they consulted, the government, and the Chief Minister in particular, would have understood this issue and the impact on businesses in Central Australia. Clearly, the arrogance shown by the Chief Minister demonstrates that she does not care which, no doubt, explains why her parliamentary colleagues - apparently most of them - want her out of the job.
I turn to another Alice Springs issue. I was delighted that the Alice Springs Town Council has finally agreed to support the installation of security cameras in trouble spots in the central business district of Alice Springs. I am pleased, put simply, that the council has finally caught up. It was some years ago - perhaps three or four - that I made a representation to the Alice Springs Town Council about the installation of security cameras. I spoke to businessmen and women in the Todd Mall and the level of support was enormous. However, at that time the council rejected the proposal, and I specifically made a representation to the council outlining why CCTV cameras were required.
The Mayor, in 2003 - that is, former Labor candidate Fran Kilgariff - said that installing and monitoring security cameras was ‘quite a big cost; why bother?’ The CLP wanted security cameras and a youth curfew before the last election, and the council rejected the ideas. In fact, the Mayor, the Labor candidate, just prior to the Territory election, used her casting vote last year to reject a call for the youth curfew. In the past six weeks, a group of business people have each pledged $1000 towards the installation of security cameras in the Todd Mall and the CBD of Alice Springs. They have done so because they care about the town of Alice Springs, and the Chief Minister does not. The Mayor of Alice Springs is on the record about her position on the matter.
As a direct result of the initiative of this group of business people, at the November Corporate and Community Services Committee meeting, council received a deputation from local businesses requesting that the council introduce CCTV in the CBD to reduce the incidences of antisocial behaviour. The installation of closed circuit TV cameras is a case of better late than never for the Alice Springs Town Council. Now the Northern Territory government must take action. It is no good denying the problems in Alice Springs or, indeed, being critical of anyone who identifies the problems, as I have done in the past as a member of parliament based in Alice Springs. The council has no option but to pursue the safety of the community, and there has been limited success in the current programs.
The Territory crime stats have shown a concerning and increasing trend in reported offences in Alice Springs, and it is imperative that coordinated action is taken to reverse this trend. Some members of the community expressed a view that they feel unsafe in the CBD of Alice Springs in the evening. Every Territorian has a right to feel safe. Safety is closely linked to the feelings of health and wellbeing, and also inter-related to the person’s perception of their environment and sense of belonging in their community.
Tourism is a major industry for Alice Springs. The negative national media has promoted Alice Springs as the murder capital of the world. There is need for urgent action to be taken to demonstrate that Alice Springs is a safe place, and reverse the publicity that Alice Springs has recently received. In receiving publicity, there is no point denying the problems. We need to be sensible in identifying the problems as well as providing solutions. The Alice Springs business community has provided a solution, and that is why they approached the Alice Springs Town Council to install CCTV cameras to combat vandalism, assault and antisocial behaviour, particularly alcohol offenders in the CBD area, and they clearly demonstrated a commitment to improving our town.
It is with pleasure I advise the Assembly tonight that, at an Alice Springs Town Council meeting held last night, council voted to support the introduction of CCTV cameras in hot spots in the CBD. To further the installation of the CCTV cameras, the council will apply to the federal government for funding. The National Crime Prevention Fund has a funding round that closes on Friday, 1 December this year. The Alice Springs Town Council has prepared a submission, in consultation with the business sector and the Northern Territory Chamber of Commerce and Northern Territory Police, asking the federal government for a contribution of $150 000. Total expenditure to install and commission CCTV in the CBD totals about $230 000: $5000 for the development of specifications for the system; $60 000 for fibre optic cables; $60 000 for hand tilt zoom cameras; $30 000 for digital reporting and split screen monitors and physical fit-out; and $42 000 for in-kind management and coordination from the Alice Springs Town Council.
A $30 000 in-kind contribution has been made by the group of local business people who initially made the deputation to council. I expect that the Alice Springs Town Council will request - and should request - the Northern Territory government to make at least a $30 000 contribution which would replace the in-kind contribution made by the concerned, motivated and forward-thinking group of local business people.
The government has to stop playing politics with safety issues in Alice Springs and listen to the community. The government should support the council’s youth curfew and provide funds for the installation and operation of security cameras in hot spots in the CBD. Alice Springs, like many regional centres of the Northern Territory, needs a greater police presence and other means of ensuring the safety of the community. There should be no more excuses. The Alice Springs Town Council and the Northern Territory Labor government should simply get on with it. There is a concern in the community that this matter, now that the council has agreed to it, is being flicked to the federal government.
I expect - and you do not have to be terribly clever to know - that in the lead-up to the next Territory election, various references will be made to the federal government. We have seen it in relation to the swimming pool. I note the reference by the Sport minister. I believe it was ‘$3m is beer money’ or words to that effect; ‘It is a drop in the ocean for the federal government’. Why should the federal government pay for a swimming pool in Alice Springs? This is a local government and Territory government responsibility.
Mr Deputy Speaker, installation of close circuit television cameras in Alice Springs, to ensure the people of Alice Springs are safe, cannot be avoided by this Territory government. If funds can be obtained from the Commonwealth government, that is fine. However, I would hate to see a situation where this Territory government said: ‘No, we are not providing you with funds, you go to the feds’. That would be an offensive position for this government to take. I know the Chief Minister does not like Alice Springs and does not think very much of the people who live there. However, I urge her to get on with the job of protecting their safety - that is for as long as she has the job. She should just do the decent thing and provide funding to assist the good people of Alice Springs and, importantly, make them feel safe at home and on the streets.
Mr NATT (Drysdale): Mr Deputy Speaker, tonight I would like to talk about a few events that I have been involved in, in my electorate of Drysdale since the last sittings. Drysdale is a dynamic electorate and the people who live in it are very supportive and really enjoy the lifestyle of Darwin and Palmerston. Many good things are happening in and around my electorate, and I would like to mention a few of them.
On Friday, 27 October, Palmerston held its last night market for 2006. Throughout the year, along with my colleagues, the members for Brennan and Goyder, with support from my colleagues and many ministers, I participated by having a stall at the markets. The stalls have been a wonderful opportunity for us, as members, to provide greater access to the local Palmerston and rural community to engage with their elected representatives. It gives us a chance to hear firsthand the issues that people are happy with and, of course, those issues that are causing concern.
The Palmerston night markets have been a huge success and are immensely popular with locals and visitors alike. I use this opportunity to acknowledge a couple of people who deserve much credit for their success. Julia Battison does a marvellous in coordinating the stallholders and ensuring everything runs smoothly. The house DJ, Geoff Snider, spins popular music discs and has all the kids up dancing, singing and joining in with the many activities he has organised. He is ably assisted by his enthusiastic support crew dressed as court jesters. His assistants encourage all onlookers to become involved, and they really try to put a smile on everyone’s face.
On its last night of 2006, Santa made a special appearance along with little helpers. One of the little helpers was Shad McDonald, the president of our Palmerston Branch, and I thank him for his assistance that night.
I extend my appreciation and gratitude to the many people who have participated and contributed to make this market a fabulous community activity, and thank all of our branch members who have assisted throughout the year, in particular Shad McDonald, Merv Hunt and Simon Hall. Special thanks also to our electorate officers, Jo Flesfader, Sarah Schubert and Russell Wilson for their continued support to the stall and at the markets.
While still on the theme of food and stalls, I want to also mention the good work Lavinia Mills and her staff at the Kentish Family Day Care perform. My office assisted in one of their fundraising activities last week – a sausage sizzle at Bunnings Palmerston. This was a fun day and I know the funds generated will be put to good use. I also make you aware of some of their good work. On Saturday, 28 October, they held Short Stories, Tall Stories and More Stories at Target in Palmerston. Various dignitaries and invited guests were given a 10-minute allocation to read or sing a story or two to children and their parents. Their learning and integrated play sessions, more commonly referred to as the KLIPS program, has provided a wonderful range of learning experiences and outings for the children and the service delivery team. I extend my gratitude to Lavinia and her team and all the volunteers and carers who make this possible.
A few weeks ago at the Durack Primary School, I spent a Saturday morning with the school, students, staff and parents as we started on a little school project to install a vegetable garden to predominately help children with learning difficulties focus on a task. On this particular morning, we managed to pour a concrete slab for the garden shed and erect a fence around the garden. It was terrific to see the kids get enthusiastically behind the project, and also receive fabulous response and support from parents, school staff and community members. It is gratifying to see that the community spirit still exists to such an extent that the old adage – many hands make light work – was reinforced. The Durack area is a wonderful little spot where families interact positively and share a pride in their surrounds and the activities that are undertaken. The Durack Primary School is a great little school that receives fantastic support from its principal, teachers, parents and volunteers.
Many thanks are extended to the many volunteers and businesses which got behind this project including Bunnings and Readymix Concrete. I congratulate the Durack Primary School for this initiative and all those involved, particularly the project coordinator Rachel Dickman, her husband, Peter who, along with school caretaker, Joe Walter, did an amazing job on that morning - and many thanks to them. Many thanks are also extended to Brendan Cabry, Joe Sinclair, Tony Nicholson from Readymix Concrete, Lara and Dean Sinclair and their sons, Joseph and Jack, Jack Gilmore, Aaron Clark, and his sons, Cameron and Joshua, and all the students who gave up their free time to be involved.
Many thanks to Tony Nicholson from Readymix Concrete for donating the concrete to the project, and to Bunnings at Palmerston for their donation of the garden shed, irrigation equipment and garden tools. Berrimah Second Hand Building Supplies gave me some great discounts on the fencing materials and they are to be thanked as well for their contribution to the school. Well done to everyone, and I look forward to my first feed of bok choy.
At Kormilda College, another school of excellence within the Drysdale electorate, reside three young indigenous students who have just receive the Duke of Edinburgh’s Gold Award. It has been 10 years since an indigenous youth has received the Duke of Edinburgh’s Gold Award in the Northern Territory. Clifford Duncan, Anton Plummer and Nico Farrell are boarding students at Kormilda College and come from the remote Aboriginal communities of Urapunga, Wugularr and Ngukurr. These boys are also the first indigenous students from Kormilda College to achieve their Gold Award. It has been an incredible journey for these young men who, during the past three years, have grown from shy, quiet boys into strong, confident, young men. What an outstanding result. They will, undoubtedly, be great role models in their community and I am sure their families are very proud of them. This is an example of how, working together, great things can be achieved for young indigenous males: strong community, strong youth.
While talking of Kormilda, I also want to again formally thank one of the Drysdale constituents, the Right Reverend Dr Phillip Freier for his very good work as chairman of the Kormilda’s Board of Directors. Phillip has served with Kormilda Board for sometime and is soon to commence his appointment as Archbishop of Melbourne Diocese. Phillip will depart for Melbourne next month to take up his post. I wish Phillip and his wife, Joy, the very best of luck in their new post.
Whilst on notes of departure I am compelled to comment on another constituent who departed the electorate recently for what I hope will be a very short time. On Wednesday, 22 November 2006, a story in the NT News featured a story on Mr Ray Bradshaw, his wife, Nicole, and their children, eight-year-old Dylan, and his four-year-old sister, Jasmine. Ray has departed for Afghanistan with the Australian Defence Force as part of the 1st Reconstruction Task Force. The story detailed his six-month tour as the longest that Ray will spend away from his family. It will also be the first Christmas his children have spent without him. This article was a timely reminder for us of all the families undergoing separation for reasons such as this. I am also intimately aware that a high percentage of Drysdale constituents may also be, or already be, called upon for similar service. I acknowledge the importance of Ray’s work and his fellow Defence Force colleagues, and the danger that accompanies deployments such as these. I pray that he and his colleagues return safely home to their waiting families. I also acknowledge the support and sacrifice made by the families of our Defence Force troops. It would be especially hard to manage a family at this particular time of the year with a partner overseas on deployment. Our thoughts and hearts are with you.
On a matter of outstanding achievement, I want to draw the Assembly’s attention to a sporting achievement of the latest emerging talent of the Territory to hit the national and international sports stage. Just in case anyone missed the headlines, last Friday the NT News reported that Aaron Pike, a 21-year-old amateur golfer, enjoyed a fabulous start with the Australian Golf Masters with an eagle on the first hole. If that was not enough of an achievement, Aaron continued his great form by finishing the day with a course equaling eight under par 64 to head the leader board at the day’s end. Aaron comes from my electorate of Drysdale where his parents Evelyn and Terrance, and his brother, Owen, live. Aaron learnt his craft from former Palmerston Pro Tony Albon. Aaron carried his good form throughout the championships and, although he did not finish with the tournament’s coveted trophy, he did finish a very creditable fourth and just three shots behind the Master’s winner at Huntingdale. I am confident that we have not seen the last of Aaron. I am sure everyone here in this Assembly wishes Aaron every success with this golfing career ahead.
Another local constituent also deserving of praise is Debbie Smith, a health worker at the Palmerston Community Care Centre. She was nominated and was amongst the finalists at the Territory’s first Aboriginal Health Excellence Awards. Although she did not manage to pull off the top prize, I congratulate Debbie on her nomination and wish her the very best as she progress through her career. I am sure she will continue her great work in the Palmerston Community Care Centre.
Finally, as this is the last sittings before Christmas, I want to extend season’s greetings and thanks to many community organisations that enrich the quality of living for many of us throughout the electorate. These, to name just a few, include: Loraine Watson and the staff at Banyan House; Alva Whitbread and her husband Brian, and Ann Brown at Palmerston Senior Bowls and, of course, all their colleagues who enjoy their Thursday bowls session and then wander over to Cazaly’s to have a game of bingo; Ian Walsh and everyone at the Pensioners’ Workshop at Winnellie; Bob Lee and Maggie Schoenfisch at U3A; Judy Joyce and her colleagues who organise the Alexandra Day Club for many Palmerston seniors; the hard-working committee of the Palmerston Golf Club, of which I am patron; thanks to Gary Shipway and his predecessor Dallas Frakking and his staff at the Palmerston Sun for their continued support; the Palmerston City Council staff and, in particular, their Chief Executive, Rodney Donne, and Technical Service Director Lucio Cercarelli; and a very special mention to all the sporting clubs, their management committees, volunteers and participants who put a lot of work in throughout the year to ensure the great life style of Palmerston is maintained.
I want to acknowledge all of the schools within my electorate for the good work that they have done. To this end, I want to thank the principals: Mr Julian Denholm from Good Shepherd Lutheran College; Chris Dias from the Palmerston High School; Malcolm Pritchard from Kormilda College; Jo Wynn from Durack Primary School; Cindy McGarry from Gray Primary School; and Rob Presswell from Driver Primary School. My congratulations and gratitude also goes to the staff and volunteers at all of these schools who have done a great job this year. I have really enjoyed my interaction with the schools, staff and students this year and I look forward to that continuing next year. No doubt, between now and the commencement of the new school year, there will be some movement of staff between schools, and I wish them the very best if they are moving on and thank them for their contribution to my electorate.
A very quick congratulations to Karen Sheldon and her partners in crime, Sarah Hickey, Amanda Swift and Julie Calvert in Karen’s Kitchen. I was extremely pleased to see the article in the NT News last week recognising the hard work of this group to deliver a successful growing business in the very volatile food industry. Karen and I worked closely together in my days at the AFLNT. She managed Kantilla’s Function Centre and was a wonderful support to me, my wife and the league. Karen’s generosity and amiable nature was greatly appreciated, and I am extremely pleased to see her business flourishing in partnership with Sarah, Julie and Amanda. Well done, guys; keep up the great work.
In closing, Mr Acting Deputy Speaker, I hope all have a very happy and safe Christmas holiday break. I look forward to the new year and getting involved again in 2007, which I feel will be a very prosperous year for all.
Dr LIM (Greatorex): Mr Acting Deputy Speaker, I start by reading a letter to the editor by a Darwinian in the NT News on 22 November this year. He was talking about the Territory lifestyle that that has been lost and I will read it in full for the record:
- What happened to my Darwin?
It surely wasn’t all that long ago that we Territorians were young, vibrant and free.
We were the ‘can-do’ people, the envy of Australia.
Now we are being dragged into line with ‘other jurisdictions’.
Am I the only one to swell up with pride on 1 July each year, when I remember the glorious day in 1978 on the Esplanade when our flag was unfurled for the first time?
We had achieved self-government.
There were tower cranes across the skyline, a construction program unlike any other operated around the clock.
Tourists flocked in and southern business operators had to come here to see what we did and how we did it because they wanted a bit of our enthusiasm.
Those ‘other jurisdictions’ wanted to be like us.
We went buff shooting with Colin Howells on the Marrakai Plains, built a bush airstrip with Mick Nudl, water skied from Vesteys to Fannie Bay pub for lunch and then skied back.
We supped with heroes such as Wilf Arthur and Eric Simmons and helped Bunny Booth get the boxing scene going.
And we scoffed chicken and champagne in the race track car park with Terry Dent and Ron the brewer and eyed off Sharyn Sherrington and Jan Collins.
- Easter was a time to take the family on camp and it was like a whole new neighbourhood for a couple of days as we joined like-minded families at the popular spot. And the kids ate salty plums.
And we were always laughing. It was an infectious disease, that Territory laughter.
We had it in abundance and took it with us everywhere we went. When we went south, people wanted to be near us, to listen to us and try to laugh like us.
Unfortunately, they did not get it.
We weren’t laughing at anything funny, we were always laughing because we had what everybody else wanted, but couldn’t get - we were Territorians!
What happened?
Since then, we have had more and more antisocial behaviour in our streets. A while ago, I said that there was so much strife that it was almost like anarchy in the streets. Law and order is not being maintained in our communities. We keep saying there are not enough police resources. Government says: ‘Oh yes, we are putting on so many police’. It is a fact that we are going to lose some 20 police in Alice Springs shortly. Tennant Creek cannot get enough officers to go down there because they do not want to go. The commissioner tried to force them to go there. The TRG is losing something like six officers shortly, and more and more police are moving away because they are unhappy with what is happening.
They brought in pool fence laws and made such a botch-up of it ...
Mr Stirling: And how many have died since? How many have died since compared to your record? How many? Zero!
Dr LIM: You made such a botch-up of your swimming pool laws, but now your current laws says: ‘Do what you like’ ...
Mr Stirling: You were too gutless to do it, you blokes. You were too gutless to bring in public policy.
Mr ACTING DEPUTY SPEAKER: Order!
Dr LIM: What is the legislation now? Do what you want, and it is on your own head what you do with your swimming pool. What sort of pool fencing law is that?
Now, speed limits and demerits points - no evidence ...
Mr Stirling: Read the report.
Dr LIM: I pick up the minister’s interjection to read the report. I have read the report. This minister cannot understand that there is no evidence to suggest that there are many fatalities, if any, above 130 km/h. It is amazing that this government would continue to make life in the Territory so bad that people are moving away in droves. Talk to the removalists. People are moving away in droves because life in the Territory is no longer what it used to be.
People in the southern states, when they look at the Northern Territory - Alice Springs, Tennant Creek, Katherine, Nhulunbuy, Darwin - they say: ‘They are probably harsh places to live. It might be the climate, the distance from family, the build-up, they are all difficult things. Maybe we should go there because it is an opportunity to make a better life for ourselves’. Wages were pretty good in those days that people were prepared to come up here, put up with some of the hardships. However, they were compensated by Territory lifestyle - a lifestyle second to none.
I have lived here 25 years and I am one of the few fortunate people who have been able to travel between Alice Springs and Darwin quite regularly to appreciate the difference between the communities. However, people who live at the other end of the Territory all came because there was something special about the Territory. More and more, we are made to be like just another southern state and our Territory-ness has disappeared. More and more they are disappearing …
Mr Stirling: The one or two toddlers a year drowning, that was fine? That was okay; that was part of the part of the lifestyle?
Dr LIM: When law and order is breaking down, this government does not seem to understand. When it makes laws, it makes laws that, to my way of looking at it, are racist - one law for indigenous people and another law for the rest of Territorians. That is just …
Mr STIRLING: A point of order, Mr Acting Deputy Speaker! If he wants to declare this government being racist, I suggest it ought be by way of a substantive motion.
Dr Lim: You do it all the time, Deputy Chief Minister. You do it all the time. What are you talking about?
Mr STIRLING: That ought be by way of substantive motion. You ought be prepared to back it up.
Mr ACTING DEPUTY SPEAKER: Member for Greatorex, please sit down for a moment. There has been a point of order raised, and I will seek some advice on that. Having considered advice, I rule that there is no point of order on the basis that the member for Greatorex has not directly suggested the government is racist. However, I make comment that if you do say something as direct as that, member for Greatorex, then a point of order will be substantiated.
Dr LIM: Thank you very much, Mr Acting Deputy Speaker.
The cost of living is just humungous. This government, when in opposition, was screaming just about every day about the cost of food, petrol, power, and housing. What have they done about it since they have been in government? Absolutely nothing these last five years. Absolutely nothing! When the CLP was in government, we did the food price survey. We made recommendations, which Treasury took up, by publicising every three months lists of food baskets that were purchased across the Territory so that people knew where they could get their food at the cheapest place. People voted with their feet and retailers then competed for that, and ensured that they were competitively pricing their food.
Petrol pricing was the other thing. The Chief Minister, then in opposition, was screaming about how irresponsible the CLP was in not being able to keep the petrol prices down. Under her regime, prices went up to $1.40, $1.50 ...
Mr Stirling interjecting.
Dr LIM: The Deputy Chief Minister sniggers under his beard. For goodness sake …
Mr Stirling: What did Mr Howard do about it - your hero?
Dr LIM: Under your regime you did nothing - absolutely nothing! You dare to stand up and say: ‘Oh, the CLP had to do it’. Electricity and the cost of power - you raised it 2.4% in April this year ...
Mr Stirling: Yes, we carried a five-year freeze
Dr LIM: There you go, the Deputy Chief Minister admits that he has done it. Therefore, do not come back and tell us that the CLP did all those things when your government, in these last five years, has done more to rip off Territorians than ever.
What have you done about land release? You have landlocked Alice Springs completely. When people want to release land they have to go through hurdle after hurdle because of what this government has put against them. The cost of entry market housing for first home buyers is just about non-existent. Nobody can get in to buy their first home because the cost is so expensive now.
Mr Stirling: What did you do for first home loan borrowers? Nothing. How much stamp duty relief did you give them? Nothing.
Dr LIM: How many blocks of land have you released in your five years that is affordable for first home buyers? Not much at all.
You give all our parks estate away. Recently, I saw a letter written by the Minister for Parks and Wildlife, telling everybody we have entered into a contract with groups and which is, essentially, locking up those parks for the next 99 years. I wonder why Territorians are so angry? It is because they see their rights living in this community slowly being whittled away. You wonder why you see letters like that written by Dave Collins of Darwin on 22 November 2006 in the Northern Territory News. I will go back to his letter. I ended before with the words ‘what happened’. He continued:
- The laughter is disappearing and replaced by cynicism, the pride of being a Territorian is starting to jade a little, our fierce independence is being replaced with reluctant obedience.
I am continually reminded that I am standing on someone else’s land. I can’t walk from the city to home anymore lest I be accosted, my home is like a fortress and I know that the iron-barred windows and deadlocks will ensure that I die in the event of a fire. The politicians listen and smile and pat your hand, say soothing words and do nothing.
And I do mean politicians of all persuasions, whether they are council, Territory or federal.
Beware the smiling pythons.
And then there is the number of barriers to progress.
Permits, approvals, impact statements, engineering reports, just to put a Whirlybird roof vent in. But now there are also mobs of busybodies who call themselves ‘The friends of …’ or ‘The … Coalition’ or ‘The Network’, who have taken it on themselves to tell me how I must live or build or behave.
That is really the problem with this government. It has allowed the spirit of the Territorian to be whittled bit by bit so that there is now a sense of despair out there in the public - a real sense of despair. Every day, they wake up and see that they are no different to any other capital city in Australia for people living in Darwin and, as far as Alice Springs is concerned, they just feel that this government is continuing to strangle the community to such a degree that very little development is even possible.
The minister will just have to go down - the government has to go down - and talk to the people in Alice Springs. They will tell you they are sick of being strangled. You heard the Leader of the Opposition talk about CCTV for the mall. This started several years ago because of the law and order issues in Alice Springs, but this government continued to ignore it. Alice Springs Town Council continues to ignore it. Well, the people have now declared that they want it. In fact, the council has even come out in support of it. I ask the government to take heed. They are destroying the Territory. It is time to stop.
Ms MARTIN (Fannie Bay): Mr Acting Deputy Speaker, I take this opportunity to recognise one of Darwin’s oldest institutions this evening, the Darwin Bowls and Social Club. The club is very important to the Fannie Bay electorate. It provides sporting and social activities for many Territorians as well as many of our visitors. The Darwin Bowls Club is managed by the board and the current office bearers are: chair and Bowls NT rep, John Bennett; vice chair, Stuart Bell; treasurer, Roger Hammill; secretary and social director, Robyn Byers; greens director, Michael Holdstock; and bowls committee reps, Ian and Carole Belsham.
The club runs a bar and kitchen that not only services members but also caters for groups wishing to hire the facilities. A real effort has been made to keep the prices within the reach of those on pensions and limited incomes and provide real value for money. The hard-working volunteers are the main reasons why it has succeeded. Special thanks go to Stuart Bell, Roger Hammill, Les Dunlop, Jeff, Fester, Charles Hopper who is called Chopper, John Bennett, Tony Shelley, Robyn Byers, John Laurie, Carole Belsham, Don Poundford, Paul Royce, Matthew Pooley and Christine Bradley.
The club’s two greens are the club’s greatest assets and, over the past 12 months, the club has upgraded them. This is no small investment with each green costing around $100 000 to redevelop and then approximately $70 000 each year to maintain them both. Many thanks to project manager Russell Knight and all the club’s volunteers on greens: Roger Hamill, John Bennett, Stuart Bell, Rob Calder, Tony Shelley, Ian Belsham, Ken Hill, Paul Rodin, Peter Killington, Shane Lampe, Norm Snider and the Nightcliff Bowls Club volunteers.
The bowls club runs lawn bowls competitions, including internal club competitions, men’s and ladies single, pairs, triples and fours. There are also the Bowls NT competitions, the Top End Shield and the Darwin Carnival. These competitions attract many interstate players, especially to those events held in our beautiful Dry Season. Social bowls competitions are open to the general public four days a week. In the Wet Season, ‘mufti bowls’ takes place on Saturday afternoons sponsored by NT General Store. There is the gala event and dress-up on Darwin Cup Open Day. I have heard the club is also fuelling trans-Tasman rivalry with Kiwi and Aussie teams vying for the ‘Bladder Slow’ Cup.
The Darwin Bowls Club is very community- minded. They support a range of groups, including Darwin High School, Blind Bowlers NT, Tracks Dance, our Defence forces and the Pride Festival.
The club enters a new era next year with the retirement of long-standing chairperson, Russell Knight. Russell has steered the club from a precarious financial situation to one where the club is able to undertake major projects like the greens upgrade. I know the club wants to keep up the momentum and become recognised as the nation’s best bowls club north of the 26th parallel within the next five years. They want to become recognised for the quality of their greens, their facility, their hospitality and their access to the bowling public. I extend my sincere thanks to Russell for his hard work and achievements over the years and to say his contribution will never be forgotten, even though he is heading off for New South Wales; he will be long remembered here at the Darwin Bowls Club.
The Parap Village Traders Association has been up and running now for over 20 years. The main aim of the association is to enhance the Parap Village area and improve business. The association also holds the licence for the famous Parap Village Markets and works hard to ensure that the markets are managed as well as possible to attract as many people as possible.
The Parap Village Traders Association recently held their annual general meeting. After many years at the helm as President, Ann Alderslade, who also owned Frangipani Fabrics, has retired and moved to Tasmania with her husband, Phil. Sadly, Frangipani Fabrics has closed its doors. The new president is Ken Houghton. Ken and his wife, Shirley, whom I have known for many years, own and manage Brumby’s Bakery at Parap. Ken will bring experience and enthusiasm to the role of the President of the Parap Village Traders Association and I wish him the best of luck.
Neville Pantazis from Parap Fine Foods remains as vice president. Neville and his family have played a key role in making Parap Village the vibrant place it is today. I am very pleased that Neville will continue to contribute to the association.
The new treasurer is Chris Moffitt who owns Rochelle’s Fine Jewellery. Chris has been in the jewellery business for over 20 years and has been at Parap Village for about three. I know that Chris has become more and more involved in the business of boosting Parap Village over the past year, and I am happy to see that he has taken an active role with the traders association. Many thanks to Roger Pearson from Arafura Catering and Equipment who served as treasurer before Chris. Roger’s business has grown significantly over recent years and now turns over millions of dollars. He and his wife, Sharon, have a great team at Arafura Catering, and it is good to know that Roger will continue to play a part in the association as a committee member.
Another newcomer to the association is Fiona Vong from Toppy’s Sandwich Bar. Toppy’s is a crucial business in Parap Village. I order sandwiches from there when catering for electorate events. Fiona is the new secretary of the association, which is a very challenging role. Many thanks to Aaron Mead, who owns Toppy’s, for fulfilling the role over the last year.
A dedicated team of staff manage the markets and the site. Many thanks to Louis Kemnitz, Maurice Foley, Lee Petrusis, Rory McMahon and Nandi Schroeder. You have all done a great job.
Parap Primary School’s annual concert was held at the Darwin Entertainment Centre on Wednesday, 8 November. It was a great night, and I know that everyone who attended had a lot of fun. Eleven classes took part from Year 3 to Year 7. The very talented school choir was lead by Judy Weepers and Annie Richards and they sang up a storm. The school band was also very impressive led by Matthew Sutton and other instructors from the NT School of Music.
The comperes for the evening were members of the Student Executive Council: School Captains, Hannah Cox and Ryan Davis, plus Allicia Cann, Shari Fuller, Matthew Zarimis and Sasha Hanton. Congratulations to them all; they did a great job.
Special thanks must go to the concert’s production managers, Kerry Hudson and Yvonne Harding. They were assisted by many parents and friends who helped out with things like costumes, props and choreography. I thoroughly enjoyed the night and each of the classes did a great job.
Wati Dzulkifly’s Year 4/3 performance was based on The Simpsons, which went down a treat. Ellie Richards can take a bow for the excellent choreography. Kim Rowe’s Year 5/6 class brought a circus atmosphere to the evening, and Nicola Hanssen’s Year 3/4 class relaxed with yoga and were instructed by yoga teacher, Sanjit Das. Tania Hardy’s and Petra Jenkin’s Year 6/7 class were consumed by aliens, while Colleen Williams’ and Gayle Cann’s combined class celebrated 50 years of television. Special thanks to Erynne Fildes, Monica van den Nieuwenhof and Debbie Jessop for their generous assistance.
Letichia Boekel’s Year 5/6 class performed their own Parap Idol and, while there was no Jess, they certainly kept the audience entertained, as did Anne Gray’s Year 3/4 class who all had Wednesday Night Fever. Thanks again to Erynne as well as Paula Pantazis. Melanie Brown’s Year 6/7 showed off 10 Aussie inventions and icons. I particularly liked the little vegemite sequence and the rose on every cheek. Hats off to Nan and Jill Edgar for their input there. Krissy Quinell’s and Brian Hyke’s Year 4/5 finished the performances with a Dance through the Decades. A big thank you to Cassie Williams, Ed Houston, Karen Brown and Tori Hayman for their assistance.
Following the school captain’s speech and the principal’s address, the Year 7s sang Forever Young, a fitting song to acknowledge their time at Parap. Thank you to all students, parents, teachers and all Parap staff for their efforts in putting the production together.
Mrs MILLER (Katherine): Mr Acting Deputy Speaker, tonight I wish to place on the Parliamentary Record the commitment by Fred Murphy to the development of the AFLNT football competition in Katherine, especially in the Under 18 age group. Fred first approached me in 2004 to talk of his plans for a leadership program for the Katherine region to involve as many young people as possible. The motivation for participation in this program was linked to school attendance, skill and attitude. Fred is totally committed to getting young people to be as fit and healthy as possible and believed that sport, especially Aussie Rules football, was a good base to start. I could not agree with him more and, as such, have been a supporter of the work that Fred began back then. The young players who participate in his leadership program are great mentors for the younger people and their communities.
Through Fred’s persistence, young players from many outlying communities have had the opportunity to play competition football in Katherine. It has been an absolute pleasure to watch these games. I have not been to as many as I would like, but whenever I have had the opportunity, I have been very pleased to see the enthusiasm of the players on the ground.
The Katherine Oval at the showgrounds has been a great venue for these competitions, with the environment being very family friendly with no alcohol permitted into the grounds on competition days. It is a pleasure to be able to sit and watch these games without drunken behaviour around. Fred Murphy’s commitment to AFL and these young players is so encouraging; he has great ambitions for their future and, through the competition that he has put together, is giving many of the players a great opportunity to further themselves through football. Fred has opened up a whole new world to many of these young blokes.
His negotiations with Collingwood Football Club saw four of these young players, Alistair Evans, Cody Williams, Alphanso Carew and Josh Blitner travel to Victoria in July and train with the Collingwood players. What a buzz it was for these young men, and what an incentive to continue improving their skills through football. The possibilities are endless. This is the first time that an AFL league club has supported Under 17 grassroots junior competition players and, hopefully, the beginning of many more opportunities.
Fred has organised an AFLNT Under 17 six-round competition which is current. The teams that are playing are the Katherine Kannons, the Ngukurr Bulldogs, the Minyerri Tigers and, for the first time, the Timber Creek Demons. I do not know if the members of this House are aware of the distances that some of these players have to travel to play in this competition, but the return trip totals several hundreds of kilometres for most of these young men. The support that each of these teams has is fantastic. There are some fabulous young talented players, and I sincerely hope that those who want to develop their skills further are given the opportunity.
From the current competition, a rep side will be chosen by Tim Alcorn and Lewis Fammartino to come to Darwin to play St Mary’s Under 18 and Kormilda College. I believe that the first match is on 5 December so, watch out, you Top Enders, you are in for a surprise when you see how good these young players are. I know they will do very well.
The AFL committee in Katherine consists of Sandy Talbot, Gavin Greenoff, Allan Girdler Jr, Beno Toby, Rick Fletcher and policeman Steve. I congratulate these people for their commitment to ensuring the game keeps alive and well.
To all the coaches, boundary, goal and field umpires, well done for supporting junior AFL. You are helping these young players to adopt a healthy attitude to life and sport by your encouragement and involvement.
My role is really quite easy. I get the enjoyment of being a spectator and providing the sausages for sausage sizzles after the game - all easy and very pleasurable. I acknowledge tonight the wonderful work that Fred Murphy does for the young people right throughout the Katherine region. It is people like Fred who bring out the best in others, and it is a delight to be associated with the work that he does. Well done, Fred, and all the volunteers who so willingly assist you.
It is also a pleasure tonight that I place on the record the names of the Year 12 students from Katherine High School 2006 who celebrated their final school assembly last Friday, 24 November. It was pleasing to see the minister for Education present to address these young people as they end their school years and begin another phase of their life’s journey. Many parents and friends attended the whole-of-school assembly and were entertained by some of the talented Year 12 students.
Items were presented by Giulio Puccetti on guitar assisted by Year 10 students, Alex Brindell on bongos and Rachael McLellan on guitar, also assisted by Alex. It was a pleasure to listen to these young talented performers. The assembly also enjoyed two videos by the movie makers, Rosemary Jennings and Amy Domaschenz, assisted by Rachel Dixon. Well done to all of you.
Stemmed glasses with the school logo etched on the side were presented to each of the Year 12 students by principal, Ken Barnes, and Year 12 student coordinator, Tim Alcorn, as a memento of their years at Katherine High School. The logo on the glasses has special significance as it was designed by Year 11 student, James Geritz. Well done, James, your design is permanently etched in the memories of the Year 12 students of 2006. Some frivolity was appropriately targeted at the stemmed glasses, with suggestions that they be used for drinking water or milk. However, they are a lovely memento for the students to have as a remembrance of 2006.
Also for the record, I am going to read the names of the Year 12 students of Katherine High School of 2006. They are Amy Barton, Nicholas Brindell, Kyle Briscoe, Jessica Canning, Briony Carson, Jared Cheetham, Sally Cook, Thea De Leon, Rachel Dixon, Amy Domaschenz, Keran Donzow, Alistair Evans, Rebecca Ferguson, Kylee Fletcher, Wayne Furness, Jarred Hawke, Tommy Jack, Rosemary Jennings, Talya Johnston, Maris Lalim, Hunter Linton, Sinead Linton, Caitlyn Lowe, Nathan Lye, Magnus Malmerin-Fejo, Rachael McLellan, Oliver Ogilvie, Tasha Paddy, Giulio Puccetti, Chelsea Ryan-South, Sinead Stubbs, Susan Symes, Shannon Trattles, Keira Wardley, Lisa Wilton and Thomas Wuttke. Well done to you all.
The assembly listened to an emotional speech by one of the Year 12 students, Caitlyn Lowe, which I am sure summed up the feelings of the other students. I would like to place her speech on record. I quote:
- Good morning everyone.
I stand here now hardly feeling as though this is all over. This is a day that has been long in the making for all teachers and Year 12 students. After constant pleas and wishes made to some higher power that it would all just be over, our last day of high school has arrived and, in some ways - at least for me - I wish it hadn’t come so soon.
The prospect of the world outside of this one is daunting for all of us. Where will we go and who will we be? Retrospectively, I know that I have not appreciated this place for all its worth but as they say, ‘Hindsight is a grand thing’. The many thousands of words written, the pieces of paper screwed up in disgust, and what seems to be a million hours studying, have been responsible for many of us being so fully wrapped up in our work, and this world. Imagine a life free of study, assignments and homework. It’s hard not to feel a little lost.
I now say, realising that this will not affect everyone because until you start waking up at 2 am to get a bit more study done, that this is one year of your life where the only judge of your success is not what you get out, but what you put in.
On that note, I would like to thank all my teachers past and present who have helped me to that realisation, and also all teachers of any of my fellow Year 12 students. To my peers in Year 12, I would like to say thank you and congratulate you on the work many of you have put in this year. To next year’s Year 12s, take control of your year, try your best and no one can ever say it was not enough. Thank you for listening.
It was a delight to speak to some of the students at morning tea following the assembly and to hear what plans they have for their future. Quite a few will have to leave Katherine to further their studies to realise their dreams. Hopefully, they will return in the future to contribute to our community. I wish them all well in whatever path they choose to take, and feel confident that they will achieve the success that they desire. Whatever you do, students, enjoy it and be happy.
While talking about Katherine High School, I acknowledge the success of students who entered the Westpac Australian Mathematics Competition 2006. Twenty-nine students obtained a credit or distinction, with several of the students ranking in the top 10% in the Northern Territory. It shows that, despite the size of the school, there are students who are highly academic. Maths Senior Teacher, David Purins, was very pleased with the result and, in particular, congratulated Year 9 Maths teacher, Ms Elliot. Her Year 9s stole the show with 15 of them gaining a credit or a distinction. Mathew Kirk, Glen Humphries and Peter Bell all ranked in the highest when compared with their peers across the Territory.
While the Year 9s had the highest number of successful students, the top three scores for the school were won by Year 8 students; Justin Heim, Alex Fraser and Tahrini Connop. Well done, Year 8s.
The students who entered the competition were: Year 8 - as I just mentioned, Justin Heim, Alex Fraser and Tahrini Connop; Year 9 - Mathew Kirk, Glen Humphries, Peter Bell, Timothy Mathas, Daniel Brummitt, Benjamin Daw, Nicholas Westra Van Holthe, Bryney Rollinson, Nicholas Hanks, Riley Vaughan, Thomas McGregor, Arryn Perner, Sarah Johnston, Melissa Harding and Edward Hannah; Year 10 - Bryan Quill, David Humphries and Robert Mackie; Year 11 - Jake Saunders, Tamarah King, Colleen Crowley, Rachael McGraw and Phillip Morrow; and Year 12 - Susan Symes, Amy Barton and Caitlyn Lowe.
While there was a reduced number of entries this year from Katherine High School, the results were an improvement over last year. The challenge is there for the students of 2007. Well done to all the staff and students at Katherine High School for a very busy and successful 2006.
Clive Fenton Primary School also took part in the mathematics competition and, while I have not got the names of the students to place on record, I congratulate Assistant Principal, Tanya Lambert, on the students’ success. As Tanya said, the competition showed that students in small town schools were able to achieve high standards and take part in a range of activities.
Another school in my electorate is Casuarina Street Primary School. It is always a delight to visit when they have assembly to watch the young students either perform or to be acknowledged for their achievements. One of the awards that is highly prized amongst students at Casuarina Street School is the Casuarina Award. Students have to work consistently over a long period of time to receive this award, so it is quite significant to receive a Casuarina Award. A Casuarina Award is presented after a student earns five Principal’s Awards. Each Principal’s Award requires a student to earn 100 Merit Awards which are given for a range of positive acts such as kindness to others, a helping hand to other students, diligently completing school work including homework on time, working well in class and, generally, being a good all round student.
Student, Hannah McGraw was recently presented with a Casuarina Award at assembly by the Mayor of Katherine, Anne Shepherd. Hannah’s win was particularly gratifying for her as her two older siblings had received this award previously - her sister, Rachael, in 2002 and her brother, Ben, in 2005. All three of the McGraw children have contributed extremely well to Casuarina Street Primary School. Hannah was very gracious in her acceptance speech, thanking all of the teachers for helping her get the award. Mum and dad, Kim and Gareth, are justifiably very proud.
I must also mention that only two of these highly prized awards have been presented during 2006. The first one was to Shannon Perkins. Congratulations, Shannon and Hannah. Keep up the wonderful spirit for which you have received these awards; it will stand you in great stead for the future.
In other news about young people in Katherine, I congratulate two students who have been selected to represent the Territory for the School Sport Australia Track and Field Exchange in Cairns. Ten-year-old Liam McGregor and 11-year-old Rebecca Robins have been selected to complete at the national competition with Liam competing in the 100 m sprint, 800 m long jump, shot put, and 4 x 100 m relay, and Rebecca competing in the 100 m sprint, 200 m sprint and the 4 x 100 m relay in their respective age and gender sections.
The two athletes were selected for the Territory team during September’s combined club and school athletics carnival at Marrara where young sports people from across the Northern Territory competed for a place in the team. Liam and Rebecca trained very hard for this competition two to three times per week, and were very enthusiastic about competing. Both athletes are trained by Rodney Gregg who has been very impressed with the dedication of Liam and Rebecca. Both athletes headed to Darwin on 20 November for a three-day training camp at Marrara before flying to Cairns on the 23rd. Unfortunately, for tonight’s adjournment I was unable to determine the results of the meet, even though my electorate secretary tried very hard today. Hopefully, I will be able to report the result from the Cairns carnival.
Mrs BRAHAM (Braitling): Mr Acting Deputy Speaker, last Saturday, 25 November, was White Ribbon Day, a day on which we all get together to talk very strongly against violence against women.
Mark Coffey, the Superintendent of Alice Springs police, put on a morning tea. I was pleased to join with him and hear some of the speakers who spoke so eloquently - all men. One, in particular, with whom I was very impressed was the legal aid lawyer, Russell Goldflam. Too often, we think that defence lawyers become desensitised to violence within our community, but that was not the message from Russell.
Tonight, I would like to share with members some of his thoughts as a defence lawyer in his stance on violence against women. Russell said that he was pleased for me to pass on his thoughts, noting that they are his own personal thoughts and not those of the organisation at which he works.
He told the story of how he saw a young woman being bashed by a man in the Todd, how he walked over to intervene and stop what was happening and how, by his personal intervention, it did, in fact, stop. As he reminded everyone, the woman could have easily been killed that morning and that she was, as a Northern Territory indigenous woman, 12 times more likely to be violently killed than other Australian women.
Visitors to Alice Springs - and we have all had these sort of conversations - tell us they are shocked by what they see. As Russell said, we must not stop being shocked by what we see. If you see violence and the results of violence and you are not shocked, you walk or drive past. I will read from Russell’s notes:
- Around this time last year there was an appalling spate of homicidal violence in Alice Springs. Unfortunately for me, I had become involved in most of these cases. A chilling feature common to almost all of these matters was the number of times a local did just that: walk or drive past. I’m not talking about one place here, but several - the norm in Alice Springs nowadays seems to be if you see someone lying in the river, or in the street, or in an abandoned house, who looks as if they might have been bashed, you just walk on by.
Don’t walk on by. Check, or, if it’s not safe or appropriate for you to check, call someone to check. That’s what the police are for. Someone’s life might be at stake.
- … many of our clients have done horrible, horrible things and most of the victims of our violent crimes are, or were, women.
There’s always interesting, often intense and sometimes tense relationship between defence lawyers and prosecutors. Nannette Rogers and I have worked ‘together’, but on opposite sides of the bar table, for nearly 10 years. The night Nanette’s interview on Lateline was broadcast, I happened to be in Tennant Creek for work with a group of commissioners from the Northern Territory Legal Aid Commission. We watched the interview together. A couple of days later the commission met formally in Alice Springs and asked me to speak on its behalf in support of Nanette’s intervention. I was happy to do so.
- A few weeks later I wrote an article as a contribution to the debate which ensued, in which I said this:
- All of us who work in the Territory’s criminal courts are confronted daily by the appalling violence Nanette Rogers detailed. There was nothing new to us about her ‘revelations’, but it was refreshing and salutary to be reminded so publicly, and so pungently, that we should all, indeed, be appalled by the behaviour of so many of our own clients. Amongst us defence lawyers there is something of an unspoken code, almost a reflex, that, as people who defend offenders, we should be defensively reactive when others criticise them, or their conduct.
It is as though we are letting the side down if we dare to think (let alone speak) ill of what they’ve done. This attitude is not only unattractive, it is also counterproductive. Unless we challenge the environment and the cycle of violence which prevails in the communities in which so many of our violent clients live, we are implicitly supporting the maintenance of that environment and that cycle. Our clients will continue to offend and re-offend, which doesn’t help them, not to mention their victims (male and female), their families, or the community as a whole. It doesn’t help their lawyers either.
How can we positively address these issues without compromising our duties and our commitments to our clients? In the area of child sexual abuse, for example, should we challenge the culture of silence, or champion the right to silence? When we are instructed to set a matter for hearing merely on the basis that our client expects the victim will not turn up or come up to proof, are we working within the system or entrenching system abuse?
These dilemmas are by no means simple, but neither are they insoluble. As a profession, we should actively encourage child protection, victim support and crime prevention programs, while on a case-by-case basis we should vigorously advocate to ensure that our clients are accorded the full protection of the law when being investigated, prosecuted and tried.
- The commission has drawn attention to the link between violence and alcohol abuse, and called for effective measures to reduce the availability of supply of alcohol in Alice Springs. I am delighted to hear that, following the introduction of these measures a few weeks ago, there already appears to have been a significant reduction in violent crime. In addition, the commission has recently expressed serious concern about the increase in Northern Territory imprisonment rates, and called for more rehabilitation programs, particularly for short-term prisoners. We ran forums last month in Alice Springs and Darwin to promote the development of an integrated response to domestic violence - as a participant in the Alice Springs forum, I am convinced that we need a domestic violence crisis intervention service to support victims, and then to stick with them through the legal stuff, but also the broader health, accommodation, employment and welfare stuff.
We have also engaged in the current review of the Domestic Violence Act, participating in consultations, and drafting submissions. We don’t all agree on the detail, but we all agree on the goal – to reduce domestic violence.
I urge the government to think seriously about how we can bring in measures to address the number of people within our gaols at the moment, and those who are in our gaols who could be in another place of rehabilitation. I would like the government to look at what is happening now. I do not believe there are enough programs offered to prisoners. I do not believe the courts’ sentence people to go through some of these programs. Perhaps they do not do that because they are not available.
However, the one message that came through on that Saturday when we all got together was that there is too much violence against women in our communities - too much violence for Aboriginal women, in particular. Too many times we look away. Too many times we walk away because we do not quite know how to handle it. Then, we get the dilemma of the defenders of the offenders - and we have to appreciate the dilemma that people like Russell Goldflam must find themselves in. However, his professional attitude in all he does means that he brings justice for his clients and, hopefully, we all see that the victims can get some sort of justice by having that offender rehabilitated in such a way that it never occurs again.
I know there are many of us who attended White Ribbon Days throughout the Territory. I just hope you made a commitment there and then, as parliamentarians, to see what you could do to improve the situation within our communities. Go to an Emergency Department in any hospital and see for yourself what the nurses in our hospitals see. Go and see what the police see and what they have to handle. It is not something we can hold our heads up high about. Sure, the Territory is a wonderful place, but this is the dark side of the Territory. This is the side we do not want to admit is there; that we do not really know how to improve it.
Tomorrow I will be introducing my amendment to the Bail Act. It is about presumption of bail being removed for serious sexual assault. We have to start somewhere. We have to start doing things that tell our community that we are as concerned as some of the lawyers who have to deal with these cases. We need to think seriously about what is the best way to manage these things but, most of all in all that we do, we need to remember the victims who, often themselves, do not have a voice, and who often live for the rest of their life with the injustice that has been done to them. I can tell many sad stories and I will bring a few of them to the parliament’s attention tomorrow when I introduce this amendment.
Mr Acting Deputy Speaker, I thank Mark Coffey for bringing us all together for White Ribbon Day. I thank Russell Goldflam for sharing his words with me. I was a bit surprised at his honesty and integrity; it was refreshing. However, there was something special about him standing up, as a legal aid lawyer who defends the offenders so often, talking about things we should do to lessen the violence against women.
Ms McCARTHY (Arnhem): Mr Acting Deputy Speaker, we are nearing the end of the year, and I take this opportunity in my adjournment tonight to thank those people who have played a major part in assisting me in my duties as a member.
There are 16 communities in the Arnhem electorate, and each time I visit there are many people who make those visits very warm and welcoming ones. Along with many individuals and their families across the electorate, I thank the teachers, the councils, the health professionals, police, the rangers, and the many outstation resource centre staff for their support this year. With over 130 000 km to cover, I am deeply grateful for the care and concern of all these people in the communities. Yes, while I am there to do a job, it is often the unwritten, unscripted part of the job description that warms the heart; that is, the cheery welcome from individuals in the communities on each visit. These people include: John Morgan and Jennifer Baker at Millingimbi; Bula Bula Arts mob; Belinda and Louise at Ramingining, and Coralyn Armstrong and the school staff at Ramingining; Pauline and Morris Higgins, Graham Phelps and Jennifer Fry, Nancy Lalara and Grant Burgoyne, and Greg Arnott at Groote Eylandt; the Anindilyakwa Land Council staff, especially the ALC Board, thank you. Special mention to Mimi Henry Nungumbajbarr and Dad Henry, Bridgett and Earnest, Moses, and Mildred Numuridirdi at Numbulwar; Doris Joe and Joyce Dirdi, Noughie Ruth Friday and Kuku Solomon Daniels and Eddie Chisholm at Ngukurr; Arnold Von Senden and Cherryl Lardy at Jilkminggan; the Charlie and Riley families at Minyerri; the Lee and Ashley families at Barunga and Wugularr; and the Murray and Miller families at Bulman.
These people are just a few who assist me in every way possible on my journey through Arnhem Land.
In the Assembly this time last year, I spoke of the Wugularr community’s requests for a new school building. That call has been heard by our government and tenders are now under way for a new $2.5m school to be build in the new year. This will add to the new $1m school built down the road at Manyallaluk and opened this year by our new Education minister, Paul Henderson.
Then there are the silent soldiers, the ones who work behind the scenes in assisting MLAs in their duties and in prominent roles in the Northern Territory parliament. It is at this point I would like to acknowledge the Clerk of the Assembly, Ian McNeill, and Deputy Clerk, David Horton. There are a few others I would like to name, in particular, Steven Stokes and Annette Brown for the numerous amounts of paper that fly back and forwards on our desk and, most importantly, the bottomless glasses of water. Also to Graham Gadd, Jan Sporn, Brian Cook, Joanne Carbone, Vicki Long, and Anna Marie Socci.
To Helen Allmich and the Hansard staff - where would any parliament or politician be without you guys, without Hansard? Thank you for your perseverance in correct spelling, not only of names of people and places in English, but also those in Aboriginal languages. I know some of my speeches and pronunciations have been an interesting challenge for you. Thank you for trying to always get them right.
To Tony Hibberd for your dedication to safety in the building and for checking our offices - you and I know what that means, Tony. To Jan Bradley, thank you for the assistance and the changing and servicing of the electorate vehicles. Sincere wishes to you, Madam Speaker, especially in light of your personal challenges this year. You are an inspiration to all women. May your Christmas break be even more special. Those dinners are just fantastic. I look forward to them continuing. A special thank you to your staff, Chris Grace and Kent Rowe.
In our Parliamentary Library a very big thank you to Trudi Maly. Thanks to parliamentary photographer, Todd Sinclair, for your support this year, especially with photos for functions and school visits.
Special mention to the Parliamentary Protocol Team. Our evening celebrations for the cast and visitors of the film Ten Canoes here in the Hall of Parliament was a huge success. The film was made at Ramingining with Yolngu actors and continues to be an award winning hit across the world. The next stop is the Oscars in February.
As a recently elected Chair to the Legal and Constitutional Affairs Committee and the Statehood Steering Committee, I acknowledge my co-chair, Sue Bradley. Sue, thank you for your patience and support in my settling-in process as Chair. Next year is going to be a great year for our committee members, and I am looking forward to us moving together towards statehood. To the Statehood Steering Committee members, Brian Martin, Daniel Bourchier, Jamey Robertson, Jenny Medwell, Kathleen Chong Fong, Irene Nangala, Stuart Kenny, Kezia Purick, Maurie Ryan Japarta, Pete Davies, Margaret Vigants, Loraine Braham MLA, Terry Mills MLA, Wayne Connop, Ray Wooldridge and legal advisor, Graham Nicholson, thank you for your support in my newly-elected role as Chair of the Statehood Steering Committee. It will be a wonderful year ahead. I am delighted to be working with each and every one of you. I certainly got an insight to the challenges that are ahead of us, especially with the recent inquiry in the Territory into statehood by the House of Representatives.
I would like to pay tribute to the staff of the office of the chairman. Executive Officer, Michael Tatham, thank you for your enthusiasm and dedication to the process of statehood and for your insight in the matters of legal and historical significance that often seem so complicated until you explain, Michael, quite clearly and ever so simply. Thank you. To Nora Kempster and Sharon McAlear, thank you for your daily commitment to the statehood process. Thank you for your patience, especially during the uncertain times of funding decisions. Ladies, now it is full steam ahead.
To the parliamentary committee teams, Terry Hanley and Pat Hancock, thank you. Pat, your knowledge and advice on parliamentary process is greatly valued, especially now in my role as Chair. To Robyn Smith, special commendations to you, Robyn, for the research work conducted during my time in the Sport and Youth Committee. To Brian Lloyd, thank you. I appreciated your efforts on research regarding examples from overseas on indigenous land ownership, and just recently with statehood. I look forward to working with you next year.
The silent soldiers also include our government staff on the fifth floor and across the Northern Territory. Thank you to each of you for your support this year in my many queries and requests and, often, concerns regarding my constituents of Arnhem. Your professionalism at all times has been very much respected and appreciated.
I pay public tribute and extend my gratitude to my electorate officer, Phillip Powling. Phil, you are absolutely invaluable. Thank you for the consistent committed and professional way you support me in my role as the member for Arnhem. I wish you and your family, Melanie, Naida, David, Kane and Craig a wonderful Christmas break and look forward to the challenges of 2007.
To my mother, Maisie Charlie, and my sister, Selina, and the children, thank you for your efforts in newsletters, office support and accompanying me where necessary. You are always there to support me, and for that I thank you. My husband, Norm, sons, CJ and Grayson, thank you for the tireless support only family can give their loved ones at all times - support that no words can describe adequately. I know our Christmas break will be a very special one.
Sincere wishes to each one of my parliamentary colleagues on the opposite side of the House, and your families, over the Christmas break. To my caucus colleagues, it has been an amazing year in more ways than one. Thank you for the struggles we have shared and will continue to do so in our most privileged position of representing the people of the Northern Territory. I wish each and every one of you a safe and very happy Christmas.
Mr HAMPTON (Stuart): Mr Acting Deputy Speaker, I am pleased and relieved to have survived my first few sessions of parliament and the sittings. I, like the member for Arnhem, would like to thank the Department of the Legislative Assembly staff for their support and advice in my first couple of months of being a member of parliament. I am looking forward to sittings next year, particularly with sittings being held in Alice Springs in April. I am sure it is going to be an exciting year for me and the community of Alice Springs.
As this is the last sittings of the year and we are all moving into the Christmas spirit, I would like to acknowledge some people in my electorate of Stuart. First, I recognise and congratulate a local lady in Alice Springs – actually, a lady who lives at the town camp of White Gate. Magdaline Johnson is a lady who has achieved something none of us could dream of achieving; that is, reach the age of 101 years. The story that was in the Centralian Advocate last week was truly amazing. It is equally amazing, given the fact that the average lifespan of an indigenous people is 20 years below other Australians. Magdaline’s memory of the old days, so clearly told in the Centralian Advocate story, is remarkable. I look forward to visiting Magdaline after the sittings and listening to her stories firsthand.
There are number of people who are leaving the electorate of Stuart and I would like to acknowledge the work and contributions they have made during the year. I say goodbye to Scott McConnell who has recently left the Ingkerreke Outstation Resource Centre for Newhaven Station. Scott is one of those blokes who puts everything into his work and gives nothing less than 110%. To Scott and his wife, Cathy, I thank them for the work they have done for the Ingkerreke Outstation Resource Centre, and wish them a very safe Christmas and all the best for the future. Added to that, I would like to thank all the staff of Ingkerreke and the communities in the Ingkerreke region for their support and advice to me over the past few months.
Viv and Cathy, the store managers at Ampilatwatja community, are heading off to Queensland. I wish them all the best and a safe and merry Christmas. Viv and Cathy both had big shoes to fill when they first took over managing the store at Ampilatawatja, and I have no problems in saying that they have done a very good job. Ampilatwatja Store is a previous winner of the Tidy Towns Award for the Best Store, and you only have to walk inside to see why.
I also acknowledge a lady who has recently left Alice Springs, Rose Connelly, who I met through the local Alice Springs Branch of the Labor Party some five years ago. I am sure Rose’s decision to leave after 17 years in Alice Springs was a hard one. I thank her for her contributions, both to the party and the advice she has given me personally during my time as a member. I understand that she is moving to Theodore in Queensland, and I am sure that the local branch of the Alice Springs Labor Party will miss her.
To my acting electorate officer, Judy Buckley, who has filled in at a very busy time and done a fantastic job, I would like to say thanks to her especially. I imagine that most electorate officers, especially those bush members and their offices, can agree that things do get very busy from time to time. Judy, in her own unique way, deals with the multitude of issues that come through the office from day to day. Having to juggle these responsibilities along with her family obligation has been testing for Judy and, once again, I thank her for her dedication during this time. To Judy and her husband, Graham, and her family, I wish a very safe and merry Christmas.
I also send my best wishes to a couple of other ladies in Alice Springs and their families who are currently having some hard times and are in hospital. Barbara Ross and Barbara Campbell are two ladies I have known for a long time, along with their families, and I wish them and their families well in the coming months.
This year, we celebrated the 40th anniversary of the Wave Hill walk-off that paved the way for the rights of indigenous people to be recognised on a national scene. The walk-off event 40 years ago also resulted in the formation of the Aboriginal Land Rights (Northern Territory) Act and indigenous rights as well on the national scene. Sadly, this year, we have lost two important members of this movement from the communities of Daguragu and Kalkarindji. I recognise these people by placing their names on the public record and showing respect to their families. Earlier this year, Mr V Vincent passed away suddenly and, unfortunately, before the 40th anniversary and festival. I would like to pass on my sympathies to his families and the community of Daguragu for this loss. Old Man, Mr M Rangiari was a truly remarkable Territorian and someone who has passed away recently. I am sure many of us would agree that this old man has taken with him a big part of Australian history.
It is very concerning as well, given that we are celebrating the 40th anniversary of this significant event, that we see the Australian government attacking the rights of indigenous people in a way that we have never seen before. I believe the attitude and direction that we are seeing the Australian government tackling of indigenous affairs is absolutely disgraceful. I urge every member of this parliament to stand up and fight against what they are doing.
As we move closer to 2007, I look forward to Alice Springs continuing to develop as we have seen this year. As I said earlier in my statement supporting the Chief Minister, we are seeing positive signs with the new alcohol restrictions that were introduced into Alice Springs in October. I am sure, if you get the chance and you drive around Alice Springs today, you will see many construction projects under way. We have the Yipirinya redevelopment project; Imparja Television’s new offices being built; and apartments along South Terrace.
As the Minister for Sport and Recreation spoke about today during Question Time, there has been $8.1m released for the aquatic centre to the town council, $350 000 for the shooting range in Alice Springs, and $800 000 for the new drag strip, to name just a few. In fact, I believe the minister said a total of $12.75m of funding has gone into sporting facilities in Alice Springs.
I would now like to talk about an initiative I am currently undertaking through my electorate office. I have named the initiative Local Heroes and Role Models. The aim is to identify and promote local people who are achievers, leaders and community orientated people. These heroes or role models are not the people we read about in the local papers or see on television. They are not the AFL footballers or sports stars we recognise on the national level. I would like to mention three of my inaugural local heroes tonight.
I am proud to say that Robert Charles, Sebastian Watson and Jeany Campbell are three worthy people I would like to put up as local role models and heroes. Robert Charles, from the Aboriginal community of Pmara Jutunta near Ti Tree won a national award acknowledging outstanding community leadership by a Year 12 student living in a rural and regional Australian community in October 2005. Robert attended as a border the St Phillip’s College in Alice Springs since Year 8, and was a very popular student. To his credit since leaving St Phillip’s, he has gone back to his community in Ti Tree and, with the support of the Anmatjere Council and his family, has a job and is helping his community move forward. Robert has high ambition, which is good. In fact, he has aspirations of becoming a doctor or registered nurse. I have no doubts about Robert being able to achieve this because of the strong support he has and the drive that has seen him complete Year 12 through St Phillip’s.
Sebastian Watson from the community of Yuendumu, who is a relative of mine, has recently graduated as an Aboriginal Community Police Officer. It is also pleasing to see Sebastian return to his home community of Yuendumu and work with his people. Sebastian also was, and is still currently, an active worker in the Mt Theo program to assist young people affected by substance abuse.
Jeany Campbell from the community of Ti Tree was nominated in the first Indigenous Health Worker Awards in the Northern Territory recently. I have known Jeany for some time and, during this time, she has always put to me her aspirations of becoming a home buyer in Ti Tree. I wish Jeany and her sister, April, the best of wishes for Christmas and I look forward to working with them again next year as well.
To my colleagues, both in caucus and the other members of Parliament House, I wish them and their families a safe and merry Christmas as well. I look forward to working with them next year.
Finally, I thank my family for all their support this year. It has been a big year for my family with many challenges that we have had to face together. I thank them for their support and I am sure that next year will be a good year for me and my family. Their continued support is something that I look forward to.
Mr BURKE (Brennan): Mr Acting Deputy Speaker, tonight I provide a report on a conference I recently attended, the fifth Canadian Parliamentary Seminar for New Members of Parliament, held in Ottawa, Canada, from 22 to 28 October. Canada is a beautiful country and the people are extremely friendly.
The theme of the seminar was Strengthening Democracy and the Role of Parliamentarian: Challenges and Solutions. I enjoyed the seminar program greatly. I thank at the outset Carol Chafe, Kathleen Gallahue, Lynne Frappier, Danielle Gougeon, and Kelly-Ann Benoit. It is solely due to these ladies that no one was lost or eaten by giant Canadian beavers. They also provided delegates with explanations of Canadian politics and current issues. Thank you, ladies, for looking after the member for Port Darwin and me, and making us feel extremely welcome. Ms Frappier was preparing for a marathon while we were there, so I wish her all the best with that.
I thank Mr Russ Hiebert MP, Chair of the Canadian Branch of the Commonwealth Parliamentarian Association, Hon Noel Kinsella, Speaker of the Senate, and Hon Peter Milliken, Speaker of the House of Commons, for their hospitality while we were there.
The delegates at the seminar were very appreciative of the number of senators and members of parliament who gave their time to attend the seminars and contribute. I add my thanks to them. I have with me biographies of presenters. I seek leave to table the biographies of presenters and the names of the senators and members of parliament.
Leave granted.
Mr BURKE: I also thank my fellow seminar delegates for sharing their experience with me. Delegates came from as far away as Malaysia, India, Malta and Malawi, and as near as the Canadian provinces of Manitoba and New Brunswick. Sessions of the seminar included topics such as the Commonwealth and the Role of the Commonwealth Parliamentarians Association, the Canadian Political Scene, Political Recruiting, and Women in the Political Process.
I was not aware until my election that the CPA even existed, let alone its role. The association provides a valuable resource for parliamentarians as well as opportunities for those of us elected to, or who otherwise hold, parliamentary office in the various Commonwealth parliaments, to share ideas on the working of parliaments that share the many traditions we do.
I found it interesting that attracting women into politics in Canada is as difficult as here in Australia. I can inform the Assembly that the member for Port Darwin and I took great pleasure informing all and sundry that our parliament sports a female Chief Minister, Leader of the Opposition, and Speaker. It was equally satisfying but, perhaps even more important, to be able to say that 10 out of 25 members of our Assembly are women.
The session on how an MPs office works included presentations by Madame Nicole Demers, MP, and Ms Nancy Karetak-Lindell, MP. Madam Demers’ electorate - or Riding as the Canadians call it - is urban, whereas Ms Karetak-Lindell represents Nunavut, the newly-created Canadian territory that represents one-fifth of Canada’s land mass. I believe Ms Karetak-Lindell may just pip our own Warren Snowdon for geographic area represented, even when the Territory was one federal seat. However, just like our federal representatives, Ms Karetak-Lindell racks up the kilometres in flights. She said she once had a journalist chasing her about her massive Riding travel expenditure, but the story seemed to die a quick death after she discovered why she had to cover such distances by air.
There was a session on parliamentary committees. What became immediately apparent was that there is not one single answer to how committees ought to run. As we all know, committees play an important role in parliamentary business and our role as parliamentarians.
We had a session on the role of party caucuses in our parliaments. Canadian political parties allow a slightly greater degree of freedom to their members to cross the floor than our tradition in Australia or the United Kingdom. I would not say that that freedom is much more, but it appeared to me a bit more relaxed. I do not think this is necessarily better or worse, just different. Certainly, the political parties of Canada have a well organised system of Whips. I noted India also seems to have a culture of strict party voting.
I have the program of the seminar with me and invite honourable members to contact me for a copy if they wish one.
Before our return, the member for Port Darwin and I took the opportunity to visit the Legislative Assembly of British Columbia. The assembly is based in Victoria. I thank our Clerk for organising this visit for us. I also thank the Clerk of British Columbia’s Legislative Assembly, Mr George MacMinn QC, and his staff for their hospitality.
During our stay in Ottawa, we were invited to visit Australia’s High Commissioner to Canada. He made an interesting suggestion: that the Northern Territory send a delegation to Alberta, the Northwest Territory and Nunavut. Alberta’s economy is surging ahead as a result of, primarily, increased mining. This has led to an extreme labour shortage in Alberta. However, all of Canada is experiencing a labour shortage, such that every fourth shop seemed to have a ‘help wanted’ sign up. The suggestion of the High Commissioner is worth considering, and I add my own suggestion that any such trip, should it be planned, be made during the Canadian summer. Those members from the Centre might be able to handle minus-40C, but those of us from the Top End, I suspect, will struggle. I thank the High Commissioner and his wife for their hospitality in entertaining the member for Port Darwin and me.
Last, but by no means least, I wish to thank Mrs Norma Lapointe. I met Norma and her work colleague, Brenda, in the flight lounge at Vancouver Airport. Our connection to Ottawa was delayed and there was nothing to do but wait - and who waits in silence? This chance meeting led to Norma showing the member for Port Darwin and me so much in and around Ottawa and taking us to Montreal. Such was her generosity and hospitality, I thought she must have been a Territorian.
One of the things I was keen to do while in Canada was to see an ice hockey game. Because of Norma, we got to see the Montreal Canadiens play the Toronto Maple Leaves. In fact, I have the ticket with me here tonight. There is absolutely no way, though, that I am seeking leave to table the ticket; it will take a place in my scrapbook amongst my memorabilia. As Norma explained, there is no bigger rivalry in the ice hockey league than the Canadiens and the Maple Leaves. The stadium was packed and we only got the tickets due to another accident of chance and a fair degree of negotiation.
Norma lives a little way out from Ottawa. She and her husband own some 50 acres of which they lease 49 or so to a wheat farmer. We stopped in at Norma’s place on the drive from Ottawa to Montreal and I was bowled over by the fact that the wheat field started literally on her backdoor step. What a sight!
Honourable members, I understand that this is a report on the seminar rather than a travelogue, but think of Norma as a cultural guide. She introduced us to such Canadian institutions as the beaver tail, a Canadian culinary delicacy coated in your choice of toppings such as maple butter. You can look it up on the web if you are interested. Norma also has a very distinctive way of dealing with police officers. Suffice to say I have studied it, but not, as yet, put it into practice.
Honourable members, if you get the chance to go to Ottawa do travel across to the Gatineau side. It is beautiful. It includes one of Canada’s biggest casinos. I am not personally much of a gambler, probably because I am absolutely no good at it; however, it was eye opening to wander about the casino, which I guess was about five or six times the size of SKYCITY here in Darwin. It appeared, being on the French side, that French was the first language, although Canada is a marvellous advert for bilingualism.
Norma, thank you very much for everything you did for us and enabled us to see. One thing is for sure: I will be having the warmer Christmas.
Ms SACILOTTO (Port Darwin): Mr Acting Deputy Speaker, this evening I speak of the importance of caring for people in our community. We all lead busy lives and tend to get caught up in what is happening in our own space.
There are people out there who give of themselves and their time to ensure that others can still be a part of the community and enjoy themselves. Kerrie Read and Carmel McGregor from Alzheimer’s Australia Northern Territory are such people. The Port Darwin electorate office has been hosting the Alzheimer’s Home Club this year, and Kerrie and Carmel are two individuals who organise the social events for people who suffer from Alzheimer’s. The original concept of Home Club was developed by Alzheimer’s Australia Western Australia in 1997. They promoted very small meeting groups in the support worker’s home. In 2002, Home Club was commenced in Darwin.
The program has developed significantly over the last four years, with a change of focus. Alzheimer’s Australia Northern Territory felt that many of their clients were becoming socially isolated due to not leaving their home often and, when they did, it was generally not without their carer or family member, therefore, they became out of touch with their community.
Currently, there are three Alzheimer’s Home Clubs in Darwin, which are providing up to five hours of respite for people with dementia each week. What this means is that clients can enjoy socialising in various community venues or at the day respite worker’s home. Other outings are also offered, such as visits to local scenic spots, barbecues, drives, picnics, local events and festivals in and around Darwin. Also, guest speakers are introduced to the groups on a range of informative topics. The cost of this activity is a reasonable $10.50 and includes pick-up and drop-off service, morning tea and lunch. Home Clubs operate Monday and Thursday in the Darwin area, and on Tuesday in the rural areas. If people are interested to know more about Home Club, Kerrie or Sue can be contacted on 1800 100 500.
Alzheimer’s Australia NT is very aware that people who have loved ones who are affected by dementia also need support and care. That is why they have a carers’ support group that meets monthly at their headquarters at Unit 3, 18 Bauhinia Street, Nightcliff. These meetings are held on the third Thursday of each month from 10 am to 12 noon. Alzheimer’s Australia NT provides support, counselling, information and education to help people living with dementia. If families are seeking assistance in caring for a loved one, there is a whole range of information that is available by simply contacting them. It is a worthy organisation assisting people from all sections of the community. I heartily congratulate Alzheimer’s NT, and the Port Darwin electorate office will continue our support.
The Northern Territory education event, The Beat also benefits from community-minded people, organisations and businesses who, year after year, give their time and expertise to work and support our young talented students. This year, The Beat celebrated its 27-year anniversary, and would not be possible without the involvement of these special individuals. I thank Dr Michael Myers, who is the chairman, and all of his dedicated team for making this year’s The Beat very entertaining and special. All of these community-minded people continually give their time and expertise to ensure The Beat tradition of excellence is attained every year. It is a perfect way for our students to display their talents in music, dance and other areas of performing arts.
I would like to mention and thank the many organisations, schools and sponsors that have contributed so very willingly of their time and money, a generous display of cooperation across all levels. I congratulate Trudy Proctor and the Larrakeyah school students, as well as Raz Dejongh and Stuart Park students for their hard work and beautiful voices in the choir. Congratulations to students from Darwin High and Julia Quinn for their participation and dedication to the dance sequences. Also, a special thank you to Inge Clements, a Port Darwin constituent, for the magnificent costumes she and Shirley Knight provided to the performers.
News from the schools in Port Darwin is that St Mary’s Build-up Ball was a roaring success, with $115 000 raised, all in one night. I was, again, a very watchful spotter for the auction, and enjoyed the night with good company. The very successful function could not have been possible without caring and giving people in the community again wanting to ensure a secure future for St Mary’s school. Congratulations to Laura Kenyon Slaney and the ball committee, Rachael Shanahan, Lynda Valentine, Karen McLean, Alicia Tollner, Liz Kelly, Tracey Grist, Sue Leeder, Sue McLean, Anne Hurley and Cathy Blockey - a really great event, once again.
At a whole school assembly of Larrakeyah Primary School on 15 September 2006, I had a very special task with principal, Graham Chadwick. It was to present Sophie Philip with the International Competitions and Assessments Medal (ICAS). Sophie was a successful candidate from the Northern Territory/South Australia division. This competition is organised by the University of New South Wales and is a great achievement for Sophie and her family. Her parents, Neil and Sue Philip, can be very proud. Well done, Sophie.
It is amazing to think we are only four weeks away from Christmas. I take this opportunity today to thank a number of people and organisations I have had the privilege of working with over this past year as the member for Port Darwin. This is part one, as there are so many wonderful people in my electorate it is difficult to speak without forgetting someone very important. I will try my best.
I thank the Clerk of the Legislative Assembly, Mr Ian McNeill, and all of the staff of the Legislative Assembly: Vicki Long; Mary-Anne Almond; Cherie Thorpe; Annette Post; and Helen Allmich, Editor of Debates and her staff for their hard work and long hours; the same goes for Graham Gadd, Clerk Assistant and his staff in the Table Office; Jan Sporn; and Karen Turner, Administrative Officer for electorate staffing matters. I also thank the support staff of the committees: Pat Hancock, Secretary to Committees; Brian Lloyd, Research Officer; Joanne Carbone; Captain David Horton; Terry Hanley, Committee Secretary; Maria Viegas, Research Officer, and Kim Cowcher also from that office.
I wish the following school councils members a very merry Christmas and safe and happy new year for 2007: Larrakeyah School Council members, Principal Graham Chadwick, Chairperson Bertram Birk, former principal Jo Wynn, Richard Wiltshire, Juliet Cooper, Emma Liveris, Charles Staples, Julie Pudney, Steven Smith, Kathy Hamilton, Wendy Alp, Michael Calwell, Robyn Appleby, Angela Wear, Susan Proft, Susan Rae, Vicky Godden. Welcome and congratulations to Graham Chadwick as the new principal of Larrakeyah Primary. Graham comes to the position with a wealth of experience, having acted as principal at Maningrida, Nhulunbuy and Ludmilla schools. Mr Chadwick has extensive experience in music and has been involved in The Beat, and is a past member of the NT Music School. I look forward to a strong and productive working relationship with Mr Chadwick.
I wish a very merry Christmas to Darwin High School Council members, Peter Garrigan, Graeme Lewis, Marion Guppy, Esther Egger, Rob Speirs, Charlie Manolis, Thevi Chelliah, Anne White, Robyn Liddle, Tony Copland, Denise Phelps, Col Browne, Stephen Davis, Jan MacPherson, Jodi-anne Williamson, and Bernie Millevoy.
I welcome Mr Marcus Dixon as the future principal of the new Darwin Middle School. I was very happy to renew my acquaintance with Mr Dixon this month and discuss our fantastic middle school which is currently being constructed.
I extend a very merry Christmas to Stuart Park council members: principal, Bernie Bree, Ros Coggans, Paul Clark, Ian O’Rielly, Leonie Warburton, Leonie Cramer, Danielle Stafford, Carol Metcalfe, Richard Woodside, Lynne Wallis, Nea Harrison, Helen Miralles, Philomena Smith, Barbara White and Alexandra Mullins.
I also extend Christmas wishes to all of the teachers and staff of Larrakeyah Primary School, St Mary’s Primary School, Darwin High School and St John’s College.
I also say a merry Christmas to the community organisations using the Port Darwin community room: the Darwin City Action Group members, Mr Robert Parker, Gavin, Rod Godden, Judy Miller, Danny Bacon, Cliff Campbell, Helen Galton, James Groombridge, Tony Maroulis, Heather Sjoberg, Ian Spooner, David Swift and Roger Dee. Also to Pat Williams from Cradle NT and Keith Williams from Prostate Support Group. Also, to Ms Jenny Radtke and Ms Elizabeth Burns, my acting electorate officers, and Ms Sandra Wanka, my electorate officer - merry Christmas and thank you sincerely for your hard work and support throughout the year.
Also to the Stuart Park Residence Association: John and Joan Brears, Cyril and Pauline Young, Chris Bond, Steve McCallum, Beryl and Alex Warne, Jill Ferry, Liz Nicholls, Heather Sjoberg, Chris Millowick, Roger Dee, Anna Vandenberg, Jill Rechner and John Leishman.
Congratulations to the office holders re-elected at Monday night’s AGM. Thank you to the new members and a huge thank you to those who have been office holders in the past. Thank you for all your hard work during the year in the view of maintaining and improving the fantastic Stuart Park area. I wish everyone a happy and healthy Christmas and new year for 2007.
Mr KIELY (Sanderson): Mr Acting Deputy Speaker, tonight I talk about Sanderson High School Stage 2 Year 12 awards that I, the minister for Education, and the Minister for Infrastructure and Transport, the member for Karama, attended at the Bullocky Point Museum and Art Gallery tonight.
It was a fantastic awards presentation night. I have attended this ceremony for the last six years since I have had the honour of being elected to the position of the member for Sanderson. I have seen many of these students commence in Year 7 in Sanderson High and go through to their graduation ceremony. It was, indeed, a very happy time for me. It was more of a joyous and happy occasion for all the parents who were there. The auditorium was full to the brim with very proud parents and siblings and friends who cheered and clapped and had a really good time.
Quite a number of students graduated at the Stage 2 ceremony, and I will mention them. The opening ceremony was conducted by Sarah Figg and Kimberley Smith, who stood in for Raymond Jones. The principal, Ms Denise Wilkowski, gave the welcoming address. I also put on the record Ms Wilkowski’s great work at Sanderson High. She is leaving to take up a different position within Education. I am sure she will retain her links with Sanderson. At the end of the Stage 2 Awards program, all the students, parents and other teachers wished Ms Wilkowski well for her new endeavours and also thanked her for all the work she had put in over those many years at Sanderson High.
The key note address, as I said, was delivered by the Minister for Employment, Education and Training. He spoke from the heart about his time as a youth when he left school and took up an apprenticeship as a marine fitter. He spoke about the opportunities that life has to offer, how you can never be too sure what is around the corner, and of the richness of the challenges that are put in one’s pathway as one travels through life and the rewards that can be gained. He encouraged the students not to be scared of what lies ahead, but to embrace life and life-long learning. It was a very apt and a laudable speech given by the minister.
The certificates of acknowledgement were presented by Mr Greg Gibbs who is the chairperson of the school council. Mr Gibbs has been there for many years and this will probably be his last presentation. His son was in the group that graduated. I believe that will be the last one for him and he probably will be stepping down from the council next year. On behalf of the people and the community of Sanderson High, I thank Mr Gibbs for all the work that he has done for the school over those many years.
The students who were graduating at the Stage 2 presentation were Andrew Ah Kit, Lyle Ah Sam, Faye Armstrong, Roy Assan, John Baird, Shannon Bell, Jay Bound, Travis Brown, Michelle Carr, Nathan Challis, Anthony Chappell, Adam De Ausan, Nicholas de Leeuw, Chantal Delhaye, Eunice Delos Reyes, Soraya Djawas, Alfjev Ferrer, Chez Garling, Adam Gibbs, Wayne Kellner, Toni-Lee Kirby, Shannon Lay, Kali Lodge, Jason Long, Anne-Marie Lundin, Lachlan McGregor, Dale McKeller, Jennifer Miles, Marley Mitchell, Friska Mogo, Kane Mola, Nathan Nguyen, Gemma Perkins, Christopher Rice, Michael Schulz, Amina Sherif, Alyssa Weisse, Jasmine Weisse and Heath Wolter. Quite a debonair, beautiful, handsome looking bunch of students they were too. They were all in their finery and they looked the part, and it showed in their presentation.
There were number of presentations on the night and the ‘Personal Best’ Awards, which were presented by Mr John Glasby, Executive Director of Top End Schools, went to the Travis Brown, Anthony Chappell, Chantal Delhaye, Eunice Delos Reyes, Adam Gibbs, Toni-Lee Kirby, Shannon Lay, Kali Lodge, Lachlan McGregor, Dale McKeller, Jennifer Miles, Marley Mitchell and Kane Mola.
The Caltex Best All Rounder Award, which was presented by Hon Delia Lawrie who, as I said, is the member for Karama and shares the Sanderson School with me - our electorates adjoin. Families from both our electorates are the predominant population attending Sanderson. Delia was happy and proud to present that award to Dale McKeller who is a good Northlakes resident. He is a wonderful lad. I watched him grow up; I know his family.
The Principal’s Vocational Education and Training Award was presented by Ms Denise Wilkowski to Kane Mola.
The 2006 Sanderson High School Stage 2 Service Award, which is the one I have been giving all these years and which I am proud to sponsor, went to Kali Lodge. Good on you, Kali; a wonderful effort.
The School Council Award for Indigenous Student of the Year was presented by Ms Elizabeth Tak who told me that this will also be her last presentation because her son has completed his schooling. Elizabeth, thank you for all the work that you have done for the school council; you have been a great help. The award went to Adam Gibbs, the son of Mr Greg Gibbs, so that was a wonderful turn of event. Greg said at the end how very proud he was of his son, and someone from the audience made the quip: ‘So you should be, and we are all proud of our kids’. That was a wonderful achievement.
The School Council Award for the Student of the Year went to Travis Brown, and that was presented by Greg.
The NT Board of Studies Award for the Top Achiever, Indigenous Year 12 was awarded to Marley Mitchell. It was presented by Ms Margaret Banks, CEO of the Department of Employment, Education and Training.
The NT Board of Studies Top Achiever Year 12 went to Travis Brown. Well done, Travis. That was an excellent result.
When the principal was presenting the award to Kane Mola, she said she was going to tell the audience some things that Kane did not know. On Friday, she was advised that Kane Mola had been acknowledged as the best VET trainee in Australia. He was nominated by the Holiday Inn. I will say that again for the record: the best VET student in Australia. That was from the Holiday Inn. He is picking up $2000 for that award. That is another fine achievement from the youth of Sanderson.
Closing comments were made by Travis Brown, Jennifer Miles and Gemma Perkins. The pride they have in their school, the love and affection they have for their parents, the respect that they have for their teachers and their fellow students, came through in what they were saying. They each provided little pearls of wisdom for the people to think about, and did a fabulous job of winding up the night.
In wrapping up acknowledgement of the Year 12 Stage 2 Awards, it was great to see the youth of the northern suburbs presented with these awards, to see them there in their finery. As I said before in this place, there are so many people out there who are so busy and find it easy to knock our youth, but let them have closer look. Let them see what our youth are doing. I am sure they will be a little more effusive in their praise and provide a little more positive reinforcement instead of the negative comments we so often hear in the political process so that a few people get a cheap headline in the newspaper.
Well done, to all those people for the Stage 2 Awards 2006. I look forward to being there next year for the 2007 awards. The quality of the students coming through is fantastic. With those remarks, I say well done to all the teachers for the work they have done for the students of Sanderson High School.
Motion agreed to; the Assembly adjourned.
Last updated: 04 Aug 2016