Weed Management

WRITTEN QUESTIONS
9th Assembly



16/07/2004

152. Weed Management

Mr Wood to MINISTER for Lands and Planning


Hide details for QUESTIONQUESTION
1. How much did DIPE spent on weed management in 2003/04? How much will it spend in 2004/05.
2. How much money would be needed to contained the spread of the Territory’s worst 10 weeds.
3. Has any assessment been done of the money needed for overall weed containment.
4. Is there a “priority weed” eradication program. If not, why not.
5. Are approvals still being given for the introduction of new exotic pasture improvement species in the Territory, and (b) what assessments are conducted to determine the risks associated with such releases.

Hide details for ANSWERANSWER

Answered on 09/09/2004

1: How much money did DIPE spend on weed management in 2003/04? How much will it spend in 2004/05


ANSWER
1. In the 2003-04 financial year DIPE Weeds Management Branch spent $2 330 000 on weed management. In addition, approximately $5 million was spent by other divisions of DIPE on weed control on territory roads, Crown land and Territory parks and reserves.


2: How much money would be needed to contain the spread of the Territory’s worst 10 weeds?

ANSWER
2. The commencement of the Weeds Management Act in 2001 placed the responsibility of weed control onto the landowner including the Crown.

3: Has any assessment been done of the money needed for overall weed containment?

ANSWER
See above answer - The overall resource requirement for the effective overall containment of weeds is currently under review and will be considered by government later this year.

4: Is there a priority weed eradication program? If not why not?


ANSWER
Yes. The “priority weed” eradication program is being addressed through Weeds of National Significance (WONS) with the assistance of support funding from the Federal Government. Of the 20 weeds of National Significance, 13 of these weeds are found in, or can impact on the Territory. DIPE is confident that eradication programs in place for Cabomba, Parthenium, Mesquite, Prickly Acacia and Alligator weed are working and will be effective. Additionally, eradication of Athel Pine is feasible with additional resourcing. In most other cases eradication of the other priority WONS species from the Northern Territory is not a feasible objective at the current time. They are, however, being contained and the potential for further spread reduced. These weeds include Mimosa, Olive Hymenachne, Lantana, Parkinsonia, and Salvinia. National Strategic Plans, to which the Northern Territory is a signatory, exist for each WONS species. The NT Government is National Lead Agent for two of these species, being Mimosa and Athel Pine.

5: Are approvals still being given for the introduction of new exotic improved pasture species in the Territory, and


(a) if yes, by what means is approval granted; and

(b) what assessments are conducted to determine the risks associated with such releases?

ANSWER
The Department of Business, Industry and Resource Development is the lead agency for importing exotic pasture species into the Northern Territory in consultation with the North Australian Quarantine Strategy, AQIS and CSIRO. AQIS conducts a Weed Risk Assessment to approve all new plant species being allowed into the country.

Last updated: 03 Aug 2016