Supplementary Question to Written Question 82 (Leader of the Opposition to Attorney-General)
1. In respect of $1,205,501.86 paid from the Legal Services
vote, the information which was provided in the Attorney-
General's response to Written Question 82:
(a) what were the matters; and
(b) who were the private legal practitioners.
2. In respect of the amount referred to in question 1, how much was spent on:
(a) local practitioners; and
(b) interstate practitioners.
3. Of the amount referred to in question 1, how much was spent on:
(a) local counsel fees; and
(b) interstate counsel fees.
4. What are the details of the tendering process preceding a
decision to brief a specific private practitioner.
5. Will the Attorney-General table the agreements made
pursuant to which $1,205,501.86 was paid from the Legal
Services vote.
6. Does a pro forma agreement exist for the payments referred to in question 5.
7. Is a specific agreement concluded in:
(a) some cases; or
(b) all cases.
8. If the answer to question 7(a) is yes, on what basis is a specific agreement reached.
9. What policy is applied in making a decision whether to
brief a matter to private practitioners or whether to use
legal services provided by officers of the
Attorney-General's Department.
10. On what basis are matters referred to interstate legal practitioners.
11. Should a legal services agreement be made with a local
private practitioner, what terms are included in such
agreements in respect of seeking advice from interstate
practitioners.
Page 1610